Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3029798.3038297acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Student Perceptions: The Test of Spatial Contiguity and Gestures for Robot Instructors

Published: 06 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Multimedia lessons have the potential to foster deeper understanding and knowledge. The way a robot instructor presents material and uses gestures likely impacts the perception students have toward the robot. We present preliminary data of students' (N=30) perceptions (i.e., social presence, personality, and method of instruction) of a robot instructor that applies spatial contiguity through the use of gestures. We conducted a between-subjects study with three conditions (no robot, robot without gestures, and robot with gestures). Students had the more positive perceptions of the robot with gestures and the less positive perceptions of the robot without gestures. Future work will include a larger sample size and investigate the impact on learning and retention.

References

[1]
Mayer, R.E. 2005. Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31--48). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[2]
Moreno, R., Mayer, R. 1999. Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358--368.
[3]
Koumoutsakis, T., Church, R., Alibali, M., Singer, M., Ayman-Nolley, S. 2016. Gestures in Instruction: Evidence from Live and Video Lessons. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.
[4]
Goldin-Meadow, S. 2009. The Role of Gestures in Communication and Thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3 (11), 419--429.
[5]
Ferreira, A., & Santoso, A. (2008). Do students' perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students' perceptions on academic performance. Accounting & Finance, 48(2), 209--231.
[6]
Radford, L. 2009. Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educ Stud Math, 70, 111--126.
[7]
Craig, S.D., Twyford, J., Irigoyen, N., & Zipp, S. 2015. A Test of Spatial Contiguity for Virtual Human's Gestures in Multimedia Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 3--14.
[8]
Bremner, P., Leonards, U. 2016. Iconic Gestures for Robot Avatars, Recognition and Integration with Speech. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
[9]
Ryu, J., & Baylor, A. L. 2005. The psychometric structure of pedagogical agent persona. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 2(4), 291--314.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Illustrating Robot MovementsProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576956(231-242)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2022)Robot lecture for enhancing presentation in lectureResearch and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning10.1186/s41039-021-00176-617:1Online publication date: 5-Jan-2022
  • (2022)The Design and Observed Effects of Robot-performed Manual Gestures: A Systematic ReviewACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/354953012:1(1-62)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Student Perceptions: The Test of Spatial Contiguity and Gestures for Robot Instructors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 2017
    462 pages
    ISBN:9781450348850
    DOI:10.1145/3029798
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 March 2017

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. education
    2. gestures
    3. robotics
    4. spatial contiguity

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    HRI '17
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    HRI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 51 of 211 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Illustrating Robot MovementsProceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568162.3576956(231-242)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Robot lecture for enhancing presentation in lectureResearch and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning10.1186/s41039-021-00176-617:1Online publication date: 5-Jan-2022
    • (2022)The Design and Observed Effects of Robot-performed Manual Gestures: A Systematic ReviewACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/354953012:1(1-62)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2022
    • (2019)Warping DeixisProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300838(1-12)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2018)A Robot for Reconstructing Presentation Behavior in LectureProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3284432.3284460(67-75)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media