Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3284432.3287177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Brain Neurophysiology to Objectify the Social Competence of Conversational Agents

Published: 04 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We present an approach to objectify the social competence of artificial agents using human brain neurophysiology. Whole brain activity is recorded with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) while participants discuss either with a human confederate or an artificial agent. This allows a direct comparison of local brain responses, including deep brain structures invisible to other neuroimaging techniques, as a function of the nature of the interlocutor. The present data (9 participants, artificial agent is the robotic conversational head Furhat controlled with a Wizard of Oz procedure) demonstrates the feasibility of this approach, and results confirm an increased activity in the hypothalamic region when interacting with a human compared to an artificial agent.

References

[1]
Al Moubayed, S., Beskow, J., Skantze, G., & Granström, B. (2012). Furhat: a back-projected human-like robot head for multiparty human-machine interaction. In Cognitive behavioural systems (pp. 114--130). Springer.
[2]
Chaminade, T. (2017). An experimental approach to study the physiology of natural social interactions. Interaction Studies, 18(2).
[3]
Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S. J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C. D., Micera, S., Dario, P., Rizzolatti, G., Gallese, V., & Umilta, M. A. (2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS One, 5(7), e11577.
[4]
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception--behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(6), 893
[5]
Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Kato, K. (2006). Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 437--454
[6]
Rauchbauer, B. Nazarian, B., Bourhis, B., Ochs, M., Prévot, L. & Chaminade, T. (in revision). Neural bases of social interactions investigated with an artificial agent. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B.
[7]
Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., & Cheng, G. (2016). Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 371(1693)

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Human vs computer: What effect does the source of information have on cognitive performance and achievement goal orientation?Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics10.1515/pjbr-2021-001212:1(175-186)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2021
  • (2019)L’interaction Homme-Robot, de l’anthropomorphisme à l’humanisationL’Année psychologique10.3917/anpsy1.194.0515Vol. 119:4(515-563)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2019

Index Terms

  1. Brain Neurophysiology to Objectify the Social Competence of Conversational Agents

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HAI '18: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
    December 2018
    402 pages
    ISBN:9781450359535
    DOI:10.1145/3284432
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2018

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. humanoid robot
    2. neurophysiology
    3. social interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    HAI '18
    Sponsor:
    HAI '18: 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction
    December 15 - 18, 2018
    Southampton, United Kingdom

    Acceptance Rates

    HAI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 92 submissions, 43%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 121 of 404 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Human vs computer: What effect does the source of information have on cognitive performance and achievement goal orientation?Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics10.1515/pjbr-2021-001212:1(175-186)Online publication date: 10-Feb-2021
    • (2019)L’interaction Homme-Robot, de l’anthropomorphisme à l’humanisationL’Année psychologique10.3917/anpsy1.194.0515Vol. 119:4(515-563)Online publication date: 9-Dec-2019

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media