Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3386293.3397112acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PCC arena: a benchmark platform for point cloud compression algorithms

Published: 08 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Point Cloud Compression (PCC) algorithms can be roughly categorized into: (i) traditional Signal-Processing (SP) based and, more recently, (ii) Machine-Learning (ML) based. PCC algorithms are often evaluated with very different datasets, metrics, and parameters, which in turn makes the evaluation results hard to interpret. In this paper, we propose an open-source benchmark, called PCC Arena, which consists of several point cloud datasets, a suite of performance metrics, and a unified procedure. To demonstrate its practicality, we employ PCC Arena to evaluate three SP-based and one ML-based PCC algorithms. We also conduct a user study to quantify the user experience on rendered objects reconstructed from different PCC algorithms. Several interesting insights are revealed in our evaluations. For example, SP-based PCC algorithms have diverse design objectives and strike different trade-offs between coding efficiency and time complexity. Furthermore, although ML-based PCC algorithms are quite promising, they may suffer from long running time, unscalability to diverse point cloud densities, and high engineering complexity. Nonetheless, ML-based PCC algorithms are worth of more in-depth studies, and PCC Arena will play a critical role in the follow-up research for more interpretable and comparable evaluation results.

References

[1]
The Draco authors. 2020. Draco 3D Graphics Compression. https://google.github.io/draco/.
[2]
Chao Cao, Marius Preda, and Titus Zaharia. 2019. 3D Point Cloud Compression: A Survey. In Proc. of ACM International Conference on 3D Web Technology (Web3D'19). Los Angeles, CA, 1--9.
[3]
Angel X Chang, Thomas Funkhouser, Leonidas Guibas, Pat Hanrahan, Qixing Huang, Zimo Li, Silvio Savarese, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Hao Su, et al. 2015. ShapeNet: An information-rich 3D model repository. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012 (2015).
[4]
Simon Fuhrmann, Fabian Langguth, and Michael Goesele. 2014. Mve-a multi-view reconstruction environment. In Proc. of Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage (GCH'14). Darmstadt, Germany, 11--18.
[5]
Tianxin Huang and Yong Liu. 2019. 3D Point Cloud Geometry Compression on Deep Learning. In Proc. of ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'19). Nice, France, 890--898.
[6]
MPEG/N18189 2019. G-PCC codec description v2. Document. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 MPEG 3DG. Meeting held at Marrakech, MA.
[7]
MPEG/N18474 2019. Common test conditions for point cloud compression. Document. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 MPEG 3DG. Meeting held at Geneva, CH.
[8]
Panagiotis Papadakis. 2014. The CAnonically Posed 3D Objects Dataset. In Proc. of Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval (3DOR'14). Strasbourg, France, 33--36.
[9]
PointClouds.org. 2020. PCL Point Cloud Library(PCL). http://pointclouds.org/.
[10]
Maurice Quach, Giuseppe Valenzise, and Frederic Dufaux. 2019. Learning convolutional transforms for lossy point cloud geometry compression. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'19). Taipei, Taiwan, 4320--4324.
[11]
Sebastian Schwarz, Marius Preda, Vittorio Baroncini, Madhukar Budagavi, Pablo Cesar, Philip A. Chou, Robert A. Cohen, Maja Krivokuća, Sébastien Lasserre, Zhu Li, et al. 2018. Emerging MPEG standards for point cloud compression. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 9, 1 (2018), 133--148.
[12]
Dong Tian, Hideaki Ochimizu, Chen Feng, Robert Cohen, and Anthony Vetro. 2017. Geometric distortion metrics for point cloud compression. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'17). Beijing, China, 3460--3464.
[13]
Heather L Turner, Jacob van Etten, David Firth, and Ioannis Kosmidis. 2020. Modelling rankings in R: The PlackettLuce package. Springer Computational Statistics (2020), 1--31.
[14]
Cheng-Hao Wu, Chih-Fan Hsu, Ting-Chun Kuo, Carsten Griwodz, Michael Riegler, Géraldine Morin, and Cheng-Hsin Hsu. 2020. Technical Report: A Benchmark Platform of Point Cloud Compression Algorithms. Technical Report. https://github.com/nmsl-nthu/PCC_Arena.
[15]
Zhirong Wu, Shuran Song, Aditya Khosla, Fisher Yu, Linguang Zhang, Xiaoou Tang, and Jianxiong Xiao. 2015. 3D ShapeNets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'15). Boston, MA, 1912--1920.
[16]
Qian-Yi Zhou, Jaesik Park, and Vladlen Koltun. 2018. Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processing. arXiv:1801.09847 (2018).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learnable Chamfer Distance for point cloud reconstructionPattern Recognition Letters10.1016/j.patrec.2023.12.015178(43-48)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Quantitative Comparison of Point Cloud Compression Algorithms With PCC ArenaIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2022.315492725(3073-3088)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2022)Learning to Train a Point Cloud Reconstruction Network Without MatchingComputer Vision – ECCV 202210.1007/978-3-031-19769-7_11(179-194)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MMVE '20: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Workshop on Immersive Mixed and Virtual Environment Systems
June 2020
37 pages
ISBN:9781450379472
DOI:10.1145/3386293
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 June 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. 3D point cloud
  2. benchmark
  3. geometry compression

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MMSys '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

MMVE '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 5 of 10 submissions, 50%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 26 of 44 submissions, 59%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Learnable Chamfer Distance for point cloud reconstructionPattern Recognition Letters10.1016/j.patrec.2023.12.015178(43-48)Online publication date: Feb-2024
  • (2023)Quantitative Comparison of Point Cloud Compression Algorithms With PCC ArenaIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2022.315492725(3073-3088)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2022)Learning to Train a Point Cloud Reconstruction Network Without MatchingComputer Vision – ECCV 202210.1007/978-3-031-19769-7_11(179-194)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
  • (2021)AITransferProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3474085.3475624(3989-3997)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
  • (2021)Dynamic 3D point cloud streamingProceedings of the 31st ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video10.1145/3458306.3458876(98-105)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Comparative Study of 3D Point Cloud Compression Methods2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData52589.2021.9671822(5859-5861)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2021

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media