research-article

Can Children Catch Curiosity from a Social Robot?

Authors:

Cynthia Breazeal,

Susan EngelAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Pages 91 - 98

https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696469

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Curiosity is key to learning, yet school children show wide variability in their eagerness to acquire information. Recent research suggests that other people have a strong influence on children's exploratory behavior. Would a curious robot elicit children's exploration and the desire to find out new things? In order to answer this question we designed a novel experimental paradigm in which a child plays an education tablet app with an autonomous social robot, which is portrayed as a younger peer. We manipulated the robot's behavior to be either curiosity-driven or not and measured the child's curiosity after the interaction. We show that some of the child's curiosity measures are significantly higher after interacting with a curious robot, compared to a non-curious one, while others do not. These results suggest that interacting with an autonomous social curious robot can selectively guide and promote children's curiosity.

References

[1]

M. P. Arnone, R. V. Small, S. A. Chauncey, and H. P. McKenna. Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments: a new research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2):181--198, 2011.

[2]

W. A. Bainbridge, J.W. Hart, E. S. Kim, and B. Scassellati. The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(1):41--52, 2011.

[3]

L. S. Blackwell, K. H. Trzesniewski, and C. S. Dweck. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child development, 78(1):246--263, 2007.

[4]

C. Dweck. Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House LLC, 2006.

[5]

R. C. Endsley and S. A. Clarey. Answering young children's questions as a determinant of their subsequent question-asking behavior. Developmental Psychology, 11(6):863, 1975.

[6]

S. Engel. Children's need to know: curiosity in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4):625--645, 2011.

[7]

S. Engel. The case for curiosity. Educational Leadership, 70(5):36--40, 2013.

[8]

A. Gatt and E. Reiter. Simplenlg: A realisation engine for practical applications. In Proc. of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pages 90--93. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.

Digital Library

[9]

K. Haimovitz, S. V. Wormington, and J. H. Corpus. Dangerous mindsets: How beliefs about intelligence predict motivational change. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6):747--752, 2011.

[10]

P. L. Harris. Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. Harvard University Press, 2012.

[11]

B. Henderson and S. G. Moore. Children's responses to objects differing in novelty in relation to level of curiosity and adult behavior. Child development, pages 457--465, 1980.

[12]

B. B. Henderson. Parents and exploration: The effect of context on individual differences in exploratory behavior. Child Development, pages 1237--1245, 1984.

[13]

J. Jirout and D. Klahr. Children's scientific curiosity: In search of an operational definition of an elusive concept. Developmental Review, 32(2):125--160, 2012.

[14]

T. B. Kashdan and M. Yuen. Whether highly curious students thrive academically depends on perceptions about the school learning environment: A study of hong kong adolescents. Motivation and Emotion, 31(4):260--270, 2007.

[15]

R. Langevin. Is curiosity a unitary construct? Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 25(4):360, 1971.

[16]

D. Leyzberg, S. Spaulding, M. Toneva, and B. Scassellati. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX, 2012.

[17]

A. N. Meltzoff, P. K. Kuhl, J. Movellan, and T. J. Sejnowski. Foundations for a new science of learning. science, 325(5938):284--288, 2009.

[18]

J. Movellan, M. Eckhardt, M. Virnes, and A. Rodriguez. Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In Proc. of the 4th ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human robot interaction, pages 307--308, 2009.

Digital Library

[19]

L. Schulz. The origins of inquiry: inductive inference and exploration in early childhood. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(7):382--389, 2012.

[20]

A. Setapen. Creating Robotic Characters for Long-term Interaction. Thesis, 2012.

[21]

F. Tanaka and S. Matsuzoe. Children teach a care-receiving robot to promote their learning: field experiments in a classroom for vocabulary learning. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 2012.

[22]

J. Torgesen, R. Wagner, and C. Rashotte. Test of word reading efficiency (towre). austin, texas: Pro-ed, 1999.

[23]

F. Wardle. Getting back to the basics of childrens play. Child Care Information Exchange, 57:27--30, 1987.

Cited By

Elgarf MSalam HPeters C(2024)Fostering children’s creativity through LLM-driven storytelling with a social robotFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.145742911Online publication date: 13-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1457429
Wang FCheung A(2024)Robots’ Social Behaviors for Language Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisReview of Educational Research10.3102/00346543231216437Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231216437
IWASAKI SMORIGUCHI YSEKIYAMA K(2024)ASSOCIATION OF EPISTEMIC CURIOSITY AND COGNITIVE ABILITY IN YOUNG CHILDREN: PREFERENCE FOR FILLING THE INFORMATION GAP OVER NOVELTYPSYCHOLOGIA10.2117/psysoc.2022-A20266:2(109-124)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2022-A202
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Can Children Catch Curiosity from a Social Robot?

Recommendations

Can Children Learn Creativity from a Social Robot?
C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Children's creativity contributes to their learning outcomes and personal growth. Standardized measures of creative thinking reveal that as children enter elementary school, their creativity drops. In this work, we evaluated whether a social robotic ...
How Can a Social Robot Facilitate Children’s Collaboration?
Social Robotics
Abstract
We used a social robot as a teaching assistant in a class for children’s collaborative learning. The class was designed to be learner-centered, and we formed a class only with a robot and children but without adults. In the class, a group of 6th ...
Can social robots affect children's prosocial behavior? An experimental study on prosocial robot models
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate whether a social robot that models prosocial behavior (in terms of giving away stickers) influences the occurrence of prosocial behavior among children as well as the extent to which children ...
Highlights
- Strongly prosocial robots elicit more prosocial behavior among children.
- ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '15: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 2015

368 pages

ISBN:9781450328838

DOI:10.1145/2696454

General Chairs:
Julie A. Adams
Vanderbilt University, USA
,
William Smart
Oregon State University, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Bilge Mutlu
University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
,
Leila Takayama
Google[x], USA

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
RA: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 March 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

NSF

Conference

HRI '15

Sponsor:

HRI '15: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 2 - 5, 2015

Oregon, Portland, USA

Acceptance Rates

HRI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 43 of 169 submissions, 25%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

113
Total Citations
View Citations
1,459
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)179
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Elgarf MSalam HPeters C(2024)Fostering children’s creativity through LLM-driven storytelling with a social robotFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.145742911Online publication date: 13-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1457429
Wang FCheung A(2024)Robots’ Social Behaviors for Language Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisReview of Educational Research10.3102/00346543231216437Online publication date: 3-Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231216437
IWASAKI SMORIGUCHI YSEKIYAMA K(2024)ASSOCIATION OF EPISTEMIC CURIOSITY AND COGNITIVE ABILITY IN YOUNG CHILDREN: PREFERENCE FOR FILLING THE INFORMATION GAP OVER NOVELTYPSYCHOLOGIA10.2117/psysoc.2022-A20266:2(109-124)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2022-A202
Suzuki SImaoka NAndo T(2024)babypapa: Multiple Communication Robots to Enrich Relationship Between Parents and Child–Design and Evaluation of KANSEI Model to Control Closeness—Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics10.20965/jrm.2024.p015836:1(158-167)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2024.p0158
Indellicato R(2024)Artificial Intelligence and Social-Emotional Learning: what relationship?Journal of Modern Science10.13166/jms/19676560:6(460-470)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/196765
Gkantia EDinas K(2024)Curiosity and Digital Stories: Exploring Preschoolers’ BehaviorsEuropean Journal of Educational Research10.12973/eu-jer.13.4.1741volume-13-2024:volume-13-issue-4-october-2024(1741-1760)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.4.1741
Lin HChen Q(2024)Artificial intelligence (AI) -integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: students and teachers’ perceptions and attitudesBMC Psychology10.1186/s40359-024-01979-012:1Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0
Weatherwax KDooley DCarstensdottir ETakayama L(2024)The Case of the Curious Robot: On the Social Viability of Curious Behavior in Non-Human AgentsProceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3652988.3673920(1-12)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652988.3673920
Kim DRavi PWilliams RYoo D(2024)App Planner: Utilizing Generative AI in K-12 Mobile App Development EducationProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659392(770-775)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3659392
Williams RAli SAlcantara RBurghleh TAlghowinem SBreazeal CGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Doodlebot: An Educational Robot for Creativity and AI LiteracyProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634950(772-780)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634950
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents