research-article

Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia

Authors:

Elisabeth Joyce,

Jacqueline PikeAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1101 - 1110

https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357227

Published: 06 April 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Wikis are sites that support the development of emergent, collective infrastructures that are highly flexible and open, suggesting that the systems that use them will be egalitarian, free, and unstructured. Yet it is apparent that the flexible infrastructure of wikis allows the development and deployment of a wide range of structures. However, we find that the policies in Wikipedia and the systems and mechanisms that operate around them are multi-faceted. In this descriptive study, we draw on prior work on rules and policies in organizations to propose and apply a conceptual framework for understanding the natures and roles of policies in wikis. We conclude that wikis are capable of supporting a broader range of structures and activities than other collaborative platforms. Wikis allow for and, in fact, facilitate the creation of policies that serve a wide variety of functions.

References

[1]

Ahuja, M.K. and K.M. Carley, Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 1999. 10(6): p. 741--757.

Digital Library

[2]

Barreto, M. and N. Ellemers, The impact of anonymity and group identification on progroup behavior in computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 2002. 33(5): p. 590--610.

[3]

Baym, N., Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside a computer-mediate fan culture. Journal of Folklore Research, 1993. 30: p. 143--176.

[4]

Baym, N.K., Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. 2000, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

[5]

Bryant, S.L., A. Forte, and A. Bruckman, Becoming wikipedia: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia, in GROUP. 2005: Sanibel Island, FL.

Digital Library

[6]

Burnett, G. and L. Bonnici, Beyond the faq: Explicit and implicit norms in usenet newsgroups. Library & Information Science Research, 2003. 25(3): p. 333.

[7]

Chidambaram, L. and L.L. Tung, Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 2005. 16(2): p. 149--168.

Digital Library

[8]

Cohen, N., Defending wikipedia's impolite side, in The New York TImes. 2007, The New York Times Company: New York, NY.

[9]

Connelly, T. and B.K. Thorn, Discretionary databases: Theory, data, and implications, in Organizations and communication technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Editors. 1990, Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA. p. 219--233.

[10]

Fogel, K., Producing open source software: How to run a successful free software project 2005, Sebastopol, CA O'Reilly Media, Inc.

Digital Library

[11]

Forte, A. and A. Bruckman, Why do people write for wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open-content publishing, in Group 2005 Workshop - Sustaining Community: The role and design of incentive mechanisms in online systems. 2005: Sanibel Island, FL.

[12]

Galegher, J., L. Sproull, and S. Kiesler, Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 1998. 15(4): p. 493--530.

[13]

Hinds, P.J. and D.E. Bailey, Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 2003. 14(6): p. 515--632.

Digital Library

[14]

Hinds, P.J. and M. Mortensen, Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 2005. 16(3): p. 290--307.

Digital Library

[15]

Jensen, C. and W. Scacchi. Collaboration, leadership, control, and conflict negotiation in the netbeans.Org software development community. in Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2005. Waikola Village, HI.

Digital Library

[16]

Jensen, C. and W. Scacchi. Role migration and advancement processes in ossd projects: A comparative case study. in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineerring. 2007. Minneapolis, MN.

Digital Library

[17]

Jones, Q., G. Ravid, and S. Rafaeli, Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 2004. 15(2): p. 194--210.

Digital Library

[18]

Kennedy, H., Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media & Society, 2006. 8(6): p. 859--876.

[19]

Kim, A.J., Community building on the web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. 1 ed. 2000, Berkeley, CA Peachpit Press.

Digital Library

[20]

Kirsch, L.J., Portfolios of control modes and is project management. Information Systems Research, 1997. 8(3): p. 215--239.

[21]

Kirsch, L.J., et al., Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Science, 2002. 48(4): p. 484--498.

Digital Library

[22]

Kittur, A., et al., Power of the few vs. Wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2007: San Jose, CA.

[23]

Kittur, A., et al., He says, she says: Conflict and coordination in wikipedia, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2007: San Jose, CA.

Digital Library

[24]

Kollock, P. and M. Smith, Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities, in Computer--mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, S. Herring, Editor. 1996, John Benjamins: Amsterdam. p. 109--128.

[25]

Kuechler, W.L. and C. Vaishnavi, So, talk to me: The effect of explicit goals on the comprehension of business process narratives. MIS Quarterly, 2006. 30(4): p. 961--A16.

Digital Library

[26]

Lakhani, K.R. and E. von Hippel, How open source software works: "Free" User-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 2003. 32(6): p. 923--943.

[27]

Malone, T., W. and K. Crowston, The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 1994. 26(1): p. 87--119.

Digital Library

[28]

Maney, K., Mass collaboration could change way companies operate, in USA Today. 2006.

[29]

March, J.G., M. Schulz, and X. Zhou, The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. 2000, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

[30]

McKenna, K.Y.A. and J.A. Bargh, Coming out in the age of the internet: Identity "Demarginalization" Through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 75(3): p. 681.

[31]

Nidumolu, S.R. and M.R. Subramani, The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003. 20(Issue 3): p. 159.

Digital Library

[32]

Ostrom, E., Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000. 14(3): p. 137--158.

[33]

Petronio, S., The boundaries of privacy: Praxis of everyday life, in Balancing the secrets of private disclosures, S. Petronio, Editor. 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N. J. p. 37--50.

[34]

Petronio, S., et al., (mis)communicating across boundaries. Communication Research, 1998: p. 571--595.

[35]

Raymond, E., The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge and Policy, 1999. 12(3).

Digital Library

[36]

Ren, Y., R.E. Kraut, and S. Kiesler, Applying common identity and bond theory to the design of online communities. In press, 2006.

[37]

Riva, G. and C. Galimberti, Computer-mediated communication: Identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 1998. 124(4): p. 434--463.

[38]

Roberts, J.A., I.-H. Hann, and S.A. Slaughter, Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Management Science, 2006. 52(7): p. 984--999.

Digital Library

[39]

Simon, H., Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991. 2(1): p. 125--134.

Digital Library

[40]

Slaughter, S.A. and L.J. Kirsch, The effectiveness of knowledge transfer portfolios on software process improvement: A field study. Information Systems Research, 2006. 17(3): p. 301--320.

Digital Library

[41]

Stewart, K.J. and S. Gosain, The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 2006. 30(2): p. 291--314.

Digital Library

[42]

Viegas, F., M. Wattenberg, and K. Dave, Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2004: Vienna, Austria.

Digital Library

[43]

Viegas, F.B., et al. Talk before you type: Coordination in wikipedia. in Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2007. Big Island, HI.

Digital Library

[44]

von Krogh, G., S. Spaeth, and K.R. Lakhani, Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 2003. 32(7): p. 1217--1241.

[45]

Wikipedia contributors, Ignore all rules. 2006, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[46]

Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[47]

Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia talk:Copyrights 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[48]

Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia: Policies and guidelines. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[49]

Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia:Consensus. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[50]

Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[51]

Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[52]

Zhang, X.M. and F. Zhu, Intrinsic motivation of open content contributors: The case of wikipedia, in Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. 2006: Evanston, IL.

[53]

Zlati?, V., et al., Wikipedias: Collaborative web-based encyclopedias as complex networks. Physical Review, 2006. 74(016115).

Cited By

Bulat BWang HFujimoto SFrey S(2024)The psychology of volunteer moderators: Tradeoffs between participation, belonging, and norms in online community governanceNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241259028Online publication date: 29-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241259028
Kharazian ZStarbird KHill B(2024)Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Serbo-Croatian WikipediasProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373388:CSCW1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637338
Kou YMa RZhang ZZhou YGui X(2024)Community Begins Where Moderation Ends: Peer Support and Its Implications for Community-Based RehabilitationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642675(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642675
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia

Recommendations

Keeping eyes on the prize: officially sanctioned rule breaking in mass collaboration systems
CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work

Mass collaboration systems are often characterized as unstructured organizations lacking rule and order. However, examination of Wikipedia reveals that it contains a complex policy and rule structure that supports the organization. Bureaucratic ...
Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation
GROUP '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

When large groups cooperate, issues of conflict and control surface because of differences in perspective. Managing such diverse views is a persistent problem in cooperative group work. The Wikipedian community has responded with an evolving body of ...
Wikipedia's “Neutral Point of View”: Settling Conflict through Ambiguity

This article discusses how one of the most important Wikipedia policies, the “neutral point of view” (NPOV), is appropriated and interpreted by the participants in the Wikipedia project. By analyzing a set of constitutive documents for the Wikipedian ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2008

1870 pages

ISBN:9781605580111

DOI:10.1145/1357054

General Chairs:
Mary Czerwinski
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Arnie Lund
Microsoft, USA
,
Program Chair:
Desney Tan
Microsoft Research, USA

Copyright © 2008 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 April 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '08

Sponsor:

CHI '08: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 5 - 10, 2008

Florence, Italy

Acceptance Rates

CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 157 of 714 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

151
Total Citations
View Citations
1,965
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)85
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 18 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bulat BWang HFujimoto SFrey S(2024)The psychology of volunteer moderators: Tradeoffs between participation, belonging, and norms in online community governanceNew Media & Society10.1177/14614448241259028Online publication date: 29-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241259028
Kharazian ZStarbird KHill B(2024)Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian, and Serbo-Croatian WikipediasProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373388:CSCW1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637338
Kou YMa RZhang ZZhou YGui X(2024)Community Begins Where Moderation Ends: Peer Support and Its Implications for Community-Based RehabilitationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642675(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642675
Schaffner BBhagoji ACheng SMei JShen JWang GChetty MFeamster NLakier GTan C(2024)"Community Guidelines Make this the Best Party on the Internet": An In-Depth Study of Online Platforms' Content Moderation PoliciesProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642333(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642333
Wang LVincent NRukanskaitė JZhang A(2024)Pika: Empowering Non-Programmers to Author Executable Governance Policies in Online CommunitiesProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642012(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642012
Chakraborti MAtkisson CStănciulescu ŞFilkov VFrey S(2024)Do We Run How We Say We Run? Formalization and Practice of Governance in OSS CommunitiesProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641980(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3641980
Roszkowski M(2024)Navigating change: an exploration of socio-epistemic process of extending Wikidata ontology with new propertiesJournal of Documentation10.1108/JD-01-2024-0008Online publication date: 13-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2024-0008
König R(2024)„Google WTC-7“ – Zur ambivalenten Position von marginalisiertem Wissen im InternetKonspiration10.1007/978-3-658-43429-8_16(363-380)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43429-8_16
Hergueux J(2023)3. Coopération en ligne : quarante ans de télétravail volontaireLe travail à distance10.3917/dec.senik.2023.01.0060(59-75)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.senik.2023.01.0060
Anand SArazy OMandayam NNov O(2023)A game-theoretic analysis of Wikipedia’s peer production: The interplay between community’s governance and contributors’ interactionsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.028172518:5(e0281725)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281725
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents