Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675292acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Open Education in the Wild: The Dynamics of Course Production in the Peer 2 Peer University

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The Peer 2 Peer University (P2PU) is an online, open education platform where any user can create a course, contribute content, or join an existing course as a learner. P2PU represents an experiment in organizing the production of entirely user-generated, open education. However, the open model of P2PU rests on the critical assumption that members can successfully coordinate and produce a sufficient supply of courses and motivate others to join in. In this paper, we use log data from P2PU to describe the dynamics of organizers -- members who try to produce and launch open courses -- and explore the factors related to their ability to successfully create courses on this open platform. We find that a critical predictor of successful course development is quickly finding like-minded organizers to collaborate with, suggesting that creating new education systems based on open, social computing platforms requires facilitation of key aspects of social coordination beyond providing platform and content resources.

References

[1]
Abelson, H. The Creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 2 (2008), 164--174.
[2]
Ahn, J., Butler, B., Weng, C., and Webster, S. Learning to be a better q'er in social q&a sites: Social norms and information artifacts. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology (ASIS&T), (2013).
[3]
Ahn, J., Butler, B.S., Alam, A., and Webster, S.A. Learner Participation and Engagement in Open Online Courses: Insights from the Peer 2 Peer University. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching 9, 2 (2013).
[4]
Ahn, J., Weng, C., and Butler, B.S. The Dynamics of Open, Peer-to-Peer Learning: What Factors Influence Participation in the P2P University? Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE (2013), 3098--3107.
[5]
Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Borokhovski, E., et al. A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research 79, 3 (2009), 1243--1289.
[6]
Bruckman, A. Learning in online communities. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, (2006), 461--472.
[7]
Burke, M., Joyce, E., Kim, T., Anand, V., and Kraut, R. Introductions and requests: Rhetorical strategies that elicit response in online communities. In Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, 2007, 21--39.
[8]
Butler, B., Joyce, E., and Pike, J. Don't Look Now, but We've Created a Bureaucracy: The Nature and Roles of Policies and Rules in Wikipedia. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2008), 1101--1110.
[9]
Butler, B., Kiesler, S., and Kraut, R. Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? Leadership at a distance: Research in technologicallysupported work, (2013), 171.
[10]
Butler, B.S. and Ahn, J. Ecological perspectives on creating and sustaining open learning environments. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Workshop on CSCW and Education, ACM (2013).
[11]
Crowston, K., Wei, K., Howison, J., and Wiggins, A. Free/Libre Open-source Software Development: What We Know and What We Do Not Know. ACM Comput. Surv. 44, 2 (2008), 7:1--7:35.
[12]
Forte, A. and Bruckman, A. Scaling consensus: Increasing decentralization in Wikipedia governance. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual, IEEE (2008), 157--157.
[13]
Gennarelli, V. Personal Communication. 2014. http://www.slideshare.net/VanessaGennarelli/designresearch-course-creation.
[14]
Haythornthwaite, C. Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on, IEEE (2009), 1--10.
[15]
Howison, J., Wiggins, A., and Crowston, Kevin. Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12, 12 (2011), 767--797.
[16]
Jenkins, H. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MIT Press, 2009.
[17]
Kafai, Y.B. and Peppler, K.A. Beyond small groups: New opportunities for research in computersupported collective learning. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, (2011).
[18]
Kirschner, P.A. and van Merriënboer, J.J.G. Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education. Educational Psychologist 48, 3 (2013), 169--183.
[19]
Knox, J. Five critiques of the Open Educational Resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education 18, 8 (2013), 821--832.
[20]
Kraut, R., Wang, X., Butler, B., Joyce, E., and Burke, M. Beyond information: Developing the relationship between the individual and the group in online communities. Information Systems Research, (under review).
[21]
Maloney-Krichmar, D. and Preece, J. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12, 2 (2005), 201--232.
[22]
Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., Mittal, M., Hripcsak, G., and Hartmann, B. Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2011), 2857--2866.
[23]
McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., and Cormier, D. The MOOC model for digital practice. 2010.
[24]
Pappano, L. Massive Open Online Courses Are Multiplying at a Rapid Pace. The New York Times, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massi ve-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapidpace.html.
[25]
Peter, S. and Deimann, M. On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis 5, 1 (2013), 7--14.
[26]
Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. The Reader-toLeader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (2009), 13--32.
[27]
Quinn, A.J. and Bederson, B.B. Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2011), 1403--1412.
[28]
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., et al. Scratch: programming for all. Communications of the ACM 52, 11 (2009), 60--67.
[29]
Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., et al. Dynamic Changes in Motivation in Collaborative Citizenscience Projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 217--226.
[30]
Seely Brown, J. and Adler, R.P. Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause review 43, 1 (2008), 16--20.
[31]
Uys, D. Personal communication. 2014.
[32]
Wiggins, A. and Crowston, K. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (2011), 1--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Revealing mutually constitutive ties between the information and learning sciencesThe Information Society10.1080/01972243.2016.113049632:2(81-84)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
  • (2016)Transnational Programs and Providers: Mobilities and Complex Spatial FlowsInternationalization of Higher Education10.1057/978-1-137-53345-6_7(123-150)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2016

Index Terms

  1. Open Education in the Wild: The Dynamics of Course Production in the Peer 2 Peer University

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2015
    1956 pages
    ISBN:9781450329224
    DOI:10.1145/2675133
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. computer supported cooperative work
    2. open education
    3. open learning
    4. social computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2016)Revealing mutually constitutive ties between the information and learning sciencesThe Information Society10.1080/01972243.2016.113049632:2(81-84)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
    • (2016)Transnational Programs and Providers: Mobilities and Complex Spatial FlowsInternationalization of Higher Education10.1057/978-1-137-53345-6_7(123-150)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2016

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media