Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518874acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Framing design in the third paradigm

Published: 04 April 2009 Publication History

Abstract

This paper develops vocabulary to discuss the phenomena related to the new design paradigm, which considers designing as a situated and constructive activity of meaning making rather than as problem solving. The paper studies how design projects proceed from the fuzzy early phases towards the issues of central relevance to designing. A central concept is framing, and it is elaborated with examples from two case studies. Several aspects of framing are explicated, exploratory, anticipatory and social framing, and related concepts of 'focusing', 'priming', and 'grounding' are explained. The paper concludes that understanding designing as a situated and constructive making of meaning has bearings on how designing needs to be supported.

References

[1]
Anderson, R.J. Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction 9, (1994), 151--182.
[2]
Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: A Customer-Centered Approach to Systems Designs. Morgan Kaufmann, (1998).
[3]
Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press, (1998).
[4]
Brooks, F.P. No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer 20, 4 (1987), 10--19.
[5]
Cagan, J., Vogel, C.M. Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval. FT Press, (2002).
[6]
Cooper, A. Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. SAMS, (1999).
[7]
Cooper, R.G. Product Leadership: Pathways to Profitable Innovation. Basic Books, New York, (2005).
[8]
Dorst, K., Cross, N. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22, 5 (2001), 425--427.
[9]
Forlizzi, J. Product Ecologies: Understanding the Context of Use Surrounding Products. Carnegie Mellon University, (2007).
[10]
Gasson, S. Framing design: a social process view of information system development. In Proc. ICIS '98, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA, (1998), 224--236.
[11]
Gibson, J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, USA, (1979).
[12]
Goffman, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press, USA, (1974).
[13]
Goodwin, C., Duranti, A. Rethinking context: an introduction. In Duranti, A.&Goodwin, C. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, (1992) 1--42.
[14]
Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P. The Three Paradigms of HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (in press), (2008).
[15]
Hey, J.H.G., Joyce, C.K., Beckman, S.K. Framing Innovation: negotiating shared frames during early design phases. Journal of Design Research 6, 1-2 (2007), 79--99.
[16]
Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W. Westerlund, B., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 17--24.
[17]
Johnstone, K. Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. Theatre Arts Book, (1987).
[18]
Jordan, B., Henderson, A. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39--103.
[19]
Jääskö, V., Mattelmäki, T., Ylirisku, S. The Scene of Experiences. In Proc. The Good the Bad and the Irrelevant, (2003).
[20]
Keinonen, T., Takala, R. Product Concept Design: A Review of the Conceptual Design of Products in Industry. Springer, (2006).
[21]
Kuikka, N. Asukaskeskeisiä suunnittelumenetelmiä kylien kehittämiseen. Nordia tiedonantoja 3/2004. Multiprint Oy, (2004)
[22]
Lim, Y., Stolterman, E., Tenenberg, J. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 5 (2008), 1--27.
[23]
Ljungblad, S., Holmquist, L.E. Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 737--746.
[24]
Mattelmäki, T. Design Probes. Doctoral thesis, the University of Art and Design Helsinki, (2006).
[25]
Mattelmäki, T., Vaajakallio K., Ylirisku, S. Active@work - Design dealing with social change. In Proc. Include, (2007).
[26]
Moore, J., Buur, J. Exploring how user video supports design. In Proc. Nordic Design Research Conference, (2005).
[27]
Rittel, H., Webber, M. Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In Cross, N. Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley&Sons, (1984), 135--144.
[28]
Sanders, E.B.N., Dandavate, U. Designing for Experiencing: New Tools. in Overbeeke, C. J.&Hekkert, P. (ed.), In Proc. Design and Emotion, (1999).
[29]
Schön, D.A. Problems, frames and perspectives on designing. Design Studies 5, 3 (1984), 132--136.
[30]
Schön, D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, (1987).
[31]
Schön, D.A., Rein, M. Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, (1994).
[32]
Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1996).
[33]
Sleeswijk-Visser, F., Stappers, J., van der Lugt, R., Sanders, E.B.N. Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign Journal, 1, 2 (2005), 119--149.
[34]
Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, (2003).
[35]
Valkenburg, R.C. The Reflective Practice in product design teams. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, (2000).
[36]
Wang, C., Burris, M.A. Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education&Behavior 24, 3 (1997), 369 -- 387.
[37]
Williamson, J., Brown, L.M. Flutter: Directed Random Browsing of Photo Collections with a Tangible Interface. In Proc. DIS 2008, (2008).
[38]
Yan-Chi Kwok, J. The weight of space: participatory design research for configuring habitable space for new arrival women in Hong Kong. In Proc. PDC 2004, (2004), 183--192.
[39]
Ylirisku, S., Buur, J. Designing with Video: Focusing the User-Centred Design Process. Springer, (2007).
[40]
Ylirisku, S., Vaajakallio, K. Situated Make Tools for envisioning ICTs with ageing workers. In Proc. Include, (2007).
[41]
Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 493--502.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Seeing Through Things: Exploring the Design Space of Privacy-aware Data-enabled ObjectsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/357701230:4(1-43)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2022
  • (2021)Embodied Genres, Typified Performances, and the Engineering Design ProcessWritten Communication10.1177/0741088321103150838:4(587-626)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2021
  • (2020)DESIGN RATIONALE IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN TEAMS’ PRACTICEProceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference10.1017/dsd.2020.111(1315-1324)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Framing design in the third paradigm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2009
    2426 pages
    ISBN:9781605582467
    DOI:10.1145/1518701
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 April 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design framing
    2. reflective practice
    3. user-centered design
    4. user-driven innovation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '09
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 277 of 1,130 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Seeing Through Things: Exploring the Design Space of Privacy-aware Data-enabled ObjectsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/357701230:4(1-43)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2022
    • (2021)Embodied Genres, Typified Performances, and the Engineering Design ProcessWritten Communication10.1177/0741088321103150838:4(587-626)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2021
    • (2020)DESIGN RATIONALE IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN TEAMS’ PRACTICEProceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference10.1017/dsd.2020.111(1315-1324)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2020
    • (2019)Seeking Insights into an unknown Future: Exploring Designers’ Strategies to Discover Key InsightsProceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design10.1017/dsi.2019.4071:1(3999-4008)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2019
    • (2019)Design Requirements of Tools Supporting Reflection on Design ImpactHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 201910.1007/978-3-030-29381-9_37(609-622)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2019
    • (2018)The Varieties of Good DesignAdvancements in the Philosophy of Design10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_4(51-70)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2018
    • (2017)From Exploring and Constructing to UnderstandingProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems10.1145/3064857.3079168(393-395)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2017
    • (2017)Evaluation of Prototypes and the Problem of Possible FuturesProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025658(2064-2077)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
    • (2016)Designing for Active Place Presence at HomeProceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems10.1145/2901790.2901884(1341-1352)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2016
    • (2014)PORTSProceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication10.1145/2638728.2641551(971-978)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media