Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2612733.2612761acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The negative effects of open government data - investigating the dark side of open data

Published: 18 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Reports and research appears to assume that the benefits of open data dominate open data's negative consequences. Moreover, much of the existing research discusses benefits and disadvantages on a high level without providing much detailed insight in the underlying processes. Yet many governments are reluctant to open their data, as they are afraid of possible negative consequences of opening data. The objective of this policy paper is to better understand the aspects of the dark side of open data and contributes to the literature by providing a more realistic perspective on open data. We conducted nineteen in depth interviews with public sector officials and data archivists and identified sixteen categories of negative effects. For the dark side inherent to open data efforts the research suggests that a context and dataset dependent decision-making model needs to be made weighing the benefits of open data on the one hand (e.g. creating transparency, the possibility to strengthen economic growth), and the risks and disadvantages of open data (e.g. violating privacy and possible misuse and misinterpretation of data) on the other hand.

References

[1]
European_Commission. (2003, December 12). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/rules/eu/index_en.htm.
[2]
K. Janssen, "The Influence of the PSI Directive on Open Government Data: An Overview of Recent Developments," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 446--456, 2011.
[3]
P. McDermott, "Building Open Government," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 401--413, 2010.
[4]
E. Barry and F. Bannister, "Barriers to Open Data Release: A View from the Top," presented at the 2013 EGPA Annual Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 2013.
[5]
P. Conradie and S. Choenni, "Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government," presented at the 6th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (ICEGOV), Albany, New York, United States of America, 2012.
[6]
K. Janssen, "Legal interoperability -- barriers to the harmonization of licences " presented at the ICRI - Share PSI workshop, Brussels, 2011.
[7]
T. Jetzek, M. Avital, and N. Bjorn-Andersen, "Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 9, 2014.
[8]
J. C. Bertot, P. McDermott, and T. Smith, "Measurement of Open Government: Metrics and Process," presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, U.S.A., 2012.
[9]
European_Commission, "Riding the wave: how Europe can gain form the rising tide of scientific data," Brussels2010.
[10]
B. Obama. (2009, September 15). Open Government Directive. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf
[11]
B. Obama. (2012, September 15). Digital Government. Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government.html
[12]
European_Commission. (2013, January 14). EU implementation of the G8 Open Data Charter. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/newsroom/cf/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=3489
[13]
M. Janssen, Y. Charalabidis, and A. Zuiderwijk, "Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government," Information Systems Management, vol. 29, pp. 258--268, 2012.
[14]
Y. Charalabidis, E. Ntanos, and F. Lampathaki, "An architectural framework for open governmental data for researchers and citizens," in Electronic government and electronic participation joint proceedings of ongoing research and projects of IFIP EGOV and ePart 2011, M. Janssen, A. Macintosh, J. Scholl, E. Tambouris, M. Wimmer, H. d. Bruijn, et al., Eds., ed Delft 2011, pp. 77--85.
[15]
J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and J. M. Grimes, "Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-Corruption Tools for Societies," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 264--271, 2010.
[16]
M. T. Borzacchiello and M. Craglia, "The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: A research strategy," International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 60, pp. 114--129, 2012.
[17]
T. Davies, F. Perini, and J. M. Alonso. (2013, February 24). Researching the emerging impacts of open data. ODDC conceptual framework. Available: http://www.opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Researching%20the%20emerging%20impacts%20of%20open%20data.pdf
[18]
F. Bannister and R. Connolly, "The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e-Government," Policy & Internet, vol. 3, p. Article 8, 2011.
[19]
M. Strathern, "The Tyranny of Transparency," British Educational Research Journal, vol. 26, pp. 309--321, 2000.
[20]
M. Gurstein, "Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone?," First Monday, vol. 16, 2011.
[21]
A. Zuiderwijk and M. Janssen, "Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A comparison framework," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. 17--29, 2014.
[22]
B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. United States of America: Sociology Press, 1967.
[23]
S. Nieuwenhuijs. (2014, February 3). Het opvallendste nieuws volgens Sandor Nieuwenhuijs Available: http://www.automatiseringgids.nl/nieuws/2014/05/het-opvallendste-nieuws-volgens-sandor-nieuwenhuijs
[24]
C. Böhm, M. Freitag, A. Heise, C. Lehmann, A. Mascher, F. Naumann, et al., "GovWILD: Integrating Open Government Data for Transparency," WWW, vol. (Companion Volume), pp. 321--324, 2012.
[25]
W. Delone and E. McLean, "Information Systems Succes: the quest for the dependent variable," Information Systems Research, vol. 3, pp. pp.60--95, 1992.
[26]
Y. W. Lee, D. M. Strong, B. K. Kahn, and R. Y. Wang, "AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment," Information and Management, vol. 40, pp. 133--146, 2002.
[27]
W. R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.
[28]
J. E. Fountain, Building the virtual state. Information technology and institutional change. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
[29]
L. F. Luna-Reyes and J. R. Gil-Garcia, "Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 329--345, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Methodological approach for mapping the flood physical vulnerability index with geographical open-source data: an example in a small-middle city (Ponferrada, Spain)Natural Hazards10.1007/s11069-023-06370-7120:5(4053-4081)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)The Needs, Wants, and Wishes of the Open Government Data Idea – The Emergence of a New UnderstandingElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_21(337-353)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2024
  • (2023)The role of open data in digital society: The analysis of scientific trending topics through a bibliometric approachFrontiers in Sociology10.3389/fsoc.2023.11345188Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2014
365 pages
ISBN:9781450329019
DOI:10.1145/2612733
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Digital Government Society of North America

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. dark side
  2. effects
  3. interviews
  4. negative impact
  5. open data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

dg.o '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

dg.o '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 62 submissions, 58%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)156
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Methodological approach for mapping the flood physical vulnerability index with geographical open-source data: an example in a small-middle city (Ponferrada, Spain)Natural Hazards10.1007/s11069-023-06370-7120:5(4053-4081)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2024
  • (2024)The Needs, Wants, and Wishes of the Open Government Data Idea – The Emergence of a New UnderstandingElectronic Government10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_21(337-353)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2024
  • (2023)The role of open data in digital society: The analysis of scientific trending topics through a bibliometric approachFrontiers in Sociology10.3389/fsoc.2023.11345188Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
  • (2023)No Labels?Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law10.1145/3594536.3595171(277-286)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Orchestrating distributed data governance in open social innovationInformation and Organization10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.10045333:1Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • (2023)Coordinated Co-governance and Grassroots Innovation: A Case Study of Shenzhen’s Livelihood-Related Project Voting SystemChinese Political Science Review10.1007/s41111-023-00241-z9:4(577-597)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Open Government Data: Development, Practice, and ChallengesOpen Data10.5772/intechopen.100465Online publication date: 13-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Development of an Open Government Data (OGD) Evaluation Framework for BIMBuildings10.3390/buildings1204049012:4(490)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Open Government Data in Pandemic Disease: Encouraging Spatial Policy-Making in East Java and JakartaGEMA PUBLICA10.14710/gp.7.2.2022.237-2607:2(237-260)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Coding quality of deaths and its impact on elderly unintentional fall mortality data from 1990 to 2019: a retrospective analysis of the WHO Mortality DatabaseBMC Geriatrics10.1186/s12877-021-02744-322:1Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media