Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2799250.2799251acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Everyday commuting: prediction, actual experience and recall of anger and frustration in the car

Published: 01 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents insights on driver's User Experience (UX) in terms of systematically investigating predicted experience, actual experience, and recalled experience. By conducting a three-week field study with car commuters in two countries, we studied how frustration and anger differentiate in prediction, actual experience, and recall. Our results show that commuters accurately predict their upcoming anger or frustration in a traffic congestion, however, lower their experienced frustration when being recalled. Moreover, unexpected traffic congestions (in contrast to expected ones) are prone to higher levels of anger. We further found that time of day is related to the prediction of anger, and mood is related to the prediction of frustration. With our study we provide a holistic view on commuters' everyday emotions and experiences -- not only when being on the road, but also before and after the trip.

References

[1]
David A. Armor and Shelley E. Taylor. 2002. When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism. In Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Gilovich, Thomas (eds). Cambridge University Press.
[2]
Leonard Berkowitz. 1989. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59--73.
[3]
Gary W. Evans, Richard Wener, Donald Phillips 2002. The Morning Rush Hour: Predictability and Commuter Stress. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 521.
[4]
Florian Eyben, Martin Wöllmer, Tony Poitschke, Björn Schuller, Christoph Blaschke, Berthold Färber, and Nhu Nguyen-Thien. 2010. Emotion on the road: necessity, acceptance, and feasibility of affective computing in the car. Adv. in Hum.-Comp. Int. 2010, Article 5.
[5]
Erik Hansson, Kristoffer Mattisson, Jonas Björk, Per-Olof Östergren, Kristina Jakobsson. 2011. Relationship between commuting and health outcomes in a cross-sectional population survey in southern Sweden. BMC Public Health, 11:8343.
[6]
Helen Harris and Clifford Nass. 2011. Emotion regulation for frustrating driving contexts. In Proc. of CHI '11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 749--752.
[7]
Dwight A. Hennessy. 2008. The Impact of Commuter Stress on Workplace Aggression, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 9.
[8]
Evangelos Karapanos, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2009. User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proc. of CHI '09. ACM, NY, USA, 729--738.
[9]
Timo Lajunen and Dianne Parker. 2001. Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accident Anal. and Prev., 33, 243--255.
[10]
Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Sandra Trösterer, Christine Döttlinger, David Wilfinger, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2013. Computerized experience sampling in the car: issues and challenges. In Proc. of AutomotiveUI' 13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 220--223.
[11]
Terence R. Mitchell.1997. Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The "rosy view." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 421--448.
[12]
Donald A. Norman. 2009. The way I see it: Memory is more important than actuality. Interactions, 16(2), 24--26.
[13]
Marianna Obrist, Daniela Wurhofer, Alina Krischkowsky, Evangelos Karapanos, David H. Wilfinger, Nicole Perterer, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2013. Experiential perspectives on road congestions. In CHI EA '13. ACM, NY, USA, 535--540.
[14]
Carolyn O'Fallon and Ian Wallis. 2012. A wider look at how travellers value the quality and quantity of travel time. NZ Transport Agency research report 469.
[15]
Michael Potegal, Gerhard Stemmler and Charles Spielberger. 2010. International Handbook of Anger : Constituent and Concomitant Biological, Psychological, and Social Processes. New York: Springer.
[16]
Ira J. Roseman, Cynthia Wiest, and Tamara Swartz. 1994. Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206--221.
[17]
David Schrank, Bill Eisele, and Tim Lomax. 2012. TTI's 2012 Urban Mobility Report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, University of Wisconsin.
[18]
Saul Shiffman, Arthur A. Stone, and Michael R. Hufford. 2008. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1--32.
[19]
Amanda Stephens, John and Groeger. 2011. Anger-congruent behaviour transfers across driving situations, Cognition & Emotion, 25(8), 1423.
[20]
Ronnie Taib, Jeremy Tederry, and Benjamin Itzstein. 2014. Quantifying driver frustration to improve road safety. In CHI EA '14. ACM, NY, USA, 1777--1782.
[21]
Sandra Trösterer, Daniela Wurhofer, Christina Rödel, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Using a Parking Assist System Over Time: Insights on Acceptance and Experiences. In Proc. of AutomotiveUI '14. ACM, NY.
[22]
Wilco W. Van Dijk, Lotte van Dillen, Elise Seip, Mark Rotteveel. 2012. Emotional time travel: Emotion regulation and the overestimation of future anger and sadnes. Eur. Journal of Social Psychol., 42(3), 308--313.
[23]
David L. Van Rooy. 2006. Effects of automobil commute characteristics on affect and job candidate evaluations: A field experiment. Environment and Behavior, 38, 626--655.
[24]
Timothy D. Wilson and Daniel T. Gilbert. 2003. Affective forecasting. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 35, 345--411. New York: Elsevier.
[25]
Thedy Yogasara, 2014. Anticipated user experience in the early stages of product development. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Affective Automotive User Interfaces–Reviewing the State of Driver Affect Research and Emotion Regulation in the CarACM Computing Surveys10.1145/346093854:7(1-26)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2021
  • (2021)The role of route familiarity in traffic participants’ behaviour and transport psychology research: A systematic reviewTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives10.1016/j.trip.2021.1003319(100331)Online publication date: Mar-2021
  • (2020)Measuring Anticipated and Episodic UX of Tasks in Social NetworksApplied Sciences10.3390/app1022819910:22(8199)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Everyday commuting: prediction, actual experience and recall of anger and frustration in the car

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AutomotiveUI '15: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2015
    338 pages
    ISBN:9781450337366
    DOI:10.1145/2799250
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. anger
    2. car
    3. commuting
    4. frustration
    5. user experience

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • European Commission

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '15

    Acceptance Rates

    AutomotiveUI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 38 of 80 submissions, 48%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Affective Automotive User Interfaces–Reviewing the State of Driver Affect Research and Emotion Regulation in the CarACM Computing Surveys10.1145/346093854:7(1-26)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2021
    • (2021)The role of route familiarity in traffic participants’ behaviour and transport psychology research: A systematic reviewTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives10.1016/j.trip.2021.1003319(100331)Online publication date: Mar-2021
    • (2020)Measuring Anticipated and Episodic UX of Tasks in Social NetworksApplied Sciences10.3390/app1022819910:22(8199)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2020
    • (2020)New Mobilities: A Workshop on Mobility Beyond the CarExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3375169(1-8)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
    • (2020)In-Vehicle Violence Detection in Carpooling: A Brief Survey Towards a General Surveillance SystemDistributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 17th International Conference10.1007/978-3-030-53036-5_23(211-220)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2020
    • (2019)Technology-assisted reconstruction: a new alternative to the experience sampling methodBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2019.1608303(1-19)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2019
    • (2018)AUX and UX Evaluation of User Tools in Social Networks2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)10.1109/WI.2018.0-101(104-111)Online publication date: Dec-2018
    • (2018)UX Evaluation Over Time: User Tools in Social Networks2018 15th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE)10.1109/ICEEE.2018.8533950(1-6)Online publication date: Sep-2018
    • (2018)Towards an AUX Evaluation Framework for User Tools in Virtual CommunitiesCollaboration and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-99504-5_3(25-33)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2018
    • (2016)Activities and Technology Usage while DrivingProceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/2971485.2971556(1-10)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2016
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media