Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
Skip header Section
The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product DesignOctober 2005
Publisher:
  • Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
  • 340 Pine Street, Sixth Floor
  • San Francisco
  • CA
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-12-566251-2
Published:01 October 2005
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Offering techniques and tools related to planning, creating, communicating, and using personas to create great product designs, this innovative text addresses the how of creating effective personas and using them to design products that people love.

References

  1. Ahlqvist, S. (1996). "Objectory for GUI Intensive Systems: Extension," Kista, Sweden: Objectory Software AB.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. AIGA Experience Design (2005). "Who Is AIGA Experience Design For?," ww.aiga.org/content.cfm? contentalias=who_for.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Asch, S. E. (1951). "Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments," in H. Guetzkow (ed.), Groups, Leadership, and Men, pp. 177-190. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacon, F. (1625). First Book of Aphorisms. Aphorism XLVI. Reprinted in Internet Modern History Sourcebook, http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/bacon-aphor.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. Cohen (eds.), (2000). Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2d ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Baxley, B. (2003). Making the Web Work: Designing Effective Web Applications. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedbury, S. (2002). A New Brand World: 8 Principles for Achieving Brand Leadership in the 21st Century. New York: Viking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Benun, I. (2003). Designing Websites for Every Audience. Cincinnati: How Design Books. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Benyon, D., and C. Macauley (2002). "Scenarios and the HCI-SE Design Problem," Interacting with Computers 14(4):397-405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Beyer, H., and K. Holtzblatt (1998a). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Beyer, H., and K. Holtzblatt (1998b). "Contextual Inquiry and Design Methods," in Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bias, R. G., and D. J. Mayhew (eds.), (1994). Cost-Justifying Usability. Boston: Harcourt Brace & Co. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bickmore, T.W. (2004). "Unspoken Rules of Spoken Interaction," Communications of the ACM 47(4):38-44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Blankenship, A., G. Breen, and A. Dutka (1998). State of the Art Marketing Research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Blomquist, Å., and M. Arvola (2002). "Personas in Action: Ethnography in an Interaction Design Team," in Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI, October 19-23, 2002, Aarhus, Denmark. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Boehm, B. (1988). "A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement," IEEE Computer 21(5):61-72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Boyle, C. and M. Clarke (1985). "An Intelligent Mail Filter," in Proceedings of HCI'85, pp. 331-341. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brewer, L. (2003). "When Characters Develop Minds of Their Own," Vision 13, January/February.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. In: P.W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester & I. L. McClelland (eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid (2000). The Social Life of Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Buchenau, M., and J. F. Suri (2000). "Experience Prototyping," in Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 424-433. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bødker, S. (2000). "Scenarios in User-centered Design: Setting the Stage for Reflection and Action," Interacting with Computers 13(1):61-75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Caine, R., and G. Caine (1994). Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Calde, S. (2004). "Using Personas to Create User Documentation," www.cooper.com/content/insights/newsletters/2004_issue04/Using_personas_to_create_user_docs.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (reprinted 1972).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Card, S., T. Moran, and A. Newell (1983). "GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, and Selection Rules)" in The Psychology of Human/Computer Interaction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Carliner, S. (1998). "Future Travels of the Info Wrangler," Intercomm 45(8):20-24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Carroll, J. (2000a). "Five Reasons for Scenario-based Design," Interacting with Computers 13(1):43-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Carroll, J. (2000b). Making Use: Scenario-based Design of Human-computer Interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Carroll, J. (ed.), (1995). Scenario-based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Chiu, C., Y. Hong and C. S. Dweck (1997). "Lay Dispositionism and Implicit Theories of Personality," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(1):19-30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Chung, Hyejin; Hu, Yuegu; Lim, Kapin and Park, Eliot. (2004). A Study of Snack Perception and Behavior. Team project for D786: Design Research, Fall Quarter, in the Department of Industrial, Interior and Visual Communication Design at The Ohio State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Clancy, K., and P. Krieg (2000). Counter-intuitive Marketing: Achieve Great Results Using Uncommon Sense. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Cockburn, A. (2001). Writing Effective Use Cases. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Coen, J., and E. Coen (2000). O Brother, Where Art Thou? Universal Pictures.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Cohn, M. (2004). User Stories Applied for Agile Software Development. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Coney, M. and M. Steehouder (2000). Role playing on the web: Guidelines for designing and evaluating personas online, Technical Communication, Vol. 47, No. 3, August, 327-340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Constantine, L. L. (1994). "Essentially Speaking," Software Development 2(11). Reprinted in L. L. Constantine, The Peopleware Papers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Constantine, L. L. (1995). "Essential Modeling: Use Cases for User Interfaces," ACM Interactions 2(2). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Constantine, L. L. (1998). "Abstract Prototyping," Software Development, 6(10). Reprinted in S. Ambler and L. Constantine (eds.), The Unified Process Elaboration Phase. San Francisco: CMP Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Constantine, L. L. (2001). "Creative Input: From Feature Fantasies to Practical Products," in L. L. Constantine (ed.), Beyond Chaos: The Expert Edge in Managing Software Development. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Constantine, L. L. (2003). "Canonical Abstract Prototypes for Abstract Visual and Interaction Design," in J. Jorge, N. Jardim Nunes, and J. Falcao e Cunha (eds.), Interactive Systems: Design, Specification, and Verification. Proceedings, 10th International Workshop, DSV-IS 2003, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal, 11-13 June 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2844. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Constantine, L. L. (2004a)."Beyond User-Centered Design and User Experience," Cutter IT Journal 17(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Constantine, L. L. (2004b). "Agility and Usability," Cutter Executive Report. Agile Project Management, Vol. 5, No. 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Constantine, L. L., and L. A.D. Lockwood (2001). "Personas," for Use Newsletter 15, August. www.foruse.com/newsletter/foruse15.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Constantine, L. L., and L. A.D. Lockwood (2002). "Modeling: Persona Popularity and Role Relationships," for Use Newsletter 26, October. www.foruse.com/newsletter/foruse26.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Constantine, L. L., and L. A. D. Lockwood (1999). Software for Use: A Practical Guide to the Models and Methods of Usage-Centered Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Constantine, L. L., and L. A. D. Lockwood (2001). "Structure and Style in Use Cases for User Interfaces," in M. van Harmelan (ed.), Object Modeling and User Interface Design. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Constantine, L. L., and L. A. D. Lockwood (2002). "Usage-Centered Engineering for Web Applications," IEEE Software 19(2). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Constantine, L. L., H. Windl, J. Noble, and L. A. D. Lockwood (2000). "From Abstraction to Realization in User Interface Design: Abstract Prototypes Based on Canonical Components," working paper, The Convergence Colloquy, July 2000. www.foruse.com/articles/canonical.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Cooper, A. (1995). About Face 1.0. Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Cooper, A. (1999). The Inmates Are Running the Asylum. New York: Macmillan. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Cooper, A., and R. M. Reimann (2003). About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Cushman, W.H., and R. Derounian (1988). "Design and Testing of a Facility for Two-Way Video Teleconferencing," Proceedings, 33rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Volume 2, pp. 224-228. Denver, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Dalton, J. P., H. Manning, and M. Amato (2003). Executive Q&A: Evaluating Design Personas. Forrester Research Brief Series. http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Brief/Excerpt/0,1317,32548,00.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Davidson, J. P. (2001). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Change Management. Indianapolis: Alpha Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Dayton, T., A. McFarland, and J. Kramer (1988). "Bridging User Needs to Object-oriented GUI Prototype via Task Object Design," in Larry E. Wood (ed.), User Interface Design: Bridging the Gap from User Requirements to Design, pp. 15-56. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Decker, D. (1998). "Anatomy of a Screenplay," Screenwriters Group, 1998. Excerpts online at www.anatomyofascreenplay.com/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Denning, S. (2000). The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Denning, S. (2004). "Empathy: The Mechanism of Storytelling," Organizational and Business Storytelling in the News: Story 67, February 22, 2004. www.stevedenning.com/SIG-67-empathy-key-to-storytelling.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Djajadiningrat, J. P., W.W. Gaver, and J.W. Frens (2000). "Interaction Relabeling and Extreme Characters: Methods for Exploring Aesthetic Interactions," in Proc. DIS 2000, pp. 66-71. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Domhoff, G.W. (1996). Finding Meaning in Dreams: A Quantitative Approach. New York: Plenum Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Donahue, G. M. (2001). "Usability and the Bottom Line," IEEE Software Vol 18, No. 1, pp. 31-37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Donoghue, K. (2002). Built for Use: Driving Profitability Through the User Experience. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Dourish, P., and G. Button (1998). "On 'Technomethodology': Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design," Human-Computer Interaction, 13(4):395-432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Dreyfuss, H. (1955). Designing for People (2003 ed.). New York: Allworth Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Easty, E. D. (1981). On Method Acting. New York: Ballantine Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Ehn, P. (1993). "Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill," in D. Schuler and A. Namioka (eds.), Participatory Design, pp. 41-77. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Erickson, T. (1996). "Design as Storytelling," Interactions 3(4):30-35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. FindLaw (2005). "Your Target Market." http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/business-operations/advertising-marketing/marketing-target-market.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Flanagan, J. (1954). "The Critical Incident Technique," Psychological Bulletin 51:327-358.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Fortini-Campbell, L. (1992). Hitting the Sweet Spot: How Consumer Insights Can Inspire Better Marketing and Advertising. Chicago: The Copy Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Foulkes, D. (1999). Children's Dreaming and the Development of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Fowler, M., and K. Scott (1997). UML Distilled. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Freed, J. (2004). "Best Buy Starts an Overhaul Before Its Problems Begin," Associated Press, 19 May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. New York: Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Garreau, Joel (2001). The End-User View of Techno-Nirvana: Blink, Blink, Blink. Washington, D.C: The Washington Post. Monday, March 19, 2001: C01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Garrett, J. J. (2002). The Elements of User Experience: User-Centered Design for the Web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Gass, M. (2005). "An Introduction to the Bridge," www.participatorydesign.com/BridgeIntro.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Gilovich, T. (1991). How We Know What Isn't So. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Godin, S., and M. Gladwell (2001). Unleashing the Ideavirus. New York: Do You Zoom, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Gould, J. D., and C. Lewis (1985). "Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think," Communications of the ACM 28(3):360-411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Grobstein, P. (2004). "The Brain's Images: Co-Constructing Reality and Self," 11th Annual Usability Professionals' Association (UPA) Conference, July 2002, Orlando, Florida. http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/reflections/upa/UPApaper.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Grudin, J. (2003). "The West Wing: Fiction Can Serve Politics," Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 15:73-77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Grudin, J. and J. Pruitt (2002). "Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement," Proc. PDC 2002, 144-161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Grudin, R. (1996). On Dialogue. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Gudjonsdottir, R. (2001). "Life-size Personas," Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Conference, Tenth Annual Conference. Bloomingdale, IL: The Usability Professionals' Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Hackos, J. T., and J. C. Redish (1998). User and Task Analysis Techniques: User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Hague, P. N. (2002). Market Research: A Guide to Planning, Methodology and Evaluation (3d ed.). London: Kogan Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Haney, C., W. C. Banks, and P. G. Zimbardo (1973). "Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison," International Journal of Criminology and Penology 1:69-97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Harrison, M., R. Henneman, and L. Blatt (1994). "Design of a Human Factors Cost-Justification Tool," in R. G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew (eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability, pp. 203-242. Boston: Harcourt Brace & Co. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Heumann, J. (2003). "Use Case Storyboards: Integrating Usability with RUP and UML," in L. Constantine (ed.), Performance by Design: Proceedings USE 2003, Second International Conference on Usage-Centered Design. Rowley, MA: Ampersand Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Hiatt, J., and T. Creasey (2003). Change Management. Loveland, CO: Prosci Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Holtzblatt, K. (2002). "Personas and Contextual Design," www.incent.com/community/design_corner/02_0913.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Holtzblatt, K., J. Burns Wendell, and S. Wood (2004). Rapid Contextual Design: A How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-Centered Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Hoult, J. (2000). "Perfecting Your Pitch, Part One: Assume Short Buildings," Fast Company Web Exclusives, October, www.fastcompany.com/articles/archive/act_joos1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Hughes, J. A., D. Randall, and D. Shapiro (1992). "Faltering from Ethnography to Design," in Proc. CSCW'92, pp. 115-122. New York: ACM. IBM. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. IBM Research Knowledge Socialization Project (2003). "Why Stories," 22 August. www.research.ibm.com/knowsoc/project_whystories.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Idson, L. C., and W. Mischel (2001). "The Personality of Familiar and Significant People: The Lay Perceiver as a Social-cognitive Theorist," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(4):585-596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  100. Jacobson, I. (1995). "The Use-Case Construct in Object-Oriented Software Engineering," in J. M. Carroll (ed.), Scenario-Based Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Jacobson, I., G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh (1999). The Unified Software Development Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Jacobson, I., M. Christerson, P. Jonsson, and G. Övergaard (1992). Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Jahnek, A. (2004). "Tomorrowland: Interview with Bran Ferren," CIO Web Business Magazine, December 1998. www.sio.com/archive/webbusiness/120198_qa.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Jeffries, R., A. Anderson, and C. Hendrickson (2001). Extreme Programming Installed. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Jensen, K. B. (ed.), (2002). Handbook of Media and Communications Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Kehr, D. (2003). "As for Directing, It's Telling a Story," The New York Times, 30 December.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Kerr, N. (1993). Mental Imagery, Dreams, and Perception," in C. Cavallero and D. Foulkes (eds.), Dreaming as Cognition, pp. 18-37. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Kiel, A. C., C. Fuson, J. Grudin, and E. Feldman (2005). "Ethnography for Software Development," in R. G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew (eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for the Internet Age. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Kirakowski, J. (ed.), (2000). Human Factors Research Group, "Questionnaires in Usability Engineering: A List of Frequently Asked Questions," (3d ed.). www.ucc.ie/hfrg/resources/qfaq1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Kranz, G. (2000). Failure Is Not an Option: Mission Control from Mercury to Apollo 13 and Beyond. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Kruchten, P., S. Ahlqvist, and S. Bylund (2001). "User Interface Design in the Rational Unified Process," in M. van Harmelan (ed.), Object Modeling and User Interface Design. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Lafreniere, D. (1996). "CUTA: Collaborative Users' Task Analysis, A Simple, Low-cost Approach to Task Analysis," Interactions Magazine, Sept./Oct. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Leffingwell, D., and D. Widrig (1999). Managing Software Requirements: A Unified Approach. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Leonard, E. (1998). Interview. www.bookreporter.com/authors/au-leonard-elmore.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. Leonard, E. (1999). Interview with Sean Elder. www.salon.com/people/bc/1999/09/28/leonard/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Leonard, E. (2002). Interview with Simon Haupt. www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/printarticle/gam/20020204/RVLEON.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Lewis, J. R. (1995). "IBM Computer Usability Satisfaction Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation and Instructions for Use," International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7(1):57-78. http://drjim.0catch.com/usabqtr.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Lyman, R. (2004). "Marlon Brando, Oscar-winning Actor, Is Dead at 80," The New York Times, 2 July.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Macdonald, Nico (2001). "Breakout Group: What's Next?" Presentation for The Advance for Design Summit 4, http://advance.aiga.org/timeline/artifacts/Matrix.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Malle, B. F. (2004). How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Manning, H., and M. Dorsey (2001). "Scenario Design Depends on Personas," Forrester Research Report, 14 August. www.forrester.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Manning, H., B. D. Temkin, and N. Belanger (2003). The Power of Design Personas. Forrester Research Report, December 2003. www.forrester.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Manning, H., B. D. Temkin, and N. Belanger (2004). Persona Best Practices From Discover Card. Forrester Research Report, January 2004. www.forrester.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Maxim, P. S. (1999). Quantitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Mayhew, D. (1992). Principles and Guidelines in Software User Interface Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. Mayhew, D. (1999). The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner's Handbook for User Interface Design. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. Mayhew, D., and M. Mantei (1994). "A Basic Framework for Cost-justifying Usability Engineering," in R. G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew (eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability, pp. 9-44. Boston: Harcourt Brace & Co. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperPerennial.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. McGovern, (2002). Content Critical: Gaining Competitive Advantage through High-Quality Web Content. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. McQuaid, H., A. Goel, and M. McManus (2003). "When You Can't Talk to Customers: Using Storyboards and Narratives to Elicit Empathy for Users," Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. Meier, B. (1993). "Speech and Thinking in Dreams," in C. Cavallero and D. Foulkes (eds.), Dreaming as Cognition, pp. 58-76. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. Mello, S. (2002). Customer-centric Product Definition: The Key to Great Product Development. New York: AMACOM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Michalis, P. (2004). "The First Storyteller." www.collectorsguide.com/fa/fa014.shtml.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Mikkelson, N., and W. O. Lee (2000). "Incorporating User Archetypes into Scenario-based Design," 9th Annual Usability Professionals' Association (UPA) Conference, Asheville, North Carolina.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. Milgram, S. (1963). "Behavioral Study of Obedience," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67:371-378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  137. Mithen, S. (2000). "Palaeoanthropological Perspectives on the Theory of Mind," in S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. J. Cohen (eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2d ed.), pp. 488-502. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. Molich, R., and R. Jeffries. (2003). "Comparative Expert Reviews," Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'03 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Moore, G. A. (1991). Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers (rev. ed. 2002). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Moore, G. A. (1995). Inside the Tornado: Marketing Strategies from Silicon Valley's Cutting Edge. Oxford: Capstone.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Morris, M. W., D. R. Ames, and E. D. Knowles (2001). "What We Theorize When We Theorize That We Theorize: Examining the "Implicit Theory" Construct from a Cross-disciplinary Perspective," in G. Moskowitz (ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, pp. 143-161. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Mourier, P., and M. Smith (2001). Conquering Organizational Change: How to Succeed Where Most Companies Fail. Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Muller, M. J. (2003). "Layered Participatory Analysis: New Developments in the CARD Technique." http://www.research.ibm.com/compsci/spotlight/hci/p90-muller.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Neuhauser, P. C. (1993). Corporate Legends and Lore: The Power of Storytelling as a Management Tool. Austin: PCN Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Newburger, E. S. (2001). "Home Computers and Internet Use in the United States," U.S. Bureau of the Census. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Nielsen, J. (1992). "The Usability Engineer Lifecycle," Computer Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 12-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  147. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press. Hardcover edition. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. Nielsen, J. (1994a). "Guerrilla HCI: Using Discount Usability Engineering to Penetrate the Intimidation Barrier," in R. G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew (eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability. Boston: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. Nielsen, J. (1994b). Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  150. Nielsen, J., and R. Mack (eds.), (1994). Usability Inspection Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. Nielsen, J., and R. Molich (1990). "Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces," in Proceedings of the ACM CHI'90 Conference, Seattle, WA, 1-5 April, pp. 249-256. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. Nielsen, L. (2002). From User to Character: Designing Interactive Systems -- 2002. London, ACM Sigchi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  153. Nielsen, L. (2003a). A Model for Personas and Scenario Creation. Third Danish Human-Computer Interaction Research Symposium 2003, Roskilde, Writings in Computer Science, Roskilde University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. Nielsen, L. (2003b). Constructing the User. Human Computer Interaction International 2003 -- Theory and Practice Crete: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. Norman, D. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart. New York: Perseus Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. Orenstein, C. (2002). Little Red Riding Hood Uncloaked: Sex, Morality, and the Evolution of a Fairy Tale. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. Overholt, A. (2004). "Do You Hear What Starbucks Hears?," Fast Company, July, www.fastcompany.com/magazine/84/starbucks_schultz.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. Patton, J. (2002). "Extreme Design: Usage-Centered Design in XP and Agile Development," in L. L. Constantine (ed.), for USE 2002: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Usage-Centered, Task-Centered, and Performance-Centered Design. Rowley, MA: Ampersand Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. Patton, J. (2003). "Improving Agility: Adding Usage-Centered Design to Agile Software Development," in L. L. Constantine (ed.), Performance by Design: Proceedings, for Use 2003, Second International Conference on Usage-Centered Design, Rowley, MA: Ampersand Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. Plaks, J. E., S. J. Stroessner, C. S. Dweck, and J. W. Sherman (2001). "Person Theories and Attention Allocation: Preferences for Stereotypic vs. Counterstereotypic Information," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80:876-893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  161. Preece, J., H. Rogers, and H. Sharp (2002). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  162. Premack, D., and G. Woodruff (1978). "Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?" Behavioral & Brain Sciences 4:515-526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  163. Pruitt, J. and J. Grudin (2003). "Personas: Practice and Theory," Proc. DUX 2003. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  164. Rackham, N. (1988). SPIN Selling. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. Rao, V., and J. Steckel (1995). The New Science of Marketing: State-of-the-Art Tools for Anticipating and Tracking the Market Forces That Will Shape Your Company's Future. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. RedHat Applications (2005). "Personas," http://ccm.redhat.com/user-centered/personas.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. Redish, J. (2001). "Storytelling: The Power of Scenarios," Goldsmith Award presentation from the IEEE PCS Conference, October 2001. www.redish.net/content/handouts/redish_Goldsmith_Oct2001.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. Repacholi, B. M., and A. Gopnick (1997). "Early Reasoning About Desires: Evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds," Developmental Psychology 33:12-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  169. Ries, A., and L. Ries (1998). The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding: How to Build a Product or Service Into a World-Class Brand. New York: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  170. Rönkkö, K., M. Hellman, B. Kilander, and Y. Dittrich (2004)."Personas Is Not Applicable: Local Remedies Interpreted in a Wider Context," Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2004, Toronto, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. Rubinstein, R. and H. Hersh (1984). The Human Factor: Designing Computer Systems for People. Burlington, MA: Digital Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. Salvador, T., and K. Howells (1998). "Focus Troupe: Using Drama to Create Common Context for New Product Concept End-user Evaluations," Proceedings of CHI 98. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  173. Sanders, E.B-N., and C. T. William (2001). "Harnessing People's Creativity: Ideation and Expression through Visual Communication," in J. Langford and D. McDonagh-Philp (eds.), Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development. London: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. Sato, S., and T. Salvador (1999). "Methods & tools: Playacting and focus troupes: theater techniques for creating quick, intense, immersive, and engaging focus group sessions," Interactions of the ACM 6(5):35-41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  175. Schmitt, B. H. (1999). Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, Relate to Your Company and Brands. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. Schwartz, B. (2004). The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. Selden, L., and G. Colvin (2003). Angel Customers and Demon Customers: Discover Which Is Which and Turbo-Charge Your Stock. New York: Portfolio.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. Senge, P. M., A. Kleiner, C. Roberts, G. Roth, R. Ross, B. Smith (1999). The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. New York: Currency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  181. Serendip (2004). "Seeing More Than Your Eye Does," http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/blindspot1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  182. Settle, R. B., and P. L. Alreck (1986). Why They Buy: American Consumers Inside and Out. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  183. Shoda, Y., and S. L. Tiernan (2002). "What Remains Invariant?: Finding Order Within a Person's Thoughts, Feelings, and Behaviors Across Situations," in D. Cervone and W. Mischel, Advances in Personality Science, pp. 241-270. New York: Guilford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  184. Sinha, R. (2003). "Persona Development for Information-rich Domains," in Proceedings of CHI 2003. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  185. Sissors, J. (1966). "What Is a Market?," Journal of Marketing 30:17-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  186. Sleeswijk-Visser, F., R. Van Der Lugt, and P. J. Stappers (2004). "The Personal Cardset: A Designer-centered Tool for Sharing Insights from User Studies," in Proceedings of 2AD, Second International Conference on Appliance Design. Bristol, UK: Appliance Design Network.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  187. Sorkin, A., and K. Falls (2000). "Galileo," The West Wing, originally broadcast on 29 November, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  188. Souza, R., H. Manning, P. Sonderegger, S. Roshan, and M. Dorsey (2001). "Get ROI from Design," Forrester Research Report, June 2001. www.forrester.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  189. Spencer, R. (2000). "The Streamlined Cognitive Walkthrough Method," in Proceedings of the ACM, ACM-CHI 2000, 1-6 April, pp. 353-361. New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  190. Stern, C.W., and G. Stalk Jr. (1998). Perspectives on Strategy from the Boston Consulting Group. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  191. Stroessner, S. J., and J. E. Plaks (1998). "Illusory Correlation and Stereotype Formation: Tracing the Arc of Research Over a Quarter Century," in G. Moskowitz (ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, pp. 247-259. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  192. Strope, J. (2003). "Designing for Breakthroughs in User Performance," in L. L. Constantine (ed.), Performance by Design: Proceedings of for Use 2003, the Second International Conference on Usage-Centered Design. Rowley, MA: Ampersand Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  193. Tahir, M. F. (1997). "Who's on the Other Side of Your Software: Creating User Profiles Through Contextual Inquiry," in Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Conference'97. Bloomingdale, IL: The Usability Professionals' Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  194. Temkin, B. D., J. P. Dalton, M. Dorsey, H. Manning, and P. Sonderegger (2003). "Executive Q&A: Design Personas, the Bridge Methodology." Business Brief Series. Sept 15. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  195. Thralls, C., N. Blyler, and H. Ewald (1988). "Real Readers, Implied Readers, and Professional Writers: Suggested Research," Journal of Business Communication 25:47-65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  196. Tognazzini, B. (1995). Tog on Software Design. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  197. Tolkein, J. R. R. (1965). The Lord of the Rings. New York: Ballantine Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  198. Tudor, L. G., M. J. Muller, T. Dayton, and R.W. Root (1993). "CARD: A Participatory Design Technique for High-level Task Analysis, Critique, and Redesign," in Proceedings of HFES'93. Seattle, WA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  199. Turner Learning (2004). Learning Through Storytelling, "Teaching with Stories: Brain Based," Turner Learning. http://learning.turner.com/turnersouth/storetelling/brain.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  200. Upshaw, L. (1995). Building Brand Identity: A Strategy for Success in a Hostile Marketplace. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  201. Usability Net (2003). Methods Table. http://www.usabilitynet.org/tools/methods.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  202. Vinden, P., and J. Astington (2000). "Culture and Understanding Other Minds," in S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. Cohen (eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2d ed.), pp. 503-519. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  203. Vredenburg, K. (2003). "Building Ease of Use into the IBM User Experience," IBM Systems Journal 42(2). www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/424/vredenburg.html. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  204. Vredenburg, K., S. Isensee, and C. Righi (2001). User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  205. Walden, D. (1993)."Kano's Methods for Understanding Customer-defined Quality: Introduction to Kano's Methods," Center for Quality Management Journal 2(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  206. Wambaugh, J. (attributed). Quoted on Bard's Ink. http://www.iprimus.ca/~pjduane/Sitemap.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  207. Watkins, M. (1990). Invisible Guests: The Development of Imaginal Dialogues. Boston: Sigo Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  208. Weerdmeester, B. A., and I. L. McClelland (eds.), (1996). Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  209. Weinstein, A. (1998). Defining Your Market: Winning Strategies for High-tech, Industrial, and Service Firms. New York: Haworth Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  210. Weiss, A. (2002). "What is Marketing?" MarketingProfs.com, November 26, 2002. http://www.marketingprofs.com/2/whatismarketing.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  211. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  212. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Mediated Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  213. Wharton, C., J., Rieman, C., Lewis and P. Polson (1994). The Cognitive Walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack (eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. pp. 105-141. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  214. Wideman, M. (2004). "The Role of the Project Life Cycle (Life Span) in Project Management: A Literature Review by R. Max Wideman," Max's Project Management Wisdom. http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/plc-models/1990s.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  215. Wilson, C. E., and S. Rosenbaum (2005). "Categories of ROI and their Practical Implications," in R.G. Bias and D. J. Mayhew (eds.), Cost-Justifying Usability. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  216. Windl, H. (2002a). "Usage-Centered Exploration: Speeding the Initial Design Process," in L. L. Constantine (ed.), for Use 2002: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Usage-Centered Design. Rowley, MA: Ampersand Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  217. Windl, H. (2002b). "Designing a Winner: Creating STEP 7 Lite with Usage-Centered Design," in L. L. Constantine (ed.), for Use 2002: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Usage-Centered Design. Rowley, MA: Ampersand Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  218. Wirfs-Brock, R. (1993). "Designing Scenarios: Making a Case for a Use Case Framework," Smalltalk Report Nov./Dec.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  219. Wixon, D., and S. Jones (1996). "Usability for Fun and Profit: A Case Study of the Design of DEC Rally Version 2," in M. Rudisill, C. Lewis, P. B. Polson, and T. D.McKay (eds.), Human-Computer Interface Design: Success Stories, Emerging Methods, and Real-World Context. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  220. Wodtke, C. (2002). Information Architecture: Blueprints for the Web. Berkeley: New Riders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  221. Zaltman, G. (2003). How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  222. Zyman, S. (1999). The End of Marketing as We Know It. New York: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Cited By

  1. Fabio G, Giuditta C, Margherita P and Raffaeli R (2025). A human-centric methodology for the co-evolution of operators’ skills, digital tools and user interfaces to support the Operator 4.0, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 91:C, Online publication date: 1-Feb-2025.
  2. ACM
    Karanassios C, Hadan H, Zhang-Kennedy L and Assal H Towards Security-Focused Developer Personas Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (1-18)
  3. ACM
    Nemcova V, Kunešová V, Mikulik R and Knoche H Focusing on what matters: Crafting stroke survivor personas relevant to systems supporting their self-management Adjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (1-7)
  4. ACM
    Shin J, Hedderich M, Rey B, Lucero A and Oulasvirta A Understanding Human-AI Workflows for Generating Personas Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (757-781)
  5. ACM
    Zhang X, Liu L, Wang Y, Liu X, Wang H, Arora C, Liu H, Wang W and Hoang T Auto-Generated Personas: Enhancing User-centered Design Practices among University Students Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-7)
  6. ACM
    Schuller A, Janssen D, Blumenröther J, Probst T, Schmidt M and Kumar C Generating personas using LLMs and assessing their viability Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-7)
  7. ACM
    Yeo S, Lim G, Gao J, Zhang W and Perrault S Help Me Reflect: Leveraging Self-Reflection Interface Nudges to Enhance Deliberativeness on Online Deliberation Platforms Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-32)
  8. ACM
    Desai S and Twidale M (2023). Metaphors in Voice User Interfaces: A Slippery Fish, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30:6, (1-37), Online publication date: 31-Dec-2024.
  9. ACM
    Sien S, Ahn J and McGrenere J (2023). Co-designing Mental Health Technologies with International University Students in Canada, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7:CSCW2, (1-25), Online publication date: 28-Sep-2023.
  10. P D, Simoes S and MacCarthaigh M (2023). AI and core electoral processes, AI Magazine, 44:3, (218-239), Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023.
  11. Barth C, Schmid J, Al-Hazwani I, Sachdeva M, Cibulski L and Bernard J (2023). How applicable are attribute-based approaches for human-centered ranking creation?, Computers and Graphics, 114:C, (45-58), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023.
  12. Boyle R, Pledger R, Brown H and Vanderbilt R A Case Study in Organizational Adoption of User Personas: Assessing Perceptions, Awareness, and Hesitation to Adopt Design, User Experience, and Usability, (51-65)
  13. ACM
    Richardson B, Sattigeri P, Wei D, Ramamurthy K, Varshney K, Dhurandhar A and Gilbert J Add-Remove-or-Relabel: Practitioner-Friendly Bias Mitigation via Influential Fairness Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, (736-752)
  14. ACM
    Xiao F, Thaker K and He D Categorizing Open Government Data Users by Exploring their Challenges and Proficiency CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, (1-7)
  15. Bowen J and Hinze A Designing for Inaccessible People and Places Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021, (546-556)
  16. ACM
    Salminen J, Şengün S, Jung S and Jansen B Comparing Persona Analytics and Social Media Analytics for a User-Centric Task Using Eye-Tracking and Think-Aloud Proceedings of the 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter, (1-8)
  17. ACM
    Bondel G, Landgraf A and Matthes F API Management Patterns for Public, Partner, and Group Web API Initiatives with a Focus on Collaboration Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, (1-17)
  18. ACM
    Leong T, Su C, Liang R and Tsai W Experiential Persona: Towards Supporting Richer and Unfinalized Representations of People Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-6)
  19. ACM
    Velt R, Benford S and Reeves S (2020). Translations and Boundaries in the Gap Between HCI Theory and Design Practice, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27:4, (1-28), Online publication date: 25-Sep-2020.
  20. Hu H and Lu L Practical Implementation of an Innovative Design Aimed at Increasing Enthusiasm for Exercise Among the Elderly HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Universal Access and Inclusive Design, (549-563)
  21. Salminen J, Rao R, Jung S, Chowdhury S and Jansen B Enriching Social Media Personas with Personality Traits: A Deep Learning Approach Using the Big Five Classes Artificial Intelligence in HCI, (101-120)
  22. Salminen J, Jung S, Chowdhury S and Jansen B Rethinking Personas for Fairness: Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability in Data-Driven Personas Artificial Intelligence in HCI, (82-100)
  23. Fischer B and Östlund B Technology Development with Older People: The Role of “Unfettered Design” Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience, (18-33)
  24. Salminen J, Guan K, Nielsen L, Jung S and Jansen B A Template for Data-Driven Personas: Analyzing 31 Quantitatively Oriented Persona Profiles Human Interface and the Management of Information. Designing Information, (125-144)
  25. ACM
    Salminen J, Jung S, Chowdhury S, Sengün S and Jansen B Personas and Analytics: A Comparative User Study of Efficiency and Effectiveness for a User Identification Task Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-13)
  26. Rapp A (2022). Design fictions for learning, Computers & Education, 145:C, Online publication date: 1-Feb-2020.
  27. Tsvyatkova D and Storni C (2019). A review of selected methods, techniques and tools in Child–Computer Interaction (CCI) developed/adapted to support children’s involvement in technology development, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 22:C, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2019.
  28. ACM
    Almeida R, de O. V. Paiva J, Gouveia T, Barroso H, Neto J, de S. Santos I, de P. Evangelista A, de Andrade L, de H. C. Barreto I and Andrade R Fictitious Personas for Interdisciplinary Team Alignment in the Requirements Elicitation Activities Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality, (276-285)
  29. Salminen J, Jung S, An J, Kwak H, Nielsen L and Jansen B (2019). Confusion and information triggered by photos in persona profiles, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 129:C, (1-14), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2019.
  30. ACM
    Zhu H, Wang H and Carroll J Creating Persona Skeletons from Imbalanced Datasets - A Case Study using U.S. Older Adults' Health Data Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, (61-70)
  31. ACM
    Luo Y, Liu P and Choe E Co-Designing Food Trackers with Dietitians Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-13)
  32. ACM
    Schwind V, Deierlein N, Poguntke R and Henze N Understanding the Social Acceptability of Mobile Devices using the Stereotype Content Model Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-12)
  33. ACM
    Marsden N and Pröbster M Personas and Identity Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-14)
  34. ACM
    Kawano A, Motoyama Y and Aoyama M A LX (Learner eXperience)-Based Evaluation Method of the Education and Training Programs for Professional Software Engineers Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, (151-159)
  35. Subhi N and Bell D Hybrid user experience (UX) modelling in a heritage setting Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, (1298-1309)
  36. ACM
    An J, Kwak H, Jung S, Salminen J, Admad M and Jansen B (2018). Imaginary People Representing Real Numbers, ACM Transactions on the Web, 12:4, (1-26), Online publication date: 6-Nov-2018.
  37. ACM
    Ferreira B, Barbosa S and Conte T Creating Personas focused on Representing Potential Requirements to Support the Design of Applications Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-9)
  38. ACM
    Rose E and Cardinal A (2018). Participatory video methods in UX, Communication Design Quarterly, 6:2, (9-20), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018.
  39. ACM
    Oliveira M, Rivero L, de Oliveira Neto J, Santos R and Viana D Developing an Application for Dealing with Depression through the Analysis of Information and Requirements found in Groups from a Social Network Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, (1-10)
  40. ACM
    Tanaka Y, Iida H and Takemura Y A manga-driven system requirements development PBL exercise Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering Education for Millennials, (80-85)
  41. ACM
    Salminen J, Nielsen L, Jung S, An J, Kwak H and Jansen B “Is More Better?” Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-13)
  42. ACM
    Salminen J, Jansen B, An J, Jung S, Nielsen L and Kwak H Fixation and Confusion Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval, (110-119)
  43. (Weber) Dupree J, Lank E and Berry D (2018). A case study of using grounded analysis as a requirement engineering method, Science of Computer Programming, 152:C, (1-37), Online publication date: 15-Jan-2018.
  44. ACM
    Nielsen L, Jung S, An J, Salminen J, Kwak H and Jansen B Who are your users? Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, (602-606)
  45. ACM
    Linder J and Arvola M IPA in UX Research Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, (17-24)
  46. Hirskyj-Douglas I, Read J and Horton M Animal personas Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference, (1-13)
  47. ACM
    Chang W, Giaccardi E, Chen L and Liang R "Interview with Things" Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, (1001-1012)
  48. ACM
    Jung S, An J, Kwak H, Ahmad M, Nielsen L and Jansen B Persona Generation from Aggregated Social Media Data Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1748-1755)
  49. Carrillo A, Martinez S, Falgueras J and Scott-Brown K (2017). A reflective characterisation of occasional user, Computers in Human Behavior, 70:C, (74-89), Online publication date: 1-May-2017.
  50. ACM
    Scheja S, Schmidt R and Masuch M Play-persona Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, (375-384)
  51. Huh J, Kwon B, Kim S, Lee S, Choo J, Kim J, Choi M and Yi J (2016). Personas in online health communities, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 63:C, (212-225), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2016.
  52. ACM
    Rose E and Tenenberg J Arguing about design Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, (1-10)
  53. Lin K, Chien C and Kerh R (2016). UNISON framework of data-driven innovation for extracting user experience of product design of wearable devices, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 99:C, (487-502), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.
  54. Vlachostergiou A, Stratogiannis G, Caridakis G, Siolas G and Mylonas P (2016). User Adaptive and Context-Aware Smart Home Using Pervasive and Semantic Technologies, Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2016, (8), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016.
  55. ACM
    Sasaki Y, Kunigami M and Terano T Uncovering the Competency of Middle Managers in Different Business Environments Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting Society, (1-6)
  56. Hüttig A and Herczeg M Tool-Supported Usability Engineering for Continuous User Analysis Proceedings, Part I, of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice - Volume 9731, (302-312)
  57. Viana G and Robert J The Practitioners' Points of View on the Creation and Use of Personas for User Interface Design Proceedings, Part I, of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice - Volume 9731, (233-244)
  58. Ferreira B, Barbosa S and Conte T PATHY Proceedings, Part I, of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development and Practice - Volume 9731, (153-165)
  59. ACM
    Skovbjerg H, Bekker T and Barendregt W Being Explicit about Underlying Values, Assumptions and Views when Designing for Children in the IDC Community Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (713-719)
  60. ACM
    Marsden N and Haag M Stereotypes and Politics Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (4017-4031)
  61. ACM
    O'Leary C, Mtenzi F and McAvinia C Towards Reusable Personas for Everyday Design Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2915-2922)
  62. ACM
    Alves F, Santos J and Maciel C Evaluation of character creation rules in RPG as a guide for creating personas Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-4)
  63. ACM
    Cavalcante C, Furtado V and Furtado E An environment to support the design, implementation and evaluation of gamification in social systems Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-10)
  64. Compagna D and Kohlbacher F Adopting Scenario-Based Design to Increase the Acceptance of Technology Innovations for Older People Proceedings, Part I, of the First International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging - Volume 9193, (26-34)
  65. ACM
    Hüttig A and Herczeg M Tool-based gradual User Modeling for Usability Engineering Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015, (1-4)
  66. ACM
    Nouwen M, Van Mechelen M and Zaman B A value sensitive design approach to parental software for young children Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (363-366)
  67. ACM
    Pascual A, Ribera M and Granollers T Empathic communication of accessibility barriers in web 2.0 editing Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference, (1-8)
  68. ACM
    Blomkvist J, Persson J and Åberg J Communication through Boundary Objects in Distributed Agile Teams Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1875-1884)
  69. ACM
    Dittmar A and Hensch M Two-Level Personas for Nested Design Spaces Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (3265-3274)
  70. ACM
    Howard T (2015). Are personas really usable?, Communication Design Quarterly, 3:2, (20-26), Online publication date: 27-Mar-2015.
  71. Vosbergen S, Mulder-Wiggers J, Lacroix J, Kemps H, Kraaijenhagen R, Jaspers M and Peek N (2015). Using personas to tailor educational messages to the preferences of coronary heart disease patients, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 53:C, (100-112), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2015.
  72. Rodrigues K, Bocanegra L, Gonçalves V, Carvalho V and Neris V Enriquecimento de personas para apoio ao design de aplicações terapêuticas para a saúde mental Proceedings of the 13th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (51-60)
  73. ACM
    Barré J, Buisine S, Guegan J, Mantelet F and Aoussat A Anticipating user's needs with playful methods Proceedings of the 2014 Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée Conference - Design, Ergonomie et IHM: quelle articulation pour la co-conception de l'interaction, (25-32)
  74. ACM
    Cabrero D Participatory design of persona artefacts for user eXperience in non-WEIRD cultures Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2, (247-250)
  75. Caballero L, Moreno A and Seffah A Persona as a Tool to Involving Human in Agile Methods Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 13.2 International Conference on Human-Centered Software Engineering - Volume 8742, (283-290)
  76. Billestrup J, Stage J, Bruun A, Nielsen L and Nielsen K Creating and Using Personas in Software Development Proceedings of the 5th IFIP WG 13.2 International Conference on Human-Centered Software Engineering - Volume 8742, (251-258)
  77. ACM
    González C, Muñoz V, Toledo P, Mora A and Moreno L EMATIC Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, (1-8)
  78. Araujo C and Aquino Junior P Psychological Personas for Universal User Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools - Volume 8510, (3-13)
  79. ACM
    Howard T (2014). Journey mapping, Communication Design Quarterly, 2:3, (10-13), Online publication date: 1-May-2014.
  80. ACM
    González C, Toledo P, Muñoz V, Noda M, Bruno A and Moreno L Inclusive educational software design with agile approach Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, (149-155)
  81. ACM
    Cockton G Design isn't a shape and it hasn't got a centre Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation, (1-16)
  82. ACM
    Hochleitner C, Graf C and Tscheligi M Do you enjoy getting gifts? CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2355-2358)
  83. ACM
    Cockton G A load of cobbler's children CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2139-2148)
  84. ACM
    Giboin A Emphasizing dysfunctional group dynamics in collaboration personas CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (121-126)
  85. ACM
    Jakobsen C Dolls as props representing users in design Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, (263-272)
  86. Masiero A, Ferreira L and Aquino P Algoritmos de clusterização e python científico apoiando modelagem de usuário Companion Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (47-50)
  87. ACM
    Wöckl B, Yildizoglu U, Buber I, Aparicio Diaz B, Kruijff E and Tscheligi M Basic senior personas Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, (25-32)
  88. ACM
    Ruault J, Kolski C and Vanderhaegen F Persona pour la conception de systèmes complexes résilients Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Ergonomie et Interaction homme-machine, (17-24)
  89. ACM
    Jakobsen C Towards doll based design Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, (388-397)
  90. ACM
    Weiss B, Wechsung I and Marquardt S Assessing ICT user groups Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, (275-283)
  91. ACM
    Laporte L, Slegers K and De Grooff D Using correspondence analysis to monitor the persona segmentation process Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, (265-274)
  92. ACM
    Faily S, Lyle J, Namiluko C, Atzeni A and Cameroni C Model-driven architectural risk analysis using architectural and contextualised attack patterns Proceedings of the Workshop on Model-Driven Security, (1-6)
  93. ACM
    Bødker S, Christiansen E, Nyvang T and Zander P Personas, people and participation Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, (91-100)
  94. Schneidewind L, Hörold S, Mayas C, Krömker H, Falke S and Pucklitsch T How personas support requirements engineering Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering, (1-5)
  95. ACM
    Switzky A Incorporating UCD into the software development lifecycle CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (469-484)
  96. ACM
    Matthews T, Judge T and Whittaker S How do designers and user experience professionals actually perceive and use personas? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1219-1228)
  97. ACM
    Judge T, Matthews T and Whittaker S Comparing collaboration and individual personas for the design and evaluation of collaboration software Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1997-2000)
  98. Mukhtar M, Ismail M and Yahya Y (2012). A hierarchical classification of co-creation models and techniques to aid in product or service design, Computers in Industry, 63:4, (289-297), Online publication date: 1-May-2012.
  99. ACM
    Fuhrhop C, Lyle J and Faily S The webinos project Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, (259-262)
  100. ACM
    Alaoui M, Lewkowicz M and Seffah A Increasing elderly social relationships through TV-based services Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, (13-20)
  101. ACM
    Moser C, Fuchsberger V and Tscheligi M Using probes to create child personas for games Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, (1-8)
  102. Masiero A, Leite M, Filgueiras L and Aquino P Multidirectional knowledge extraction process for creating behavioral personas Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (91-99)
  103. Guo F, Shamdasani S and Randall B Creating effective personas for product design Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Internationalization, design and global development, (37-46)
  104. Valls A, Garreta-Domingo M and López M Enhancing personas with their main scenarios Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Human-computer interaction: design and development approaches - Volume Part I, (136-141)
  105. ACM
    Yargin G and Erbuğ Ç A proposed information systems framework for effective delivery of user research findings Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, (1-8)
  106. ACM
    Cleland-Huang J, Czauderna A, Dekhtyar A, Gotel O, Hayes J, Keenan E, Leach G, Maletic J, Poshyvanyk D, Shin Y, Zisman A, Antoniol G, Berenbach B, Egyed A and Maeder P Grand challenges, benchmarks, and TraceLab Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Traceability in Emerging Forms of Software Engineering, (17-23)
  107. ACM
    Saez A and Garreta Domingo M Scenario-based persona CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (505-505)
  108. ACM
    Bekker T and Antle A Developmentally situated design (DSD) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2531-2540)
  109. ACM
    Matthews T, Whittaker S, Moran T and Yuen S Collaboration personas Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2247-2256)
  110. Grudin J (2011). Human-computer interaction, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45:1, (367-430), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.
  111. ACM
    Tomitsch M, Sturm F, Konzett M, Bolin A, Wagner I and Grechenig T Stories from the field Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (1-5)
  112. ACM
    Light A, Wakeman I, Robinson J, Basu A and Chalmers D Chutney and relish Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, (208-215)
  113. Faily S and Fléchais I The secret lives of assumptions Proceedings of the Third international conference on Human-centred software engineering, (111-118)
  114. Gomes A and Furtado E FAVIHC - framework de avaliação da interação Humano Computador, estudo de caso na televisão digital Proceedings of the IX Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (81-90)
  115. Haesen M, Meskens J, Luyten K and Coninx K Draw me a storyboard Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference, (133-142)
  116. Faily S and Fléchais I Barry is not the weakest link Proceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference, (124-132)
  117. Lundh P, Cheng B, Penuel W and Joshi A Using design personas to inform refinements to software for science learning Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 2, (320-321)
  118. ACM
    Nunes F, Silva P and Abrantes F Human-computer interaction and the older adult Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, (1-8)
  119. ACM
    Furtado E, Ibarra-Mayora O and Fuhrhop C Assessments and consensus on users' needs of cross-cultural stakeholders Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, (197-204)
  120. ACM
    Siegel D The mystique of numbers CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (4721-4732)
  121. Scholl H Mobile computing in the public sector Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government, (361-363)
  122. Keinonen T (2009). Design Contribution Square, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23:2, (142-148), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2009.
  123. Aquino P and Filgueiras L A expressão da diversidade de usuários no projeto de interação com padrões e personas Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1-10)
  124. Rönkkö K, Hellman M and Dittrich Y PD method and socio-political context of the development organization Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, (71-80)
  125. Casas R, Blasco Marín R, Robinet A, Delgado A, Yarza A, Mcginn J, Picking R and Grout V User Modelling in Ambient Intelligence for Elderly and Disabled People Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, (114-122)
  126. ACM
    McGinn J and Kotamraju N Data-driven persona development Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1521-1524)
  127. ACM
    Miaskiewicz T, Sumner T and Kozar K A latent semantic analysis methodology for the identification and creation of personas Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1501-1510)
  128. ACM
    Marcoux Y and Rizkallah É Experience with the use of peritexts to support modeler-author communication in a structured-document system Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, (142-147)
  129. ACM
    Visser F and Stappers P Mind the face Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, (119-134)
  130. Hofer R, Zimmermann D and Jekal M Alignment of product portfolio definition and user centered design activities Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: interaction design and usability, (98-107)
  131. Go K A scenario-based design method with photo diaries and photo essays Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: interaction design and usability, (88-97)
  132. Dong J, Kelkar K and Braun K Getting the most out of personas for product usability enhancements Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Usability and internationalization, (291-296)
  133. ACM
    Kantola V, Tiitta S, Mehto K and Kankainen T Using dramaturgical methods to gain more dynamic user understanding in user-centered design Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition, (173-182)
  134. ACM
    Nieters J, Ivaturi S and Ahmed I Making personas memorable CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1817-1824)
  135. ACM
    Khalayli N, Nyhus S, Hamnes K and Terum T Persona based rapid usability kick-off CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1771-1776)
  136. ACM
    Adlin T, Pruitt J, Goodwin K, Hynes C, McGrane K, Rosenstein A and Muller M Putting personas to work CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (13-16)
Contributors
  • Microsoft Corporation

Recommendations