Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240834acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Pressure marks

Published: 29 April 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Selections and actions in GUI's are often separated -- i.e. an action or command typically follows a selection. This sequence imposes a lower bound on the interaction time that is equal to or greater than the sum of its parts. In this paper, we introduce pressure marks -- pen strokes where the variations in pressure make it possible to indicate both a selection and an action simultaneously. We propose a series of design guidelines from which we develop a set of four basictypes of pressure marks. We first assess the viability of this set through an exploratory study that looks at the way users draw straight and lasso pressure marks of different sizes and orientations. We then present the results of a quantitative experiment that shows that users perform faster selection-action interactions with pressure marks than with a combination of lassos and pigtails. Based on these results, we present and discuss a number of interaction designs that incorporate pressure marks.

References

[1]
Agarawala, A. and Balakrishnan, R. (2006). Keepin' It Real: Pushing the Desktop Metaphor with Physics, Piles and the Pen. CHI, 1283--1292.
[2]
Baudisch, P., Xie, X., Wang, C. and Ma, W.-Y. (2004). Collapse-to-zoom: viewing web pages on small screen devices by interactively removing irrelevant content. UIST, 91--94.
[3]
Boothe, R.G. (2001) Perception of the Visual Environment. Springer.
[4]
Buxton, W. and Myers, B. (1986). A study in two-handed input. CHI, 321--326.
[5]
Elliott, D., Helsen, W.F. and Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's, 1899. Two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psych. Bulletin (127). 342--357.
[6]
Fitzmaurice, G., Balakrishnan, R. and Kurtenbach, G. (1999). An exploration into supporting artwork orientation in the user interface. CHI, 167--174.
[7]
Guimbretière, F., Martin, A. and Winograd, T. (2005). Benefits of merging command selection and direct manipulation. TOCHI, 12 (3). 460--476.
[8]
Hinckley, K., Baudisch, P., Ramos, G. and Guimbretiere, F. (2005). Design and analysis of delimiters for selection-action pen gesture phrases in scriboli. CHI, 451--460.
[9]
Hinckley, K., Guimbretiere, F., Agrawala, M., Apitz, G. and Chen, N. (2006). Phrasing techniques for multi-stroke selection gestures. GI, 147--154.
[10]
Jacob, R., Sibert, L., McFarlane, D. and Mullen, M. (1994). Integrality and separability of input devices. TOCHI, 1 (1). 3--26.
[11]
Kara, L.B. and Stahovich, T.F. (2004). Hierarchical parsing and recognition of hand-sketched diagrams. UIST, 13--22.
[12]
Kurtenbach, G. and Buxton, W. (1993). The limits of expert performance using hierarchical marking menus. CHI, 35--42.
[13]
Latulipe, C., Kaplan, C.S. and Clarke, C.L.A. (2005). Bimanual and unimanual image alignment: an evaluation of mousebased techniques. UIST, 123--131.
[14]
Li, Y., Hinckley, K., Guan, Z. and Landay, J.A. (2005). Experimental analysis of mode switching techniques in pen-based user interfaces. CHI, 461--470.
[15]
Mizobuchi, S. and Yasumura, M. (2004). Tapping vs. circling selections on pen-based devices: evidence for different performance-shaping factors. CHI, 607--614.
[16]
Ramos, G. and Balakrishnan, R. (2005). Zliding: fluid zooming and sliding for high precision parameter manipulation. UIST, 143--152.
[17]
Ramos, G., Boulos, M. and Balakrishnan, R. (2004). Pressure Widgets. CHI, 487--494.
[18]
Rubine, D. (1991). Specifying gestures by example. SIGGRAPH, 329--337.
[19]
Saund, E. and Lank, E. (2003). Stylus input and editing without prior selection of mode. UIST, 213--216.
[20]
Shen, C., Vernier, F.D., Forlines, C. and Ringel, M. (2004). DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. CHI, 167--174.
[21]
Srinivasan, M. and Chen, J. (1993). Human performance in controlling normal forces of contact with rigid objects. ASME, 49. 119--125.
[22]
Wu, M. and Balakrishnan, R. (2003). Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. UIST, 193--202.
[23]
Zeleznik, R., Miller, T. and Forsberg, A. (2001). Pop through mouse button interactions. UIST, 195--196.
[24]
Zhao, S. and Balakrishnan, R. (2004). Simple vs. compound mark hierarchical marking menus. UIST, 33--42.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2007
1654 pages
ISBN:9781595935939
DOI:10.1145/1240624
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 April 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. design
  2. experimentation
  3. human factors
  4. pen input
  5. pressure widgets

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

CHI07
Sponsor:
CHI07: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 28 - May 3, 2007
California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 182 of 840 submissions, 22%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Design and Evaluation of Pen Body CommandsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2375703(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Pen-Based InteractionHandbook of Human Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-319-27648-9_102-1(1-22)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2024
  • (2022)Hierarchical Pointing on Distant Displays with Smart DevicesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.210855939:19(3859-3874)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
  • (2021)HyperBrush: Exploring the Influence of Flexural Stiffness on the Performance and Preference for Bendable Stylus InterfacesHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_4(51-71)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2021
  • (2020)Glissade: Generating Balance Shifting Feedback to Facilitate Auxiliary Digital Pen InputProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376505(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • (2019)Estimating Touch Force with Barometric Pressure SensorsProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300919(1-7)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2018)FDSenseProceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3242587.3242644(809-823)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2018
  • (2017)Release, Don't Wait!Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/3132272.3134116(246-251)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2017
  • (2017)BackXPressProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025565(4654-4666)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
  • (2016)Differentiating in-Game Frustration from at-Game Frustration using Touch PressureProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/2992154.2992185(225-234)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media