research-article

Participatory video methods in UX: sharing power with users to gain insights into everyday life

Authors:

Alison CardinalAuthors Info & Claims

Communication Design Quarterly Review, Volume 6, Issue 2

Pages 9 - 20

https://doi.org/10.1145/3282665.3282667

Published: 01 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

As technologies proliferate into all aspects of daily life, UX practitioners have the ability and responsibility to engage in research to help organizations better understand people's needs. We argue that UX practitioners have an ethical commitment to deploy methods that consciously shift power to create a more equitable relationship between researcher and participants. This article offers participatory video as a method for UX practitioners that democratizes the design process and creates rich visual data. We detail two cases of participatory video methods and how they were used to explore the potential of participatory methods in UX.

References

[1]

Agboka, G. Y. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28--49.

[2]

Arroyo, S. J. (2013). Participatory composition: Video culture, writing, and electracy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

[3]

Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: SAGE Publications.

[4]

Barnum, C. M. (2011). Usability testing essentials: ready, set-test. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Digital Library

[5]

Beasley, M. (2012). Making the case: Rounding out usability testing with web analytics. UXPA Magazine, 11(3).

[6]

Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T., & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(3), 272--298.

[7]

Boyd, D., Levy, K., & Marwick, A. E. (2014). The networked nature of algorithmic discrimination. Data and Discrimination, (October), 53--57.

[8]

Capstick, A. (2012). Participatory video and situated ethics: Avoiding disablism. In Milne, E. J., Mitchell, C. & de Lange, N. (Eds.), The Handbook of participatory video (pp. 269--282). Lanham MD: AltaMira Press.

[9]

Cartwright, E. (2013). Video. In Marion, J., & Crowder, J. W. (Eds.), Visual research: A concise introduction to thinking visually (pp.67--81). London: Bloomsbury.

[10]

Chalfen, R. (2011). Differentiating practices of participatory media production. In Margolis, E. & Pouwels, L. (Eds.), The sage handbook of visual research methods (pp.186--200). London: Sage.

[11]

Chowdhury, A., Odame, H., Thompson, S., & Hauser, M. (2015). Enhancing farmers' capacity for botanical pesticide innovation through video-mediated learning in Bangladesh. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 1--24.

[12]

Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Sams Publishing.

Digital Library

[13]

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

[14]

Dilger, B. (2006). Extreme usability and technical communication. In Scott, Wills, Longo (Eds), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 47--69). SUNY Press.

[15]

Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. (1999). A Practical guide to usability testing. Exeter, England: Intellect Books.

Digital Library

[16]

Ehn, P. (1993). Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill. In D. Schuler (Ed.), Participatory design: principles and practices (pp. 41--70). Hillsdale N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

[17]

Flaherty, K. (2016) Diary studies: Understanding long-term user behavior and experiences. Norman Nielsen Group. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/diary-studies/

[18]

Friess, E. (2010). Designing from data: Rhetorical appeals in support of design decisions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(4). 403--444.

[19]

Friess, E. (2012). Personas and decision making in the design process (p. 1209). Presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '12, New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[20]

Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[21]

Gubrium, A., & Harper, Kr. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.

[22]

Hadfield, H & Haw. H. (2012). Video: Modalities and methodologies. International Journal of Research & Method Education, 35 (3), 311--324.

[23]

High, C., Singh, S., Petherman L. & Nemes, G. (2012). Defining participatory video from practice. In Milne, E., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 35--48). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

[24]

Jacobs, J. (2016). Visualising the visceral: Using film to research the ineffable. Area, 48(4), 480--487.

[25]

Jones, N. N. (2016). Narrative inquiry in human centered design: examining silence and voice to promote social justice in design scenarios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 471--492. Retrieved from papers3://publication/uuid/E6699495-97AA-4B39-B266-FDACA510D7A5

[26]

Karat, J., & Karat, C.-M. (2003). The evolution of user-centered focus in the human-computer interaction field. IBM Systems Journal, 42(4). 532--541.

Digital Library

[27]

Kindon, S. (2003). Participatory video in geographic research: A feminist practice of looking? Area, 35(2), 142--153.

[28]

Kindon, S. (2016a). Participatory video as a feminist practice of looking: `take two!' Area, 48(4), 496--503.

[29]

Kindon, S. (2016b). Participatory video's spectro&squ;geographies. Area, 48(4), 449--451.

[30]

Ladner, S. (2014). Practical ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

[31]

Lallemand, C. (2012). Dear diary: Using diaries to study user experience. User Experience Magazine, 11(3). Retrieved from http://uxpamagazine.org/dear-diary-using-diaries-to-study-user-experience/

[32]

Lunch, N & Lunch, C. (2006). Insights into participatory video: A handbook for the field. Oxford: Insightshare.

[33]

MacEntee, K., Burkholder, C., & Schwab-Cartas, J. (2016). What's a cellphilm?: Integrating mobile phone technology into participatory visual research and activism. Rotterdam: Sense.

[34]

McNely, B. J. (2015). Taking things seriously with visual research. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 3(2), 48--54.

Digital Library

[35]

McNely, B. J. (2013). Visual research methods and communication design. In SIGDOC '13 Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on design of communication (pp. 123--132). New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[36]

Milne, E. (2016). Critiquing participatory video: Experiences from around the world. Area, 48(4), 401--404.

[37]

Mitchel, C. & de Lange, N. (2011). Community-based participatory video and social action in rural South Africa. In Margolis, E. & Pouwels, L. (Eds.), The sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 171--185). London: Sage.

[38]

Mitchell, C., Lange, N., & Moletsane, R. (2016). Me and my cellphone: Constructing change from the inside through cellphilms and participatory video in a rural community. Area, 48(4), 435--441.

[39]

Nair, S. & White, S. (2003). Magic roots: Children explore participatory video. In S. White (Ed.), Participatory video : Images that transform and empower. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

[40]

Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239--263). Springer Netherlands.

[41]

Owens, D. (2017). Thinking outside the browse and search box: Big data as a complement to navigation design. User Experience Magazine, 17(1). Retrieved from http://uxpamagazine.org/thinking-outside-the-browse-and-search-box/

[42]

Pelleg, D., Rokhlenko, O., Szpektor, I., Agichtein, E., & Guy, I. (2016). When the crowd is not enough: Improving user experience with social media through automatic quality analysis. In CSCW '16 Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1080--1090). ACM: New York.

Digital Library

[43]

Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

[44]

Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

[45]

Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2010). The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Digital Library

[46]

Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2007). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

[47]

Rose, E. J. (2016). Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 427--445.

[48]

Rose, E. J., Racadio, R., Martin, T., Girard, D., & Kolko, B. (2017). Expert yet vulnerable: Understanding the needs of transit dependent riders to inform policy and design. The Journal of Community Informatics, 13(1).

[49]

Rose, E. J., Sierschynski, J., & Björling, E. A. (2016). Reflecting on reflections: Using video in learning reflection to enhance authenticity. Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, 9. Retrieved from https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/reflecting-on-reflections-using-video-in-learning-reflection-to-enhance-authenticity/

[50]

Rose, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2016). Arguing about design: A taxonomy of rhetorical strategies deployed by user experience practitioners. In SIGDOC '16 Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (Article No. 4). New York: ACM.

Digital Library

[51]

Rose, E. J., & Tenenberg, J. (2017). Poor poor dumb mouths, and bid them speak for me: Theorizing the use of personas in practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(2). 161--174.

[52]

Rosenthal, S. R., & Capper, M. (2006). Ethnographies in the front end: Designing for enhanced customer experiences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 215--237.

[53]

Salvador, T., Bell, G., & Anderson, K. (1999). Design ethnography. Design Management Journal, 10(4):35--41.

[54]

Scott, J. (2017). Big data UX: Research opportunity and ethical challenge. User Experience Magazine, 17(1). Retrieved from http://uxpamagazine.org/big-data-ux/

[55]

Seidl, B. (2003). Trapped: Women take control of video storytelling. In S. White (Ed.), Participatory video: Images that transform and empower. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

[56]

Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163--174.

Digital Library

[57]

Sullivan, P. 1989. Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4):256--64.

[58]

Todisco, M. (2015). Share and share alike? Considering racial discrimination in the nascent room-sharing economy. Stanford Law Review, 67(March), 279--352.

[59]

Underwood, C. & Jabre, B. (2003). Guatemalan Mayan women and participatory media. In S. White (Ed.), Participatory video: Images that transform and empower. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

[60]

Ulmer, G. (1989). Teletheory. New York: Routledge.

[61]

Ulmer, G. (2003). Internet invention: From literacy to electracy. New York: Longman.

[62]

Volz, J., & Mitchell, C. (2017). Mechanical Turk: Quickly scale research without breaking the bank. UXPA Magazine, 17(5).

[63]

Wagner, J. (2011). Seeing things: Visual research and material culture. In Margolis, E. & Pouwels, L. (Eds.), The sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 72--95). London: Sage.

[64]

Walton, R., & Jones, N. N. (2013). Navigating increasingly cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary, and cross-organizational contexts to support social justice. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 1(4), 31--35.

Digital Library

[65]

Walton, R., Zraly, M., & Mugengana, J. P. (2015). Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45--69.

[66]

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369--387

[67]

Wickman, C. (2014). Wicked Problems in Technical Communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(1), 23--42.

[68]

Wheeler, J. (2012). Using participatory video to engage in policy processes: Representation, power, and knowledge in public screenings. In Milne, E., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 365--382). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

[69]

White, S. (2003). Participatory video: Images that transform and empower. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

[70]

Yang, K.-H. (2012). Reflexivity, participation, and video. In Milne, E., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 100--114). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

[71]

Yeats, D., & Carter, L. (2005). The role of the highlights video in usability testing: Rhetorical and generic expectations. Technical Communication, 52(2). 156--162.

[72]

Zdenek, S. (2011). Which sounds are significant? Towards a rhetoric of closed captioning. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(3). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1667/1604

[73]

Zoettl, P. A. (2013). Images of culture: Participatory video, identity and empowerment. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 209--224.

Cited By

Albright LKo WBuvanesh MHaraldsson HPolubriaginof FKuperman GLevy MSterling MDell NEstrin D(2024)Opportunities and Challenges for Augmented Reality in Family Caregiving: Qualitative Video Elicitation StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/569168(e56916)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.2196/56916
Thominet LAmorim JAcosta KSohan V(2024)Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative ResearchJournal of Technical Writing and Communication10.1177/0047281624126004454:4(396-418)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816241260044
Meijer WBourgeois Jvan der Vegte WKortuem G(2024)Sphere Window: Challenges and Opportunities of 360° Video in Collaborative Design Workshops.Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685407(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685407
Show More Cited By

Participatory video methods in UX: sharing power with users to gain insights into everyday life
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods

Recommendations

User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality
IHM '08: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine

User Experience (UX) is not just "old wine in new bottles". It is a truly extended and distinct perspective on the quality of interactive technology: away from products and problems to humans and the drivers of positive experience. This paper will ...
Interactive video stories from user generated content: a school concert use case
ICIDS'12: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Interactive Storytelling

This paper describes a web-based narrative system able to generate video compilations, framed as event stories, from a shared repository of video recordings of the event itself and possibly of related events. For this, it employs narrative techniques ...
Netnography Approach for UX Research
CHIuXiD '16: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in HCI and UX Indonesia 2016

This paper discusses on how netnography can be applied to gain an understanding on sensitive research topic in a high power distance culture. The study investigated the frustrations among practitioners in incorporating the User Experience Design (UXD) ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communication Design Quarterly

Communication Design Quarterly Volume 6, Issue 2

Summer 2018

120 pages

EISSN:2166-1642

DOI:10.1145/3282665

Editor:
Kirk St.Amant
Louisiana Tech University

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2018 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s).

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2018

Published in SIGDOC-CDQ Volume 6, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

24
Total Citations
View Citations
427
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)60
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Albright LKo WBuvanesh MHaraldsson HPolubriaginof FKuperman GLevy MSterling MDell NEstrin D(2024)Opportunities and Challenges for Augmented Reality in Family Caregiving: Qualitative Video Elicitation StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/569168(e56916)Online publication date: 30-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.2196/56916
Thominet LAmorim JAcosta KSohan V(2024)Role Play: Conversational Roles as a Framework for Reflexive Practice in AI-Assisted Qualitative ResearchJournal of Technical Writing and Communication10.1177/0047281624126004454:4(396-418)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816241260044
Meijer WBourgeois Jvan der Vegte WKortuem G(2024)Sphere Window: Challenges and Opportunities of 360° Video in Collaborative Design Workshops.Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685407(1-13)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685407
Saha MLindsay SWatterson JBartindale TVarghese DSaha MOliver GAhmed SOlivier P(2024)Hearing Community Voices in HCI4D: Establishing Safe Places to Co-Create Counter-Collective Narratives with Women Farmers in BangladeshProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642532(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642532
Razem MKhalid RSunikka-Blank M(2024)Unveiling women’s ventilation practices and comfort in Jordan: video diaries as method for post-occupancy evaluationBuilding Research & Information10.1080/09613218.2024.2387289(1-21)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2024.2387289
Hughes JMorrison LRobb JHagerman M(2023)“It feels like I have a camera in my eye”: New methods for literacies research in maker-oriented classroomsFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2023.10984108Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1098410
Saha MBartindale TVarghese DLindsay SRichardson DAhmed SOlivier P(2023)Community Voice as Data: Affordances of Participatory Videos for International Program DevelopmentProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581458(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581458
Fujita STaoka YOwada SNakatani MSaito S(2023)Towards Co-design with Day Care Teachers Based on In-Situ Behavioral Data: A Case Study of a Workshop for Reflection Based on Video RecordingsDesign, User Experience, and Usability10.1007/978-3-031-35705-3_19(255-268)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-35705-3_19
Hocutt DRanade NVerhulsdonck G(2022)Localizing Content: The Roles of Technical & Professional Communicators and Machine Learning in Personalized Chatbot ResponsesTechnical Communication10.55177/tc14839669:4(114-131)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.55177/tc148396
Carlson E(2022)“Who Am I Fighting For? Who Am I Accountable To?”: Comradeship as a Frame for Nonprofit Community Work in Technical CommunicationTechnical Communication Quarterly10.1080/10572252.2022.208581032:2(165-180)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2022.2085810
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents