Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3313831.3376848acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Heatmaps, Shadows, Bubbles, Rays: Comparing Mid-Air Pen Position Visualizations in Handheld AR

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In Handheld Augmented Reality, users look at AR scenes through the smartphone held in their hand. In this setting, having a mid-air pointing device like a pen in the other hand greatly expands the interaction possibilities. For example, it lets users create 3D sketches and models while on the go. However, perceptual issues in Handheld AR make it difficult to judge the distance of a virtual object, making it hard to align a pen to it. To address this, we designed and compared different visualizations of the pen's position in its virtual environment, measuring pointing precision, task time, activation patterns, and subjective ratings of helpfulness, confidence, and comprehensibility of each visualization. While all visualizations resulted in only minor differences in precision and task time, subjective ratings of perceived helpfulness and confidence favor a 'heatmap' technique that colors the objects in the scene based on their distance to the pen.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Preview video
MP4 File
Supplemental video
SRT File
Preview video captions
ZIP File
The supplementary materials provided include the software used in our study, our study recordings, and the scripts used for evaluation. You can find detailed information on how to use the software and scripts in the file ?00Readme.txt?.
ZIP File
Video figure captions

References

[1]
Claudia Armbrüster, Marc Wolter, Torsten Kuhlen, Wilhelmus Spijkers, and Bruno Fimm. 2008. Depth Perception in Virtual Reality: Distance Estimations in Peri- and Extrapersonal Space. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 1 (2008), 9--15. 18275307.
[2]
Rahul Arora, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Tovi Grossman, George Fitzmaurice, and Karan Singh. 2018. SymbiosisSketch: Combining 2D & 3D Sketching for Designing Detailed 3D Objects in Situ. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 185, 15 pages.
[3]
Rahul Arora, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Fraser Anderson, Tovi Grossman, Karan Singh, and George Fitzmaurice. 2017. Experimental Evaluation of Sketching on Surfaces in VR. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 5643--5654.
[4]
Jeff Butterworth, Andrew Davidson, Stephen Hench, and Marc. T. Olano. 1992. 3DM: A Three Dimensional Modeler Using a Head-mounted Display. In Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (I3D '92). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 135--138.
[5]
James Carpenter and John Bithell. 2000. Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Statistics in Medicine 19, 9 (2000), 1141--1164. 19:91141::AID-SIM4793.0.CO;2-F
[6]
Zeynep Cipiloglu, Abdullah Bulbul, and Tolga Capin. 2010. A Framework for Enhancing Depth Perception in Computer Graphics. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV '10). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 141--148.
[7]
Geoff Cumming. 2014. The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychological Science 25, 1 (2014), 7--29. 24220629.
[8]
James E. Cutting. 2003. Reconceiving Perceptual Space. In Looking Into Pictures: An interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space, Heiko Hecht, Robert Schwartz, and Margaret Atherton (Eds.). MIT Press, 215--238.
[9]
James E. Cutting and Peter M. Vishton. 1995. Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth. In Perception of Space and Motion, William Epstein and Sheena Rogers (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 69--117.
[10]
Michael F. Deering. 1995. HoloSketch: A Virtual Reality Sketching/Animation Tool. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 2, 3 (Sept. 1995), 220--238.
[11]
Arindam Dey, Mark Billinghurst, Robert W. Lindeman, and J. Edward Swan. 2018. A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018), 37.
[12]
Arindam Dey, Graeme Jarvis, Christian Sandor, and Gerhard Reitmayr. 2012. Tablet versus phone: Depth perception in handheld augmented reality. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 187--196.
[13]
Arindam Dey and Christian Sandor. 2014. Lessons Learned: Evaluating Visualizations for Occluded Objects in Handheld Augmented Reality. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72, 10--11 (Oct. 2014), 704--716.
[14]
Catherine Diaz, Michael Walker, Danielle A. Szafir, and Daniel Szafir. 2017. Designing for Depth Perceptions in Augmented Reality. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 111--122.
[15]
Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Fair Statistical Communication in HCI. Springer International Publishing, 291--330.
[16]
David Drascic and Paul Milgram. 1996. Perceptual issues in augmented reality. In Proc. SPIE Vol. 2653: Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems III. 123--134.
[17]
Bradley Efron. 1987. Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82, 397 (1987), 171--185.
[18]
Stephen R. Ellis and Brian M. Menges. 1998. Localization of Virtual Objects in the Near Visual Field. Human Factors 40, 3 (1998), 415--431. 11536894.
[19]
Eg Su Goh, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar, and Ajune Wanis Ismail. 2019. 3D Object Manipulation Techniques in Handheld Mobile Augmented Reality Interface: A Review. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 40581--40601.
[20]
Leo Gomba?, Klen ?opi? Pucihar, Matja? Kljun, Paul Coulton, and Jan Grbac. 2016. 3D Virtual Tracing and Depth Perception Problem on Mobile AR. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1849--1856.
[21]
Geoffrey S. Hubona, Philip N. Wheeler, Gregory W. Shirah, and Matthew Brandt. 1999. The Relative Contributions of Stereo, Lighting, and Background Scenes in Promoting 3D Depth Visualization. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 3 (Sept. 1999), 214--242.
[22]
Ke Huo, Vinayak, and Karthik Ramani. 2017. Window-Shaping: 3D Design Ideation by Creating on, Borrowing from, and Looking at the Physical World. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 37--45.
[23]
Wolfgang Hürst and Casper van Wezel. 2013. Gesture-based interaction via finger tracking for mobile augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications 62, 1 (Jan 2013), 233--258.
[24]
J. Edward Swan II, Liisa Kuparinen, Scott Rapson, and Christian Sandor. 2017. Visually Perceived Distance Judgments: Tablet-Based Augmented Reality Versus the Real World. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 33, 7 (2017), 576--591.
[25]
IKEA. 2017. A better reality. Blog. (2017). Retrieved September 17, 2019 from http://highlights.ikea.com/2017/ikea-place/.
[26]
Transparent Statistics in Human-Computer Interaction Working Group. 2019. Transparent Statistics Guidelines. (Jun 2019). (Available at https://transparentstats.github.io/guidelines).
[27]
Bret Jackson and Daniel F. Keefe. 2016. Lift-Off: Using Reference Imagery and Freehand Sketching to Create 3D Models in VR. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 4 (April 2016), 1442--1451.
[28]
J. Adam Jones, J. Edward Swan, II, Gurjot Singh, Eric Kolstad, and Stephen R. Ellis. 2008. The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 9--14.
[29]
Volkert Jurgens, Andy Cockburn, and Mark Billinghurst. 2006. Depth Cues for Augmented Reality Stakeout. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand Chapter's International Conference on Computer-human Interaction: Design Centered HCI (CHINZ '06). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 117--124.
[30]
Ernst Kruijff, J. Edward Swan, and Steven Feiner. 2010. Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 3--12.
[31]
David Lakatos, Matthew Blackshaw, Alex Olwal, Zachary Barryte, Ken Perlin, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2014. T(Ether): Spatially-aware Handhelds, Gestures and Proprioception for Multi-user 3D Modeling and Animation. In Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 90--93.
[32]
Ingmar Lissner and Philipp Urban. 2012. Toward a Unified Color Space for Perception-Based Image Processing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21, 3 (March 2012), 1153--1168.
[33]
Mark A. Livingston, Zhuming Ai, J. Edward Swan, and Harvey S. Smallman. 2009. Indoor vs. Outdoor Depth Perception for Mobile Augmented Reality. In 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. 55--62.
[34]
Paul Milgram and Fumio Kishino. 1994. A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information Systems E77-D (1994). http://vered. rose.utoronto.ca/people/paul_dir/IEICE94/ieice.html
[35]
Annette Mossel, Benjamin Venditti, and Hannes Kaufmann. 2013. 3DTouch and HOMER-S: Intuitive Manipulation Techniques for One-handed Handheld Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual (VRIC '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 12, 10 pages.
[36]
Huaishu Peng, Jimmy Briggs, Cheng-Yao Wang, Kevin Guo, Joseph Kider, Stefanie Mueller, Patrick Baudisch, and François Guimbretière. 2018. RoMA: Interactive Fabrication with Augmented Reality and a Robotic 3D Printer. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 579, 12 pages.
[37]
Nina Rosa, Remco C. Veltkamp, Wolfgang Hürst, Tanja Nijboer, Carolien Gilbers, and Peter Werkhoven. 2019. The Supernumerary Hand Illusion in Augmented Reality. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 16, 2, Article 12 (Aug. 2019), 20 pages.
[38]
Emanuel Sachs, Andrew Roberts, and David Stoops. 1991. 3-Draw: a tool for designing 3D shapes. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 11, 6 (Nov 1991), 18--26.
[39]
Valentin Schwind, Pascal Knierim, Lewis Chuang, and Niels Henze. 2017. "Where's Pinky?": The Effects of a Reduced Number of Fingers in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 507--515.
[40]
Iris Seidinger and Jens Grubert. 2016. 3D Character Customization for Non-Professional Users in Handheld Augmented Reality. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). 129--134.
[41]
J. Edward Swan, Mark A. Livingston, Harvey S. Smallman, Dennis Brown, Yohan Baillot, Joseph L. Gabbard, and Deborah Hix. 2006. A Perceptual Matching Technique for Depth Judgments in Optical, See-Through Augmented Reality. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006). 19--26.
[42]
Jeff K. T. Tang, Tin-Young A. Duong, Yui-Wang Ng, and Hoi-Kit Luk. 2015. Learning to create 3D models via an augmented reality smartphone interface. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE). 236--241.
[43]
Takahiro Tsuda, Haruyoshi Yamamoto, Yoshinari Kameda, and Yuichi Ohta. 2005. Visualization Methods for Outdoor See-through Vision. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Augmented Tele-existence (ICAT '05). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 62--69.
[44]
Klen Copic Pucihar, Paul Coulton, and Jason Alexander. 2013. Evaluating Dual-view Perceptual Issues in Handheld Augmented Reality: Device vs. User Perspective Rendering. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '13). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 381--388.
[45]
Philipp Wacker, Oliver Nowak, Simon Voelker, and Jan Borchers. 2019. ARPen: Mid-Air Object Manipulation Techniques for a Bimanual AR System with Pen & Smartphone. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 619, 12 pages.
[46]
Philipp Wacker, Adrian Wagner, Simon Voelker, and Jan Borchers. 2018. Physical Guides: An Analysis of 3D Sketching Performance on Physical Objects in Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI '18). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 25--35.
[47]
Leonard R. Wanger, James A. Ferwerda, and Donald P. Greenberg. 1992. Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 12, 3 (May 1992), 44--58.
[48]
John P. Wann, Simon Rushton, and Mark Mon-Williams. 1995. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research 35, 19 (1995), 2731--2736.
[49]
Jason Wither and Tobias Hollerer. 2005. Pictorial depth cues for outdoor augmented reality. In Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC'05). 92--99.
[50]
Po-Chen Wu, Robert Wang, Kenrick Kin, Christopher Twigg, Shangchen Han, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Shao-Yi Chien. 2017. DodecaPen: Accurate 6DoF Tracking of a Passive Stylus. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 365--374.
[51]
Min Xin, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2008. Napkin sketch: handheld mixed reality 3D sketching. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology - VRST '08. ACM Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PhoneCanvas: 3D Sketching System Using a Depth Camera-Equipped Smartphone as a CanvasProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682078(1-12)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)AI and 6G Into the Metaverse: Fundamentals, Challenges and Future Research TrendsIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.33494655(730-778)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2023)Augmented Reality: Current and New Trends in EducationElectronics10.3390/electronics1216353112:16(3531)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Heatmaps, Shadows, Bubbles, Rays: Comparing Mid-Air Pen Position Visualizations in Handheld AR

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      10688 pages
      ISBN:9781450367080
      DOI:10.1145/3313831
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 April 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. 3D pen
      2. augmented reality
      3. depth cues
      4. depth perception
      5. interaction
      6. mid-air
      7. modeling
      8. smartphone

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '20
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI 2025
      ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)PhoneCanvas: 3D Sketching System Using a Depth Camera-Equipped Smartphone as a CanvasProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3677386.3682078(1-12)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
      • (2024)AI and 6G Into the Metaverse: Fundamentals, Challenges and Future Research TrendsIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society10.1109/OJCOMS.2024.33494655(730-778)Online publication date: 2024
      • (2023)Augmented Reality: Current and New Trends in EducationElectronics10.3390/electronics1216353112:16(3531)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2023
      • (2023)User-Aware Rendering: Merging the Strengths of Device- and User-Perspective Rendering in Handheld ARProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042787:MHCI(1-18)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
      • (2023)FMASketch: Freehand Mid-Air Sketching in ARInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.222394840:8(2142-2152)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2023
      • (2023)The realm of metaverse: A surveyComputer Animation and Virtual Worlds10.1002/cav.215034:5Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
      • (2022)Understanding and Creating Spatial Interactions with Distant Displays Enabled by Unmodified Off-The-Shelf SmartphonesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti61000946:10(94)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2022
      • (2021)Towards Augmented Reality Driven Human-City Interaction: Current Research on Mobile Headsets and Future ChallengesACM Computing Surveys10.1145/346796354:8(1-38)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2021
      • (2021)Portalware: Exploring Free-Hand AR Drawing with a Dual-Display Smartphone-Wearable ParadigmProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462098(205-219)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
      • (2020)Evaluating Menu Techniques for Handheld AR with a Smartphone & Mid-Air Pen22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services10.1145/3379503.3403548(1-10)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2020
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media