Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

The Effects of Interpersonal Attitude of a Group of Agents on User’s Presence and Proxemics Behavior

Published: 20 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In the everyday world people form small conversing groups where social interaction takes place, and much of the social behavior takes place through managing interpersonal space (i.e., proxemics) and group formation, signaling their attentio to others (i.e., through gaze behavior), and expressing certain attitudes, for example, friendliness, by smiling, getting close through increased engagement and intimacy, and welcoming newcomers. Many real-time interactive systems feature virtual anthropomorphic characters in order to simulate conversing groups and add plausibility and believability to the simulated environments. However, only a few have dealt with autonomous behavior generation, and in those cases, the agents’ exhibited behavior should be evaluated by users in terms of appropriateness, believability, and conveyed meaning (e.g., attitudes). In this article we present an integrated intelligent interactive system for generating believable nonverbal behavior exhibited by virtual agents in small simulated group conversations. The produced behavior supports group formation management and the expression of interpersonal attitudes (friendly vs. unfriendly) both among the agents in the group (i.e., in-group attitude) and towards an approaching user in an avatar-based interaction (out-group attitude). A user study investigating the effects of these attitudes on users’ social presence evaluation and proxemics behavior (with their avatar) in a three-dimensional virtual city environment is presented. We divided the study into two trials according to the task assigned to users, that is, joining a conversing group and reaching a target destination behind the group. Results showed that the out-group attitude had a major impact on social presence evaluations in both trials, whereby friendly groups were perceived as more socially rich. The user’s proxemics behavior depended on both out-group and in-group attitudes expressed by the agents. Implications of these results for the design and implementation of similar intelligent interactive systems for the autonomous generation of agents’ multimodal behavior are briefly discussed.

References

[1]
Michael Argyle. 1988. Bodily Communication (2nd ed.). Methuen, New York. 363 pages.
[2]
Michael Argyle, Florisse Alkema, and Robin Gilmour. 1971. The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 3 (1971), 385--402.
[3]
Jeremy N. Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, Andrew C. Beall, and Jack M. Loomis. 2003. Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 7 (2003), 819--833.
[4]
Paul Ballantine and Brett Martin. 2005. Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Adv. Consumer Res. 32 (2005), 197.
[5]
Daniel Ballin, Marco Gillies, and Barry Crabtree. 2004. A framework for interpersonal attitude and non-verbal communication in improvisational visual media production. In First European Conference on Visual Media Production IEEE. 203--210.
[6]
Aryel Beck, Brett Stevens, Kim A. Bard, and Lola Cañamero. 2012. Emotional body language displayed by artificial agents. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2, 1, Article 2 (March 2012), 29 pages.
[7]
S. Bernard, J. Therien, C. Malone, S. Beeson, A. Gubman, and R. Pardo 2008. Taming the mob: Creating believable crowds in assassin’s creed. In Presented at Game Developers Conference (San Francisco, CA, Feb 18-22).
[8]
Elisabetta Bevacqua, Sathish Pammi, Sylwia Julia Hyniewska, Marc Schröder, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2010. Multimodal backchannels for embodied conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, Berlin, 194--200. 10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_21
[9]
Martin J. Bland and G. Douglas Altman 1996. Statistics notes: Transforming data. Br. Med. J. 312, 7033 (3 1996), 770.
[10]
James V. Bradley. 1958. Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a latin square design. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53, 282 (1958), 525--528.
[11]
Julien Bruneau, Anne-Helene Olivier, and Julien Pettre. 2015. Going through, going around: A study on individual avoidance of groups. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 21, 4 (2015), 520--528.
[12]
Judee Burgoon and Beth Le Poire. 1999. Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality. Commun. Monogr. 66, 2 (1999), 105--124.
[13]
Judee K. Burgoon, David B. Buller, Jerold L. Hale, and Mark A. de Turck. 1984. Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Hum. Commun. Res. 10, 3 (1984), 351--378.
[14]
Judee K. Burgoon and Jerold L. Hale. 1984. The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Commun. Monogr. 51, 3 (1984), 193--214.
[15]
Angelo Cafaro, Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson, Timothy W. Bickmore, Dirk Heylen, and Daniel Schulman. 2013. First impressions in user-agent encounters: The impact of an agent’s nonverbal behavior on users’ relational decisions. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. IFAAMAS, 1201--1202.
[16]
Angelo Cafaro, Hannes Vilhjálmsson, Timothy Bickmore, Dirk Heylen, Kamilla Jóhannsdóttir, and Gunnar Valgarósson. 2012. First impressions: Users’ judgments of virtual agents’ personality and interpersonal attitude in first encounters. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 67--80.
[17]
Mathieu Chollet, Magalie Ochs, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2014. From non-verbal signals sequence mining to Bayesian networks for interpersonal attitudes expression. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Timothy Bickmore, Stacy Marsella, and Candace Sidner (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8637. Springer, Berlin, 120--133.
[18]
Marco Cristani, Giulia Paggetti, Alessandro Vinciarelli, Loris Bazzani, Gloria Menegaz, and Vittorio Murino. 2011. Towards computational proxemics: Inferring social relations from interpersonal distances. In 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Social Computing. 290--297.
[19]
Ralph B. D’Agostino. 1970. Transformation to normality of the null distribution of g1. Biometrika 57, 3 (1970), 679--681.
[20]
Starkey Duncan. 1972. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 23, 2 (1972), 283.
[21]
Birgit Endrass, Elisabeth André, Matthias Rehm, and Yukiko Nakano. 2013. Investigating culture-related aspects of behavior for virtual characters. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 27, 2 (2013), 277--304.
[22]
Cathy Ennis, Rachel McDonnell, and Carol O’Sullivan. 2010. Seeing is believing: Body motion dominates in multisensory conversations. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, Article 91 (July 2010), 9 pages.
[23]
Cathy Ennis and Carol O’Sullivan. 2012. Perceptually plausible formations for virtual conversers. Comput. Anim. Virtual Worlds 23, 3--4 (May 2012), 321--329.
[24]
Doron Friedman, Anthony Steed, and Mel Slater. 2007. Spatial social behavior in second life. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Catherine Pelachaud, Jean-Claude Martin, Elisabeth André, Gérard Chollet, Kostas Karpouzis, and Danielle Pelé (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4722. Springer, Berlin, 252--263.
[25]
Edward T. Hall. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday.
[26]
Kotaro Hayashi, Masahiro Shiomi, Takayuki Kanda, Norihiro Hagita, and ATR Intelligent Robotics. 2012. Friendly patrolling: A model of natural encounters. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems. 121.
[27]
Dirk Helbing and Péter Molnár. 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995), 4282--4286. Issue 5.
[28]
Dirk Heylen, Stefan Kopp, Stacy C. Marsella, Catherine Pelachaud, and Hannes Vilhjálmsson. 2008. The next step towards a function markup language. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’08). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 270--280. 978-3-540-85483-8_28
[29]
Dušan Jan and David R. Traum. 2007. Dynamic movement and positioning of embodied agents in multiparty conversations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Embodied Language Processing (EmbodiedNLP’07). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 59--66.
[30]
Kristiina Jokinen, Hirohisa Furukawa, Masafumi Nishida, and Seiichi Yamamoto. 2013. Gaze and turn-taking behavior in casual conversational interactions. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 3, 2, Article 12 (Aug. 2013), 30 pages.
[31]
Matthew P. Kassner, Eric D. Wesselmann, Alvin Ty Law, and Kipling D. Williams. 2012. Virtually ostracized: Studying ostracism in immersive virtual environments. J. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Network. 15, 8 (2012), 399--403.
[32]
Adam Kendon. 1967. Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychol. 26, 1 (1967), 22--63.
[33]
Adam Kendon. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[34]
Yunkyung Kim and Bilge Mutlu. 2014. How social distance shapes human--robot interaction. International J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72, 12 (2014), 783--795.
[35]
Nathan Kirchner, Alen Alempijevic, and Gamini Dissanayake. 2011. Nonverbal robot-group interaction using an imitated gaze cue. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 497--504.
[36]
Felix Kistler, Birgit Endrass, Ionut Damian, ChiTai Dang, and Elisabeth André. 2012. Natural interaction with culturally adaptive virtual characters. J. Multimodal User Interf. 6, 1--2 (2012), 39--47.
[37]
Clyde Kluckhohn. 1950. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. George Kingsley Zipf. Am. Anthropol. 52, 2 (1950), 268--270.
[38]
Stefan Kopp, Brigitte Krenn, Stacy Marsella, Andrew N. Marshall, Catherine Pelachaud, Hannes Pirker, Kristinn R. Thórisson, and Hannes H. Vilhjálmsson. 2006. Towards a common framework for multimodal generation: The behavior markup language. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA’06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 205--217.
[39]
Lauren I. Labrecque. 2014. Fostering consumer--Brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. J. Interact. Market. 28, 2 (2014), 134--148. 10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
[40]
Petri Lankoski. 2010. Character-Driven Game Design: A Design Approach and Its Foundations in Character Engagement. Vol. 101. Taik Books.
[41]
Jina Lee and Stacy Marsella. 2011. Modeling side participants and bystanders: The importance of being a laugh track. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson, Stefan Kopp, Stacy Marsella, and Kristinn R. Thórisson (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6895. Springer, Berlin, 240--247. 10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_26
[42]
Joan Llobera, Bernhard Spanlang, Giulio Ruffini, and Mel Slater. 2010. Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 8, 1, Article 3 (2010), 12 pages.
[43]
Matthew Lombard and Theresa Ditton. 1997. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 3, 2 (1997), 0--0.
[44]
Matthew Lombard, Lisa Weinstein, and Theresa Ditton. 2011. Measuring telepresence: The validity of the temple presence inventory (TPI) in a gaming context. In 2011 Annual conference of the International Society for Presence Research (ISPR) (ISPR 2011). 9.
[45]
T. Lombard, M. Ditton, and L. Weinstein. 2009. Measuring telepresence: The temple presence inventory. In Twelfth International Workshop on Presence.
[46]
David McNeill. 1992. Hand and Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.
[47]
Ross Mead, Amin Atrash, and Maja J. Matarić. 2013. Automated proxemic feature extraction and behavior recognition: Applications in human-robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5, 3 (2013), 367--378.
[48]
Albert Mehrabian. 1969a. Significance of posture and position in the communication of attitude and status relationships. Psychol. Bull. 71, 5 (1969), 359--372.
[49]
Albert Mehrabian. 1969b. Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. 1, 6 (1969), 203--207.
[50]
Albert Mehrabian. 1981. Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
[51]
Bilge Mutlu, Takayuki Kanda, Jodi Forlizzi, Jessica Hodgins, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2012. Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 1, 2, Article 12 (Jan. 2012), 33 pages.
[52]
Nasser Nassiri, Norman Powell, and David Moore. 2010. Human interactions and personal space in collaborative virtual environments. Virtual Reality 14, 4 (2010), 229--240.
[53]
Carmine Oliva and Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson. 2014. Prediction in social path following. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Motion in Games (MIG’14). ACM, New York, NY, 103--108.
[54]
Mark T. Palmer. 1995. Communication in the age of virtual reality. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, Chapter Interpersonal Communication and Virtual Reality: Mediating Interpersonal Relationships, 277--299. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=207922.207932
[55]
Florian Pecune, Angelo Cafaro, Mathieu Chollet, Pierre Philippe, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2014. Suggestions for extending SAIBA with the VIB platform. In Workshop on Architectures and Standards for IVAs, Held at the ’14th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2014)’. Bielefeld eCollections, 16--20.
[56]
Claudio Pedica and Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson. 2010. Spontaneous avatar behavior for human territoriality. Appl. Artif. Intell. 24, 6 (2010), 575--593.
[57]
Claudio Pedica, Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson, and Marta Lárusdóttir. 2010. Avatars in conversation: The importance of simulating territorial behavior. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Jan Allbeck, Norman Badler, Timothy Bickmore, Catherine Pelachaud, and Alla Safonova (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6356. Springer, Berlin, 336--342.
[58]
Claudio Pedica and Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson. 2012. Lifelike interactive characters with behavior trees for social territorial intelligence. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Posters (SIGGRAPH’12). ACM, New York, NY, Article 32, 1 pages.
[59]
Rui Prada and Ana Paiva. 2005. Believable groups of synthetic characters. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’05). ACM, New York, NY, 37--43.
[60]
Brian Ravenet, Angelo Cafaro, Beatrice Biancardi, Magalie Ochs, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2015. Conversational behavior reflecting interpersonal attitudes in small group interactions. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Willem-Paul Brinkman, Joost Broekens, and Dirk Heylen (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9238. Springer, Berlin, 375--388.
[61]
Brian Ravenet, Angelo Cafaro, Magalie Ochs, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2014. Interpersonal attitude of a speaking agent in simulated group conversations. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Timothy Bickmore, Stacy Marsella, and Candace Sidner (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8637. Springer, Berlin, 345--349.
[62]
Brian Ravenet, Magalie Ochs, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2013. From a user-created corpus of virtual agent’s non-verbal behavior to a computational model of interpersonal attitudes. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Ruth Aylett, Brigitte Krenn, Catherine Pelachaud, and Hiroshi Shimodaira (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8108. Springer, Berlin, 263--274.
[63]
Matthias Rehm and Birgit Endrass. 2009. Rapid prototyping of social group dynamics in multiagent systems. AI Soc. 24, 1 (2009), 13--23.
[64]
Craig Reynolds. 1999. Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. In Proceedings of the Game Developers Conference. Miller Freeman Game Groups, San Francisco, CA, 763--782.
[65]
Virginia Richmond, James McCroskey, and Mark Hickson. 2008. Nonverbal Communication in Interpersonal Relations (6th ed. ed.). Allyn & Bacon, London.
[66]
A. E. Scheflen. 1976. Human Territories: How we Behave in Space and Time. Prentice-Hall, New York, NY.
[67]
W. C. Schutz. 1958. FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY. 267 pages.
[68]
John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, NY.
[69]
Mel Slater, Amela Sadagic, Martin Usoh, and Ralph Schroeder. 2000. Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study. Presence: Teleoperat. Virtual Environ. 9, 1 (Feb. 2000), 37--51.
[70]
Lynn Smith-Lovin and Charles Brody. 2009. Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition. SAGE Publications Ltd., London, 424--435. 9781446262269
[71]
Olivier Szymanezyk, Patrick Dickinson, and Tom Duckett. 2011. From individual characters to large crowds: Augmenting the believability of open-world games through exploring social emotion in pedestrian groups. In Proceedings of the 2011 DiGRA International Conference: Think Design Play. DiGRA/Utrecht School of the Arts.
[72]
D. G. Tatar. 1997. Social and Personal Effects of a Preoccupied Listener. Stanford University.
[73]
J. Vroon, M. Joosse, M. Lohse, J. Kolkmeier, Jaebok Kim, K. Truong, G. Englebienne, D. Heylen, and V. Evers. 2015. Dynamics of social positioning patterns in group-robot interactions. In 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 394--399. ROMAN.2015.7333633
[74]
G. J. Walker. 1998. Our Sweetest Hours: Recreation and the Mental State of Absorption. Taylor & Francis, London.
[75]
Nick Yee, Jeremy N. Bailenson, Mark Urbanek, Francis Chang, and Dan Merget. 2007. The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 10, 1 (2007), 115--121.
[76]
Victor H. Yngve. 1970. On getting a word in edgewise. In Chicago Linguistics Society, 6th Meeting. 567--578.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Join Me Here if You Will: Investigating Embodiment and Politeness Behaviors When Joining Small Groups of Humans, Robots, and Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642905(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)GROUP DYNAMICS AND CREATIVITY: A RESEARCH WITH YOUNG ADULTS IN REGGIO EMILIA, ITALYCreativity Studies10.3846/cs.2023.1756416:1(297-314)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Impact of Multimodal Communication on Persuasiveness and Perceived Politeness of Virtual Agents in Small GroupsProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607356(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 6, Issue 2
Regular Articles, Special Issue on Highlights of IUI 2015 (Part 2 of 2) and Special Issue on Highlights of ICMI 2014 (Part 1 of 2)
August 2016
282 pages
ISSN:2160-6455
EISSN:2160-6463
DOI:10.1145/2974721
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 July 2016
Accepted: 01 April 2016
Revised: 01 January 2016
Received: 01 June 2015
Published in TIIS Volume 6, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Interpersonal attitude
  2. embodied conversational agents
  3. group behavior
  4. human territoriality
  5. multimodal nonverbal behavior
  6. social presence

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • H2020 European project ARIA-VALUSPA
  • VERVE
  • French state funds and managed by the ANR
  • Labex SMART (ANR-11-LABX-65) “Investissements d’Avenir” program

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)100
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Join Me Here if You Will: Investigating Embodiment and Politeness Behaviors When Joining Small Groups of Humans, Robots, and Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642905(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)GROUP DYNAMICS AND CREATIVITY: A RESEARCH WITH YOUNG ADULTS IN REGGIO EMILIA, ITALYCreativity Studies10.3846/cs.2023.1756416:1(297-314)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Impact of Multimodal Communication on Persuasiveness and Perceived Politeness of Virtual Agents in Small GroupsProceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3570945.3607356(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Real-Life Experiment Metrics for Evaluating Human-Robot Collaborative Navigation Tasks2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309529(660-667)Online publication date: 28-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Emotionally intelligent virtual tour guide in handling group conflicts: Effect on user outcomesComputer Animation and Virtual Worlds10.1002/cav.215334:3-4Online publication date: 23-May-2023
  • (2022)Multiparty Interaction Between Humans and Socially Interactive AgentsThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563665(113-154)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Interaction in Social SpaceThe Handbook on Socially Interactive Agents10.1145/3563659.3563662(3-44)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Don't walk between usProceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3514197.3549676(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Social media engagement with organization-generated content: Role of visuals in enhancing public engagement with organizations on Facebook and InstagramPublic Relations Review10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.10217448:2(102174)Online publication date: Jun-2022
  • (2022)Immersive machine learning for social attitude detection in virtual reality narrative gamesVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-022-00644-426:4(1519-1538)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media