Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2501907.2501936acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Semantic work process analysis: a reflexive stakeholder articulation approach

Published: 26 August 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Developers still frequently fail to meet stakeholder needs due to the lack of human-centred work representations. The resulting lack of understanding among technology providers, responsible authorities, management, and staff requires revisiting work process representations. Semantic work analysis based on Concept Mapping and Value Networks Analysis helps eliciting, elaborating, reflecting, and developing essential elements of a currently perceived towards an envisioned work structure. Rather than referring to other stakeholders it pinpoints individual potential in terms of generated services or products. They are assessed as additional tangible or intangible input to other process participants.

References

[1]
Adams, B., Berner, E. S., Wyatt, J. R. Best practice. Applying strategies to overcome user resistance in a group of clinical managers to a business software application: a case study, in: Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16 (4), 2004, 55--64
[2]
Allee, V. (2002) The Future of Knowledge - Increasing Prosperity Through Value Networks, Butterworth Heinemann, New York
[3]
Aschoff F.-R., Bernardi, A. Schwarz, S. Weakly-structured workflows for knowledge-intensive tasks: an experimental evaluation, in: Proceedings International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'03), IEEE, 2003, 340--345
[4]
Augl, M. Building a conceptual roadmap for systemic change--a novel approach to change management in expert organizations in health care, in: Proceedings S-BPM ONE--Scientific Research, LNBIP Vol. 104, Springer, Berlin, 2012, 43--61
[5]
Bardram, J. E., Hansen, T. R. Why the plan doesn't hold: a study of situated planning, articulation and coordination work in a surgical ward, in: Proceedings Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'10), ACM, 2010, 331--340
[6]
Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (eds.) (2008) Prozessmanagement, 6. Auflage, Springer, Berlin
[7]
Braun, V., Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology, in: Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2006, 77--101
[8]
Chevalier, A., Bonnardel, N. Articulation of web site design constraints: Effects of the task and designer's expertise, in: Computers and Human Behavior, 23, 2007, 2455--2472
[9]
Ciuciu, I., Zhao, G., Mülle, J., von Stackelberg, S., Vasquez, C., Haberecht, T., Böhm, K. Semantic support for security-annotated business process models, in: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, Springer, Berlin, 2011, 284--298
[10]
Cohn, D., Hull, R. Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes, in: Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 32(3), 2009, 3--9
[11]
Collins, A.; Brown, J.-S., Holum, A. Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Thinking Visible, in: American Educator, American Federation of Teachers, 6(11), 1991, 38--46
[12]
De Bono, E., Markland, J. (1999) Six thinking hats, Back Bay Books 192, New York
[13]
de Castro, R. P. L., Armayor, D. P., Gómez, J. M., Mosquera, I. S., Batista, J. A. D. Semantic supported modeling and orchestration of logistic integrated processes, with focus on supply chain: framework design, in: ICT Innovations 2009, Springer, Berlin, 2010, 285--294
[14]
Ding, X.-H., Liu, H. and Song, Y. Are internal knowledge transfer strategies double-edged swords?, Journal of Knowledge Management 17(1), 2013, 69--86
[15]
El Kharbili, M., Keil, T. Bringing agility to business process management: Rules deployment in an SOA, in: Emerging Web Services Technology Volume III, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2010, 157--170
[16]
Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 2000, 1105--1121
[17]
Filipowska, A., Kaczmarek, M., Koschmider, A., Stein, S., Wecel, K., Abramowicz, W. Social software and semantics for Business Process Management-Alternative or synergy?, in: Journal of Systems Integration, 2(3), 2011, 54--69
[18]
Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, Ch., Obermeier, St., Börger, E. (2012) Subject-oriented Business Process Management, Springer, Berlin
[19]
Fleischmann, A., Stary, Ch. Whom to talk to? A stakeholder-perspective on business process development, in: Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(2), 2012, 125--150
[20]
Fowler, J. J., Horan, P. Are information systems' success and failure factors related? An exploratory study, in: Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 19 (2), 2007, 1--22
[21]
Gaitanides, M. (1983) Prozessorganisation. Entwicklung, Ansätze und Programme prozessorientierter Organisationsgestaltung, Hanser, München
[22]
Gerson, E. M., Star, S. L. Analyzing due process in the workplace, in: ACM Trans. Inf. Systems, 4(3), 1986, 257--270
[23]
Hammer, M. (1996) Beyond Reengineering: How the Process-Centered Organization Is Changing Our Lives, Harper Business, New York
[24]
Hammer, M. How process enterprises really work, in: Harvard Business Review, 77(6), 1999, 108--18
[25]
Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business, New York
[26]
Hoang, H. H., Tran, P. C. T., Le, T. M. State of the art of semantic business process management: an investigation on approaches for business-to-business integration, in: Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Springer, Berlin, 2010, 154--165
[27]
Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., Weber, K. Cooking up real world business applications combining physicality, digitality, and image schemas, in: Proceedings International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI'08), ACM, 2008, 239--246
[28]
Jeston, J., Nelis, J. (2008) Business Process Management. Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations, 2nd edition, Elsevier, Oxford, UK
[29]
Klaus, T., Wingreen, S., Blanton, J. B. Examining user resistance and management strategies in enterprise system implementations, in: Proceedings SIGMIS Conference on Computer Personnel Research (CPR'07), ACM, 2007, 55--62
[30]
Kim, G., Suh, Y. Building semantic business process space for agile and efficient Business Processes Management: Ontology-based approach, in: Business Enterprise, Process, and Technology Management: Models and Applications, eds.: Venky Shankararaman, J. Leon Zhao, Jae Kyu Lee, 51--74, IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2012.
[31]
Kirchmer, M. What has Jazz to do with MPE?, in: High Performance Through Process Excellence, ch.11, Springer, Berlin, 2011, 159--169
[32]
Kolb, D. G., Shepherd, D. M. Concept mapping organizational cultures, in: Journal Management Inquiry, 6 (4), 1997, 282--295
[33]
Korpelainen, E., Kira, M. Systems approach for analysing problems in IT system adoption at work, in: Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(3), 2013, 247--262
[34]
Martin, J. (1996) Cybercorp - The New Business Revolution, American Management Association, New York
[35]
Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., Recker, J. Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations, in: Information Systems, 35(4), 2010, 467--482
[36]
Merriam, S. B. (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 3rd, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
[37]
Ngai, E. W., Chau, D. C., Chan, T. L. A. Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies, in: The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3), 2011 232--249
[38]
Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G. Perspective---Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory, in: Organization Science, 20(3), 2009, 635--652
[39]
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B. (1984) Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, NY
[40]
Oppl, S., Stary, Ch. (2009) Tabletop concept mapping, in: Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI'09), ACM, 275--282
[41]
Oppl, S., & Stary, C. (2011) Effects of a Tabletop Interface on the Co-construction of Concept Maps, in: Proceedings INTERACT 2011, Springer, Berlin, 443--460
[42]
Österle H. (1995) Prozessanalytik, Oldenburg, München
[43]
Österle, H., Winter, R. (1995) (eds.), Business Engineering, 2nd edition, Springer, Berlin
[44]
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V. Enterprise agility and the enabling role of Information Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 2006, 120--131
[45]
Prilla, M., Schermann, M., Herrmann, I. T., Krcmar, H. Process modeling with SeeMe: a modeling method for service processes, in: Implementing International Services. A Tailorable Method for Market Assessment, Modularization, and Process Transfer, eds. Böhmann, T., Burr, W., Herrmann, Th., Krcmar, H., Gabler, 2012, Wiesbaden, 67--81
[46]
Rentsch, J. R., Mello, A. L., Delise, L. A. Collaboration and meaning analysis process in intense problem solving teams, in: Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(4), 2010, 287--303
[47]
Salovaara, A., Tamminen, S. Acceptance or appropriation? A design-oriented critique of technology acceptance models, in: P. Saariluoma, H. Isomaki, eds. Future Interaction Design II, Springer, London, 2009, 157--173
[48]
Sambamurthy, V., Anandhi, B., Varun, G. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of Information Technology in contemporary firms, in: MIS Quarterly 27(2), 2003, 237--263
[49]
Sandberg, J. (2005) How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches?, in: Organizational Research Methods, 8 (1), 2005, 41--68
[50]
Scheer, A. W. (1999) ARIS-Business Process Modeling, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin
[51]
Schreiber G., Akkermans R., Anjewierden A., Hoog R., Shadbolt N., DeVelde W. V., Wielinga B. (2002) Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology, MIT Press, Cambridge
[52]
Sonpar, K., Golden-Biddle, K. Using content analysis to elaborate adolescent theories of organization, in: Organizational Research Methods, 11 (4), 2008, 795--814
[53]
Stary, Ch., Fleischmann, A. Evidence-based interactive management of change, in: Knowledge Management & E-Learning 3(2), 2011, 170--200
[54]
Storey, M. A., Treude, C., van Deursen, A., Cheng, L. T. The impact of social media on software engineering practices and tools, in: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering Research, ACM, 2010, 359--364
[55]
Strauss, A. Work and the Division of Labor, in: The Sociological Quarterly, 26(1), 1985, 1--19
[56]
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Newell, S. Why don't (or do) organizations learn from projects?, in: Management Learning, 41(3), 2010, 325--344
[57]
Toral, S. L., Martínez-Torres, M. R. Barrero, F., Gallardo, S., Durán, M. J. An electronic engineering curriculum design based on concept-mapping techniques, in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17 (3), 2007, 341--356.
[58]
Trochim, W. M. K. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation, in: Evaluation Program Planning, 12 (1), 1989, 1--16
[59]
Weber, J. E., Schmidt, W., Weber, P. S. Using Social Network Analysis and derivates to develop the S-BPM approach and Community of Practice, in: Proceedings S-BPM ONE 2012, LNBIP 104, Springer, Berlin, 2012, 205--217
[60]
Weske, M. (2012) Business Process Management. Concepts, Languages, Architectures, 2nd edition, Springer, Berlin
[61]
Worley, C. G., Lawler, E. E. Agility and organization design: a diagnostic framework, in: Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 2010, 194--204
[62]
Yin, R. K., (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
[63]
Zollo, M., Winter, S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13, 2002, 339--351
[64]
Zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J. How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the business process modeling notation, in: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer, Berlin, 2008, 465-

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Model While You WorkProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management10.1145/2882879.2882890(1-10)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2016
  • (2014)Non-disruptive knowledge and business processing in knowledge life cycles – aligning value network analysis to process managementJournal of Knowledge Management10.1108/JKM-10-2013-037718:4(651-686)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2014

Index Terms

  1. Semantic work process analysis: a reflexive stakeholder articulation approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ECCE '13: Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
    August 2013
    220 pages
    ISBN:9781450322515
    DOI:10.1145/2501907
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 August 2013

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. articulation
    2. concept mapping
    3. notation
    4. representation
    5. semantic process modelling
    6. value networks
    7. work knowledge

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ECCE '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)Model While You WorkProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management10.1145/2882879.2882890(1-10)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2016
    • (2014)Non-disruptive knowledge and business processing in knowledge life cycles – aligning value network analysis to process managementJournal of Knowledge Management10.1108/JKM-10-2013-037718:4(651-686)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2014

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media