Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300857acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Transformation through Provocation?

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Can a chatbot enable us to change our conceptions, to be critically reflective? To what extent can interaction with a technologically 'minimal' medium such as a chatbot evoke emotional engagement in ways that can challenge us to act on the world? In this paper, we discuss the design of a provocative bot, a 'bot of conviction', aimed at triggering conversations on complex topics (e.g. death, wealth distribution, gender equality, privacy) and, ultimately, soliciting specific actions from the user it converses with. We instantiate our design with a use case in the cultural sector, specifically a Neolithic archaeological site that acts as a stage of conversation on such hard themes. Our larger contributions include an interaction framework for bots of conviction, insights gained from an iterative process of participatory design and evaluation, and a vision for bot interaction mechanisms that can apply to the HCI community more widely.

    Supplementary Material

    JPG File (paper627.jpg)
    Supplemental video
    MP4 File (paper627p.mp4)
    Preview video
    MP4 File (paper627.mp4)

    References

    [1]
    Auckland Art Gallery. 2018. Auckland Art Gallery's new chatbot: artificial intelligence. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/CU1805/S00203/auckland-art-gallerys-new-chatbot-art-ificial-intelligence.htm Last accessed 31 December 2018.
    [2]
    Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "critical" about critical design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3297.
    [3]
    Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, and John Antanitis. 2012. Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on - DIS '12. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 288.
    [4]
    Justine Cassell. 2001. Embodied conversational agents: representation and intelligence in user interfaces. AI Magazine 22, 4 (2001), 67--83.
    [5]
    Justine Cassell, Tim Bickmore, Lee Campbell, Hannes Vihjalmsson, and Hao Yan. 2000. Human conversation as a system framework: designing embodied conversational agents. In Embodied conversational agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, Chapter 2, 29--62.
    [6]
    Dot - Akron Art Museum. 2018. Dot - Akron Art Museum guide. https://akronartmuseum.org/calendar/connect-with-dot-launch-party/12829 Last accessed 31 December 2018.
    [7]
    Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.
    [8]
    Jason Endacott and Sarah Brooks. 2013. An Updated Theoretical and Practical Model for Promoting Historical Empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice 8, 1 (2013), 41--58. http://www.socstrpr.org/ wp-content/uploads/2013/04/MS{_}06482{_}no3.pdf
    [9]
    Asbjørn Følstad and Petter Bae Brandtzæg. 2017. Chatbots and the new world of HCI. interactions 24, 4 (jun 2017), 38--42.
    [10]
    Smithsonian Institution & Museweb Foundation. 2016. Storytelling Toolkit - Facilitated Dialogue. Technical Report. 21 pages. https://museumonmainstreet.org/sites/default/files/facilitated_dialogue.pdf
    [11]
    Katrina Gargett. 2018. Re-thinking the guided tour: co-creation, dialogue and practices of facilitation at York Minster. MA Thesis. University of York.
    [12]
    Avelino J. Gonzalez, James R. Hollister, Ronald F. DeMara, Jason Leigh, Brandan Lanman, Sang-Yoon Lee, Shane Parker, Christopher Walls, Jeanne Parker, Josiah Wong, Clayton Barham, and Bryan Wilder. 2017. AI in Informal Science Education: Bringing Turing Back to Life to Perform the Turing Test. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 27, 2 (jun 2017), 353--384.
    [13]
    Shawn Graham. 2017. An Introduction to Twitter Bots with Tracery. https://programminghistorian.org/en/lessons/intro-to-twitterbots
    [14]
    Tom Hennes. 2002. Rethinking the Visitor Experience: Transforming Obstacle into Purpose. Curator: The Museum Journal 45, 2 (apr 2002), 105--117.
    [15]
    Anne Frank House. 2017. Anne Frank House bot for Messenger launch. https://www.annefrank.org/en/about-us/news-and-press/ news/2017/3/21/anne-frank-house-launches-bot-messenger/ Last accessed 31 December 2018.
    [16]
    Akrivi Katifori, Maria Roussou, Sara Perry, George Drettakis, Sebastian Vizcay, and Julien Philip. 2018. The EMOTIVE Project - Emotive virtual cultural experiences through personalized storytelling. In EuroMed 2018, International Conference on Cultural Heritage. Lemessos, Cyprus.
    [17]
    Mark Katrikh. 2018. Creating Safe(r) Spaces for Visitors and Staff in Museum Programs. Journal of Museum Education 43, 1 (jan 2018), 7--15.
    [18]
    A. Baki Kocaballi, Liliana Laranjo, and Enrico Coiera. 2018. Measuring User Experience in Conversational Interfaces: A Comparison of Six Questionnaires. In Proceedings of the 32Nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI '18). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, UK, Article 21, 12 pages.
    [19]
    Stefan Kopp, Christian Becker, and Ipke Wachsmuth. 2006. The Virtual Human Max - Modeling Embodied Conversation. In KI 2006 - Demo Presentation, Extended Abstracts. 19--22.
    [20]
    Stefan Kopp, Lars Gesellensetter, Nicole C. Krämer, and Ipke Wachsmuth. 2005. A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3661, T. Panayiotopoulos, J. Gratch, Ruth Aylett, Ballin Dan, Olivier Patrick, and T. Rist (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 329--343.
    [21]
    Peter M. Krafft, Michael Macy, and Alex "Sandy" Pentland. 2017. Bots as Virtual Confederates. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 183--190.
    [22]
    H. Chad Lane, Clara Cahill, Susan Foutz, Daniel Auerbach, Dan Noren, Catherine Lussenhop, and William Swartout. 2013. The Effects of a Pedagogical Agent for Informal Science Education on Learner Behaviors and Self-efficacy. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7926, H. Chad Lane, Kalina Yacef, Jack Mostow, and P. Pavlik (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Memphis, TN, USA, 309--318.
    [23]
    Q. Vera Liao, Werner Geyer, Muhammed Mas-ud Hussain, Praveen Chandar, Matthew Davis, Yasaman Khazaeni, Marco Patricio Crasso, Dakuo Wang, Michael Muller, and N. Sadat Shami. 2018. All Work and no Play? Conversations with a Question-and-Answer Chatbot in the Wild. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--13.
    [24]
    Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. "Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 5286--5297.
    [25]
    Bernadette Lynch. 2013. Reflective debate, radical transparency and trust in museums. Museum Management and Curatorship 28, 1 (2013), 1--13.
    [26]
    Matt Malpass. 2013. Between Wit and Reason: Defining Associative, Speculative, and Critical Design in Practice. Design and Culture 5, 3 (nov 2013), 333--356.
    [27]
    Timothy Marsh, Peter Wright, and Shamus P. Smith. 2001. Evaluation for the design of experience in virtual environments: modeling breakdown of interaction and illusion. Cyberpsychology & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 4, 2 (2001), 225--238.
    [28]
    Nikita Mattar and Ipke Wachsmuth. 2014. Let's Get Personal. In Human-Computer Interaction. Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques. HCI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8511. Springer, Cham, 450--461.
    [29]
    John McCarthy, Peter Wright, Jayne Wallace, and Andy Dearden. 2006. The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 6 (2006), 369--378.
    [30]
    Sierra McKinney. 2018. Generating pre-historical empathy in classrooms. Master's thesis. University of York.
    [31]
    Michael Minge and Manfred Thüring. 2018. Hedonic and pragmatic halo effects at early stages of User Experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 109 (jan 2018), 13--25.
    [32]
    Elahe Paikari and André van der Hoek. 2018. A framework for understanding chatbots and their future. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering - CHASE '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 13--16.
    [33]
    Sara Perry. 2018. The Enchantment of the Archaeological Record. In 24th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists. European Association of Archaeologists, Barcelona, Spain.
    [34]
    James Pierce, Phoebe Sengers, Tad Hirsch, Tom Jenkins, William Gaver, and Carl DiSalvo. 2015. Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 2083--2092.
    [35]
    Maria Roussou and Akrivi Katifori. 2018. Flow, Staging, Wayfinding, Personalization: Evaluating User Experience with Mobile Museum Narratives. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 2 (jun 2018), 32.
    [36]
    Mark Sample. 2014. A protest bot is a bot so specific you can't mistake it for bullshit: A Call for Bots of Conviction. http://bit.ly/2F3fYGO
    [37]
    Ari Schlesinger, Kenton P. O'Hara, and Alex S. Taylor. 2018. Let's Talk About Race: Identity, Chatbots, and AI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--14.
    [38]
    M. Schroder, E. Bevacqua, R. Cowie, F. Eyben, H. Gunes, D. Heylen, M. ter Maat, G. McKeown, S. Pammi, M. Pantic, C. Pelachaud, B. Schuller, E. de Sevin, M. Valstar, and M. Wollmer. 2012. Building Autonomous Sensitive Artificial Listeners. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3, 2 (apr 2012), 165--183.
    [39]
    Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing between sense and sensibility - CC '05. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 49.
    [40]
    Samira Shaikh. 2017. A persuasive virtual chat agent based on sociolinguistic theories of influence. AI Matters 3, 2 (jul 2017), 26--27.
    [41]
    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2018. Think Again: How to Reason and Argue. Penguin, London, UK.
    [42]
    Mel Slater. 2004. How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 4 (aug 2004), 484--493.
    [43]
    Laurajane Smith. 2016. Changing views? Emotional intelligence, registers of engagement, and the museum visit. In Museums as Sites of Historical Consciousness: Perspectives on museum theory and practice in Canada, Vivienne Gosselin and Phaedra Livingstone (Eds.). UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada, Chapter 6, 101--121.
    [44]
    Barbara J. Soren. 2009. Museum experiences that change visitors. Museum Management and Curatorship 24, 3 (sep 2009), 233--251.
    [45]
    Statista. 2018. Number of monthly active Facebook Messenger users from April 2014 to September 2017 (in millions). https://www.statista. com/statistics/417295/facebook-messenger-monthly-active-users/ Last accessed 31 December 2018.
    [46]
    William Swartout, David Traum, Ron Artstein, Dan Noren, Paul Debevec, Kerry Bronnenkant, Josh Williams, Anton Leuski, Shrikanth Narayanan, Diane Piepol, Chad Lane, Jacquelyn Morie, Priti Aggarwal, Matt Liewer, Jen-Yuan Chiang, Jillian Gerten, Selina Chu, and Kyle White. 2010. Ada and Grace: Toward Realistic and Engaging Virtual Museum Guides. In IVA 2010, J. Allbeck (Ed.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 286--300. http://ict.usc.edu/pubs/adaandgrace.pdf
    [47]
    Ella Tallyn, Hector Fried, Rory Gianni, Amy Isard, and Chris Speed. 2018. The Ethnobot: Gathering Ethnographies in the Age of IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--13.
    [48]
    The House Museums of Milan. 2016. Di Casa in casa adventour. https: //www.facebook.com/dicasaincasagame/ Last accessed 31 December 2018.
    [49]
    Angeliki Tzouganatou. 2017. Chatbot Experience for ÇATALHÖYÜK. Master's thesis. University of York.
    [50]
    Stavros Vassos, Eirini Malliaraki, Federica dal Falco, Jessica Di Maggio, Manlio Massimetti, Maria Giulia Nocentini, and Angela Testa. 2016. Art-Bots: Toward Chat-Based Conversational Experiences in Museums. In Interactive Storytelling. 9th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2016, Frank Nack and Andrew S. Gordon (Eds.). Los Angeles, CA, USA, 433--437.
    [51]
    Astrid M. von der Pütten, Nicole C. Krämer, Jonathan Gratch, and Sin-Hwa Kang. 2010. "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (nov 2010), 1641--1650.
    [52]
    Margaret Wetherell. 2012. Affect and Emotion (1st ed.). Sage Publications Ltd, London, UK. 192 pages.
    [53]
    Margaret Wetherell, Laurajane Smith, and Gary Campbell. 2018. Introduction: Affective heritage practices. In Emotion, Affective Practices, and the Past in the Present, Laurajane Smith, Margaret Wetherell, and Gary Campbell (Eds.). Routledge, London, 1--21.
    [54]
    Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2008. Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 637.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring Effects of Chatbot's Interpretation and Self-disclosure on Mental Illness StigmaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373298:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Tax and Welfare Chatbots Used by Young Adults with Dyslexia: A Usability StudyUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60875-9_23(337-352)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2024)GamificationInclusive Smart Museums10.1007/978-3-031-43615-4_4(127-151)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2019
    9077 pages
    ISBN:9781450359702
    DOI:10.1145/3290605
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. chatbots
    2. conversational agents
    3. cultural informatics
    4. emotional engagement
    5. provocative interaction
    6. ux design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CHI '19
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 703 of 2,958 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring Effects of Chatbot's Interpretation and Self-disclosure on Mental Illness StigmaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373298:CSCW1(1-33)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Tax and Welfare Chatbots Used by Young Adults with Dyslexia: A Usability StudyUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60875-9_23(337-352)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2024)GamificationInclusive Smart Museums10.1007/978-3-031-43615-4_4(127-151)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Social Cohesion in Interactive Digital Heritage ExperiencesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti70600617:6(61)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Chatbots in Museums: Is Visitor Experience Measured?Czech Journal of Tourism10.2478/cjot-2022-000211:1-2(14-31)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Gender Nuances in Human-Computer Interaction ResearchProceedings of the XXII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3638067.3638077(1-12)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
    • (2023)From Inclusive Theatre to inclusive technologies: Lessons learnt from co-designing Touch Tours with an Inclusive Theatre groupProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596094(1367-1382)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Towards Critical Heritage in the wild: Analysing Discomfort through Collaborative AutoethnographyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581274(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)The Impact of Story Structure, Meaningfulness, and Concentration in Serious GamesInformation10.3390/info1312056713:12(567)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Current Digital ArchaeologyAnnual Review of Anthropology10.1146/annurev-anthro-041320-11410151:1(213-231)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media