Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3180296acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

A Cognitive Design Space for Supporting Self-Regulation of ICT Use

Published: 20 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

A majority of users of smartphones and laptops report that they struggle with effective self-control over their device use. In response, HCI research - as well as a rapidly growing commercial market for 'anti-distraction tools' - has begun to develop apps, browser plugins, and other tools that help users understand and regulate their use. The extensive literature on the mechanics of self-regulation from cognitive neuroscience and behavioural economics might help guide this work. However, so far the emerging HCI work has drawn on a very limited subset of self-regulatory models, in particular Social-Cognitive Theory. Here, we draw together main insights from a broader spectrum of basic research on the mechanics of self-regulation in a simple framework. We use the generated model to analyse interventions in a sample of 112 existing anti-distraction tools, and hope it may contribute a useful alternative view of the design space for UI features that support self-regulation.

References

[1]
Adam Alter. 2017. Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked. Penguin Press.
[2]
Dan Ariely and Klaus Wertenbroch. 2002. Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: self-control by precommitment. Psychological science 2000: 219--224.
[3]
R. F. Baumeister, E. Bratslavsky, M. Muraven, and D. M. Tice. 1998. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of personality and social psychology 74, 5: 1252--1265.
[4]
Eric Baumer and Phil Adams. 2013. Limiting, leaving, and (re) lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. Chi 2013: 3257--3266.
[5]
Matthew Botvinick and Todd S. Braver. 2015. Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 83--113.
[6]
Emily I. M. Collins, Anna L. Cox, Jon Bird, and Cassie Cornish-Tresstail. 2014. Barriers to engagement with a personal informatics productivity tool. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures the Future of Design - OzCHI '14: 370-- 379.
[7]
Richard Cooper and Tim Shallice. 2000. Contention Scheduling and the Control of Routine Activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17, 4: 297--338.
[8]
Angela L. Duckworth and Laurence Steinberg. 2015. Unpacking Self-Control. Child development perspectives 9, 1: 32--37.
[9]
E. A. Edwards, J. Lumsden, C. Rivas, et al. 2016. Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. BMJ Open 6, 10: e012447.
[10]
Google Play. 2017. Forest: Stay focused. Google Play. Retrieved September 23, 2017 from https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=cc.forestapp&hl=en_GB.
[11]
Alexis Hiniker, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. MyTime: Designing and Evaluating an Intervention for Smartphone Non-Use. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 4746--4757.
[12]
Minsam Ko, Kyong-Mee Chung, Subin Yang, et al. 2015. NUGU: A Group-based Intervention App for Improving Self-Regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15: 1235--1245.
[13]
Heyoung Lee, Heejune Ahn, Samwook Choi, and Wanbok Choi. 2014. The SAMS: Smartphone addiction management system and verification. Journal of Medical Systems 38, 1.
[14]
Markus Löchtefeld, Matthias Böhmer, and Lyubomir Ganev. 2013. AppDetox. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia - MUM '13: 1--2.
[15]
Gloria Mark, Shamsi Iqbal, and Mary Czerwinski. 2017. How Blocking Distractions Affects Workplace Focus and Productivity. UbiComp/ISWC'17 Adjunct, 928--934.
[16]
Veronica Marotta and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. Online Distractions, Website Blockers, and Economic Productivity: A Randomized Field Experiment.
[17]
E. K. Miller and J. D. Cohen. 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual review of neuroscience 24, 1: 167--202.
[18]
D. A. Norman and T. Shallice. 1986. Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behaviour. In R. J. et al. Davidson, ed., Consciousness and Self-regulation (Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 4). Plenum, 1--18.
[19]
Connie S. K. Poon, Derek J. Koehler, and Roger Buehler. 2014. On the psychology of selfprediction: Consideration of situational barriers to intended actions. Judgment and Decision Making 9, 3: 207--225.
[20]
Nicholas Shea, Annika Boldt, Dan Bang, Nick Yeung, Cecilia Heyes, and Chris D. Frith. 2014. Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18, 4: 186--193.
[21]
Piers Steel and Cornelius J. König. 2006. Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review 31, 4: 889--913.
[22]
Virginia Thomas, Margarita Azmitia, and Steve Whittaker. 2016. Unplugged: Exploring the costs and benefits of constant connection. Computers in Human Behavior 63: 540--548.
[23]
Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Victoria Hollis, and Andrew Guydish. 2016. "Don't Waste My Time": Use of Time Information Improves Focus. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1729--1738.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Mapping a pluralistic continuum of approaches to digital disconnectionMedia, Culture & Society10.1177/0163443724122878546:4(851-862)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Opt-out, abstain, unplug. A systematic review of the voluntary digital disconnection literatureTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2023.10198081(101980)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2022)Disturbing aspects of smartphone usage: a qualitative analysisBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.212909242:14(2504-2519)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A Cognitive Design Space for Supporting Self-Regulation of ICT Use

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2018
    3155 pages
    ISBN:9781450356213
    DOI:10.1145/3170427
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 April 2018

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. attention
    2. cognitive models
    3. distraction
    4. non-use
    5. self-control
    6. self-regulation

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    CHI '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,208 of 3,955 submissions, 31%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Mapping a pluralistic continuum of approaches to digital disconnectionMedia, Culture & Society10.1177/0163443724122878546:4(851-862)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Opt-out, abstain, unplug. A systematic review of the voluntary digital disconnection literatureTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2023.10198081(101980)Online publication date: Jun-2023
    • (2022)Disturbing aspects of smartphone usage: a qualitative analysisBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.212909242:14(2504-2519)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
    • (2020)Feeling scarcityProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202010.1145/3404983.3409998(421-423)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2020
    • (2020)TimeToFocusACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/339604427:5(1-31)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2020
    • (2019)Modeling the Engagement-Disengagement Cycle of Compulsive Phone UseProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300542(1-14)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2019)Self-Control in CyberspaceProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300361(1-18)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2018)What Makes Smartphone Use Meaningful or Meaningless?Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31917542:1(1-26)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2018

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media