Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.5555/564124.564291acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Bottleneck equipment management: simulating test program methods in semiconductor assembly test factories

Published: 09 December 2001 Publication History

Abstract

Significant opportunities for improvement in semiconductor Assembly/Test (A/T) manufacturing reside in the Test areas. These Test areas can very often be the system constraint, due to complex testing policies, bin-to-order mapping, and cost. A very difficult problem for both researchers and manufacturers is to determine the best methods for assigning test programs for lots on these test equipment. To answer these problems, Intel has produced dynamic discrete event simulation models that consider multiple wafer types, multiple end products, multiple test program methods, and binning policies of end products according to the tested performance of the die. This model does not require modeling specific manufacturing equipment and operator activities, only detailed logic of test program and binning policies. The quantitative output data from this model provides the relative decision support necessary to determine what methods work best for Intel, given other costs and business drivers.

References

[1]
Carlyle, M., Knutson, K. and Fowler, J. 1999. Bin covering algorithms in the second stage of the lot to order matching problem. Department of Industrial Engineering, Arizona State University.
[2]
Domashke, J., Brown, S., Liebl, F. and Robinson, J. 1998. Effective implementation of cycle time reduction strategies for semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, 985-992.
[3]
Fowler, J. W., Knutson, K., and Carlyle, W. M. 2000. Comparison and Evaluation of Lot-To-Order Matching Policies for a Semiconductor Assembly and Test Facility. International Journal of Production Research, 38(8):1841-1853.
[4]
Fowler, J. W., Aguilar, R. A. and Flores, C. A. 1997. A Simulation Methodology for Evaluating the Impact of Layout on the performance of Assembly/Packaging/Test Operations. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Part C: Manufacturing.
[5]
Hilton, C., Mazenko, G., Solomon, L., Kempf, K. 1996. Assembly Floor Layout and Operation: Quantifying the differences. Proceedings IEEE 5th International Symposium Semiconductor Manufacturing.
[6]
Hopp, W. J. and Spearman, M. 1996. Factory Physics. Chicago, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.
[7]
Knutson, K., Kempf, K., Fowler, J. and Carlyle, M. 1998. Lot-to-order matching for a semiconductor assembly and test facility. Department of Industrial Engineering, Arizona State University.
[8]
Law, A. M. and W. D. Kelton. 1991. Simulation Modeling & Analysis, Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '01: Proceedings of the 33nd conference on Winter simulation
December 2001
1595 pages
ISBN:078037309X
  • Conference Chair:
  • Matt Rohrer,
  • Program Chair:
  • Deb Medeiros,
  • Publications Chair:
  • Mark Grabau

Sponsors

  • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
  • INFORMS/CS: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
  • ASA: American Statistical Association
  • ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
  • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
  • IEEE/CS: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
  • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • IEEE/SMCS: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
  • SCS: The Society for Computer Simulation International

Publisher

IEEE Computer Society

United States

Publication History

Published: 09 December 2001

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

WSC01
Sponsor:
  • IIE
  • INFORMS/CS
  • ASA
  • ACM
  • SIGSIM
  • IEEE/CS
  • NIST
  • IEEE/SMCS
  • SCS
WSC01: Winter Simulation Conference 2001
December 9 - 12, 2001
Virginia, Arlington

Acceptance Rates

WSC '01 Paper Acceptance Rate 111 of 155 submissions, 72%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 189
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media