research-article

Exploring the Effect of a Robotics Laboratory on Computational Thinking Skills in Primary School Children Using the Bebras Tasks

Authors:

Giuseppe Chiazzese,

Antonella Chifari,

Violetta Lonati, and

Crispino TostoAuthors Info & Claims

TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 2018

Pages 25 - 30

https://doi.org/10.1145/3284179.3284186

Published: 24 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents preliminary findings from a project-based learning laboratory of robotics aimed at stimulating computational thinking processes in primary school students. The laboratory was carried out within the context of an ongoing project funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research. The aim of the project is to activate a national network for the enhancement of students' technological and scientific skills in school and extra-school settings. A group of 51 students, engaged in the robotics laboratory, were compared to a comparison group of 32 students in order to evaluate the impact of programming WeDo robotics artefacts on the development of computational thinking skills. Overall, the results showed that programming robotics artefacts may exert positive effects on children's acquisition of computational thinking skills.

References

[1]

David Hung. 2002. Situated cognition and problem-based learning: Implications for learning and instruction with technology. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(4), 393--414.

[2]

Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd. ed.). Basic Books Inc., New York, NY

Digital Library

[3]

Fabiane B.V. Benitti and Newton Spolaôr. 2017. How Have Robots Supported STEM Teaching?. In Robotics in STEM Education. Springer, Cham, pp. 103--129.

[4]

David Weintrop and Uri Wilensky. 2015. To block or not to block, that is the question: students' perceptions of blocks-based programming. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2015). ACM, New York, NY, 199--208.

Digital Library

[5]

David Weintrop, and Uri Wilensky. 2017. Comparing block-based and text-based programming in high school computer science classrooms. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 18(1), 3.

Digital Library

[6]

Francisco J. García-Peñalvo, Daniela Reimann, Maire Tuul, Alyson Rees, and Ilkka Jormanainen. 2016. An overview of the most relevant literature on coding and computational thinking with emphasis on the relevant issues for teachers. Belgium: TACCLE3 Consortium.

[7]

Caitlin Kelleher, and Randy Pausch. 2005. Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 37(2), 83--137.

Digital Library

[8]

Wan Ng. 2012. Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065--1078.

Digital Library

[9]

Mike Carbonaro, Marion Rex, and Joan Chambers. 2004. Using LEGO robotics in a project-based learning environment. The Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning 6(1). Retrieved June 28, 2018 from http://www.imej.wfu.edu/articles/2004/1/02/printver.asp

[10]

Ana M. Pinto-Llorente, Sonia Casillas-Martín, Marcos Cabezas-Martín, and Francisco J. García-Peñalvo. 2016. Developing Computational Thinking via the Visual Programming Tool: Lego Education WeDo. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'16). ACM, New York, NY, 45--50.

Digital Library

[11]

Ana M. Pinto-Llorente, Sonia Casillas-Martín, Marcos Cabezas-Martín, and Francisco J. García-Peñalvo. 2017. Building, coding and programming 3D models via a visual programming environment. Quality & Quantity, 1--14.

[12]

International Socie/ty for Technology in Education (ISTE) and the Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA). 2011. Operational definition of computational thinking for K-12 education. Retrieved June 28, 2018 from http://www.iste.org/docs/ct-documents/computational-thinking-operational-definition-flyer.pdf

[13]

Francisco J. García-Peñalvo and Antonio J. Mendes. 2018. Exploring the computational thinking effects in pre-university education. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 407--411.

[14]

Andrew Csizmadia, Paul Curzon, Mark Dorling, Simon Humphreys, Thomas Ng, Cynthia Selby, John Woollard. 2015. Computational thinking: a guide for teachers. Retrieved June 28, 2018 from http://community.computingatschool.org.uk/resources/2324/single

[15]

Fabiane.B.V. Benitti. 2012. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978--988.

Digital Library

[16]

Florence R. Sullivan, and John Heffernan. 2016. Robotic Construction Kits as Computational Manipulatives for Learning in the STEM Disciplines. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 105--128.

[17]

Marina U. Bers, Louise Flannery, Elizabeth R. Kazakoff, and Amanda Sullivan. 2014. Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145--157.

[18]

LEGO Education WeDo 2.0, https://education.lego.com/en-us/elementary/shop/wedo-2

[19]

Ignacio Montero, and Orfelio G. León. 2007. A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7(3), 847-862

[20]

Valentina Dagienė and Gerald Futschek. 2008. Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: Criteria for good tasks. In International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools-Evolution and Perspectives, 19--30. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Digital Library

[21]

Valentina Dagiene and Gerald Stupuriene. 2016. Bebras-a sustainable community building model for the concept based learning of informatics and computational thinking. Informatics in Education, 15(1), 25--44.

[22]

Marcus Román-González, Jesus Moreno-León, and Gregorio Robles. 2017. Complementary tools for computational thinking assessment. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (CTE 2017), S.C. Kong, J. Sheldon, and K.Y. Li (Eds.). The Education University of Hong Kong, 154--159.

[23]

G. Chiazzese, G. Fulantelli, V. Pipitone, and D. Taibi. 2018. Engaging Primary School Children in Computational Thinking: Designing and Developing Videogames. Education in the Knowledge Society, 19(2), 63--81.

[24]

Guanhua Chen, Ji Shen, Lauren Barth-Cohen, Shiyan Jiang, Xiaoting Huang, and Moataz Eltoukhy. 2017. Assessing elementary students' computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162--175.

Digital Library

Cited By

Mangina EPsyrra GScrepanti LScaradozzi D(2024)Robotics in the Context of Primary and Preschool Education: A Scoping ReviewIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.326663117(342-363)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TLT.2023.3266631
Adnan NAbdullah SRaja Yusof RZainal NQamar FYadegaridehkordi E(2023)A Systematic Literature Review in Robotics Experiential Learning With Computational and Adversarial ThinkingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.324976111(44806-44827)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3249761
Souza IAndrade WSampaio L(2021)Educational Robotics Applied to Computational Thinking Development: A Systematic Mapping Study2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637185(1-8)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637185
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Exploring the Effect of a Robotics Laboratory on Computational Thinking Skills in Primary School Children Using the Bebras Tasks
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. Collaborative learning
    2. Interactive learning environments
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computational thinking
      2. Computing education programs

Recommendations

Computational thinking in high school courses
SIGCSE '10: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

The number of undergraduates entering computer science has declined in recent years. This is paralleled by a drop in the number of high school students taking the CS AP exam and the number of high schools offering computer science courses. The declines ...
Read More
Computational Thinking in Teacher Education
SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Teacher education programs are beginning to acknowledge the important role they play in preparing teachers to support students in the area of STEM, coding, Computational Thinking and robotics. As a result, new courses are being developed that connect ...
Read More
A Computational Thinking Obstacle Course Based on Bebras Tasks for K-12 Schools
ITiCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1

This paper describes an unplugged computational thinking (CT) resource for primary and secondary schools developed from Bebras tasks. In Ireland, CT is not part of the primary school curriculum or mandatory in secondary schools. However, the National ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

TEEM'18: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 2018

1072 pages

ISBN:9781450365185

DOI:10.1145/3284179

Editor:
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
University of Salamanca

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 October 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEEM'18

TEEM'18: Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 24 - 26, 2018

Salamanca, Spain

Acceptance Rates

TEEM'18 Paper Acceptance Rate 151 of 243 submissions, 62%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
365
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)24
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mangina EPsyrra GScrepanti LScaradozzi D(2024)Robotics in the Context of Primary and Preschool Education: A Scoping ReviewIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.326663117(342-363)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TLT.2023.3266631
Adnan NAbdullah SRaja Yusof RZainal NQamar FYadegaridehkordi E(2023)A Systematic Literature Review in Robotics Experiential Learning With Computational and Adversarial ThinkingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.324976111(44806-44827)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3249761
Souza IAndrade WSampaio L(2021)Educational Robotics Applied to Computational Thinking Development: A Systematic Mapping Study2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637185(1-8)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637185
Oliveira AAndrade WGuerrero DMelo M(2021)How do Bebras Tasks Explore Algorithmic Thinking Skill in a Computational Thinking Contest?2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637151(1-7)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637151
GÜLBAHAR YKALELİOĞLU FDOĞAN DKARATAŞ E(2020)Bilge Kunduz: Enformatik ve Bilgi-İşlemsel Düşünmeyi Kavram Temelli Öğrenme için Toplumsal Bir YaklaşımAnkara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi10.30964/auebfd.560771Online publication date: 20-Mar-2020
https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.560771
Chiazzese GArrigo MChifari ALonati VTosto C(2019)Educational Robotics in Primary School: Measuring the Development of Computational Thinking Skills with the Bebras TasksInformatics10.3390/informatics60400436:4(43)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019
https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6040043
García-Peñalvo F(2018)Computational thinking and programming education principlesProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3284179.3284184(14-17)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3284179.3284184

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents