Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2413219.2413228acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ConEx based QoE feedback to enhance QoE

Published: 10 December 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Quality of service (QoS) generally represents the performance of packet networks. Quality of experience (QoE) defines the quality perceived by end-users of applications running on these networks. This paper relates these two metrics in a novel way using the newly defined congestion exposure (ConEx) mechanism. ConEx is an experimental protocol defined by the IETF that allows the sender of a flow to convey the received explicit congestion notification (ECN) information back into the network. In IPv6, ConEx is implemented in an option header with 28 unused bits. These bits can be used to convey more than ECN feedback towards the network. This paper proposes to use these bits to send real-time objective QoE information, as perceived by the end-users, into the network. Routers can leverage this information to adjust QoS mechanisms. As an example, a new queue management technique is proposed with a multi-field DiffServ classifier using the QoE metric. Simulation results show that this mechanism can help in improving the overall QoE of active flows.

    Supplementary Material

    ZIP File (csws11.zip)
    NA

    References

    [1]
    Congestion Exposure (ConEx). IETF Working group, http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/conex/charter.
    [2]
    Network Simulator. NS-3, http://www.nsnam.org/.
    [3]
    T. H. Anh, A. Mellouk, and S. Hoceini. User to user adaptive routing based on qoe. In ISPS'11, 10th International Symposium on Programming and Systems, pages 39--45, April 2011.
    [4]
    S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. An Architecture for Differentiated Service. RFC 2475 (Informational), December 1998. Updated by RFC 3260.
    [5]
    B. Briscoe, A. Jacquet, T. Moncaster, and A. Smith. Re-ECN: Adding Accountability for Causing Congestion to TCP/IP. IETF, April 2012. Status: Individual Draft: draft-briscoe-conex-re-ecn-tcp-00, Work in progress.
    [6]
    B. Briscoe, R. Woundy, and A. Cooper. ConEx Concepts and Use Cases. IETF, July 2012. Status: WG Draft: draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-05, Work in progress.
    [7]
    T. Friedman, R. Caceres, and A. Clark. RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR). RFC 3611 (Standards Track), November 2003.
    [8]
    ITU-T. The e-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning. Recommendation G.107, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, April 2009.
    [9]
    E. Jammeh, I.-H. Mkwawa, A. Khan, M. Goudarzi, L. Sun, and E. Ifeachor. Quality of experience (qoe) driven adaptation scheme for voice/video over ip. Telecommunication Systems, 49(3):99--111, January 2012.
    [10]
    S. Krishnan, M. Kuehlewind, and C. Ucendo. IPv6 Destination Option for ConEx. IETF, March 2012. Status: WG Draft: draft-ietf-conex-destopt-02, Work in progress.
    [11]
    D. Kutscher, F. Mir, R. Winter, S. Krishnan, Y. Zhang, and C. Bernardos. Mobile Communication Congestion Exposure Scenario. IETF, July 2012. Status: WG Draft: draft-ietf-conex-mobile-00, Work in progress.
    [12]
    M. Mathis and B. Briscoe. Congestion Exposure (ConEx) Concepts and Abstract Mechanism. IETF, July 2012. Status: WG Draft: draft-ietf-conex-abstract-mech-05, Work in progress.
    [13]
    N. T. Moura, B. A. Vianna, C. V. N. Albuquerque, V. E. F. Rebello, and C. Boeres. Mos-based rate adaption for voip sources. In ICC'07, IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 628--633, June 2007.
    [14]
    K. Nichols and V. Jacobson. Controlling queue delay. Communications of the ACM Magazine, 55(7):42--50, July 2012.
    [15]
    K. Ramakrishnan, S. Floyd, and D. Black. The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP. RFC 3168 (Standards Track), September 2001.
    [16]
    S. Ramroop. A DiffServ model for the NS-3 simulator, University of West Indies. http://www.eng.uwi.tt/depts/elec/staff/rvadams/sramroop/index.htm.
    [17]
    H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson. RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications. RFC 3550 (Standards Track), July 2003.
    [18]
    M. Westerlund, I. Johansson, C. Perkins, P. O'Hanlon, and K. Carlberg. Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) for RTP over UDP. RFC 6679 (Standards Track), August 2012.
    [19]
    Q. Zizhi, S. Lingfen, N. Heilemann, and E. Ifeachor. A new method for voip quality of service control use combined adaptive sender rate and priority marking. ICC'04, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 3:1473--1477, June 2004.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. ConEx based QoE feedback to enhance QoE

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSWS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM workshop on Capacity sharing
      December 2012
      66 pages
      ISBN:9781450317801
      DOI:10.1145/2413219
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 10 December 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. AQM
      2. ConEx
      3. QoE
      4. QoS

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CoNEXT '12
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CSWS '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 9 of 17 submissions, 53%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 19 of 40 submissions, 48%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media