Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2688204.2688216acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplashConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wyvern: Impacting Software Security via Programming Language Design

Published: 21 October 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Breaches of software security affect millions of people, and therefore it is crucial to strive for more secure software systems. However, the effect of programming language design on software security is not easily measured or studied. In the absence of scientific insight, opinions range from those that claim that programming language design has no effect on security of the system, to those that believe that programming language design is the only way to provide "high-assurance software." In this paper, we discuss how programming language design can impact software security by looking at a specific example: the Wyvern programming language. We report on how the design of the Wyvern programming language leverages security principles, together with hypotheses about how usability impacts security, in order to prevent command injection attacks. Furthermore, we discuss what security principles we considered in Wyvern's design.

References

[1]
J. Aldrich, C. Omar, A. Potanin, and D. Li. Language-Based Architectural Control. In IWACO, 2014.
[2]
K. Hickey. Most secure Web programming language? It depends., April 2014. URL http://gcn.com/articles/2014/04/24/programming-language-security.aspx.
[3]
D. Kurilova, C. Omar, L. Nistor, B. Chung, A. Potanin, and J. Aldrich. Type-Specific Languages to Fight Injection Attacks. In HotSoS, 2014.
[4]
L. Nistor, D. Kurilova, S. Balzer, B. Chung, A. Potanin, and J. Aldrich. Wyvern: A Simple, Typed, and Pure Object-oriented Language. In MASPEGHI, 2013.
[5]
C. Omar, D. Kurilova, L. Nistor, B. Chung, A. Potanin, and J. Aldrich. Safely Composable Type-Specific Languages. In ECOOP, 2014.
[6]
OWASP. Category:OWASP Top Ten Project, 2014. URL https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project.
[7]
P. Perego. Which Is the Most Secure Programming Language Ever?, July 2012. URL http://armoredcode.com/blog/which-is-the-mostsecure-programming-language-ever/.
[8]
J. H. Saltzer and M. D. Schroeder. The Protection of Information in Computer Systems. Proc. IEEE, 1975.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Fixing vulnerabilities potentially hinders maintainabilityEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-021-10019-z26:6Online publication date: 22-Sep-2021
  • (2018)LangSec Revisited: Input Security Flaws of the Second Kind2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)10.1109/SPW.2018.00051(329-334)Online publication date: May-2018
  • (2016)Cyber Security, a Threat to Cyber Banking in South Africa: An Approach to Network and Application Security2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)10.1109/CSCloud.2016.18(1-6)Online publication date: Jun-2016

Index Terms

  1. Wyvern: Impacting Software Security via Programming Language Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    PLATEAU '14: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools
    October 2014
    80 pages
    ISBN:9781450322775
    DOI:10.1145/2688204
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 October 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. command injection attacks
    2. programming language
    3. programming language design
    4. security
    5. security principles
    6. usability
    7. wyvern

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • USA NSA Lablet

    Conference

    SPLASH '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    PLATEAU '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 5 of 8 submissions, 63%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 5 of 8 submissions, 63%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Fixing vulnerabilities potentially hinders maintainabilityEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-021-10019-z26:6Online publication date: 22-Sep-2021
    • (2018)LangSec Revisited: Input Security Flaws of the Second Kind2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)10.1109/SPW.2018.00051(329-334)Online publication date: May-2018
    • (2016)Cyber Security, a Threat to Cyber Banking in South Africa: An Approach to Network and Application Security2016 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)10.1109/CSCloud.2016.18(1-6)Online publication date: Jun-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media