abstract

Personalized Views for Immersive Analytics

Authors:

Santiago Bonada,

Christopher CollinsAuthors Info & Claims

ISS '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Companion on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces

Pages 83 - 89

https://doi.org/10.1145/3009939.3009953

Published: 06 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we present work-in-progress toward a vision of personalized views of visual analytics interfaces in the context of collaborative analytics in immersive spaces. In particular, we are interested in the sense of immersion, responsiveness, and personalization afforded by gaze-based input. Through combining large screen visual analytics tools with eye-tracking, a collaborative visual analytics system can become egocentric while not disrupting the collaborative nature of the experience. We present a prototype system and several ideas for real-time personalization of views in visual analytics.

References

[1]

Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. Proxemic Interaction: Designing for a Proximity and Orientation-aware Environment. In Proc. of the ACM Int. Conf. on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 121--130.

Digital Library

[2]

Jeremy Boy, Ronald A Rensink, Enrico Bertini, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. A principled way of assessing visualization literacy. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (2014), 1963--1972.

[3]

Richard Cox. 1999. representation construction, externalised, cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction 9, 4 (1999), 343--363.

[4]

Jakub Dostal, Uta Hinrichs, Per Ola Kristensson, and Aaron Quigley. 2014. SpiderEyes: Designing Attention- and Proximity-aware Collaborative Interfaces for Wall-sized Displays. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces. 143--152.

Digital Library

[5]

Eric G Freedman and Priti Shah. 2002. Toward a Model of Knowledge-Based Graph Comprehension. Diagrams (2002), 18--30.

Digital Library

[6]

Lars Grammel, Melanie Tory, and Margaret Anne Storey. 2010. How information visualization novices construct visualizations. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010), 943--952.

Digital Library

[7]

Simen Hagen and Frode Eika Sandnes. 2012. Visual scoping and personal space on shared tabletop surfaces. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 3, 2 (2012), 95--102.

[8]

Petra Isenberg, Danyel Fisher, Sharoda Paul, Meredith Ringel Morris, Kori Inkpen, and Mary Czerwinski. 2012. Co-located collaborative visual analytics around a tabletop display. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 5 (May 2012), 689--702.

Digital Library

[9]

Christian Lander, Sven Gehring, Antonio Krüger, Sebastian Boring, Andreas Bulling, and Dfki Gmbh. GazeProjector: Accurate Gaze Estimation and Seamless Gaze Interaction Across Multiple Displays.

[10]

Sukwon Lee, Sung-hee Kim, Ya-hsin Hung, Heidi Lam, Youn-ah Kang, and Ji Soo Yi. 2015. How do People Make Sense of Unfamiliar Visualizations?: A Grounded Model of Novice's Information Visualization Sensemaking. 22, c (2015).

[11]

Ken Pfeuffer, Yanxia Zhang, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. A Collaborative Gaze Aware Information Display. In Adjunct Proc. of the ACM Int. Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 389--391.

Digital Library

[12]

Bertrand Schneider and Roy Pea. 2014. Toward collaboration sensing. Int. J. of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 9, 4 (2014), 371--395.

[13]

Stacey D Scott and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2006. Investigating Tabletop Territoriality in Digital Tabletop Workspaces. Technical Report 2006--836--29. University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science.

[14]

Julian Seifert, Adalberto Simeone, Dominik Schmidt, Paul Holleis, Christian Reinartz, Matthias Wagner, Hans Gellersen, and Enrico Rukzio. 2012. MobiSurf: Improving Co-located Collaboration Through Integrating Mobile Devices and Interactive Surfaces. In Proc. of the ACM Int. Conf. on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--60.

Digital Library

[15]

Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Tanja Döring, Pouyan Parvahan, Bernd Ahrens, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2009. Poker Surface: Combining a Multi-touch Table and Mobile Phones in Interactive Card Games. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 73, 2 pages.

Digital Library

[16]

Ben Steichen, Giuseppe Carenini, and Cristina Conati. 2013. User-adaptive information visualization: using eye gaze data to infer visualization tasks and user cognitive abilities. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 317--328.

Digital Library

[17]

Philip Tuddenham. 2007. Distributed Tabletops: Territoriality and Orientation in Distributed Collaboration. In CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2237--2242.

Digital Library

[18]

Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive public ambient displays. Proc. of the ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology (2004), 137.

Digital Library

[19]

Katherine Vogt, Lauren Bradel, Christopher Andrews, Chris North, Alex Endert, and Duke Hutchings. 2011. Co-located Collaborative Sensemaking on a Large High-Resolution Display with Multiple Input Devices. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 589--604.

Digital Library

[20]

Yanxia Zhang, Jörg Müller, Ming Ki Chong, Andreas Bulling, and Hans Gellersen. 2014. GazeHorizon. In Proc. of the ACM Int. Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 559--563.

Digital Library

Cited By

Shin SBatch AButcher PRitsos PElmqvist N(2024)The Reality of the Situation: A Survey of Situated AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.328554630:8(5147-5164)Online publication date: Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3285546
Zhou ZWang WGuo MWang YGotz D(2023)A Design Space for Surfacing Content Recommendations in Visual Analytic PlatformsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.320944529:1(84-94)Online publication date: Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209445
Fröhler BAnthes CPointecker FFriedl JSchwajda DRiegler ATripathi SHolzmann CBrunner MJodlbauer HJetter HHeinzl C(2022)A Survey on Cross‐Virtuality AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1444741:1(465-494)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14447
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Personalized Views for Immersive Analytics
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
      1. Computer supported cooperative work
  2. Human computer interaction (HCI)
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing and business
      1. Computer supported cooperative work

Recommendations

The Eye in Extended Reality: A Survey on Gaze Interaction and Eye Tracking in Head-worn Extended Reality
With innovations in the field of gaze and eye tracking, a new concentration of research in the area of gaze-tracked systems and user interfaces has formed in the field of Extended Reality (XR). Eye trackers are being used to explore novel forms of spatial ...
Teaching Eye Tracking Visual Analytics in Computer and Data Science Bachelor Courses
ETRA '20 Full Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications

Making students aware of eye tracking technologies can have a great benefit on the entire application field since they may build the next generation of eye tracking researchers. On the one hand students learn the usefulness and benefits of this ...
Pistol: Pupil Invisible Supportive Tool in the Wild
Abstract
This paper is an in the wild evaluation of the eye tracking tool Pistol. Pistol supports Pupil Invisible projects and other eye trackers (Dikablis, Emke GmbH, Look, Pupil, and many more) in offline mode. For all eye tracking recordings, Pistol is ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ISS '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Companion on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces

November 2016

136 pages

ISBN:9781450345309

DOI:10.1145/3009939

General Chairs:
Mark Hancock
University of Waterloo, Canada
,
Nicolai Marquardt
University College London, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Johannes Schöning
Hasselt University, Belgium
,
Melanie Tory
Tableau Research, USA

Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Funding Sources

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Conference

ISS '16

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

ISS '16: 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces

November 6 - 9, 2016

Ontario, Niagara Falls, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 147 of 533 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
259
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)5
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Shin SBatch AButcher PRitsos PElmqvist N(2024)The Reality of the Situation: A Survey of Situated AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.328554630:8(5147-5164)Online publication date: Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3285546
Zhou ZWang WGuo MWang YGotz D(2023)A Design Space for Surfacing Content Recommendations in Visual Analytic PlatformsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.320944529:1(84-94)Online publication date: Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209445
Fröhler BAnthes CPointecker FFriedl JSchwajda DRiegler ATripathi SHolzmann CBrunner MJodlbauer HJetter HHeinzl C(2022)A Survey on Cross‐Virtuality AnalyticsComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1444741:1(465-494)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2022
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14447
Chen LLiang HLu FWang JChen WYue Y(2021)Effect of Collaboration Mode and Position Arrangement on Immersive Analytics Tasks in Virtual Reality: A Pilot StudyApplied Sciences10.3390/app11211047311:21(10473)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110473
Fonnet APrie Y(2021)Survey of Immersive AnalyticsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2019.292903327:3(2101-2122)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2929033
Gutiérrez FOchoa XSeipp KBroos TVerbert K(2019)Benefits and Trade-Offs of Different Model Representations in Decision Support Systems for Non-expert UsersHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 201910.1007/978-3-030-29384-0_35(576-597)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29384-0_35

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents