Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2559206.2559224acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

Refusing, limiting, departing: why we should study technology non-use

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In contrast to most research in HCI, this workshop focuses on non-use, that is, situations where people do not use computing technology. Using a reflexive pre-workshop activity and discussion-oriented sessions, we will consider the theories, methods, foundational texts, and central research questions in the study of non-use. In addition to a special issue proposal, we expect the research thread brought to the fore in this workshop will speak to foundational questions of use and the user in HCI.

    References

    [1]
    Ames, M. G. (2013). Managing Mobile Multitasking: The Culture of iPhones on Stanford Campus. Proc. CSCW 2013, ACM Press.
    [2]
    Baumer, E. P. S. and Silberman, M. S. (2011). When the Implication Is Not to Design. Ext. Abs. CHI 2011, ACM Press. 2271--2274.
    [3]
    Baumer, E. P. S., Adams, P., Khovanskya, V., Liao, T., Smith, M. E., Sosik, V. S., Williams, K. (2013). Limiting, Leaving, and (re)Lapsing: A Survey of Facebook Non-use Practices and Experiences. Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press.
    [4]
    Brubaker, J., Hayes, G., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society, 29(3).
    [5]
    Burrell, J. (2012). Technology hype versus enduring uses. First Monday, 17(6).
    [6]
    Cooper, G. and Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the User: Notes on the Disciplinary Rhetoric of HCI. In P. J. Thomas (Ed.), The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces, 48--66. Cambridge University Press.
    [7]
    Crawford, K. (2009). Following You: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media. Continuum, 23(4), 525--535.
    [8]
    Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276--297.
    [9]
    Kline, R. (2003). Resisting Consumer Technology in Rural America: The Telephone and Electrification. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Coconstruction of Users and Technology, 51--66. MIT Press.
    [10]
    Laegran, A. S. (2003). Escape Vehicles? The Internet and the Automobile in a Local-Global Intersection. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Coconstruction of Users and Technology, 81--100. MIT Press.
    [11]
    Mainwaring, S. D., Chang, M. F., & Anderson, K. (2004). Infrastructures and Their Discontents: Implications for Ubicomp. Proc. Ubicomp 2004, ACM Press. 418-- 432.
    [12]
    Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, 17--50. MIT Press.
    [13]
    Portwood-Stacer, L. (2012). Media Refusal and Conspicuous Non-Consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention. New Media & Society, in press.
    [14]
    Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201--223.
    [15]
    Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press.
    [16]
    Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658--1664.
    [17]
    Satchell, C., & Dourish, P. (2009). Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. Proc. OZCHI 2009, ACM Press. 9--16.
    [18]
    Selwyn, N. (2003). Apart from technology: understanding people's non-use of information and communication technologies in everyday life. Technology in Society, 25(1), 99--116.
    [19]
    Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness, and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Berg.
    [20]
    Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and MySpace. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544--564.
    [21]
    Wajcman, J. (2004). Technofeminism. Polity.
    [22]
    Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press.
    [23]
    Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, 58--99. Routledge.
    [24]
    Wyatt, S. (2003). Non-Users Also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-Users of the Internet. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter: The Coconstruction of Users and Technology, 67--79. MIT Press.
    [25]
    Wyche, S. P., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Forte, A. (2013). "Facebook is a Luxury": An Exploratory Study of Social Media Use in Rural Kenya. Proc. CSCW 2013, ACM Press. 33--43.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)On Being an Expert: Habitus as a Lens for Understanding Privacy ExpertiseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373798:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Zenscape: Encouraging Microbreaks from Screen-based Work through a Tangible SystemProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633368(1-17)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
    • (2023)From Obsolescence to Abandonment: Exploring the Precarious Use of Cochlear Implants in IndiaScience, Technology, & Human Values10.1177/01622439231211099Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Refusing, limiting, departing: why we should study technology non-use

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      2620 pages
      ISBN:9781450324748
      DOI:10.1145/2559206
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 April 2014

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. departure
      2. laggard
      3. non-use
      4. techno-resistance
      5. technology refuser

      Qualifiers

      • Technical-note

      Conference

      CHI '14
      Sponsor:
      CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2014
      Ontario, Toronto, Canada

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 3,200 submissions, 31%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI PLAY '24
      The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
      October 14 - 17, 2024
      Tampere , Finland

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)On Being an Expert: Habitus as a Lens for Understanding Privacy ExpertiseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373798:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Zenscape: Encouraging Microbreaks from Screen-based Work through a Tangible SystemProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633368(1-17)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
      • (2023)From Obsolescence to Abandonment: Exploring the Precarious Use of Cochlear Implants in IndiaScience, Technology, & Human Values10.1177/01622439231211099Online publication date: 30-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Unmaking as Emancipation: Lessons and Reflections from LuddismProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581412(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Stack bricolage and infrastructural impermanence in financial machine-learning modellingJournal of Cultural Economy10.1080/17530350.2023.222934717:1(20-38)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
      • (2022)No! Re-imagining Data Practices Through the Lens of Critical RefusalProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35579976:CSCW2(1-20)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Dealing with Digital Service ClosureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556176:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Examining Identity as a Variable of Health Technology Research for Older Adults: A Systematic ReviewProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517621(1-24)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Zoom Obscura: Counterfunctional Design for Video-ConferencingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501973(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Smart urban living in Singapore? Thinking through everyday geographiesUrban Geography10.1080/02723638.2021.201625844:4(687-706)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media