Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1979742.1979855acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison

Published: 07 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Comparison is widely used in research projects and commercial products whose goal is to motivate energy saving at home. This research builds on fundamental theories from social psychology in an attempt to shed light on how to motivate consumers to conserve energy by providing relevant people for social comparison depending on consumer's motivation to compare. To support the research process, the mobile application EnergyWiz was developed through a theory-driven design approach. Along with other features EnergyWiz provides users with three types of social comparison - normative, one-on-one and ranking. The results of interviews with prospective users are used to derive design suggestions for relevant people for comparison (comparison subjects).

References

[1]
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C. and Rothengatter, T. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25, 3 (2005), 273--291.
[2]
Card, S. K. Theory-Driven Design Research. Plenum, 1989.
[3]
Darby, S. The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing, and direct displays. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, 2006.
[4]
DEWHA. Energy Use: In the Australian residential sector 1986 - 2020. Commonwealth of Australia, 2008.
[5]
Festinger, L. A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations 7, 2 (1954), 117--140.
[6]
Fogg, B. J. Mass Interpersonal Persuasion: An Early View of a New Phenomenon. In LNCS 5033, Springer (2008), 23--34.
[7]
Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco 2003.
[8]
Foster, D., Lawson, S., Blythe, M. and Cairns, P. Wattsup?: Motivating reductions in domestic energy consumption using social networks. In Proc. NordiCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 178--187.
[9]
Froehlich, J. Promoting Energy Efficient Behaviors in the Home through Feedback: The Role of Human-Computer Interaction. University of Washington, Seattle, 2009.
[10]
Froehlich, J. The Design of Eco-Feedback Technology. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1999--2008.
[11]
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B. and Griskevicius, V. A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35, 3 (2008), 472--482.
[12]
He, H. A., Greenberg, S. and Huang, E. M. One size does not fit all: Applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design. Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, 2009.
[13]
IPCC IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg1.htm.
[14]
Mankoff, J., Fussell, S. R., Dillahunt, T., Glaves, R., Grevet, C., Johnson, M., Matthews, D., Matthews, H. S., McGuire, R., Thompson, R., Shick, A. and Setlock, L. StepGreen.org: Increasing Energy Saving Behaviors via Social Networks. In Proc. of AAAI 2010 on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.
[15]
Petersen, J. E., Shunturov, V., Janda, K., Platt, G. and Weinberger, K. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 8, 1 (2007), 16--33.
[16]
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. and Griskevicius, V. The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science 18, 5 (2007), 429--434.
[17]
Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B. and van den Burg, M. T. C. Changing Organizational Energy Consumption Behaviour Through Comparative Feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16, 3 (1996), 235--246.
[18]
Suls, J., Martin, R. and Wheeler, L. Social Comparison: Why, With Whom, and With What Effect? Current Directions. Psychological Science 11, 5 (2002), 159--163.
[19]
Wheeler, L., Martin, R. and Suls, J. The Proxy social comparison model for self-assessment of ability. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1, 1 (1997), 54--61.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examination of Educational Digital Video Games on the STEAM Game Distribution PlatformSiirt Eğitim Dergisi10.58667/sedder.15250594:2(78-104)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Gamified Physical Exercise and Mental HealthSalud, Ciencia y Tecnología10.56294/saludcyt202410634(1063)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Expanding the Concept of Sustainable Interaction Design: A Systematic ReviewSustainability10.3390/su1617748616:17(7486)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2011
    2554 pages
    ISBN:9781450302685
    DOI:10.1145/1979742

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 May 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. comparative feedback
    2. energy monitoring
    3. persuasive technology
    4. social networking
    5. sustainable hci

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    CHI '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Examination of Educational Digital Video Games on the STEAM Game Distribution PlatformSiirt Eğitim Dergisi10.58667/sedder.15250594:2(78-104)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Gamified Physical Exercise and Mental HealthSalud, Ciencia y Tecnología10.56294/saludcyt202410634(1063)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Expanding the Concept of Sustainable Interaction Design: A Systematic ReviewSustainability10.3390/su1617748616:17(7486)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Analysis of Gamification Elements in E-LearningLearning and Collaboration Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-61685-3_8(94-112)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2023)OYUNLAŞTIRMANIN İŞLETMELER ÜZERİNDE ETKİLERİ: TOY CARDS ÖRNEĞİEFFECTS OF GAMING ON BUSINESSES: TOY CARDS EXAMPLEÇukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi10.35379/cusosbil.130311432:3(113-138)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Trends and Applications of Gamification in E-Commerce: A Systematic Literature ReviewJournal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence10.20473/jisebi.9.1.28-379:1(28-37)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Blueprints: Systematizing Behavior Change Designs—The Case of Social Comparison TheoryACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/361736431:1(1-32)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Motivating Sustainable Recycling Practices Through Persuasive TechnologiesNext-Generation Applications and Implementations of Gamification Systems10.4018/978-1-7998-8089-9.ch009(166-185)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)Gamification in Classroom ManagementResearch Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning10.4018/978-1-6684-3710-0.ch085(1743-1758)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2022)The Missing Link? Insights from an Innovative Feedback Exercise for Household Electricity and Travel BehaviourSustainability10.3390/su1415911514:15(9115)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media