Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Testing Cyber-Physical Systems through Bayesian Optimization

Published: 27 September 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Many problems in the design and analysis of cyber-physical systems (CPS) reduce to the following optimization problem: given a CPS which transforms continuous-time input traces in Rm to continuous-time output traces in Rn and a cost function over output traces, find an input trace which minimizes the cost. Cyber-physical systems are typically so complex that solving the optimization problem analytically by examining the system dynamics is not feasible. We consider a black-box approach, where the optimization is performed by testing the input-output behaviour of the CPS.
We provide a unified, tool-supported methodology for CPS testing and optimization. Our tool is the first CPS testing tool that supports Bayesian optimization. It is also the first to employ fully automated dimensionality reduction techniques. We demonstrate the potential of our tool by running experiments on multiple industrial case studies. We compare the effectiveness of Bayesian optimization to state-of-the-art testing techniques based on CMA-ES and Simulated Annealing.

References

[1]
H. Abbas and G. Fainekos. 2012. Convergence proofs for Simulated Annealing falsification of safety properties. In Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on. IEEE, 1594--1601.
[2]
T. Akazaki. 2016. Falsification of Conditional Safety Properties for Cyber-Physical Systems with Gaussian Process Regression. 439--446.
[3]
R. Alur. 2015. Principles of Cyber-Physical Systems. The MIT Press.
[4]
R. Alur, T. Feder, and T. A. Henzinger. 1996. The benefits of relaxing punctuality. J. ACM 43, 1 (1996), 116--146.
[5]
Y. Annpureddy, C. Liu, G. E. Fainekos, and S. Sankaranarayanan. 2011. S-TaLiRo: A tool for temporal logic falsification for hybrid systems. In TACAS 11 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 6605. Springer, 254--257.
[6]
S. Bansal, R. Calandra, T. Xiao, S. Levine, and C. Tomlin. 2017. Goal-driven dynamics learning via Bayesian optimization. CoRR abs/1703.09260 (2017).
[7]
M. Branicky. 1995. Studies in hybrid systems: modeling, analysis, and control. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[8]
E. Brochu, V. M. Cora, and N. de Freitas. 2010. A tutorial on Bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions, with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning. CoRR abs/1012.2599 (2010).
[9]
A. D. Bull. 2011. Convergence rates of efficient global optimization algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (Nov. 2011), 2879--2904.
[10]
J. Deshmukh, X. Jin, J. Kapinski, and O. Maler. 2015. Stochastic local search for falsification of hybrid systems. In ATVA. Springer, 500--517.
[11]
A. Donzé. 2010. Breach, A Toolbox for Verification and Parameter Synthesis of Hybrid Systems. Springer, 167--170.
[12]
A. Donzé and O. Maler. 2010. Robust Satisfaction of Temporal Logic over Real-Valued Signals. Springer, 92--106.
[13]
T. Dreossi, T. Dang, A. Donzé, J. Kapinski, X. Jin, and J. V. Deshmukh. 2015. Efficient Guiding Strategies for Testing of Temporal Properties of Hybrid Systems. Springer International Publishing, 127--142.
[14]
B. Fabien. 1998. Some tools for the direct solution of optimal control problems. Advances in Engineering Software 29, 1 (1998), 45--61.
[15]
G. Fainekos. 2015. Automotive control design bug-finding with the S-TaLiRo tool. In ACC 2015. 4096.
[16]
S. Grünewälder, J.-Y. Audibert, M. Opper, and J. Shawe-Taylor. 2010. Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Bandit Problems. In AISTATS 2010. 273--280.
[17]
N. Hansen. 2016. The CMA Evolution Strategy: A tutorial. CoRR abs/1604.00772 (2016).
[18]
M. Huang, K. Zaseck, K. Butts, and I. Kolmanovsky. 2016. Rate-based model predictive controller for diesel engine air path: Design and experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology 99 (2016), 1--14.
[19]
X. Jin, J. V. Deshmukh, J. Kapinski, K. Ueda, and K. Butts. 2014. Powertrain control verification benchmark. In HSCC’14. ACM, 253--262.
[20]
W. B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss. 1984. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space. Contemporary Mathematics 26 (1984), 189--206.
[21]
D. R. Jones, C. D. Perttunen, and B. E. Stuckman. 1993. Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 79, 1 (1993), 157--181.
[22]
S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 4598 (1983), 671--680.
[23]
D. Lizotte, T. Wang, M. Bowling, and D. Schuurmans. 2007. Automatic gait optimization with Gaussian process regression. In IJCAI 07. 944--949.
[24]
N. Mahendran, Z. Wang, F. Hamze, and N. D. Freitas. 2012. Adaptive MCMC with Bayesian optimization. In AISTATS-12), N. D. Lawrence and M. A. Girolami (Eds.), Vol. 22. 751--760.
[25]
O. Maler and D. Nickovic. 2013. Monitoring properties of analog and mixed-signal circuits. STTT 15, 3 (2013), 247--268.
[26]
A. Marco, P. Hennig, J. Bohg, S. Schaal, and S. Trimpe. 2016. Automatic LQR tuning based on Gaussian process global optimization. In ICRA 16. 270--277.
[27]
Mathworks. 2017. Simulink—Simulation and model-based design. https://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink.html.
[28]
W. Messner and D. Tilbury. 2017. Control tutorials for MATLAB and Simulink. http://ctms.engin.umich.edu/CTMS/index.php?aux=Basics_Simulink% #27.
[29]
M. J. D. Powell. 2009. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Technical Report DAMTP2009/NA06. University of Cambridge.
[30]
C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press.
[31]
S. Sankaranarayanan and G. Fainekos. 2012. Falsification of temporal properties of hybrid systems using the cross-entropy method. In HSCC 12. ACM, 125--134.
[32]
P. Tabuada. 2009. Verification and Control of Hybrid Systems - A Symbolic Approach. Springer.
[33]
Z. Wang, F. Hutter, M. Zoghi, D. Matheson, and N. De Freitas. 2016. Bayesian optimization in a billion dimensions via random embeddings. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 55, 1 (2016), 361--387.
[34]
Y. Xue and P. Bogdan. 2017. Constructing compact causal mathematical models for complex dynamics. In ICCPS’17. ACM, 97--107.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Does Simulation-Based Testing for Self-Driving Cars Match Human Perception?Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering10.1145/36437681:FSE(929-950)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Falsification using Reachability of Surrogate Koopman ModelsProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control10.1145/3641513.3650141(1-13)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • (2024)Approximating the Geometry of Temporal Logic FormulasProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control10.1145/3641513.3650139(1-10)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems  Volume 16, Issue 5s
Special Issue ESWEEK 2017, CASES 2017, CODES + ISSS 2017 and EMSOFT 2017
October 2017
1448 pages
ISSN:1539-9087
EISSN:1558-3465
DOI:10.1145/3145508
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 27 September 2017
Accepted: 01 July 2017
Revised: 01 June 2017
Received: 01 April 2017
Published in TECS Volume 16, Issue 5s

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Bayesian optimization
  2. CMA-ES
  3. Cyber-physical systems
  4. Gaussian processes
  5. Simulated Annealing
  6. black-box optimization
  7. dimensionality reduction
  8. testing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • ERC Synergy Award “IMPACT”
  • Toyota

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Does Simulation-Based Testing for Self-Driving Cars Match Human Perception?Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering10.1145/36437681:FSE(929-950)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Falsification using Reachability of Surrogate Koopman ModelsProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control10.1145/3641513.3650141(1-13)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • (2024)Approximating the Geometry of Temporal Logic FormulasProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control10.1145/3641513.3650139(1-10)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • (2024)Towards Building AI-CPS with NVIDIA Isaac Sim: An Industrial Benchmark and Case Study for Robotics ManipulationProceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice10.1145/3639477.3639740(263-274)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Part-X: A Family of Stochastic Algorithms for Search-Based Test Generation With Probabilistic GuaranteesIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering10.1109/TASE.2023.329798421:3(4504-4525)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)BEACON: A Bayesian Evolutionary Approach for Counterexample Generation of Control SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343651512(106455-106465)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Sample-Based Bounds for Coherent Risk Measures: Applications to Policy Synthesis and VerificationArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2024.104195(104195)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Scenario-Based Flexible Modeling and Scalable Falsification for Reconfigurable CPSsComputer Aided Verification10.1007/978-3-031-65633-0_15(329-355)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Counterexample-Guided Policy Refinement in Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598816(1606-1614)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
  • (2023)Intelligent Embedded Systems Platform for Vehicular Cyber-Physical SystemsElectronics10.3390/electronics1213290812:13(2908)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media