Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3170358.3170364acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The teacher in the loop: customizing multimodal learning analytics for blended learning

Published: 07 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In blended learning scenarios, evidence needs to be gathered from digital and physical spaces to obtain a more complete view of the teaching and learning processes. However, these scenarios are highly heterogeneous, and the varying data sources available in each particular context can condition the accuracy, relevance, interpretability and actionability of the Learning Analytics (LA) solutions, affecting also the user's sense of agency and trust in such solutions. To aid stakeholders in making use of learning analytics, we propose a process to involve teachers in customizing multimodal LA (MMLA) solutions, adapting them to their particular blended learning situation (e.g., identifying relevant data sources and metrics). Since measuring the added value of adopting an LA solution is not straightforward, we also propose a concrete method for doing so. The results obtained from two case studies in authentic, blended computer-supported collaborative learning settings show an improvement in the sensitivity and F1 scores of the customized MMLA solution. Aside from these quantitative improvements, participant teachers reported both an increment in the effort involved, but also increased relevance, understanding and actionability of the results.

References

[1]
Chadia Abras, Diane Maloney-Krichmar, and Jenny Preece. 2004. User-centered design. Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications 37, 4 (2004), 445--456.
[2]
Muneera Bano and Didar Zowghi. 2013. User Involvement in Software Development and System Success: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 125--130.
[3]
Scott Beattie, Carolyn Woodley, and Kay Souter. 2014. Creepy analytics and learner data rights. Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology Proceedings ASCILITE (2014), 421--425.
[4]
Paulo Blikstein and Marcelo Worsley. 2016. Multimodal Learning Analytics and Education Data Mining: using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics 3, 2 (2016), 220--238.
[5]
Crescencio Bravo, Miguel A. Redondo, M. Felisa Verdejo, and Manuel Ortega. 2008. A framework for process-solution analysis in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 11 (2008), 812--832.
[6]
John Brooke. 2013. SUS: a retrospective. Journal of usability studies 8, 2 (2013), 29--40.
[7]
John P Campbell, Diana G Oblinger, et al. 2007. Academic analytics. EDUCAUSE review 42, 4 (2007), 40--57.
[8]
Mohamed Amine Chatti, Anna Lea Dyckhoff, Ulrik Schroeder, and Hendrik Thüs. 2012. A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 4, 5-6 (2012), 318--331.
[9]
Mohamed Amine Chatti, Vlatko Lukarov, Hendrik Thüs, Arham Muslim, Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef, Usman Wahid, Christoph Greven, Arnab Chakrabarti, and Ulrik Schroeder. 2014. Learning Analytics: Challenges and Future Research Directions. eleed 10, 1 (2014), 1--16. https://eleed.campussource.de/archive/10/4035
[10]
Doug Clow. 2012. The Learning Analytics Cycle: Closing the Loop Effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 134--138.
[11]
Carlos Delgado-Kloos, Davinia Hernández-Leo, and Juan I. Asensio-Pérez. 2012. Technology for Learning across Physical and Virtual Spaces J. UCS Special Issue. Journal of Universal Computer Science 18, 15 (2012), 2093--2096. http://www.jucs.org/jucs
[12]
Daniele Di Mitri, Maren Scheffel, Hendrik Drachsler, Dirk Börner, Stefaan Ternier, and Marcus Specht. 2017. Learning Pulse: A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Performance in Self-regulated Learning Using Multimodal Data. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 188--197.
[13]
Hendrik Drachsler and Wolfgang Greller. 2012. The Pulse of Learning Analytics Understandings and Expectations from the Stakeholders. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 120--129.
[14]
Maka Eradze, María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, and Mart Laanpere. 2017. Semantically Annotated Lesson observation Data in Learning Analytics Datasets: a Reference Model. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal 29, 33 (2017), 75--91.
[15]
Tracie Farrell, Alexander Mikroyannidis, and Harith Alani. 2017. "We're Seeking Relevance": Qualitative Perspectives on the Impact of Learning Analytics on Teaching and Learning. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 397--402.
[16]
Jennifer C. Greene, Lehn Benjamin, and Leslie Goodyear. 2001. The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation 7, 1 (2001), 25--44.
[17]
Dai Griffiths. 2013. The implications of Analytics for teaching practice in Higher Education. JISC CETIS Analytics Series 1, 10 (2013), 1--23.
[18]
Emily Dolci Grimm, Trent Kaufman, and Dave Doty. 2014. Rethinking classroom observation. Educational Leadership 71, 8 (2014), 24--29.
[19]
Egon G. Guba. 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Journal of Theory, Research, and Development on Educational Communication and Technology 29, 2 (1981), 75--91.
[20]
Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2017. Intelligent tutors as teachers' aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 257--266.
[21]
Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2017. SPACLE: investigating learning across virtual and physical spaces using spatial replays. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 358--367.
[22]
André Kruger, Agathe Merceron, and Benjamin Wolf. 2010. A data model to ease analysis and mining of educational data. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM'10). International EDM Society., Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 131--140.
[23]
Phil Long and George Siemens. 2011. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review 46, 4 (2011), 21--40.
[24]
Sheila MacNeill and Wilbert Kraan. 2010. Distributed Learning environments: A briefing paper. JISC Center for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards (CETIS) (2010), 1--4. http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Distributed_Learning.pdf
[25]
Kousuke Mouri, Hiroaki Ogata, and Noriko Uosaki. 2017. Learning analytics in a seamless learning environment. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 348--357.
[26]
Juan A Muñoz Cristóbal, María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Vanessa Gallego-Lema, Higinio Francisco Arribas-Cubero, Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez, and Alejandra Martínez-Monés. In press. Monitoring for Awareness and Reflection in Ubiquitous Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (In press).
[27]
Arham Muslim, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Tanmaya Mahapatra, and Ulrik Schroeder. 2016. A Rule-based Indicator Definition Tool for Personalized Learning Analytics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 264--273.
[28]
Xavier Ochoa. 2017. Multimodal Learning Analytics. In The Handbook of Learning Analytics, Charles Lang, George Siemens, Alyssa Wise, and Dragan Gašević (Eds.). SOLAR, 129--141.
[29]
Xavier Ochoa and Marcelo Worsley. 2016. Augmenting Learning Analytics with Multimodal Sensory Data. Journal of Learning Analytics 3, 2 (2016), 213--219.
[30]
Martin Oliver and Keith Trigwell. 2005. Can `blended learning' be redeemed? E-learning and Digital Media 2, 1 (2005), 17--26.
[31]
Zacharoula Papamitsiou and Anastasios A. Economides. 2014. Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining in Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 17, 4 (2014), 49--64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.49
[32]
Abelardo Pardo, Roberto Martínez-Maldonado, Simon Buckingham Shum, Jurgen Schulte, Simon McIntyre, Dragan Gašević, Jing Gao, and George Siemens. 2017. Connecting Data with Student Support Actions in a Course: A Handson Tutorial. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 522--523.
[33]
David Martin Powers. 2011. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies 2, 1 (2011), 37--63.
[34]
María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Alejandra Martínez-Monés, Juan I Asensio-Pérez, and Yannis Dimitriadis. 2015. Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology 46, 2 (2015), 330--343.
[35]
María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Alejandra Martínez-Monés, and Sara Villagrä-Sobrino. 2016. Learning analytics in small-scale teacher-led innovations: ethical and data privacy issues. Journal of Learning Analytics 3, 1 (2016), 43--65.
[36]
María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Luis P Prieto, Andrii Vozniuk, Mina Shirvani Boroujeni, Beat A Schwendimann, Adrian Holzer, and Denis Gillet. 2017. Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: a systematic review. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 9, 2--3 (2017), 126--150.
[37]
Maren Scheffel, Hendrik Drachsler, Christian Toisoul, Stefaan Ternier, and Marcus Specht. 2017. The Proof of the Pudding: Examining Validity and Reliability of the Evaluation Framework for Learning Analytics. In Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education: 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Élise Lavoué, Hendrik Drachsler, Katrien Verbert, Julien Broisin, and Mar Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 194--208.
[38]
Beat A. Schwendimann, María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Andrii Vozniuk, Luis P. Prieto, Mina Shirvani Boroujeni, Adrian Holzer, Denis Gillet, and P. Dillenbourg. 2017. Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 10, 1 (Jan 2017), 30--41.
[39]
Stylianos Sergis and Demetrios G. Sampson. 2017. Teaching and Learning Analytics to Support Teacher Inquiry: A Systematic Literature Review. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 25--63.
[40]
Sharon Slade and Paul Prinsloo. 2013. Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 10 (2013), 1510--1529.
[41]
Feng Wang and Michael J Hannafin. 2005. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development 53, 4 (2005), 5--23.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) ‘Instructor in action’: Co‐design and evaluation of human‐centred LA ‐informed feedback in MOOCs Journal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.13057Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Evidence‐based multimodal learning analytics for feedback and reflection in collaborative learningBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1349855:5(1900-1925)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)e-FeeD4Mi: human-centred design of personalised and contextualised feedback in MOOCsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.2376201(1-18)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
LAK '18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
March 2018
489 pages
ISBN:9781450364003
DOI:10.1145/3170358
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 March 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. blended learning
  2. customization
  3. multimodal learning analytics
  4. personalization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • European Union
  • Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  • Regional Government of Castilla y León

Conference

LAK '18
LAK '18: International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge
March 7 - 9, 2018
New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Acceptance Rates

LAK '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 115 submissions, 30%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)78
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) ‘Instructor in action’: Co‐design and evaluation of human‐centred LA ‐informed feedback in MOOCs Journal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.13057Online publication date: 4-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Evidence‐based multimodal learning analytics for feedback and reflection in collaborative learningBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1349855:5(1900-1925)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)e-FeeD4Mi: human-centred design of personalised and contextualised feedback in MOOCsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.2376201(1-18)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Designing human-centered learning analytics and artificial intelligence in education solutions: a systematic literature reviewBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.2345295(1-28)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Curriculum analytics in higher education institutions: a systematic literature reviewJournal of Computing in Higher Education10.1007/s12528-024-09410-8Online publication date: 23-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Developing a Human-Centered AI Environment to Enhance Financial Literacy of College Students: A Systematic ReviewCross-Cultural Design10.1007/978-3-031-60913-8_25(360-374)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • (2023)How Do Teachers Use Dashboards Enhanced with Data Storytelling Elements According to their Data Visualisation Literacy Skills?LAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576063(89-99)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)Rethinking MMLA: Design Considerations for Multimodal Learning Analytics SystemsProceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3573051.3596186(354-359)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2023
  • (2023)"An Instructor is [already] able to keep track of 30 students": Students’ Perceptions of Smart Classrooms for Improving Teaching & Their Emergent Understandings of Teaching and LearningProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596079(1277-1292)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Computer Assisted Learning10.1111/jcal.1289440:2(510-524)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media