Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2701973.2702715acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

When is it Better to Give Up?: Towards Autonomous Action Selection for Robot Assisted ASD Therapy

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Robot Assisted Therapy (RAT) for children with ASD has found promising applications. In this paper, we outline an autonomous action selection mechanism to extend current RAT approaches. This will include the ability to revert control of the therapeutic intervention to the supervising therapist. We suggest that in order to maintain the goals of therapy, sometimes it is better if the robot gives up.

    References

    [1]
    K. Dautenhahn. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. Proc. CT99, (3), 1999.
    [2]
    D. Feil-Seifer and M. Mataric. B3IA: A control architecture for autonomous robot-assisted behavior intervention for children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. RO-MAN 2008., 2008.
    [3]
    L. Riek. Wizard of Oz Studies in HRI: A Systematic Review and New Reporting Guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1):119--136, Aug. 2012.
    [4]
    B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. T. Boekhorst, and A. Billard. Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2):105--120, July 2005.
    [5]
    B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, and P. Dickerson. From Isolation to Communication: A Case Study Evaluation of Robot Assisted Play for Children with Autism with a Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot. Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pages 205--211, Feb. 2009.
    [6]
    S. Thill, C. A. Pop, T. Belpaeme, T. Ziemke, and B. Vanderborght. Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook. Paladyn, 3(4):209--217, Apr. 2013.
    [7]
    B. Vanderborght, R. Simut, and J. Saldien. Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interaction Studies, 110(Tager 2001), 2012.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A Systematic Literature Review of Decision-Making and Control Systems for Autonomous and Social RobotsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00977-315:5(745-789)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2023
    • (2015)Human-guided learning of social action selection for robot-assisted therapyProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Machine Learning for Interactive Systems - Volume 4310.5555/3045765.3045769(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015

    Index Terms

    1. When is it Better to Give Up?: Towards Autonomous Action Selection for Robot Assisted ASD Therapy

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts
      March 2015
      336 pages
      ISBN:9781450333184
      DOI:10.1145/2701973
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 March 2015

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. ASD
      2. RAT
      3. action selection
      4. cognitive robotics
      5. social robotics

      Qualifiers

      • Abstract

      Funding Sources

      • European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. EU FP7 DREAM project

      Conference

      HRI '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI'15 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate 92 of 102 submissions, 90%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)A Systematic Literature Review of Decision-Making and Control Systems for Autonomous and Social RobotsInternational Journal of Social Robotics10.1007/s12369-023-00977-315:5(745-789)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2023
      • (2015)Human-guided learning of social action selection for robot-assisted therapyProceedings of the 4th International Conference on Machine Learning for Interactive Systems - Volume 4310.5555/3045765.3045769(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media