Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Calibrating Low-Cost Sensors by a Two-Phase Learning Approach for Urban Air Quality Measurement

Published: 26 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Urban air quality information, e.g., PM2.5 concentration, is of great importance to both the government and society. Recently, there is a growing interest in developing low-cost sensors, installed on moving vehicles, for fine-grained air quality measurement. However, low-cost mobile sensors typically suffer from low accuracy and thus need careful calibration to preserve a high measurement quality. In this paper, we propose a two-phase data calibration method consisting of a linear part and a nonlinear part. We use MLS (multiple least square) to train the linear part, and use RF (random forest) to train the nonlinear part. We propose an automatic feature selection algorithm based on AIC (Akaike information criterion) for the linear model, which helps avoid overfitting due to the inclusion of inappropriate features. We evaluate our method extensively. Results show that our method outperforms existing approaches, achieving an overall accuracy improvement of 16.4% in terms of PM2.5 levels compared with state-of-the-art approach.

References

[1]
C.M. Bishop. 2007. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer (2007).
[2]
H. Bozdogan. 1987. Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52, 3 (1987), 345--370.
[3]
Central Moving Average. 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average. (2017).
[4]
L. Chen, Y.Y. Cai, Y.F. Ding, M.Q. Lv, C.L. Yuan, and G.C. Chen. 2016. Spatially Fine-grained Urban Air Quality Estimation Using Ensemble Semi-supervised Learning and Pruning. In Proc. of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.
[5]
W.H. Chen, S.H. Hsu, and H.P. Shen. 2005. Application of SVM and ANN for intrusion detection. Computers 8 Operations Research 32, 10 (2005), 2617--2634.
[6]
Y. Cheng, X.C. Li, Z.J. Li, S.X. Jiang, Y.L. Li, J. Jia, and X.F. Jiang. 2014. AirCloud: A Cloud-based Air-quality Monitoring System for Everyone. In Proc. of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems.
[7]
W. Dong, G.Y. Guan, Y. Chen, K. Guo, and Y. Gao. 2015. Mosaic: Towards City Scale Sensing with Mobile Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.
[8]
X.W. Fang and I. Bate. 2017. Using Multi-parameters for Calibration of Low-cost Sensors in Urban Environment. In Proc. of the International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks.
[9]
C. Frost and Thompson S.G. 2000. Correcting for regression dilution bias: comparison of methods for a single predictor variable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 163, 2 (2000), 173--189.
[10]
K.B. Fu, W. Ren, and W. Dong. 2017. Multihop Calibration for Mobile Sensing: k-hop Calibratability and Reference Sensor Deployment. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.
[11]
Y. Gao, W. Dong, K. Guo, X. Liu, Y. Chen, X.J. Liu, J.J. Bu, and C. Chen. 2016. Mosaic: A Low-Cost Mobile Sensing System for Urban Air Quality Monitoring. In Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.
[12]
Machine Learning in Python tools. 2017. Scikit-learn. http://scikit-learn.org. (2017).
[13]
The Mathworks Inc. 2014. Neural Network Toolbox Sample Data Sets for Shallow Networks. (2014).
[14]
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 2017. http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/uteh20/current. (2017).
[15]
B. Maag, O. Saukh, D. Hasenfratz, and L. Thiele. 2016. Pre-Deployment Testing, Augmentation and Calibration of Cross-Sensitive Sensors. In Proc. of the International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks.
[16]
B. Maag, Z.M. Zhou, O. Saukh, and L. Thiele. 2017. SCAN: Multi-Hop Calibration for Mobile Sensor Arrays. Proc. of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 2 (2017), Article 19.
[17]
M. Martin, J. Santos, H. Vasquez, and J. Agapito. 1999. Study of the interferences of NO2 and CO in solid state commercial sensors. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 58, 1 (1999), 469--473.
[18]
M. Mead, O. Popoola, G. Stewart, P. Landshoff, M. Calleja, M. Hayes, J. Baldovi, M. McLeod, T. Hodgson, and Dicks J. 2013. The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, highdensity networks. Atmospheric Environment 70 (2013), 186--203.
[19]
M. I. Mead, O. A. M. Popoola, G. B. Stewart, P. Landshoff, M. Calleja, M. Hayes, J. J. Baldovi, M. W. Mcleod, T. F. Hodgson, and J. Dicks. 2013. The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks. Atmospheric Environment 70, 2 (2013), 186--203.
[20]
Dylos Air Quality Monitor. 2017. Dylos DC1700. http://www.dylosproducts.com/dc1700.html. (2017).
[21]
R. Piedrahita, Y. Xiang, N. Masson, J. Ortega, A. Collier, Y. Jiang, K. Li, R. Dick, Q. Lv, and M. Hannigan. 2014. The next generation of low-cost personal air quality sensors for quantitative exposure monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 7, 10 (2014), 3325--3336.
[22]
PM2.5 Level. 2017. http://www.dwz.cn/cnnRO. (2017).
[23]
D. Posada and T.R. Buckley. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53, 5 (2004), 793--808.
[24]
O. Saukh, D. Hasenfratz, and L. Thiele. 2015. Reducing Multi-hop Calibration Errors in Large-scale Mobile Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.
[25]
SDS011 Particle Sensor. 2017. NOVA SDS011. http://www.inovafitness.com/a/minyongchanpin/chuanganqilei/2015/0522/32.html. (2017).
[26]
J. Shang, Y. Zheng, and W. Tong. 2014. Inferring gas consumption and pollution emission of vehicles throughout a city. In Proc. of the 20th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
[27]
L. Spinelle, M. Gerboles, M.G. Villani, M. Aleixandre, and F. Bonavitacola. 2015. Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost available sensors for air quality monitoring. part a: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 215 (2015), 249--257.
[28]
Y. Xiang, L.S. Bai, R. Piedrahita, R.P. Dick, Q. Lv, M. Hannigan, and L. Shang. 2012. Collaborative Calibration and Sensor Placement for Mobile Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.
[29]
Y. Zheng, F. Liu, and H.P. Hsieh. 2013. U-Air: when urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proc. of the 19th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sens-BERT: A BERT-Based Approach for Enabling Transferability and Re-Calibration of Calibration Models for Low-Cost Sensors Under Reference Measurements ScarcityIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2024.336296224:7(11362-11373)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Estimating Black Carbon Levels With Proxy Variables and Low-Cost SensorsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2024.336197711:10(17577-17588)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)QUEST: Quality-informed Multi-agent Dispatching System for Optimal Mobile CrowdsensingIEEE INFOCOM 2024 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM52122.2024.10621374(1811-1820)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 1
March 2018
1370 pages
EISSN:2474-9567
DOI:10.1145/3200905
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 March 2018
Accepted: 01 January 2018
Revised: 01 November 2017
Received: 01 August 2017
Published in IMWUT Volume 2, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Air quality
  2. Low-cost sensors
  3. Mobile sensor network
  4. Sensor calibration

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • National Science Foundation of China
  • Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Institute of Frontier Technologies, Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Sens-BERT: A BERT-Based Approach for Enabling Transferability and Re-Calibration of Calibration Models for Low-Cost Sensors Under Reference Measurements ScarcityIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2024.336296224:7(11362-11373)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Estimating Black Carbon Levels With Proxy Variables and Low-Cost SensorsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2024.336197711:10(17577-17588)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • (2024)QUEST: Quality-informed Multi-agent Dispatching System for Optimal Mobile CrowdsensingIEEE INFOCOM 2024 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM52122.2024.10621374(1811-1820)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2023) Development of low-cost air quality stations for next-generation monitoring networks: calibration and validation of NO 2 and O 3 sensors Atmospheric Measurement Techniques10.5194/amt-16-4723-202316:20(4723-4740)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Data-Driven Machine Learning Calibration Propagation in A Hybrid Sensor Network for Air Quality MonitoringSensors10.3390/s2305281523:5(2815)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2023
  • (2023)A Minimalistic Approach to Predict and Understand the Relation of App Usage with Students' Academic PerformanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042407:MHCI(1-28)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2023)A UAV-Assisted Multi-Task Allocation Method for Mobile Crowd SensingIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2022.314787122:7(3790-3804)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023
  • (2023)EEATC: A Novel Calibration Approach for Low-Cost SensorsIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2023.330436623:19(23500-23511)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023
  • (2023)A Variational Bayesian Blind Calibration Approach for Air Quality Sensor DeploymentsIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2022.321200923:7(7129-7141)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Supervised Learning Regression for Sensor Calibration2023 DGON Inertial Sensors and Systems (ISS)10.1109/ISS58390.2023.10361922(1-20)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media