Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1040830.1040845acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents

Published: 10 January 2005 Publication History

Abstract

Recent research shows that instructors commonly use politeness strategies to achieve affective scaffolding in educational contexts. The importance of affective factors such as self-confidence and interest that contribute to learner motivation is well recognized. In this paper, we describe the results of a Wizard-of-Oz experiment to study the effect of politeness strategies on both cognitive and motivational factors. We compare the results of two different politeness strategies, direct and polite, in assisting seventeen students in a computer-based learning task. We find that politeness can affect students' motivational state and help students learn difficult concepts. The results of the experiment provide a basis for the design of a polite pedagogical agent and its tutorial intervention strategies.

References

[1]
Aist, G., Kort, B., Reilly, R., Mostow, J., & Picard, R. (2002, June 5-7). Adding Human-Provided Emotional Scaffolding to an Automated Reading Tutor that Listens Increases Student Persistence. Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Biarritz, France, ITS 2002), Springer, Berlin 992.
[2]
André, E. Rehm, M., Minker, W., Bühner, D.: Endowing spoken language dialogue systems with emotional intelligence. In Proceedings Affective Dialogue Systems 2004. Springer, Berlin (2004).
[3]
Baylor, A.L., Ebbers, S. Evidence that Multiple Agents Facilitate Greater Learning. International Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED) Conference. Sydney (2003).
[4]
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987).
[5]
Cassell, J., Bickmore, T. Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13, 1--2 (2003) 89--132.
[6]
Cooper B. Care -- Making the affective leap: More than a concerned interest in a learner's cognitive abilities. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 1 (2003).
[7]
De Vicente, A., Pain, H. Informing the detection of the students' motivational state: An empirical study. In S.A. Cerri, G. Gouardéres, F. Paraguaçu (Eds.): Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, Berlin (2002) 933--943.
[8]
Del Soldato, T., du Boulay, B. Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6, 4 (1995) 337--378.
[9]
Dessouky, M.M., Verma, S., Bailey, D., Rickel, J.: A methodology for developing a Web-based factory simulator for manufacturing education. IEEE Transactions 33 (2001) 167--180.
[10]
Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., op den Akker, R., Vissers, M. Socially intelligent tutor agents. Social Intelligence Design Workshop (2003).
[11]
Johnson, W.L. Interaction tactics for socially intelligent pedagogical agents. Int'l Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM Press, New York (2003) 251--253.
[12]
Johnson, W. L., Kole, S., Shaw, E., and Pain, H. Socially Intelligent Learner-Agent Interaction Tactics. In Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Amsterdam, IOS Press (2003).
[13]
Johnson, W.L., Rizzo, P., Bosma W., Kole S., Ghijsen M., Welbergen H. Generating Socially Appropriate Tutorial Dialog. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Affective Dialogue Systems (ADS04). Springer, Berlin (2004).
[14]
Kort B., Reilly R., Picard R.W. An Affective Model of Interplay between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy -- Building a Learning Companion. In ICALT (2001).
[15]
Lazarus, R.S. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York (1991).
[16]
Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., Bhogal, R. S. The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In CHI '97. (1997) 359--366.
[17]
Miller C. (ed.): Etiquette for Human-Computer Work. Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium. AAAI Technical Report FS-02-02 (2002).
[18]
Porayska-Pomsta, K.: Influence of Situational Context on Language Production. Ph.D. thesis. University of Edinburgh (2004).
[19]
Porayska-Pomsta, K. and Pain, H. (2004) Providing Cognitive and Affective Scaffolding Through Teaching Strategies: Applying Linguistic Politeness to the Educational Context. In Proceedings of J.C. Lester et al. (Eds.): ITS 2004, LNCS 3220, pp. 77--86.
[20]
Qu, L., Wang, N., Johnson, W.L. Pedagogical Agents that Interact with Learners. In Proceedings of Workshop on Balanced Perception and Action in ECAs, Intel. Conference on Autonomous Agent & Multiagent Systems. New York (2004).
[21]
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996).
[22]
Sansone, C., Harackiewicz, J.M.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. Academic Press, San Diego (2000).
[23]
Shaw, E., LaBore, C., C., Y.-C., & Johnson, W.L. Animating 2D digital puppets with limited autonomy. Proceedings of the Smart Graphics Symposium, (2004) Banff, AL.
[24]
Zhou X., Conati C. Inferring User Goals from Personality and Behavior in a Causal Model of User Affect. In Proceedings of IUI 2003 (2003).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)On the role of politeness in online human–human tutoringBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1333355:1(156-180)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Twenty-five Years of Learning with Pedagogical Agents: History, Barriers, and OpportunitiesTechTrends10.1007/s11528-023-00869-367:5(851-864)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Exploring the Politeness of Instructional Strategies from Human-Human Online Tutoring DialoguesLAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3506860.3506904(282-293)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Bernice T. Glenn

The authors of this paper hypothesize that the Brown and Levinson politeness theory could be applied to human-computer tutorial interaction, similar to interaction between two humans. The paper describes an experiment based on online assistance for learning difficult concepts. The 17 subjects, all male engineering students, were subjected to a computational model of politeness in the tutorial dialog. Positive and negative politeness values were assigned beforehand to the tutor, using a natural language generator to produce speech-based utterances to the student being tutored. The authors found that their sample was too small for some conclusions, they did find that extroverted students preferred to work alone, as compared to those that scored low on extroversion. They also found that this group of subjects didn't consider the direct tutor too unfriendly. This well-designed experiment would be improved by dropping the terms "polite" versus "direct" treatment, and using the term "supportive" instead. The study suffered from the limited number of subjects, and their lack of gender and discipline diversity. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IUI '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
January 2005
344 pages
ISBN:1581138946
DOI:10.1145/1040830
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 January 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. affective interfaces
  2. agent-based paradigm
  3. pedagogical agents
  4. politeness
  5. proactive
  6. user evaluation

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

IUI05
IUI05: Tenth International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
January 10 - 13, 2005
California, San Diego, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

Upcoming Conference

IUI '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)On the role of politeness in online human–human tutoringBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1333355:1(156-180)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Twenty-five Years of Learning with Pedagogical Agents: History, Barriers, and OpportunitiesTechTrends10.1007/s11528-023-00869-367:5(851-864)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Exploring the Politeness of Instructional Strategies from Human-Human Online Tutoring DialoguesLAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3506860.3506904(282-293)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • (2018)Affect-Aware Adaptive Tutoring Based on Human–Automation Etiquette StrategiesHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society10.1177/001872081876526660:4(510-526)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2018
  • (2015)Mind your Ps and Qs! How polite instructions affect learning with multimediaComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.02551:PA(546-555)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
  • (2014)Using affective embodied agents in information literacy educationProceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries10.5555/2740769.2740836(389-398)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2014
  • (2014)Using affective embodied agents in information literacy educationIEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970195(389-398)Online publication date: Sep-2014
  • (2014)AN EXPLORATORY STUDY INTO INTERLANGUAGE PRAGMATICS OF REQUESTS: A GAME OF PERSUASIONETS Research Report Series10.1002/j.2333-8504.2009.tb02170.x2009:1Online publication date: 8-Aug-2014
  • (2012)Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robotsACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/2070719.20707251:2(1-33)Online publication date: 13-Jan-2012
  • (2012)Effects of etiquette strategy on human---robot interaction in a simulated medicine delivery taskIntelligent Service Robotics10.1007/s11370-012-0113-35:3(199-210)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media