Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Situation-Specific Models of Color Differentiation

Published: 01 December 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Color is commonly used to represent categories and values in computer applications, but users with Color-Vision Deficiencies (CVD) often have difficulty differentiating these colors. Recoloring tools have been developed to address the problem, but current recolorers are limited in that they work from a model of only one type of congenital CVD (i.e., dichromatism). This model does not adequately describe many other forms of CVD (e.g., more common congenital deficiencies such as anomalous trichromacy, acquired deficiencies such as cataracts or age-related yellowing of the lens, or temporary deficiencies such as wearing tinted glasses or working in bright sunlight), and so standard recolorers work poorly in many situations. In this article we describe an alternate approach that can address these limitations. The new approach, called Situation-Specific Modeling (SSM), constructs a model of a specific user’s color differentiation abilities in a specific situation, and uses that model as the basis for recoloring digital presentations. As a result, SSM can inherently handle all types of CVD, whether congenital, acquired, or environmental. In this article we describe and evaluate several models that are based on the SSM approach. Our first model of individual color differentiation (called ICD-1) works in RGB color space, and a user study showed it to be accurate and robust (both for users with and without congenital CVD). However, three aspects of ICD-1 were identified as needing improvement: the calibration step needed to build the situation-specific model, and the prediction steps used in recoloring were too slow for real-world use; and the results of the model’s predictions were too coarse for some uses. We therefore developed three further techniques: ICD-2 reduces the time needed to calibrate the model; ICD-3 reduces the time needed to make predictions with the model; and ICD-4 provides additional information about the degree of differentiability in a prediction. Our final result is a model of the user’s color perception that handles any type of CVD, can be calibrated in two minutes, and can find replacement colors in near-real time (~1 second for a 64-color image). The ICD models provide a tool that can greatly improve the perceptibility of digital color for many different types of CVD users, and also demonstrates situation-specific modeling as a new approach that can broaden the applicability of assistive technology.

    References

    [1]
    Birch, J. 2001. Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision 2nd Ed. Butterworth Heinemann, Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford.
    [2]
    Birch, J. 2003. Extreme anomalous trichromatism. In Normal and Defective Colour Vision, Mollon, Pokorny, and Knoblauch Eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 364--369.
    [3]
    Birch, J., Barbur, J., and Harlow, A. 1992. New method based on random luminance masking for measuring isochromatic zones using high resolution colour displays. Opthalm. Physiolog. Optics 12, 2, 133--136.
    [4]
    Booth, D. and Freeman, R. 1993. Discriminative feature integration by individuals. Acta Psychologica 84, 1, 1--16.
    [5]
    Brettel, H., Viénot, F., and Mollon, J. 1997. Computerized simulation of color appearance for dichromats. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. A14, 10, 2647--2655.
    [6]
    Cole, B. 2004. The handicap of abnormal colour vision. Clinic. Experiment. Optom. 87, 4--5, 258--275.
    [7]
    CIE (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage). 1986. Colorimetry 2nd Ed. CIE.
    [8]
    Fitzgibbon, A., Pilu, M., and Fisher, R. 1999. Direct least squares fitting of ellipses. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol. 21. 476--480.
    [9]
    Flatla, D. R. and Gutwin, C. 2010. Individual models of color differentiation to improve interpretability of information visualization. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). 2563--2572.
    [10]
    Flatla, D. R. and Gutwin, C. 2011. Improving calibration time and accuracy for situation-specific models of color differentiation. In Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 195--202.
    [11]
    Flatla, D. R. and Gutwin, C. 2012. SSMRecolor: Improving recoloring tools with situation-specific models of color differentiation. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’12). 2297--2306.
    [12]
    Frey, B. and Dueck, D. 2007. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972--976.
    [13]
    Halir, R. and Flusser, J. 1998. Numerically stable direct least squares fitting of ellipses. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics and Visualization. 59--108.
    [14]
    Healey, C. 1996. Choosing effective colours for data visualization. In Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization. 263--270.
    [15]
    Heim, M. and Morgner, J. 2001. Disturbed color vision in endogenous psychoses. Psychiatr. Prax. 28, 6, 284--286.
    [16]
    Ichikawa, M., Tanaka, K., Kondo, S., Hiroshima, K., Ichikawa, K., Tanabe, S., and Fukami, K. 2004. Preliminary study on color modification for still images to realize barrier-free color vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 36--41.
    [17]
    Ishihara, S. 1950. Tests for Colour-Blindness 9th Ed. Pseudoisochromatic Plates, London.
    [18]
    Jefferson, L. and Harvey, R. 2006. Accommodating color blind computer users. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 40--47.
    [19]
    Jefferson, L. and Harvey, R. 2007. An interface to support color blind users. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). 1535--1538.
    [20]
    Kuhn, G., Oliveira, M., and Fernandes, L. 2008. An efficient naturalness-preserving image-recoloring method for dichromats. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 14, 6, 1747--1754.
    [21]
    Lindbloom, B. 2012. www.brucelindbloom.com.
    [22]
    Lomax, R., Ridgway P., and Meldrum, M. 2004. Does occupational exposure to organic solvents affect colour discrimination? Toxicol. Rev. 23, 2, 91--121.
    [23]
    Machado, G., Oliveira, M., and Fernandes, L. 2009. A physiologically-based model for simulation of color vision deficiency. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15, 6, 1291--1298.
    [24]
    Meyer, G. and Greenburg, D. 1988. Color-Defective vision and computer graphics displays. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 8, 5, 28--40.
    [25]
    Neitz, J. and Jacobs, G. 1986. Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human colour vision. Nature 323, 623--625.
    [26]
    Poirson, A. and Wandell, B. 1990. The ellipsoidal representation of spectral sensitivity. Vis. Res. 30, 4, 647--652.
    [27]
    Rasche, K., Geist, R., and Westall, J. 2005a. Detail preserving reproduction of color images for monochromats and dichromats. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25, 3, 22--30.
    [28]
    Rasche, K., Geist, R., and Westall, J. 2005b. Re-Coloring images for gamuts of lower dimension. Comput. Graph. Forum 24, 3, 423--432.
    [29]
    Regan, B., Reffin, J., and Mollon, J. 1994. Luminance noise and the rapid determination of discrimination ellipses in colour deficiency. Vis. Res. 34, 10, 1279--1299.
    [30]
    Ro, Y. and Yang, S. 2004. Color adaptation for anomalous trichromats. Int. J. Imag. Syst. Technol. 14, 1, 16--20.
    [31]
    Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J., and Xiao, Y. 2003. When computers fade: Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. 1298--1302.
    [32]
    Stone, M. 2003. A Field Guide to Digital Color. A. K. Peters, Ltd., Natick, MA.
    [33]
    Tufte, E. 1990. Envisioning Information 10th Ed. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
    [34]
    Viénot, F., Brettel, H., Ott, L., Ben M’Barek, A., and Mollon, J. 1995. What do colour-blind people see? Nature 376, 127--128.
    [35]
    Wakita, K. and Shimamura, K. 2005. SmartColor: Disambiguation framework for the colorblind. In Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 158--165.
    [36]
    Ware, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann.
    [37]
    Wyszecki, G. and Stiles, W. 2000. Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons.
    [38]
    Yang, S., Ro, Y., Wong, E., and Lee, J. 2008. Quantification and standardized description of color vision deficiency caused by anomalous trichromats, Part I: Simulation and measurement. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 1--12.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Author Reflections on Creating Accessible Academic PapersACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/354619515:4(1-36)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Seeing Colours: Addressing Colour Vision Deficiency with Vision Augmentations using Computational GlassesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/348689929:3(1-53)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
    • (2022)An ontology-based framework for improving color vision deficiency accessibilityUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-021-00791-621:3(691-716)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Situation-Specific Models of Color Differentiation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
      ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 4, Issue 3
      December 2012
      79 pages
      ISSN:1936-7228
      EISSN:1936-7236
      DOI:10.1145/2399193
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 December 2012
      Accepted: 01 September 2012
      Revised: 01 August 2012
      Received: 01 April 2012
      Published in TACCESS Volume 4, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Color vision deficiency
      2. color differentiation
      3. situation-specific modeling

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 28 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Author Reflections on Creating Accessible Academic PapersACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/354619515:4(1-36)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2022
      • (2022)Seeing Colours: Addressing Colour Vision Deficiency with Vision Augmentations using Computational GlassesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/348689929:3(1-53)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
      • (2022)An ontology-based framework for improving color vision deficiency accessibilityUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-021-00791-621:3(691-716)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2022
      • (2021)Which emphasis technique to use? Perception of emphasis techniques with varying distractors, backgrounds, and visualization typesInformation Visualization10.1177/1473871621104535421:2(95-129)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2021
      • (2019)Situationally-Induced Impairments and DisabilitiesWeb Accessibility10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0_5(59-92)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2019
      • (2018)Towards a Multisensory Augmented Reality Map for Blind and Low Vision PeopleProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174203(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
      • (2017)Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Perspectives on Imperfect Automatic Speech Recognition for Captioning One-on-One MeetingsProceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3132525.3132541(155-164)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2017
      • (2017)ACEACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/30145889:2(1-32)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2017
      • (2017)Colors Similarity Computation for User Interface AdaptationUniversal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches and Methods10.1007/978-3-319-58706-6_27(333-345)Online publication date: 16-May-2017
      • (2016)A validation study regarding a generative approach in choosing appropriate colors for impaired usersSpringerPlus10.1186/s40064-016-2659-65:1Online publication date: 15-Jul-2016
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media