Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2016656.2016664acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empirical studies of pen tilting performance in pen-based user interfaces

Published: 04 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, pen tilting has been explored in pen-based user interfaces and has shown potential to improve user interaction in various tasks (e.g., menu selection, modeless object manipulation). However, some basic questions concerning pen tilting behaviors, such as the ideal range, azimuth size, and direction of pen tilting, have not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we report our empirical studies on user performances in basic pen tilting tasks. First, we conducted a baseline study, which helps us to determine tilting directions, tilting ranges, and the thresholds that separate incidental pen tilting actions from intentional actions used for interaction. Based on the results from the baseline study, we designed an experiment to investigate user performances in goal tilting in different tilting ranges, azimuth sizes, and directions. Drawing on the results of our data analyses on task completion time, error rate, and pen tip movements, we discussed values of tilting parameters like titling range, minimal azimuth size, and tilting direction.

References

[1]
Accot, J., Zhai, S., 1997. Beyond Fitts' law: models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. Proceedings of the CHI 1997: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, pp. 295--302.
[2]
Bi, X., Moscovich, T., Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R., Hinckley, K., 2008. An Exploration of Pen Rolling for Pen-based Interaction. In Proc. UIST 2008. 191--200.
[3]
Balakrishnan, R., Baudel, T., Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G., 1997. The Rockin'Mouse: integral 3D manipulation on a plane. In Proc. CHI 1997, ACM Press, 311--318.
[4]
Balakrishnan, R., MacKenzie, I. S., 1997. Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control. In Proceedings of ACM CHI'97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 303--310.
[5]
Card, S. K., English, W. K., & Burr, B. J. 1978. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 601--613.
[6]
Fitts, P. M., 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Experiment. Psych. 47, 6 (June), 381--391. (Reprinted in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(3):262--269, 1992).
[7]
Gan, K-C., Hoffmann, E. R., 1988. Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. Ergonomics, 31, 829--839.
[8]
Grossman, T., Hinckley, K., Baudisch, P., Agrawala, M., Balakrishnan, R., 2006. Hover widgets: Using the tracking state to extend the capabilities of pen-operated devices. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press, Montréal, pp. 861--860.
[9]
Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W., 1992. The limits of expert performance using hierarchical marking menus. In Proc. CHI 1992, ACM Press(1992), 482--487.
[10]
Kurtenbach, G., Sellen, A., Buxton, W., 1993. An empirical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of "marking menus". Human Computer Interaction, 1993. 8(1): 1--23.
[11]
Mackenzie, I. S., 1992. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, 91--139.
[12]
Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R. A., Wright, C. E., 1990. Speed accuracy tradeoffs in aimed movements: Toward a theory of rapid voluntary action. In Attention and Performance XIII, M. Jeannerod, ED. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 173--226.
[13]
Partridge, K., Chatterjee, S., Want, R., 2001. TiltType: Accelerometer-supported text entry for very small devices, In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press, 201--204.
[14]
Ramos, G., Boulos, M., Balakrishnan, R., 2004. Pressure Widgets. In Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press, 487--494.
[15]
Rahman, Mahfuz, Gustafson, Sean, Irani, Pourang, Subramanian, Sriram, 2009. Tilt techniques: investigating the dexterity of wrist-based input. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2009 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009. pp. 1943--1952.
[16]
Rekimoto, J., 1996. Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. Proc. UIST '96, 167--168.
[17]
Suzuki, Y., Misue, K., Tanaka, J., 2007. Stylus Enhancement to Enrich Interaction with Computers. In Proc. HCII 2007, 133--142
[18]
Tian, F., Ao, X., Wang, H., Setlur, V., Dai G., 2007. The Tilt Cursor: Enhancing Stimulus-Response Compatibility Based on 3D Orientation Cue of Pen Devices. In Proc. CHI 2007. ACM Press (2007), 303--306.
[19]
Tian, F., Xu, L., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Setlur, V., Dai, G., 2008. Tilt Menu: Using the 3D Orientation Information of Pen Devices to Extend the Selection Capability of Pen-based User Interfaces. In Proc. CHI 2008, 1077--1086.
[20]
Wade, M. G., Newell, K. M., & Wallace, S. A. 1978. Decision time and movement time as a function of response complexity in retarded persons. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 135--144.
[21]
Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R., 2003. TiltText: Using Tilt for Text Input to Mobile Phones. In Proc. UIST 2003. ACM Press, 81--90.
[22]
Zhai S., Milgram, P., and Buxton, W., 1996. The influence of muscle groups on performance of multiple degree-offreedom input. In Proceedings of ACMCHI'96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 308--315.
[23]
Zhao, S., Agrawala, M., Hinckley, K., 2006. Zone and Polygon Menus: Using Relative Position to Increase the Breadth of Multi-Stroke Marking Menus. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1077--1086.
[24]
Zhou X., Ren, X., Hui, Y., 2008. An Empirical Comparison of Pen Pressure and Pen Tilt Input Techniques. ISPA 2008: 982--989.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
VINCI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Visual Information Communication - International Symposium
August 2011
146 pages
ISBN:9781450307864
DOI:10.1145/2016656
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • ACM SIGCHI CHINA
  • CCF: China Computer Federation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 August 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. empirical evaluation
  2. pen tilting
  3. pen-based user interface

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

VINCI '11
Sponsor:
  • CCF

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 193 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 257
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media