Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3055399.3055454acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Efficient quantum tomography II

Published: 19 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We continue our analysis of: (i) "Quantum tomography", i.e., learning a quantum state, i.e., the quantum generalization of learning a discrete probability distribution; (ii) The distribution of Young diagrams output by the RSK algorithm on random words. Regarding (ii), we introduce two powerful new tools: first, a precise upper bound on the expected length of the longest union of k disjoint increasing subsequences in a random length-n word with letter distribution α1 ≥ α2 ≥ … ≥ αd. Our bound has the correct main term and second-order term, and holds for all n, not just in the large-n limit. Second, a new majorization property of the RSK algorithm that allows one to analyze the Young diagram formed by the lower rows λk, λk+1, … of its output. These tools allow us to prove several new theorems concerning the distribution of random Young diagrams in the nonasymptotic regime, giving concrete error bounds that are optimal, or nearly so, in all parameters. As one example, we give a fundamentally new proof of the celebrated fact that the expected length of the longest increasing sequence in a random length-n permutation is bounded by 2√n. This is the k = 1, αi ≡ 1/d, d → ∞ special case of a much more general result we prove: the expected length of the kth Young diagram row produced by an α-random word is αk n ± 2√αkd n.
From our new analyses of random Young diagrams we derive several new results in quantum tomography, including: (i) learning the eigenvalues of an unknown state to ε-accuracy in Hellinger-squared, chi-squared, or KL distance, using n = O(d2/ε) copies; (ii) learning the top-k eigenvalues of an unknown state to ε-accuracy in Hellinger-squared or chi-squared distance using n = O(kd/ε) copies or in ℓ22 distance using n = O(k/ε) copies; (iii) learning the optimal rank-k approximation of an unknown state to ε-fidelity (Hellinger-squared distance) using n = O(kd/ε) copies. We believe our new techniques will lead to further advances in quantum learning; indeed, they have already subsequently been used for efficient von Neumann entropy estimation.

References

[1]
{ANSV08} Koenraad Audenaert, Michael Nussbaum, Arleta Szkoła, and Frank Verstraete. Asymptotic error rates in quantum hypothesis testing. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 279(1):251–283, 2008.
[2]
{ARS88} Robert Alicki, Sławomir Rudnicki, and Sławomir Sadowski. Symmetry properties of product states for the system of N n-level atoms. Journal of mathematical physics, 29(5):1158–1162, 1988.
[3]
{BAH + 16} Michael Beverland, Gorjan Alagic, Jeongwan Haah, Gretchen Campbell, Ana Maria Rey, and Alexey Gorshhkov. Implementing a quantum algorithm for spectrum estimation with alkaline earth atoms. In 19th Conference on Quantum Information Processing, 2016. QIP 2016.
[4]
{BDJ99} Jinho Baik, Percy Deift, and Kurt Johansson. On the distribution of the length of the longest increasing subsequence of random permutations. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 12(4):1119–1178, 1999.
[5]
{Bia01} Philippe Biane. Approximate factorization and concentration for characters of symmetric groups. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2001(4):179–192, 2001.
[6]
{BL12} Nayantara Bhatnagar and Nathan Linial. On the Lipschitz constant of the RSK correspondence. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 119(1):63– 82, 2012.
[7]
{BMW16} Mohammad Bavarian, Saeed Mehraban, and John Wright. Personal communication, 2016.
[8]
{BOO00} Alexei Borodin, Andrei Okounkov, and Grigori Olshanski. Asymptotics of plancherel measures for symmetric groups. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 13(3):481–515, 2000.
[9]
{Buf12} Alexey Bufetov. A central limit theorem for extremal characters of the infinite symmetric group. Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 46(2):83– 93, 2012.
[10]
Efficient Quantum Tomography II STOC’17, June 2017, Montreal, Canada
[11]
{CM06} Matthias Christandl and Graeme Mitchison. The spectra of quantum states and the Kronecker coefficients of the symmetric group. Communications in mathematical physics, 261(3):789–797, 2006.
[12]
{FMN13} Valentin Féray, Pierre-Loïc Méliot, and Ashkan Nikeghbali. Mod- ϕ convergence I: Normality zones and precise deviations. Technical report, arXiv:1304.2934, 2013.
[13]
{Ful97} William Fulton. Young tableaux: with applications to representation theory and geometry. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[14]
{Gre74} Curtis Greene. An extension of Schensted’s theorem. Advances in Mathematics, 14:254–265, 1974.
[15]
{HHJ + 16} Jeongwan Haah, Aram Harrow, Zhengfeng Ji, Xiaodi Wu, and Nengkun Yu. Sample-optimal tomography of quantum states. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, August 2016.
[16]
[17]
{HM02} Masahito Hayashi and Keiji Matsumoto. Quantum universal variablelength source coding. Physical Review A, 66(2):022311, 2002.
[18]
{HMR + 10} Sean Hallgren, Cristopher Moore, Martin Rötteler, Alexander Russell, and Pranab Sen. Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 57(6):34, 2010.
[19]
{HRTS03} Sean Hallgren, Alexander Russell, and Amnon Ta-Shma. The hidden subgroup problem and quantum computation using group representations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(4):916–934, 2003.
[20]
{HX13} Christian Houdré and Hua Xu. On the limiting shape of Young diagrams associated with inhomogeneous random words. In High Dimensional Probability VI, volume 66 of Progress in Probability, pages 277–302. Springer Basel, 2013.
[21]
{IO02} Vladimir Ivanov and Grigori Olshanski. Kerov’s central limit theorem for the Plancherel measure on Young diagrams. In Symmetric functions 2001: surveys of developments and perspectives, pages 93–151. Springer, 2002.
[22]
{ITW01} Alexander Its, Craig Tracy, and Harold Widom. Random words, Toeplitz determinants and integrable systems I. In Random Matrices and their Applications, pages 245–258. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[23]
{ Joh01} Kurt Johansson. Discrete orthogonal polynomial ensembles and the Plancherel measure. Annals of Mathematics, 153(1):259–296, 2001.
[24]
{Key06} Michael Keyl. Quantum state estimation and large deviations. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 18(01):19–60, 2006.
[25]
{Kup02} Greg Kuperberg. Random words, quantum statistics, central limits, random matrices. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 9(1):99–118, 2002.
[26]
{KW01} Michael Keyl and Reinhard Werner. Estimating the spectrum of a density operator. Physical Review A, 64(5):052311, 2001.
[27]
{LS77} Benjamin Logan and Larry Shepp. A variational problem for random Young tableaux. Advances in Mathematics, 26(2):206–222, 1977.
[28]
{LZ04} Shunlong Luo and Qiang Zhang. Informational distance on quantum-state space. Physical Review A, 69(3):032106, 2004.
[29]
{Mél10} Pierre-Loïc Méliot. Kerov’s central limit theorem for Schur-Weyl measures of parameter 1/2. Technical report, arXiv:1009.4034, 2010.
[30]
{Mél12} Pierre-Loïc Méliot. Fluctuations of central measures on partitions. In 24th International Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics, pages 385–396, 2012.
[31]
{MM15} Paulina Marian and Tudor Marian. Hellinger distance as a measure of Gaussian discord. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 48(11):115301, 2015.
[32]
{MRS08} Cristopher Moore, Alexander Russell, and Leonard Schulman. The symmetric group defies strong Fourier sampling. SIAM Journal on Computing, 37(6):1842–1864, 2008.
[33]
{OW15} Ryan O’Donnell and John Wright. Quantum spectrum testing. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2015.
[34]
{OW16} Ryan O’Donnell and John Wright. Efficient quantum tomography. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2016.
[35]
{Pil90} Shaiy Pilpel. Descending subsequences of random permutations. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 53(1):96–116, 1990.
[36]
{Rom14} Dan Romik. The surprising mathematics of longest increasing subsequences. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[37]
{Sag01} Bruce E Sagan. The symmetric group: representations, combinatorial algorithms, and symmetric functions. Springer, 2001.
[38]
{Sch61} Craige Schensted. Longest increasing and decreasing subsequences. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 13(2):179–191, 1961.
[39]
{TW01} Craig Tracy and Harold Widom. On the distributions of the lengths of the longest monotone subsequences in random words. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 119(3):350–380, 2001.
[40]
{Ula61} Stanislaw Ulam. Monte Carlo calculations in problems of mathematical physics. Modern Mathematics for the Engineers, pages 261–281, 1961.
[41]
{Vie81} Gérard Viennot. Équidistribution des permutations ayant une forme donnée selon les avances et coavances. Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series A, 31(1):43–55, 1981.
[42]
{VK77} Anatoly Vershik and Sergei Kerov. Asymptotic behavior of the Plancherel measure of the symmetric group and the limit form of Young tableaux. Soviet Mathematics Doklady, 18:118–121, 1977.
[43]
{VK81} Anatoly Vershik and Sergei Kerov. Asymptotic theory of characters of the symmetric group. Functional analysis and its applications, 15(4):246–255, 1981.
[44]
{VK85} Anatoly Vershik and Sergei Kerov. Asymptotic of the largest and the typical dimensions of irreducible representations of a symmetric group. Functional Analysis and its Applications, 19(1):21–31, 1985.
[45]
{Wer94} Lorenz Wernisch. Dominance relation on point sets and aligned rectangles. PhD thesis, Free University Berlin, 1994.
[46]
{WY16} Yihong Wu and Pengkun Yang. Minimax rates of entropy estimation on large alphabets via best polynomial approximation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62(6):3702–3720, 2016.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Quantum chi-squared tomography and mutual information testingQuantum10.22331/q-2024-06-20-13818(1381)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer MatrixACM Transactions on Quantum Computing10.1145/36704185:2(1-53)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographyProceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3618260.3649704(1331-1342)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC 2017: Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing
June 2017
1268 pages
ISBN:9781450345286
DOI:10.1145/3055399
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Quantum tomography
  2. Robinson-Schensted-Knuth algorithm
  3. Schur-Weyl duality
  4. longest increasing subsequences
  5. quantum spectrum estimation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

STOC '17
Sponsor:
STOC '17: Symposium on Theory of Computing
June 19 - 23, 2017
Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

STOC '25
57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)
June 23 - 27, 2025
Prague , Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)172
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Quantum chi-squared tomography and mutual information testingQuantum10.22331/q-2024-06-20-13818(1381)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Learning Quantum Processes and Hamiltonians via the Pauli Transfer MatrixACM Transactions on Quantum Computing10.1145/36704185:2(1-53)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)An Optimal Tradeoff between Entanglement and Copy Complexity for State TomographyProceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3618260.3649704(1331-1342)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
  • (2024)New Quantum Algorithms for Computing Quantum Entropies and DistancesIEEE Transactions on Information Theory10.1109/TIT.2024.339901470:8(5653-5680)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)A Quantum Algorithm Framework for Discrete Probability Distributions With Applications to Rényi Entropy EstimationIEEE Transactions on Information Theory10.1109/TIT.2024.338203770:5(3399-3426)Online publication date: May-2024
  • (2024)Empirical Risk Minimization and Uniform Convergence for Probabilistically Observed and Quantum Measurement Hypothesis Classes2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)10.1109/ISIT57864.2024.10619236(563-568)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Certifying Almost All Quantum States with Few Single-Qubit Measurements2024 IEEE 65th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)10.1109/FOCS61266.2024.00079(1202-1206)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Quantum State Tomography via Nonconvex Riemannian Gradient DescentPhysical Review Letters10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.240804132:24Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Fat shattering, joint measurability, and PAC learnability of POVM hypothesis classesQuantum Information Processing10.1007/s11128-024-04555-y23:10Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Linear Programming with Unitary-Equivariant ConstraintsCommunications in Mathematical Physics10.1007/s00220-024-05108-1405:12Online publication date: 6-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media