Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2389176.2389219acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Workflow transparency in a microtask marketplace

Published: 27 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Interdependent tasks in Mechanical Turk (MTurk) can be managed efficiently with a workflow, a sequence of tasks through which work passes to its completion. We ask if workers should be informed about the workflow, which we call workflow transparency. Transparency could motivate workers or induce social loafing. We describe three experiments to determine the effects of workflow transparency in MTurk. We compared a text description of the workflow, a visualization of the workflow, and the combination of text and visualization with a control condition giving no workflow information. Workflow transparency marginally increased volunteerism on a charity identification task (experiment 1) and significantly increased volunteerism and quality on a business identification task (experiment 2). Results were weaker with a less experienced worker sample (experiment 3). We suggest further research on the design of workflow information to increase workers' motivation.

References

[1]
Bernstein, M. S. et al. 2010. Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside. UIST (2010), 313--322.
[2]
Downs, J. S. et al. 2010. Are Your Participants Gaming the System? Screening Mechanical Turk Workers. Science. (2010), 2399--2402.
[3]
Fekete, J.-D. et al. 2008. Information Visualization. A. Kerren et al., eds. Springer-Verlag. 1--18.
[4]
George, J. M. 1992. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal. 35, 1 (Mar. 1992), 191--202.
[5]
Granovetter, M. S. 2005. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. J. Econ. Persp. 19, 1 (2005), 33--50.
[6]
Hackman, J. R. and Oldham, G. R. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Org. Behav. and Hum. Perf. 16, 2 (1976), 250--279.
[7]
Harris, M. 2008. Email from America. Sunday Times.
[8]
Huberman, B. A. et al. 2009. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. J. of Info. Sci. 35, 6 (Dec. 2009), 758--765.
[9]
Jans, L. et al. 2011. The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups. Pers. soc. psych. bulletin. 37, 8 (2011), 1130--1141.
[10]
Jones, G. R. 1984. Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior. Academy of Management Review. 9, 4 (Oct. 1984), 684--695.
[11]
Karau, S. J. and Williams, K. D. 1993. Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. J. of Pers. and Soc.Psych. 65, 4 (1993), 681--706.
[12]
Kidwell, R. E. and Bennett, N. 1993. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Acad. of Mgmt 1993.
[13]
Kittur, A. et al. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. CHI 08. 08, April 5--10 (2008), 453.
[14]
Kittur, A. et al. 2011. CrowdForge: Crowdsourcing Complex Work. HCI (2011), 1801--1806.
[15]
Kulkarni, A. et al. 2012. Collaboratively crowdsourcing workflows with turkomatic. CSCW 2012.
[16]
Lakens, D. 2010. Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. J. of Exp. Soc. Psych. 46, 5 (2010), 701--708.
[17]
Mason, W. and Watts, D. J. 2010. Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds." ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 11, 2 (2010), 100.
[18]
Roland E. Kidwell, J. and Bennett, N. 1993. Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research. The Academy of Management Review. 18, 3 (Jul. 1993), 429--456.
[19]
Shaw, A. D. et al. 2011. Designing Incentives for Inexpert Human Raters. CSCW. 2011.
[20]
Snow, R. et al. 2008. Cheap and Fast - But is it Good? Evaluating Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks. Emp. Meth. in Nat Lang. Proc. 2008.
[21]
Ware, C. 2000. Information visualization: perception for design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The impact of digital platforms on the creativity of remote workers through the mediating role of explicit and tacit knowledge sharingJournal of Knowledge Management10.1108/JKM-08-2023-068228:8(2433-2459)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2020)The Sustainable Positive Effects of Enterprise Social Media on Employees: The Visibility and Vicarious Learning LensSustainability10.3390/su1207285512:7(2855)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2020
  • (2019)Dropping the Baton?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33592383:CSCW(1-26)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Workflow transparency in a microtask marketplace

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
    October 2012
    342 pages
    ISBN:9781450314862
    DOI:10.1145/2389176
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 October 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowdsourcing
    2. cscw
    3. entitativity
    4. productivity
    5. task motivation
    6. visualization
    7. workflow

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Group '12
    Sponsor:
    Group '12: ACM 2012 International Conference on Support Group Work
    October 27 - 31, 2012
    Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

    Upcoming Conference

    GROUP '25
    The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
    January 12 - 15, 2025
    Hilton Head , SC , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)The impact of digital platforms on the creativity of remote workers through the mediating role of explicit and tacit knowledge sharingJournal of Knowledge Management10.1108/JKM-08-2023-068228:8(2433-2459)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
    • (2020)The Sustainable Positive Effects of Enterprise Social Media on Employees: The Visibility and Vicarious Learning LensSustainability10.3390/su1207285512:7(2855)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Dropping the Baton?Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33592383:CSCW(1-26)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
    • (2018)CommunityCritProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173769(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
    • (2017)Examining Crowd Work and Gig Work Through The Historical Lens of PieceworkProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025974(4599-4616)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
    • (2016)How One Microtask Affects AnotherProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858490(3155-3166)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
    • (2015)The Perverse Effects of Social Transparency on Online Advice TakingProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing10.1145/2675133.2675253(207-217)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2015
    • (2014)Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and InnovationInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2014.053625:4(796-816)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014
    • (2014)Who's the boss?CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2559206.2581262(2533-2538)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2014

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media