Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/320297.320324acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

The role of expectations in human-computer interaction

Published: 01 November 1999 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes a pilot study on the role of expectations in human-computer interaction on a decision-making task. Participants (N=70) were randomly assigned to one of 5 different computer partners or to a human partner. After completing the rankings for the Desert Survival Task, participants engaged in a dialog with their computer or human partners. Results revealed that interaction with human partners was more expected and more positively evaluated than interaction with computer agents. In addition, the addition of human-like qualities to computer interfaces did not increase expectedness or evaluations as predicted. Correlation analysis for the five computer conditions demonstrated that expectations and evaluations do effect influence and perceptions of the partner. Discussion focuses on ways to coordinate expectations, interface design, and task objectives.

References

[1]
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., and Smollan, D. "Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 596-612, 1992.
[2]
Bengtsson, B., Burgoon, J. K., Cederberg, C., Bonito, J. A., and Lundberg, M. "The impact of anthropomorphic interfaces on influence, understanding, and credibility." Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Computer and Systems Sciences, Maui, HI. 1999.
[3]
Bengtsson, B., Burgoon, J. K., Cederberg, C., Bonito, J., and Lundeberg, M. "Virtual communication and the impact of anthropomorphic interfaces." Paper presented to the 2nd Swedish Symposium on MultimodaI Communication, Lund, Sweden. 1998.
[4]
Beskow, J. "Rule-Based Audiovisual Speech." Unpublished masters thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1995.
[5]
Bonito, J. A. and Hollingshead, A. B. "Participation in small groups," in Burleson, B. R. (ed.) Communication Yearbook 20. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1997, pp. 227- 261.
[6]
Buck, R. "From DNA to MTV: The spontaneous communication of emotional messages," in Greene, J. O. (ed.) Message production: Advances in communication theory. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997, pp. 313-340.
[7]
Burgoon, J. K. "Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory," in Wiseman, R. L. (ed.) Intercultural communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, pp. 194-214.
[8]
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengsston, B., Ramirez, A., and Dunbar, N. "Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work," Journal of Management and information Systems, in press.
[9]
Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L., and Koch, P. T. "The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance," Communication Monographs, vol. 65, pp. 308-335, 1998.
[10]
Burgoon, J. K. and White, C. H. "Researching nonverbal message production: A view from interaction adaptation theory.," in Greene, J. O. (ed.) Message production: Advances in communication theory. Mawah, N J: Erlbaum, 1997, pp. 279-312.
[11]
Burgoon, J. K. "A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test," Human Communication Research, vol. 4, pp. 129-142, 1978.
[12]
Burgoon, J. K. and Hale, J. L. "Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication," Communication Monographs, vol. 54, pp. 19-41, 1987.
[13]
Burgoon, J. K. and Hale, J. L. "Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors," Communication Monographs, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 58-79, 1988.
[14]
Burgoon, J. K. and Jones, S. B. "Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations," Human Communication Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 131- 146, 1976.
[15]
Burgoon, J. K. and LePoire, B. A. "Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior," Human Communication Research, vol. 20, no. i, pp. 67- 96, 1993.
[16]
Burgoon, J. K. and Walther, J. B. "Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations," Human Communication Research, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 232-265, 1990.
[17]
Burgoon, J. K., Walther, J. B., and Baesler, E. J. "Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch," Human Communication Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 237-263, 1992.
[18]
Cahn, D. D. and Shulman, G. M. "The perceived understanding instrument," Communication Research Reports, vol. 1, pp. 122-125, 1984.
[19]
Fisek, M. H., Berger, J., and Norman, R. Z. "Participation in hetero and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration," American Journal of Sociology, vol. 97, pp. 114-142, 1991.
[20]
Fisek, M. H., Berger, J., and Norman, R. Z. "Two issues in the assessment of the adequacy of formal sociological models of human behavior," Social Science Research, vol. 26, pp. 153-169, 1997.
[21]
Fisek, M. H. and Ofshe, R. "The process of status evolution," Sociometry, vol. 33, pp. 327-335, 1970.
[22]
Hallowell, E. M. "The human moment at work," Harvard Business Review, vol. 77, pp. 58-64, 1999.
[23]
Kellerman, K. "The conversational MOP: A model of patterned and pliable behavior," in Hewes, D. E. (ed.) The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 181-224.
[24]
Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., and Waters, K. "A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 70, pp. 47-65, 1996.
[25]
Knottnerus, J. D. "Social structure analysis and status generalization: The contributions and potential of expectation states theory," in Szmatka, J., Skvoretz, j., and Berger, J. (eds.) Status, network, and structure: Theory development in group processes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997, pp. 119-136.
[26]
Lundeberg, M. "Multi-Modal Speech Communication Development of a Test-Environment." Unpublished masters thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1997.
[27]
McCroskey, J. C., Hamilton, P. R., and Weiner, A. M. "The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction," Human Communication Research, vol. 1, pp. 42-52, 1974.
[28]
McCroskey, J. C. and McCain, T. A. "The measurement of interpersonal attraction," Speech Monographs, vol. 41, pp. 261-266, 1974.
[29]
McCroskey, J. C. and Young, T. J. "Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades," Speech Monographs, vol. 41, pp. 261- 266, 1981.
[30]
Meeker, B. F., "Performance evaluation," in Lawler, M. F. (ed.) Group processes: Sociology analyses. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1994, pp. 95-117.
[31]
Moon, Y. and Nass, C. "How "real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction," Communication Research, vol. 23, pp. 651-674, 1996.
[32]
Moon, Y. "How "Real" are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in humancomputer interaction," Communication Research, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 651-674, 1996.
[33]
Nass, C., Fogg, B. J., and Moon, Y. "Can computers be teammates?," International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, pp. 669-678, 1996.
[34]
Nass, C., Steuer, J., Henriksen, L., and Dryer, C. "Machines, Social, and Ethopoeia: Performance Assessments of Computers Subsequent to Self- or Other-Evaluations," International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, vol. 40 pp. 543-559, 1994.
[35]
Skvoretz, J. V. "Models of participation in statusdifferentiated groups," Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 51, pp. 43-57, 1988.
[36]
Smith-Lovin, L., Skvoretz, J. V., and Hudson, C. G. "Status and participation in six- person groups: A test of Skvoretz's comparative status model," Social Forces, vol. 64, pp. 992-1005, 1986.
[37]
Smith, S. W. "Perceptual processing of nonverbalrelational messages," in Hewes, D. E. (ed.) The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication. Hillsday, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 87-112.
[38]
Webster, Jr. M., Hysom, S. J., and Fultmer, E. M. "Sexual orientation and occupation as status," in Skvoretz, J. and Szmatka, J. (eds.) Advances in group processes. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, 1998, pp. 1-22.
[39]
Woodall, W. G. "Encoding specificity and nonverbal cue context: An expansion of episodic memory research," Communication Monographs, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 39-53, 1981.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Pathways Linking Expectations for AI Chatbots to Loyalty: A Moderated Mediation AnalysisTechnology in Society10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102625(102625)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2023)‘I Just Wanted to Get It Over and Done With’: A Grounded Theory of Psychological Need Frustration in Video GamesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110287:CHI PLAY(217-236)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Framing, more than speech, affects how machine agents are perceivedBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2023.2278086(1-20)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GROUP '99: Proceedings of the 1999 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
November 1999
400 pages
ISBN:1581130651
DOI:10.1145/320297
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. computer-mediated communication
  2. expectations
  3. human-computer interaction
  4. interactivity

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

GROUP99
Sponsor:
GROUP99: Conference on Supporting Group Work
November 14 - 17, 1999
Arizona, Phoenix, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

Upcoming Conference

GROUP '25
The 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
January 12 - 15, 2025
Hilton Head , SC , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)253
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Pathways Linking Expectations for AI Chatbots to Loyalty: A Moderated Mediation AnalysisTechnology in Society10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102625(102625)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2023)‘I Just Wanted to Get It Over and Done With’: A Grounded Theory of Psychological Need Frustration in Video GamesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110287:CHI PLAY(217-236)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Framing, more than speech, affects how machine agents are perceivedBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2023.2278086(1-20)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2023
  • (2021)Perception of rhythmic agency for conversational labelingHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2021.187754138:1(25-48)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2021
  • (2021)AI, you can drive my carComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2021.106944125:COnline publication date: 1-Dec-2021
  • (2021) Artificial intelligence ( AI ), don't surprise me and stay in your lane: An experimental testing of perceiving humanlike performances of AI Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies10.1002/hbe2.2923:5(1023-1032)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Are you ready for artificial Mozart and Skrillex? An experiment testing expectancy violation theory and AI musicNew Media & Society10.1177/146144482092579823:7(1920-1935)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • (2020)A Live Speech-Driven Avatar-Mediated Three-Party Telepresence System: Design and EvaluationPRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality10.1162/pres_a_0035829(113-139)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2020
  • (2017)Online auctions, messaging, communication and social facilitation: a simulation and experimental evidenceEuropean Journal of Information Systems10.1057/palgrave.ejis.300043411:3(196-207)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2017
  • (2017)More than I ever wanted or just good enough? User expectations and subjective quality perception in the context of networked multimedia servicesQuality and User Experience10.1007/s41233-016-0004-z2:1Online publication date: 9-Feb-2017
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media