Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples

Published: 01 April 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Current approaches to accessible computing share a common goal of making technology accessible to users with disabilities. Perhaps because of this goal, they may also share a tendency to centralize disability rather than ability. We present a refinement to these approaches called ability-based design that consists of focusing on ability throughout the design process in an effort to create systems that leverage the full range of human potential. Just as user-centered design shifted the focus of interactive system design from systems to users, ability-based design attempts to shift the focus of accessible design from disability to ability. Although prior approaches to accessible computing may consider users’ abilities to some extent, ability-based design makes ability its central focus. We offer seven ability-based design principles and describe the projects that inspired their formulation. We also present a research agenda for ability-based design.

References

[1]
Appert, C., Chapuis, O., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2008. Evaluation of pointing performance on screen edges. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’08). ACM Press, 119--126.
[2]
Bates, R. and Istance, H. O. 2003. Why are eye mice unpopular? A detailed comparison of head and eye controlled assistive technology pointing devices. Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 2, 3, 280--290.
[3]
Bigham, J. P. and Prince, C. M. 2007. WebAnywhere: A screen reader on-the-go. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 225--226.
[4]
Bigham, J. P., Prince, C. M., and Ladner, R. E. 2008. WebAnywhere: A screen reader on-the-go. In Proceedings of the ACM International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’08). ACM Press, 73--82.
[5]
Bigham, J. P., Chisholm, W., and Ladner, R. E. 2010. WebAnywhere: Experiences with a new delivery model for access technology. In Proceedings of the ACM International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A’10). ACM Press.
[6]
Biswas, P. and Robinson, P. 2008. Automatic evaluation of assistive interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’08). ACM Press, 247--256.
[7]
Bonner, M. N., Brudvik, J. T., Abowd, G. D., and Edwards, W. K. 2010. No-Look notes: Accessible eyesfree multi-touch text entry. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive’10). Springer-Verlag, 409--426.
[8]
Carter, S., Hurst, A., Mankoff, J., and Li, J. 2006. Dynamically adapting GUIs to diverse input devices. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 63--70.
[9]
Casali, S. P. 1992. Cursor control device performance by persons with physical disabilities: Implications for hardware and software design. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society. Human Factors Society, 311--315.
[10]
Casali, S. P. 1995. A physical skills based strategy for choosing an appropriate interface method. In ExtraOrdinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A. D. N. Edwards Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 315--341.
[11]
Chapuis, O., Blanch, R., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2007. Fitts’ law in the wild: A field study of aimed movements. LRJ Tech. rep.1480. Université de Paris Sud, Orsay, France.
[12]
Chickowski, E. 2004. It’s all about access. Alaska Airlines Mag. 28, 12, 26--31, 80--82.
[13]
Choudhury, T., Borriello, G., Consolvo, S., Haehnel, D., Harrison, B., Hemingway, B., Hightower, J., Klasnja, P., Koscher, K., LaMarca, A., Landay, J. A., Legrand, L., Lester, J., Rahimi, A., Rea, A., and Wyatt, D. 2008. The mobile sensing platform: An embedded activity recognition system. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 7, 2, 32--41.
[14]
Cook, A. M. and Hussey, S. M. 2002. Assistive Technologies. Principles and Practice. 2nd Ed. Mosby, St. Louis.
[15]
Dawe, M. 2004. Complexity, cost and customization: Uncovering barriers to adoption of assistive technology. Refereed Poster at the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’04).
[16]
Dixon, M. and Fogarty, J. A. 2010. Prefab: Implementing advanced behaviors using pixel-based reverse engineering of interface structure. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, 1525--1534.
[17]
Edwards, A. D. N. 1995. Computers and people with disabilities. In Extraordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A. D. N. Edwards Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 19--43.
[18]
Evenson, S., Rheinfrank, J., and Dubberly, H. 2010. Ability-centered design: From static to adaptive worlds. Interactions 17, 6, 75--79.
[19]
Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., and Anders, B. A. 2001. Acquisition speed with targets on the edge of the screen: An application of Fitts’ Law to commonly used web browser controls. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (HFES’01). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1205--1209.
[20]
Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., and Anders, B. A. 2002a. Using impenetrable borders in a graphical web browser: How does distance influence target selection speed? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (HFES’02). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1300--1304.
[21]
Farris, J. S., Jones, K. S., and Anders, B. A. 2002b. Using impenetrable borders in a graphical web browser: Are all angles equal? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (HFES’02). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1251--1255.
[22]
Fichten, C. S., Barile, M., Asuncion, J. V,. and Fossey, M. E. 2000. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: Recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int. J. Rehab. Resear. 23, 3, 191--199.
[23]
Findlater, L. and McGrenere, J. 2004. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, 89--96.
[24]
Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., and Dawson, J. 2009. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM Press, 1655--1664.
[25]
Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych. 47, 6, 381--391.
[26]
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. and Borning, A. 2006. Value sensitive design and information systems. In Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, D. Galletta and P. Zhang Eds., M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 348--372.
[27]
Froehlich, J., Wobbrock, J. O., and Kane, S. K. 2007. Barrier pointing: Using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 19--26.
[28]
Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. 2004. SUPPLE: Automatically generating user interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’04). ACM Press, 93--100.
[29]
Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. 2005. Preference elicitation for interface optimization. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’05). ACM Press, 173--182.
[30]
Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. 2006. Automatically generating custom user interfaces for users with physical disabilities In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 243--244.
[31]
Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. 2007. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users’ motor and vision capabilities. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’07). ACM Press, 231--240.
[32]
Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. 2008. Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 1257--1266.
[33]
Gajos, K. Z., Weld, D. S., and Wobbrock, J. O. 2010. Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with SUPPLE. Artif. Intel. 174, 12--13, 910--950.
[34]
Goette, T. 1998. Factors leading to the successful use of voice recognition technology. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS’98). ACM Press, 189--196.
[35]
Gould, J. D. and Lewis, C. 1985. Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Comm. ACM 28, 3, 300--311.
[36]
Gross, D. P. 2004. Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity. J. Occup. Rehab. 14, 3, 165--174.
[37]
Harada, S., Landay, J. A., Malkin, J., Li, X., and Bilmes, J. A. 2006. The vocal joystick: Evaluation of voice-based cursor control techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 197--204.
[38]
Harada, S., Wobbrock, J. O., and Landay, J. A. 2007. VoiceDraw: A hands-free voice-driven drawing application for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 27--34.
[39]
Harper, S. 2007. Is there design for all? Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 6, 1, 111--113.
[40]
Harris, C. M. and Wolpert, D. M. 1998. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394, 780--784.
[41]
Hazard, B. L. 2008. Separate but equal? A comparison of content on library web pages and their text versions. J. Web Librarian. 2, 2--3, 417--428.
[42]
Hinckley, K., Pierce, J., Sinclair, M., and Horvitz, E. 2000. Sensing techniques for mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’00). ACM Press, New York, 91--100.
[43]
Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., and Mankoff, J. 2007. Dynamic detection of novice vs. skilled use without a task model. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM Press, 271--280.
[44]
Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., and Trewin, S. 2008a. Automatically detecting pointing performance. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’08). ACM Press, 11--19.
[45]
Hurst, A., Mankoff, J., and Hudson, S. E. 2008b. Understanding pointing problems in real world computing environments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). ACM Press, 43--50.
[46]
Hurst, A., Hudson, S. E., and Mankoff, J. 2010. Automatically identifying targets users interact with during real world tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’10). ACM Press, 11--20.
[47]
Hwang, F., Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., and Robinson, P. 2001. Perception and haptics: Towards more accessible computers for motion-impaired users. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Perceptive User Interfaces (PUI’01). ACM Press, New York, 1--9.
[48]
Hwang, F., Keates, S., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: A submovement analysis. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’04). ACM Press, New York, 102--109.
[49]
Jipp, M., Badreddin, E., Abkai, C., and Hesser, J. 2008a. Individual ability-based system configuration: Cognitive profiling with Bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’08). IEEE Press, 3359--3364.
[50]
Jipp, M., Wagner, A., and Badreddin, E. 2008b. Individual ability-based system design of dependable human-technology interaction. In Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress (IFAC’08). Elsevier Ltd., 14779--14784.
[51]
Jipp, M., Bartolein, C., and Badreddin, E. 2009a. Predictive validity of wheelchair driving behavior for fine motor abilities: Definition of input variables for an adaptive wheelchair system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’09). IEEE Press, 39--44.
[52]
Jipp, M., Bartolein, C., Badreddin, E., Abkai, C., and Hesser, J. 2009b. Psychomotor profiling with Bayesian neworks: Prediction of user abilities based on inputs of motorized wheelchair parameters. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC’09). IEEE Press, 1680--1685.
[53]
Johnson, B. R., Farris, J. S., and Jones, K. S. 2003. Selection of web browser controls with and without impenetrable borders: Does width make a difference? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (HFES’03). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1380--1384.
[54]
Kane, S. K., Bigham, J. P., and Wobbrock, J. O. 2008a. Slide Rule: Making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’08). ACM Press, 73--80.
[55]
Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., Harniss, M., and Johnson, K. L. 2008b. TrueKeys: Identifying and correcting typing errors for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’08). ACM Press, 349--352.
[56]
Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., and Smith, I. E. 2008c. Getting off the treadmill: Evaluating walking user interfaces for mobile devices in public spaces. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’08). ACM Press, 109--118.
[57]
Keates, S., Clarkson, P. J., Harrison, L.-A., and Robinson, P. 2000. Towards a practical inclusive design approach. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’00). ACM Press, New York, 45--52.
[58]
Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., and Robinson, P. 2002. User models and user physical capability. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12, 2--3, 139--169.
[59]
Keates, S. and Clarkson, P. J. 2003. Countering design exclusion through inclusive design. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’03). ACM Press, 69--76.
[60]
Keates, S. and Clarkson, P. J. 2004. Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
[61]
Keates, S., Trewin, S., and Paradise, J. 2005. Using pointing devices: Quantifying differences across user groups. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’05). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[62]
Kelley, D. and Hartfield, B. 1996. The designer’s stance. In Bringing Design to Software, T. Winograd Ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 151--170.
[63]
Koester, H. H. 2003. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. In Proceedings of the RESNA 26th Annual Conference (RESNA’03). RESNA Press, Arlington, VA.
[64]
Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., Ashlock, G., McMillan, W. W., Moore, P., and Simpson, R. C. 2003. Compass: Software for computer skills assessment. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities (CSUN’03).
[65]
Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., and Simpson, R. C. 2005. Toward Goldilocks’ pointing device: Determining a “just right” gain sening for users with physical impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’05). ACM Press, 84--89.
[66]
Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., and Simpson, R. C. 2006. Measurement validity for Compass assessment software. In Proceedings of the RESNA 29th Annual Conference (RESNA’06). RESNA Press.
[67]
Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E. F., and Simpson, R. C. 2007a. Toward automatic adjustment of keyboard settings for people with physical impairments. Disab. Rehab. Assist. Techn. 2, 5, 261--274.
[68]
Koester, H. H., Simpson, R. C., Spaeth, D. M., and Lopresti, E. F. 2007b. Reliability and validity of Compass software for access assessment. In Proceedings of the RESNA 30th Annual Conference (RESNA’07). RESNA Press.
[69]
Kondraske, G. V. 1988a. Workplace design: An elemental resource approach to task analysis and human performance measurements. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology (ICAART’88). RESNA Press, 608--611.
[70]
Kondraske, G. V. 1988b. Rehabilitation engineering: Towards a systematic process. IEEE Engin. Medic. Bio. Mag. 7, 3, 11--15.
[71]
Kondraske, G. V. 1990a. A PC-based performance measurement laboratory system. J. Clinic. Engin. 15, 6, 467--478.
[72]
Kondraske, G. V. 1990b. Quantitative measurement and assessment of performance. In Rehabilitation Engineering, J. H. Leslie and R. V. Smith Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 101--125.
[73]
Kondraske, G. V. 1995. A working model for human system-task interfaces. In The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, J. D. Bronzino Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2157--2174.
[74]
Law, C. M., Sears, A., and Price, K. J. 2005. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’05). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
[75]
Lazar, J. 2007. Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse Users. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK, 610.
[76]
Levenshtein, V. I. 1965. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 163, 4, 845--848.
[77]
Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K. J., Sears, A., and Jacko, J. 2007. “How do people tap when walking” An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 9, 759--769.
[78]
Mace, R. L., Hardie, G. J., and Place, J. P. 1991. Accessible environments: Toward universal design. In Design Intervention: Toward a More Humane Architecture, W. E. Preiser, J. C. Vischer, and E. T. White Eds., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
[79]
MacKenzie, I. S. and Isokoski, P. 2008. Fitts’ throughput and the speed-accuracy trade-off. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM Press, 1633--1636.
[80]
Matheson, L. N. 2004. History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts. J. Occup. Rehab. 14, 3, 175--195.
[81]
Moffatt, K. and McGrenere, J. 2010. Steadied-bubbles: Combining techniques to address pen-based pointing errors for younger and older adults. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM Press, 1125--1134.
[82]
Mustonen, T., Olkkonen, M., and Hakkinen, J. 2004. Examining mobile phone text legibility while walking. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, New York, 1243--1246.
[83]
Newell, A. F. 1995. Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction. In Extraordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities, A. D. N. Edwards Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3--18.
[84]
Newell, A. F. and Gregor, P. 2000. User sensitive inclusive design-in search of a new paradigm. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’00). ACM Press, 39--44.
[85]
Persad, U., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, J. 2007. Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 6, 2, 119--135.
[86]
Potter, R. L., Weldon, L. J., and Shneiderman, B. 1988. Improving the accuracy of touch screens: An experimental evaluation of three strategies. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’88). ACM Press, 27--32.
[87]
Pransky, G. S. and Dempsey, P. G. 2004. Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations. J. Occup. Rehab. 14, 3, 217--229.
[88]
Price, K. J. and Sears, A. 2008. Performance-based functional assessment: An algorithm for measuring physical capabilities. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility.
[89]
Ringbauer, B., Peissner, M., and Gemou, M. 2007. From “design for all” towards “design for one”---A modular user interface approach. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI’07). Springer-Verlag, 517--526.
[90]
Schwesig, C., Poupyrev, I., and Morl, E. 2004. Gummi: A bendable computer. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM Press, New York, 263--270.
[91]
Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. 1991. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 34, 4, 593--613.
[92]
Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J., and Xiao, Y. 2003. When computers fade. Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’03). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1298--1302.
[93]
Sears, A., Young, M., and Feng, J. 2008. Physical disabilities and computing technologies: An analysis of impairments. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, J. A. Jacko and A. Sears Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 829--852.
[94]
Shinohara, K. and Tenenberg, J. 2007. Observing Sara: A case study of a blind person’s interactions with technology. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 171--178.
[95]
Shinohara, K. and Wobbrock, J. O. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM Press, To appear.
[96]
Shneiderman, B. 2000. Universal usability. Comm. ACM 43, 5, 84--91.
[97]
Smith, R. V. and Leslie, J. H. 1990. Rehabilitation Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
[98]
Smith, S. S. and Kondraske, G. V. 1987. Computerized system for quantitative measurement of sensorimotor aspects of human performance. Phys. Ther. 67, 12, 1860--1866.
[99]
Stary, C. 1997. The role of design and evaluation principles for user interfaces for all. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’97). Elsevier Science, New York, 477--480.
[100]
Steinfeld, E. 1994. The concept of universal design. In Proceedings of the 6th Ibero-American Conference on Accessibility.
[101]
Stephanidis, C. 2001a. User interfaces for all: Concepts, methods, and tools. Human Factors and Ergonomics Series, G. Salvendy Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 728.
[102]
Stephanidis, C. 2001b. Adaptive techniques for universal access. User model. User-Adapt. Interact. 11, 1--2, 159--179.
[103]
Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D., and Savidis, A. 1995. Design representations and development support for user interface adaptation. In Proceedings of the 1st ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All (UI4All’95). ICS-FORTH.
[104]
Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Smith, M. J., and Koubek, R. J. 1997. Towards the next generation of UIST: Developing for all users. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI’97). Elsevier Science, New York, 473--476.
[105]
Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Akoumianakis, D., Bevan, N., Brewer, J., Emiliani, P. L., Galetsas, A., Haataja, S., Iakovidis, I., Jacko, J. A., Jenkins, P., Karshmer, A. I., Korn, P., Marcus, A., Murphy, H. J., Stary, C., Vanderheiden, G., Weber, G., and Ziegler, J. 1998. Toward an information society for all: An international R&D agenda. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 10, 2, 107--134.
[106]
Story, M. F. 1998. Maximizing usability: The principles of universal design. Assist. Techn. 10, 1, 412.
[107]
Terry, M. and Mynatt, E. D. 2002. Side views: Persistent, on-demand previews for open-ended tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’02). ACM Press, 71--80.
[108]
Trewin, S. 2002. An invisible keyguard. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS’02). ACM Press, 143--149.
[109]
Trewin, S. and Pain, H. 1997. Dynamic modelling of keyboard skills: Supporting users with motor disabilities. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modeling (UM’97). Springer, 135--146.
[110]
Trewin, S. and Pain, H. 1999. Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 50, 2,109--144.
[111]
Trewin, S., Keates, S., and Moffatt, K. 2006. Developing steady clicks: A method of cursor assistance for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, 26--33.
[112]
Vanderheiden, G. 1998. Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: Alternatives or complements? Assist. Techn. 10, 1, 29--36.
[113]
Vanderheiden, G. 2000. Fundamental principles and priority~ setting for universal usability. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’00). ACM Press, 32--37.
[114]
Vogel, D. and Baudisch, P. 2007. Shift: A technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM Press, 657--666.
[115]
Walker, N. and Smelcer, J. B. 1990. A comparison of selection time from walking and bar menus. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’90). ACM Press, New York, 221--225.
[116]
Walker, N., Philbin, D. A., and Fisk, A. D. 1997. Age-related differences in movement control: Adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. J. Geront. Psych. Sci. 52B, 1, 40--52.
[117]
Wang, J. and Mankoff, J. 2003. Theoretical and architectural support for input device adaptation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU’03). ACM Press, New York, 85--92.
[118]
Wobbrock, J. O. 2003. The benefits of physical edges in gesture-making: Empirical support for an edge-based unistroke alphabet. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). ACM Press, New York, 942--943.
[119]
Wobbrock, J. O. 2006. The future of mobile device research in HCI. In CHI Workshop Proceedings: What is the Next Generation of Human-Computer Interaction? 131--134.
[120]
Wobbrock, J. O. and Gajos, K. Z. 2007. A comparison of area pointing and goal crossing for people with and without motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’07). ACM Press, 3--10.
[121]
Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2006a. From letters to words: Efficient stroke-based word completion for trackball text entry. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’06). ACM Press, New York, 2--9.
[122]
Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2006b. Trackball text entry for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06). ACM Press, New York, 479--488.
[123]
Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2006c. Analyzing the input stream for character-level errors in unconstrained text entry evaluations. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 13, 4, 458--489.
[124]
Wobbrock, J. O. and Myers, B. A. 2007. Enabling devices, empowering people: The design and evaluation of Trackball EdgeWrite. Disab. Rehab. Assist. Techn. 2, 4, 1--22.
[125]
Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Hudson, S. E. 2003a. Exploring edge-based input techniques for handheld text entry. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW’03). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 280--282.
[126]
Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., and Kembel, J. A. 2003b. EdgeWrite: A stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’03). ACM Press, New York, 61--70.
[127]
Wobbrock, J. O., Aung, H. H., Rothrock, B., and Myers, B. A. 2005. Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05). ACM Press, New York, 1869--1872.
[128]
Wobbrock, J. O., Fogarty, J., Liu, S.-Y., Kimuro, S., and Harada, S. 2009. The Angle Mouse: Target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM Press, 1401--1410.
[129]
World Health Organization. 2009. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland.
[130]
Yamabe, T. and Takahashi, K. 2007. Experiments in mobile user interface adaptation for walking users. In Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Pervasive Computing (IPC’07). IEEE Computer Society, 280--284.
[131]
Yesilada, Y., Harper, S., Chen, T., and Trewin, S. 2010. Small-device users situationally impaired by input. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 3, 427--435.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Empathy and Inclusivity in Computer Science Education: An Empirical Study on Accessibility Interventions for Undergraduate StudentsJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3665609.366561639:8(98-112)Online publication date: 17-May-2024
  • (2024)Education With PassionNavigating Computer Science Education in the 21st Century10.4018/979-8-3693-1066-3.ch007(129-148)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Interacting with Smart Virtual Assistants for Individuals with Dysarthria: A Comparative Study on Usability and User PreferencesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1404140914:4(1409)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Reviews

Molisa D. Derk

Ability-based design takes a different approach to adapting computer systems for users with less-than-ideal computer interaction abilities, whether from a recognized disability, a particular situation, or in any other context. The design concept has two primary ideas. First, the system must adapt, rather than the user. Second, the adaptation can and should be for a particular user, reflecting his or her own ability levels. The focus is on taking advantage of the abilities of the user, not the disabilities. This paper outlines design principles for ability-based design, with numerous concrete examples. A wide range of applications is discussed, including keyboarding assists, voice-directed mouse manipulation, and a creative software package that enables the blind to use touch screens on mobile devices such as iPods. I recommend this paper to anyone with an interest in this area. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 3, Issue 3
April 2011
88 pages
ISSN:1936-7228
EISSN:1936-7236
DOI:10.1145/1952383
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 April 2011
Accepted: 01 December 2010
Revised: 01 December 2010
Received: 01 June 2010
Published in TACCESS Volume 3, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Ability-based design
  2. adaptive user interfaces
  3. assistive technology
  4. computer access
  5. design for all
  6. inclusive design
  7. universal design
  8. universal usability
  9. user interfaces for all

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)762
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)67
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing Empathy and Inclusivity in Computer Science Education: An Empirical Study on Accessibility Interventions for Undergraduate StudentsJournal of Computing Sciences in Colleges10.5555/3665609.366561639:8(98-112)Online publication date: 17-May-2024
  • (2024)Education With PassionNavigating Computer Science Education in the 21st Century10.4018/979-8-3693-1066-3.ch007(129-148)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Interacting with Smart Virtual Assistants for Individuals with Dysarthria: A Comparative Study on Usability and User PreferencesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1404140914:4(1409)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Handling sensory disabilities in a smart societyJournal of Smart Cities and Society10.3233/SCS-2300193:1(3-21)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
  • (2024)The next decade in accessibility researchi-com10.1515/icom-2024-001523:2(231-237)Online publication date: 27-May-2024
  • (2024)Physically Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review of Mobile and Manipulator Robots That Physically Assist People with DisabilitiesAnnual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems10.1146/annurev-control-062823-0243527:1(123-147)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)I Don’t Want to Sound Rude, but It’s None of Their Business: Exploring Security and Privacy Concerns around Assistive Technology Use in Educational SettingsACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/367069017:2(1-30)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Light and Dark ModeProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36435398:1(1-23)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024
  • (2024)FrameKit: A Tool for Authoring Adaptive UIs Using KeyframesProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645176(660-674)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Restarting the conversation about conversational search: exploring new possibilities for multimodal and collaborative systems with people with intellectual disabilityProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638339(231-242)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media