research-article

Attitudes toward online availability of US public records

Authors:

Sean A. Munson,

Daniel Avrahami,

Sunny Consolvo,

Batya Friedman,

Ian SmithAuthors Info & Claims

dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times

Pages 2 - 9

https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037558

Published: 12 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Many have enthusiastically greeted the ability to search and view public records online as a great advance for transparency and accountability. Such ability, however, also creates value tensions with privacy and other important human values. In this paper, we report findings from a survey of 134 residents of the US Pacific Northwest on their awareness of and attitudes towards online access to political campaign records and real estate transaction histories, bringing to light some of the social implications of technological changes that increase ease of access to public records. We show that, while respondents often understood the reason behind making these records public, considerable concern about the current accessibility of these records exists, along with a precautionary indication that such open access may reduce public participation for some individuals.

References

[1]

Adams A and Sasse A. (2001). "Privacy in Multimedia Communications: Protecting Users, Not Just Data," in Blandford A, Vanderdonckt J, and Gray P (eds.), People and Computers XV -- Interaction without Frontiers: Joint Proceedings of HCI 2001 and IHM 2001.

[2]

Bender E. "Case Study: FollowTheMoney.org," in Lathrop, D and Ruma, L (ed). (2010). Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. O'Reilly.

[3]

Brandeis L. (1914). Other People's Money and How the Bankers Use it. New York: Frederick A. Stokes.

[4]

Coleman JJ and Manna PF. (2000). "Congressional Campaign Spending and the Quality of Democracy," Journal of Politics 62(3): 757--789.

[5]

Connelly K, Khalil A, Liu Y. (2007). "Do I Do What I Say?: Observed Versus Stated Privacy Preferences," In Proc. INTERACT 2007.

Digital Library

[6]

Friedman B, Kahn PH Jr, Hagman J, Severson RL, and Gill B. (2006). "The watcher and the watched: Social judgments about privacy in a public place," The Human-Computer Interaction Journal, 21(2): 233--269.

Digital Library

[7]

Givens B. (2002). "Public Records on the Internet: The Privacy Dilemma," In Proc. Computers, Privacy, and Freedom 2002.

Digital Library

[8]

Goel S, Mason W, Watts DJ. (2010). "Real and perceived attitude agreement in networks," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(4): 611--621.

[9]

Griffith V and Jakobsson M. (2005). "Messin' with Texas Deriving Mother's Maiden Names Using Public Records," in Proc. Applied Cryptography and Network Security 2005.

Digital Library

[10]

Kelley PG, Bresee J, Cranor LF, Reeder RW. (2009). "A 'Nutrition Label' for Privacy," in Proc. SOUPS '09.

Digital Library

[11]

Landis JR and Koch GG. (1977). "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data," Biometrics 33: 159--174.

[12]

Lopez S. (14 December 2008). "Prop. 8 stance upends her life," Los Angeles Times, p B1.

[13]

Miller E. "Disrupting Washington's Golden Rule," in Lathrop, D and Ruma, L (ed.). (2010). Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. O'Reilly.

[14]

Nissenbaum H. (2004). "Privacy as Contextual Integrity," Washington Law Review 79(1).

[15]

Noelle-Neumann E. (1993). The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, our Social Skin. 2nd edition. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

[16]

Palen L and Dourish P. (2003). "Unpacking 'Privacy' for a Networked World," in Proc. CHI 2003.

Digital Library

[17]

Snyder JM. (1990). "Campaign Contributions as Investments: The US House of Representatives 1980--1986," Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1195--1227.

[18]

Solove D. (2008). Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press.

[19]

Spiekerman S; Grossklags J; Berendt B. (2001). "E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior," In Proc. EC 2001, 38--47.

Digital Library

[20]

Stone B. (8 February 2009). "Prop 8 Donor Web Site Shows Disclosure Law Is 2-Edged Sword," The New York Times p. BU3.

[21]

Stratmann T. (1991). "What do campaign contributions buy? Deciphering causal effects of money and votes." Southern Economic Journal 57(3): 606--620.

[22]

United States Supreme Court. (1976). Buckley v. Valeo, 424 US 1 No. 75--436.

[23]

Warren S and Brandeis L. (1890). "The Right to Privacy," Harvard Law Review 4(5): 193--220.

[24]

Wolber D. (2006). "Political E-Identity: campaign funding data and beyond," in Proc. dg.o 151.

Digital Library

Cited By

Chivukula SGray CLi ZPivonka AChen J(2024)Surveying a Landscape of Ethics-Focused Design MethodsACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36789881:3(1-32)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678988
Vernim SBauer HRauch EZiegler MUmbrello S(2022)A value sensitive design approach for designing AI-based worker assistance systems in manufacturingProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.248200(505-516)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.248
Lutaaya MBaig KMaqsood SChiasson S(2021)“I’m Not a Millionaire”: How Users’ Online Behaviours and Offline Behaviours Impact Their PrivacyExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3451603(1-7)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411763.3451603
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Attitudes toward online availability of US public records
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy

Recommendations

Sunlight or sunburn: a survey of attitudes toward online availability of US public records
Special issue on Open Government and Public Participation: Issues and Challenges in Creating Public Value

Many have enthusiastically greeted the ability to search and view public records online as a great advance for transparency and accountability. Such ability, however, also creates value tensions with privacy and other important human values. In this ...
Multi-lifespan information system design in post-conflict societies: an evolving project in Rwanda
CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

In this paper we report on our early-stage research and design efforts to provide Rwandans with access to and reuse of video interviews from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. More generally, we investigate methods and designs that can be ...
SecureGov: secure data sharing for government services
dg.o '13: Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research

Open Government initiative allows government data available digitally to share and integrate to produce value added information products and citizen services. This "paperless" government facilitates the transparency of government and fosters ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times

June 2011

398 pages

ISBN:9781450307628

DOI:10.1145/2037556

Conference Chairs:
John Bertot
University of Maryland
,
Karine Nahon
University of Washington
,
Program Chairs:
Soon Ae Chun
City University of New York
,
Luis Luna-Reyes
Universidad de las Americas, Puebla
,
Vijay Atluri
Rutgers University

Copyright © 2011 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Routledge
Elsevier
University of Arizona: University of Arizona
San Diego Super Computing Ctr: San Diego Super Computing Ctr
Emerald: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
University of Maryland: University of Maryland
IOS Press: IOS Press

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Division of Information and Intelligent Systems

Conference

dg.o '11

Sponsor:

University of Arizona
San Diego Super Computing Ctr
Emerald
University of Maryland
IOS Press

dg.o '11: The 12th Annual International Conference of Digital Government Research

June 12 - 15, 2011

Maryland, College Park, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
226
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)12
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Chivukula SGray CLi ZPivonka AChen J(2024)Surveying a Landscape of Ethics-Focused Design MethodsACM Journal on Responsible Computing10.1145/36789881:3(1-32)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3678988
Vernim SBauer HRauch EZiegler MUmbrello S(2022)A value sensitive design approach for designing AI-based worker assistance systems in manufacturingProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.248200(505-516)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.248
Lutaaya MBaig KMaqsood SChiasson S(2021)“I’m Not a Millionaire”: How Users’ Online Behaviours and Offline Behaviours Impact Their PrivacyExtended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411763.3451603(1-7)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411763.3451603
Friedman BHendry DBorning A(2017)A Survey of Value Sensitive Design MethodsFoundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction10.1561/110000001511:2(63-125)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1561/1100000015
Bargh MChoenni SMeijer R(2017)On addressing privacy in disseminating judicial data: towards a methodologyTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy10.1108/TG-12-2015-005111:1(9-41)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2017
https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0051
Woodruff AJones MPalanque PSchmidt AGrossman T(2014)Necessary, unpleasant, and disempoweringProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2556288.2557126(149-158)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2556288.2557126
Marshall CShipman FBoughida KHoward BNelson MVan de Sompel HSølvberg I(2012)On the institutional archiving of social mediaProceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries10.1145/2232817.2232819(1-10)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2232817.2232819

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten