Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
survey

Computational Understanding of Visual Interestingness Beyond Semantics: Literature Survey and Analysis of Covariates

Published: 27 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding visual interestingness is a challenging task addressed by researchers in various disciplines ranging from humanities and psychology to, more recently, computer vision and multimedia. The rise of infographics and the visual information overload that we are facing today have given this task a crucial importance. Automatic systems are increasingly needed to help users navigate through the growing amount of visual information available, either on the web or our personal devices, for instance by selecting relevant and interesting content. Previous studies indicate that visual interest is highly related to concepts like arousal, unusualness, or complexity, where these connections are found based on psychological theories, user studies, or computational approaches. However, the link between visual interestingness and other related concepts has been only partially explored so far, for example, by considering only a limited subset of covariates at a time. In this article, we present a comprehensive survey on visual interestingness and related concepts, aiming to bring together works based on different approaches, highlighting controversies, and identifying links that have not been fully investigated yet. Finally, we present some open questions that may be addressed in future works. Our work aims to support researchers interested in visual interestingness and related subjective or abstract concepts, providing an in-depth overlook at state-of-the-art theories in humanities and methods in computational approaches, as well as providing an extended list of datasets.

Supplementary Material

a25-constantin-apndx.pdf (constantin.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Computational Understanding of Visual Interestingness Beyond Semantics: Literature Survey and Analysis of Covariates

References

[1]
Esra Acar, Frank Hopfgartner, and Sahin Albayrak. 2015. Fusion of learned multi-modal representations and dense trajectories for emotional analysis in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing. IEEE, 1--6.
[2]
Peter P. Aitken. 1974. Judgments of pleasingness and interestingness as functions of visual complexity. J. Exper. Psychol. 103, 2 (1974), 240--244.
[3]
Xavier Alameda-Pineda, Andrea Pilzer, Dan Xu, Nicu Sebe, and Elisa Ricci. 2017. Viraliency: Pooling local virality. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 484--492.
[4]
Jurandy Almeida. 2016. UNIFESP at MediaEval 2016: Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[5]
Jurandy Almeida and Ricardo M. Savii. 2017. GIBIS at MediaEval 2017: Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[6]
Jurandy Almeida, Lucas P. Valem, and Daniel C. G. Pedronette. 2017. A rank aggregation framework for video interestingness prediction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. Springer, 3--14.
[7]
Xesca Amengual, Anna Bosch, and Josep Lluís de la Rosa. 2017. How to measure memorability and social interestingness of images: A review. Int. J. Pattern Recogn. Artific. Intell. 31, 2 (2017), 1754004.
[8]
Philip W. Anderson et al. 1972. More is different. Science 177, 4047 (1972), 393--396.
[9]
Stegen R. Asher and Kristina L. McDonald. 2009. The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups (2009), 232--248.
[10]
Salvatore Attardo, Jodi Eisterhold, Jennifer Hay, and Isabella Poggi. 2003. Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humor 16, 2 (2003), 243--260.
[11]
Salvatore Attardo and Victor Raskin. 1991. Script theory revis (it) ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor-Int. J. Humor Res. 4, 3--4 (1991), 293--348.
[12]
Frank Barron and David M. Harrington. 1981. Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 32, 1 (1981), 439--476.
[13]
Yoann Baveye, Emmanuel Dellandrea, Christel Chamaret, and Liming Chen. 2015. LIRIS-ACCEDE: A video database for affective content analysis. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 6, 1 (2015), 43--55.
[14]
Olfa Ben-Ahmed, Jonas Wacker, Alessandro Gaballo, and Benoit Huet. 2017. EURECOM @MediaEval 2017: Media genre inference for predicting media interestingness. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[15]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1949. Interest as a psychological concept. Brit. J. Psychol. Gen. Sect. 39, 4 (1949), 184--195.
[16]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1960a. McGraw-Hill series in psychology. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY.
[17]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1960b. Novelty, uncertainty, conflict, complexity. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity (1960), 18--44.
[18]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1963. Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Can. J. Exper. Psychol. 17, 3 (1963), 274--290.
[19]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1970. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception 8 Psychophysics 8, 5 (1970), 279--286.
[20]
Daniel E. Berlyne. 1971. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Vol. 336. JSTOR.
[21]
Eloïse Berson, Claire-Hélène Demarty, and Ngoc Q. K. Duong. 2017. Multimodality and deep learning when predicting media interestingness. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[22]
Bir Bhanu. 1986. Automatic target recognition: State of the art survey. IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electron. Syst. AES-22, 4 (1986), 364--379.
[23]
George David Birkhoff. 1933. Aesthetic Measure. Vol. 38. Harvard University Press.
[24]
Kelsey Blackburn and James Schirillo. 2012. Emotive hemispheric differences measured in real-life portraits using pupil diameter and subjective aesthetic preferences. Exper. Brain Res. 219, 4 (2012), 447--455.
[25]
Ali Borji, Ming-Ming Cheng, Huaizu Jiang, and Jia Li. 2015. Salient object detection: A benchmark. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 12 (2015), 5706--5722.
[26]
Ali Borji and Laurent Itti. 2013. State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1 (2013), 185--207.
[27]
Timothy F. Brady, Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez, and Aude Oliva. 2008. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 38 (2008), 14325--14329.
[28]
Markus M. Breunig, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Raymond T. Ng, and Jörg Sander. 2000. LOF: Identifying density-based local outliers. In ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. 29. 93--104.
[29]
William H. Burnham. 1908. Attention and interest. Amer. J. Psychol. 19, 1 (1908), 14--18.
[30]
Daniel Stewart Butterfield, Caterina Fake, Callum James Henderson-Begg, and Serguei Mourachov. 2014. Interestingness ranking of media objects. Google Patents. U.S. Patent 8,732,175.
[31]
Zoya Bylinskii, Michelle A Borkin, Nam Wook Kim, Hanspeter Pfister, and Aude Oliva. 2015a. Eye fixation metrics for large scale evaluation and comparison of information visualizations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Eye Tracking and Visualization. Springer, 235--255.
[32]
Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Constance Bainbridge, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2015b. Intrinsic and extrinsic effects on image memorability. Vis. Res. 116 (2015), 165--178.
[33]
Zoya Bylinskii, Adrià Recasens, Ali Borji, Aude Oliva, Antonio Torralba, and Frédo Durand. 2016. Where should saliency models look next? In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 809--824.
[34]
Michel Cabanac. 2002. What is emotion? Behav. Process. 60, 2 (2002), 69--83.
[35]
Maurizio Cardaci, Vito Di Gesù, Maria Petrou, and Marco Elio Tabacchi. 2009. A fuzzy approach to the evaluation of image complexity. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160, 10 (2009), 1474--1484.
[36]
Rodrigo Andrés Cárdenas and Lauren Julius Harris. 2006. Symmetrical decorations enhance the attractiveness of faces and abstract designs. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 1 (2006), 1--18.
[37]
Pew Research Center. 2016. News use across social media platforms. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/.
[38]
Souad Chaabouni, Jenny Benois-Pineau, Akka Zemmari, and Chokri Ben Amar. 2017. Deep saliency: Prediction of interestingness in video with CNN. In Visual Content Indexing and Retrieval with Psycho-Visual Models. Springer, 43--74.
[39]
Christel Chamaret, Claire-Helene Demarty, Vincent Demoulin, and Gwenaelle Marquant. 2016. Experiencing the interestingness concept within and between pictures. Electron. Imag. 2016, 16 (2016), 1--12.
[40]
Arjun Chandrasekaran, Ashwin K. Vijayakumar, Stanislaw Antol, Mohit Bansal, Dhruv Batra, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and Devi Parikh. 2016. We are humor beings: Understanding and predicting visual humor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4603--4612.
[41]
Ang Chen, Paul W. Darst, and Robert P. Pangrazi. 2001. An examination of situational interest and its sources. Brit. J. Edu. Psychol. 71, 3 (2001), 383--400.
[42]
Xinpeng Chen, Jingyuan Chen, Lin Ma, Jian Yao, Wei Liu, Jiebo Luo, and Tong Zhang. 2018. Fine-grained video attractiveness prediction using multimodal deep learning on a large real-world dataset. In Proceedings of the Conference on the World Wide Web: The 2018 Web Conference Companion. 671--678.
[43]
Seo Young Choi, M. Luo, Michael Pointer, and Peter Rhodes. 2009. Investigation of large display color image appearance--III: Modeling image naturalness. J. Imag. Sci. Technol. 53, 3 (2009), 31104--1.
[44]
Sharon Lynn Chu, Elena Fedorovskaya, Francis Quek, and Jeffrey Snyder. 2013. The effect of familiarity on perceived interestingness of images. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, Vol. 8651. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 86511C--86511C.
[45]
Romain Cohendet, Karthik Yadati, Ngoc Q. K. Duong, and Claire-Hélène Demarty. 2018. Annotating, understanding, and predicting long-term video memorability. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 178--186.
[46]
Mihai Gabriel Constantin, Bogdan Boteanu, and Bogdan Ionescu. 2016. LAPI at MediaEval 2016: Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[47]
Mihai Gabriel Constantin, Bogdan Boteanu, and Bogdan Ionescu. 2017. LAPI at MediaEval 2017: Predicting media interestingness. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[48]
Gerald C. Cupchik and Robert J. Gebotys. 1990. Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empir. Studies Arts 8, 1 (1990), 1--14.
[49]
Ritendra Datta, Dhiraj Joshi, Jia Li, and James Z. Wang. 2006. Studying aesthetics in photographic images using a computational approach. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 288--301.
[50]
Ritendra Datta, Jia Li, and James Z. Wang. 2008. Algorithmic inferencing of aesthetics and emotion in natural images: An exposition. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE, 105--108.
[51]
Dmitry Davidov, Oren Tsur, and Ari Rappoport. 2010. Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, 107--116.
[52]
Claire-Helène Demarty, Mats Sjöberg, Mihai Gabriel Constantin, Ngoc QK Duong, Bogdan Ionescu, Thanh-Toan Do, and Hanli Wang. 2017a. Predicting interestingness of visual content. In Visual Content Indexing and Retrieval with Psycho-Visual Models. Springer, 233--265.
[53]
Claire-Hélène Demarty, Mats Sjöberg, Bogdan Ionescu, Thanh-Toan Do, Michael Gygli, and Ngoc Q. K. Duong. 2017b. Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[54]
Claire-Hélène Demarty, Mats Sjöberg, Bogdan Ionescu, Thanh-Toan Do, Hanli Wang, Ngoc Q. K. Duong, and Frédéric Lefebvre. 2016. Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[55]
Arturo Deza and Devi Parikh. 2015. Understanding image virality. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1818--1826.
[56]
Sagnik Dhar, Vicente Ordonez, and Tamara L. Berg. 2011. High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1657--1664.
[57]
Rachit Dubey, Joshua Peterson, Aditya Khosla, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Bernard Ghanem. 2015. What makes an object memorable? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 1089--1097.
[58]
Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6, 3--4 (1992), 169--200.
[59]
Lior Elazary and Laurent Itti. 2008. Interesting objects are visually salient. J. Vis. 8, 3 (2008), 3--3.
[60]
Phoebe C. Ellsworth and Klaus R. Scherer. 2003. Appraisal processes in emotion. Handbook Affect. Sci. 572 (2003), V595.
[61]
Phoebe C. Ellsworth and Craig A. Smith. 1988. Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cogn. Emot. 2, 4 (1988), 301--331.
[62]
Shaojing Fan, Tian-Tsong Ng, Bryan L. Koenig, Ming Jiang, and Qi Zhao. 2016. A paradigm for building generalized models of human image perception through data fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 5762--5771.
[63]
Kirill Fayn, Carolyn MacCann, Niko Tiliopoulos, and Paul J. Silvia. 2015. Aesthetic emotions and aesthetic people: Openness predicts sensitivity to novelty in the experiences of interest and pleasure. Front. Psychology 6 (2015), 1877.
[64]
Mengjuan Fei, Wei Jiang, and Weijie Mao. 2018. Creating memorable video summaries that satisfy the users intention for taking the videos. Neurocomputing 275 (2018), 1911--1920.
[65]
Otto Fenichel. 1951. On the psychology of boredom. Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources (1951), xviii.
[66]
Catrin Finkenauer, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, and Wim Meeus. 2002. Keeping secrets from parents: Advantages and disadvantages of secrecy in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 31, 2 (2002), 123--136.
[67]
John R. Firth. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. (1957).
[68]
Johnny R. J. Fontaine, Klaus R. Scherer, Etienne B. Roesch, and Phoebe C. Ellsworth. 2007. The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychol. Sci. 18, 12 (2007), 1050--1057.
[69]
Giulia Fontanini, Marco Bertini, and Alberto Del Bimbo. 2016. Web video popularity prediction using sentiment and content visual features. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 289--292.
[70]
Harry Fowler. 1965. Curiosity and Exploratory Behavior. Macmillan.
[71]
Barbara L. Fredrickson. 2001. The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-and-build Theory of Positive Emotions. Vol. 56. American Psychological Association, 218--226 pages.
[72]
Cassandra M. Germain and Thomas M. Hess. 2007. Motivational influences on controlled processing: Moderating distractibility in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychol. Cogn. 14, 5 (2007), 462--486.
[73]
Helmut Grabner, Fabian Nater, Michel Druey, and Luc Van Gool. 2013. Visual interestingness in image sequences. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1017--1026.
[74]
Tom Grill and Mark Scanlon. 1990. Photographic Composition. Amphoto Books.
[75]
Charles R. Gruner. 1970. The effect of humor in dull and interesting informative speeches. Central States Speech J. 21, 3 (1970).
[76]
Marco Guerini, Jacopo Staiano, and Davide Albanese. 2013. Exploring image virality in google plus. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom). IEEE, 671--678.
[77]
Michael Gygli, Helmut Grabner, Hayko Riemenschneider, Fabian Nater, and Luc Van Gool. 2013. The interestingness of images. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 1633--1640.
[78]
Michael Gygli, Helmut Grabner, Hayko Riemenschneider, and Luc Van Gool. 2014. Creating summaries from user videos. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 505--520.
[79]
Michael Gygli, Helmut Grabner, and Luc Van Gool. 2015. Video summarization by learning submodular mixtures of objectives. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3090--3098.
[80]
Michael Gygli and Mohammad Soleymani. 2016. Analyzing and predicting GIF interestingness. In Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia Conference. ACM, 122--126.
[81]
Raisa Halonen, Stina Westman, and Pirkko Oittinen. 2011. Naturalness and interestingness of test images for visual quality evaluation. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 78670Z--78670Z.
[82]
R. Hamed, Adham Atyabi, Antti Rantanen, Seppo J. Laukka, Samia Nefti-Meziani, Janne Heikkilä, et al. 2015. Predicting the valence of a scene from observers eye movements. PloS One 10, 9 (2015), e0138198.
[83]
Robert M. Haralick. 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67, 5 (1979), 786--804.
[84]
Ralf Herbrich, Tom Minka, and Thore Graepel. 2006. TrueSkill: A Bayesian skill rating system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 569--576.
[85]
Alejandro Hernández-García, Fernando Fernández-Martínez, and Fernando Díaz-de María. 2016. Comparing visual descriptors and automatic rating strategies for video aesthetics prediction. Signal Processing: Image Communication 47 (2016), 280--288.
[86]
Eckhard H. Hess and James M. Polt. 1960. Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132, 3423 (1960), 349--350.
[87]
Suzanne Hidi and Valerie Anderson. 1992. Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. Role Int. Learn. Dev. 11 (1992), 213--214.
[88]
Suzanne E. Hidi. 1995. A reexamination of the role of attention in learning from text. Edu. Psychol. Rev. 7, 4 (1995), 323--350.
[89]
James E. Hoffman and Baskaran Subramaniam. 1995. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept. Psychophys. 57, 6 (1995), 787--795.
[90]
Liang-Chi Hsieh, Winston H. Hsu, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2014. Investigating and predicting social and visual image interestingness on social media by crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP’14). IEEE, 4309--4313.
[91]
Kai-Qi Huang, Qiao Wang, and Zhen-Yang Wu. 2006. Natural color image enhancement and evaluation algorithm based on human visual system. Comput. Vision Image Understand. 103, 1 (2006), 52--63.
[92]
David A. Huffman. 1952. A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. Proc. IRE 40, 9 (1952), 1098--1101.
[93]
R. Reed Hunt and James B. Worthen. 2006. Distinctiveness and Memory. Oxford University Press.
[94]
Phillip Isola, Devi Parikh, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2011a. Understanding the intrinsic memorability of images. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2429--2437.
[95]
Phillip Isola, Jianxiong Xiao, Torralba Antonio, and Aude Oliva. 2011b. What makes an image memorable? In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 145--152.
[96]
Phillip Isola, Jianxiong Xiao, Devi Parikh, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2014. What makes a photograph memorable? IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 36, 7 (2014), 1469--1482.
[97]
C. E. Izard and B. P. Ackerman. 2000. Motivational, organizational and regulatory functions of discrete emotions. Handbook of Emotions 2 (2000), 253--264.
[98]
Philip W. Jackson and Samuel Messick. 1965. The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity1. J. Personal. 33, 3 (1965), 309--329.
[99]
T. J. W. M. Janssen and F. J. J. Blommaert. 2000. Predicting the usefulness and naturalness of color reproductions. J. Imag. Sci. Technol. 44, 2 (2000), 93--104.
[100]
Yu-Gang Jiang, Yanran Wang, Rui Feng, Xiangyang Xue, Yingbin Zheng, and Hanfang Yang. 2013. Understanding and predicting interestingness of videos. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ACM, AAAI Press, 1113--1119.
[101]
Yu-Gang Jiang, Baohan Xu, and Xiangyang Xue. 2014. Predicting emotions in user-generated videos. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. ACM, 73--79.
[102]
Anna Jordanous. 2012. A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be creative. Cogn. Comput. 4, 3 (2012), 246--279.
[103]
Brendan Jou, Subhabrata Bhattacharya, and Shih-Fu Chang. 2014. Predicting viewer perceived emotions in animated GIFs. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 213--216.
[104]
Brendan Jou, Tao Chen, Nikolaos Pappas, Miriam Redi, Mercan Topkara, and Shih-Fu Chang. 2015. Visual affect around the world: A large-scale multilingual visual sentiment ontology. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 159--168.
[105]
Immanuel Kant and Werner S. Pluhar. 1987. Critique of Judgment. Hackett Publishing.
[106]
Yan Ke, Xiaoou Tang, and Feng Jing. 2006. The design of high-level features for photo quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1. IEEE, 419--426.
[107]
Aditya Khosla, Akhil S. Raju, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2015. Understanding and predicting image memorability at a large scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2390--2398.
[108]
Aditya Khosla, Atish Das Sarma, and Raffay Hamid. 2014. What makes an image popular? In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 867--876.
[109]
Aditya Khosla, Jianxiong Xiao, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2012. Memorability of image regions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Elsevier, 305--313.
[110]
Sander Koelstra, Christian Muhl, Mohammad Soleymani, Jong-Seok Lee, Ashkan Yazdani, Touradj Ebrahimi, Thierry Pun, Anton Nijholt, and Ioannis Patras. 2012. Deap: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 3, 1 (2012), 18--31.
[111]
Kurt Koffka. 2013. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Routledge.
[112]
Bert Krages. 2012. Photography: The Art of Composition. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.
[113]
Roger J. Kreuz and Sam Glucksberg. 1989. How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. J. Exper. Psychol.: Gen. 118, 4 (1989), 374--386.
[114]
Vu Lam, Tien Do, Sang Phan, Duy-Dinh Le, Shinichi Satoh, and Duc Anh Duong. 2016. NII-UIT at MediaEval 2016 predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[115]
Peter J. Lang, Margaret M. Bradley, and Bruce N. Cuthbert. 1999. International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention 1, 39--58.
[116]
Svetlana Lazebnik, Cordelia Schmid, and Jean Ponce. 2006. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2169--2178.
[117]
Olivier Le Meur, Thierry Baccino, and Aline Roumy. 2011. Prediction of the inter-observer visual congruency (IOVC) and application to image ranking. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 373--382.
[118]
Jieun Lee and Ilyoo B. Hong. 2016. Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity. Int. J. Info. Manage. 36, 3 (2016), 360--373.
[119]
Li-Jia Li, Hao Su, Li Fei-Fei, and Eric P. Xing. 2010. Object bank: A high-level image representation for scene classification 8 semantic feature sparsification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc., 1378--1386.
[120]
Ming Li and Paul Vitányi. 2009. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer Science 8 Business Media.
[121]
Cynthia C. S. Liem. 2016. TUD-MMC at MediaEval 2016: Predicting media interestingness task. In MediaEval 2016 Workshop.
[122]
Annukka K. Lindell and Julia Mueller. 2011. Can science account for taste? Psychological insights into art appreciation. J. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 4 (2011), 453--475.
[123]
Feng Liu, Yuzhen Niu, and Michael Gleicher. 2009. Using web photos for measuring video frame interestingness. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2058--2063.
[124]
Tie Liu, Zejian Yuan, Jian Sun, Jingdong Wang, Nanning Zheng, Xiaoou Tang, and Heung-Yeung Shum. 2011. Learning to detect a salient object. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33, 2 (2011), 353--367.
[125]
Yang Liu, Zhonglei Gu, Tobey H. Ko, and Kien A. Hua. 2018. Learning perceptual embeddings with two related tasks for joint predictions of media interestingness and emotions. In Proceedings of the ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 420--427.
[126]
Paul Locher, Els Cornelis, Johan Wagemans, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2001. Artists’ use of compositional balance for creating visual displays. Empir. Studies Arts 19, 2 (2001), 213--227.
[127]
Edward Harrington Lockwood and Robert Hugh Macmillan. 1978. Geometric Symmetry. CUP Archive.
[128]
Konrad Lorenz. 1971. Studies in Animal and Human Behavior. Methuen 8 Company Limited.
[129]
Konrad Lorenz and Marjorie Kerr Wilson. 2002. Man Meets Dog. Psychology Press.
[130]
Yiwen Luo and Xiaoou Tang. 2008. Photo and video quality evaluation: Focusing on the subject. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 386--399.
[131]
Kevin Lynch. 1960. The Image of the City. Vol. 11. MIT press.
[132]
Jana Machajdik and Allan Hanbury. 2010. Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 83--92.
[133]
Mary Lou Maher. 2010. Evaluating creativity in humans, computers, and collectively intelligent systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design. Desire Network, 22--28.
[134]
Frank H. Mahnke. 1996. Color, Environment, and Human Response: An Interdisciplinary Understanding of Color and Its Use as a Beneficial Element in the Design of the Architectural Environment. John Wiley 8 Sons.
[135]
Long Mai, Hailin Jin, and Feng Liu. 2016. Composition-preserving deep photo aesthetics assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 497--506.
[136]
Matei Mancas and Olivier Le Meur. 2013. Memorability of natural scenes: The role of attention. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’13). IEEE, 196--200.
[137]
Markos Markou and Sameer Singh. 2003. Novelty detection: A reviewpart 1: Statistical approaches. Signal Process. 83, 12 (2003), 2481--2497.
[138]
Rod A. Martin, Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. J. Res. Personal. 37, 1 (2003), 48--75.
[139]
W. Cheyne McCallum. 1999. Encyclopaedia britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/attention.
[140]
Mark A. McDaniel, Paula J. Waddill, Kraig Finstad, and Tammy Bourg. 2000. The effects of text-based interest on attention and recall. J. Edu. Psychol. 92, 3 (2000), 492.
[141]
A. Peter McGraw, Caleb Warren, Lawrence E. Williams, and Bridget Leonard. 2012. Too close for comfort, or too far to care? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psychol. Sci. 23, 10 (2012), 1215--1223.
[142]
Joseph A. Mikels, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Gregory R. Larkin, Casey M. Lindberg, Sam J. Maglio, and Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz. 2005. Emotional category data on images from the international affective picture system. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 4 (2005), 626--630.
[143]
William L. Mikulas and Stephen J. Vodanovich. 1993. The essence of boredom. Psychol. Rec. 43, 1 (1993), 3.
[144]
Shasha Mo, Jianwei Niu, Yiming Su, and Sajal K. Das. 2018. A novel feature set for video emotion recognition. Neurocomputing 291 (2018), 11--20.
[145]
Douglas Colin Muecke and D. C. Muecke. 1969. The Compass of Irony. Oxford University Press.
[146]
Matthijs P. Mulder and Antinus Nijholt. 2002. Humour research: State of art. Deliverable D1, IST Programme on Future and Emerging Technologies. Action Line: IST-2000-6.1.1, HAHAcronym: Humorous Agent for Humorous Acronyms.
[147]
Naila Murray, Luca Marchesotti, and Florent Perronnin. 2012. AVA: A large-scale database for aesthetic visual analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2408--2415.
[148]
Karen Nelson-Field, Erica Riebe, and Kellie Newstead. 2013. The emotions that drive viral video. Australas. Market. J. 21, 4 (2013), 205--211.
[149]
Pardis Noorzad and Bob L. Sturm. 2012. Regression with sparse approximations of data. In Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO’12). IEEE, 674--678.
[150]
Timo Ojala, Matti Pietikainen, and Topi Maenpaa. 2002. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 7 (2002), 971--987.
[151]
Aude Oliva and Antonio Torralba. 2001. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vision 42, 3 (2001), 145--175.
[152]
Selim Onat, Alper Açık, Frank Schumann, and Peter König. 2014. The contributions of image content and behavioral relevancy to overt attention. PloS One 9, 4 (2014), e93254.
[153]
Balaji Padmanabhan and Alexander Tuzhilin. 1999. Unexpectedness as a measure of interestingness in knowledge discovery. Decis. Supp. Syst. 27, 3 (1999), 303--318.
[154]
Jayneel Parekh, Harshvardhan Tibrewal, and Sanjeel Parekh. 2017. The IITB predicting media interestingness system for MediaEval 2017. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[155]
Jayneel Parekh, Harshvardhan Tibrewal, and Sanjeel Parekh. 2018. Deep pairwise classification and ranking for predicting media interestingness. In Proceedings of the ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 428--433.
[156]
Jennifer T. Parkhurst and Andrea Hopmeyer. 1998. Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity two distinct dimensions of peer status. J. Early Adolesc. 18, 2 (1998), 125--144.
[157]
Kuan-Chuan Peng, Tsuhan Chen, Amir Sadovnik, and Andrew C. Gallagher. 2015. A mixed bag of emotions: Model, predict, and transfer emotion distributions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 860--868.
[158]
Jukka Perkiö and Aapo Hyvärinen. 2009. Modelling image complexity by independent component analysis, with application to content-based image retrieval. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 704--714.
[159]
Reza Aditya Permadi, Septian Gilang Permana Putra, Helmiriawan, and Cynthia C. S. Liem. 2017. DUT-MMSR at MediaEval 2017: Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[160]
Richard Alan Peters and Robin N. Strickland. 1990. Image complexity metrics for automatic target recognizers. In Proceedings of the Automatic Target Recognizer System and Technology Conference. 1--17.
[161]
W. A. Phillips. 1974. On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 2 (1974), 283--290.
[162]
Robert Plutchik. 1980. A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. Theor. Emot. 1 (1980), 3--31.
[163]
John P. Powell and Lee W. Andresen. 1985. Humour and teaching in higher education. Stud. High. Edu. 10, 1 (1985), 79--90.
[164]
Daniele Quercia, Rossano Schifanella, and Luca Maria Aiello. 2014. The shortest path to happiness: Recommending beautiful, quiet, and happy routes in the city. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM, 116--125.
[165]
Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz, and Piotr Winkielman. 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8, 4 (2004), 364--382.
[166]
Miriam Redi and Bernard Merialdo. 2012. Where is the interestingness? Retrieving appealing video scenes by learning flickr-based graded judgments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 1363--1364.
[167]
Miriam Redi, Neil O’Hare, Rossano Schifanella, Michele Trevisiol, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2014. Six seconds of sound and vision: Creativity in micro-videos. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 4272--4279.
[168]
Miriam Redi, Nikhil Rasiwasia, Gaurav Aggarwal, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2015. The beauty of capturing faces: Rating the quality of digital portraits. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--8.
[169]
Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O’Regan, and James J. Clark. 1997. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol. Sci. 8, 5 (1997), 368--373.
[170]
Mel Rhodes. 1961. An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42, 7 (1961), 305--310.
[171]
Jaume Rigau, Miquel Feixas, and Mateu Sbert. 2007. Conceptualizing birkhoff’s aesthetic measure using Shannon entropy and Kolmogorov complexity. In Computational Aesthetics. Eurographics Association, 105--112.
[172]
Ellen Riloff, Ashequl Qadir, Prafulla Surve, Lalindra De Silva, Nathan Gilbert, and Ruihong Huang. 2013. Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Vol. 13. ACL, 704--714.
[173]
Graeme Ritchie. 1999. Developing the incongruity-resolution theory. In Proceedings of the AISB 99 Symposium on Creative Language: Humour and Stories, Vol. 1. SSAISB, 78--85.
[174]
Daniel M. Romero, Wojciech Galuba, Sitaram Asur, and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2011. Influence and passivity in social media. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Dimitrios Gunopulos, Thomas Hofmann, Donato Malerba, and Michalis Vazirgiannis (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6913. Springer, Berlin, 18--33.
[175]
Ira J. Roseman. 1996. Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cogn. Emot. 10, 3 (1996), 241--278.
[176]
Ruth Rosenholtz, Yuanzhen Li, and Lisa Nakano. 2007. Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7, 2 (2007), 17--17.
[177]
Yossi Rubner, Carlo Tomasi, and Leonidas J. Guibas. 1998. A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 59--66.
[178]
Willibald Ruch. 2008. Psychology of humor. Primer Humor 8 (2008), 17--100.
[179]
P. A. Russell and D. A. George. 1990. Relationships between aesthetic response scales applied to paintings. Empir. Studies Arts 8, 1 (1990), 15--30.
[180]
Jonathan Sammartino and Stephen E. Palmer. 2012. Aesthetic issues in spatial composition: Effects of vertical position and perspective on framing single objects. J. Exper. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 4 (2012), 865.
[181]
Darshan Santani, Salvador Ruiz-Correa, and Daniel Gatica-Perez. 2017. Insiders and outsiders: Comparing urban impressions between population groups. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 65--71.
[182]
Andreza Sartori, Dubravko Culibrk, Yan Yan, and Nicu Sebe. 2015a. Who’s afraid of Itten: Using the art theory of color combination to analyze emotions in abstract paintings. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 311--320.
[183]
Andreza Sartori, Victoria Yanulevskaya, Almila Akdag Salah, Jasper Uijlings, Elia Bruni, and Nicu Sebe. 2015b. Affective analysis of professional and amateur abstract paintings using statistical analysis and art theory. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 5, 2 (2015), 8:1--8:27.
[184]
Rossano Schifanella, Miriam Redi, and Luca Maria Aiello. 2015. An image is worth more than a thousand favorites: Surfacing the hidden beauty of flickr pictures. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
[185]
Karen B. Schloss, Eli D. Strauss, and Stephen E. Palmer. 2013. Object color preferences. Color Res. Appl. 38, 6 (2013), 393--411.
[186]
Jürgen Schmidhuber. 2009. Driven by compression progress: A simple principle explains essential aspects of subjective beauty, novelty, surprise, interestingness, attention, curiosity, creativity, art, science, music, jokes. In Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems. Springer, 48--76.
[187]
M. Shapely. 1987. Prosodic variation and audience response. IPrA: Papers Pragmat. 1, 2 (1987), 66--79.
[188]
Sumit Shekhar, Dhruv Singal, Harvineet Singh, Manav Kedia, and Akhil Shetty. 2017. Show and recall: Learning what makes videos memorable. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2730--2739.
[189]
Yuesong Shen, Claire-Hélène Demarty, and Ngoc Q. K. Duong. 2016. Technicolor@ MediaEval 2016 predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[190]
Roger N. Shepard. 1967. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 6, 1 (1967), 156--163.
[191]
Yue Shi and Martha Larson. 2010. First approaches to automatic boredom detection: DMIR tackles the MediaEval 2010 affect task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[192]
Larry L. Shirey and Ralph E. Reynolds. 1988. Effect of interest on attention and learning. J. Edu. Psychol. 80, 2 (1988), 159.
[193]
Aliaksandr Siarohin, Gloria Zen, Cveta Majtanovic, Xavier Alameda-Pineda, Elisa Ricci, and Nicu Sebe. 2017. How to make an image more memorable? A deep style transfer approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 322--329.
[194]
Paul J. Silvia. 2005. What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion 5, 1 (2005), 89--102.
[195]
Paul J. Silvia. 2006. Exploring the Psychology of Interest. Oxford University Press.
[196]
Paul J. Silvia. 2008. Interest-the curious emotion. In Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 17. 57--60.
[197]
Paul J. Silvia. 2009. Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychol. Aesthet., Creat., Arts 3, 1 (2009), 48.
[198]
Paul J. Silvia and John B. Warburton. 2006. Positive and negative affect: Bridging states and traits. Comprehens. Handbook Personal. Psychopathol. 1 (2006), 268--284.
[199]
Mohammad Soleymani. 2010. Travelogue boredom detection with content features. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[200]
Mohammad Soleymani. 2015. The quest for visual interest. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 919--922.
[201]
Mohammad Soleymani, Guillaume Chanel, Joep J. M. Kierkels, and Thierry Pun. 2008. Affective characterization of movie scenes based on multimedia content analysis and user’s physiological emotional responses. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM’08). IEEE, 228--235.
[202]
Duncan Southgate, Nikki Westoby, and Graham Page. 2010. Creative determinants of viral video viewing. Int. J. Advert. 29, 3 (2010), 349--368.
[203]
Angus Stevenson. 2010. Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, New York.
[204]
Andreas Stolcke, Xavier Anguera, Kofi Boakye, Özgür Çetin, Adam Janin, Mathew Magimai-Doss, Chuck Wooters, and Jing Zheng. 2008. The SRI-ICSI spring 2007 meeting and lecture recognition system. In Multimodal Technologies for Perception of Humans. Springer, 450--463.
[205]
Masaki Takahashi and Masanori Sano. 2013. NHK where is beauty? Grand challenge. In ACM Multimedia Challenge. Retrieved from http://acmmm13.org/submissions/call-for-multimedia-grand-challenge-solutions/task-where-is-beauty/.
[206]
Silvan S. Tomkins. 1962. Affect, imagery, consciousness: Vol. I. The positive affects. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1964-02650-000.
[207]
Lorenzo Torresani, Martin Szummer, and Andrew Fitzgibbon. 2010. Efficient object category recognition using classemes. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 776--789.
[208]
Du Tran, Lubomir Bourdev, Rob Fergus, Lorenzo Torresani, and Manohar Paluri. 2015. Learning spatiotemporal features with 3d convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 4489--4497.
[209]
Samuel A. Turner and Paul J. Silvia. 2006. Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion 6, 4 (2006), 670.
[210]
Hang Maxime Ung. 2011. Social influence, popularity and interestingness of online contents. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[211]
Akira Utsumi. 1996. Implicit display theory of verbal irony: Towards a computational model of irony. Automatic Interpretation and Generation of Verbal Humor (1996), 29--38.
[212]
Patricia Valdez and Albert Mehrabian. 1994. Effects of color on emotions. J. Exper. Psychol.: Gen. 123, 4 (1994), 394--409.
[213]
Joost Van de Weijer, Cordelia Schmid, and Jakob Verbeek. 2007. Learning color names from real-world images. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1--8.
[214]
Mike Van Duuren, Linda Kendell-Scott, and Natalie Stark. 2003. Early aesthetic choices: Infant preferences for attractive premature infant faces. In International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 27. 212--219.
[215]
Jagannadan Varadarajan and Jean-Marc Odobez. 2009. Topic models for scene analysis and abnormality detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops. IEEE, 1338--1345.
[216]
P.-A. Verhaegen, Dennis Vandevenne, and J. R. Duflou. 2012. Originality and novelty: A different universe. In Proceedings of the International Design Conference. 1961--1966.
[217]
Stine Vogt and Svein Magnussen. 2007. Long-term memory for 400 pictures on a common theme. Exper. Psychol. 54, 4 (2007), 298--303.
[218]
Shuai Wang, Shizhe Chen, Jinming Zhao, Wenxuan Wang, and Qin Jin. 2017. RUC at MediaEval 2017: Predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[219]
Yanran Wang, Qi Dai, Rui Feng, and Yu-Gang Jiang. 2013. Beauty is here: Evaluating aesthetics in videos using multimodal features and free training data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 369--372.
[220]
Amy Beth Warriner, Victor Kuperman, and Marc Brysbaert. 2013. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 4 (2013), 1191--1207.
[221]
Robert W. Weisberg. 1999. I2 creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. Handbook Creat. 226--250 (1999).
[222]
Lois B. Wexner. 1954. The degree to which colors (hues) are associated with mood-tones. J. Appl. Psychol. 38, 6 (1954), 432--435.
[223]
Michael J. Wilber, Chen Fang, Hailin Jin, Aaron Hertzmann, John Collomosse, and Serge Belongie. 2017. BAM! The behance artistic media dataset for recognition beyond photography. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 1211--1220.
[224]
Jianxiong Xiao, James Hays, Krista A. Ehinger, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. 2010. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 3485--3492.
[225]
Baohan Xu, Yanwei Fu, and Yu-Gang Jiang. 2016. BigVid at MediaEval 2016: Predicting interestingness in images and videos. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[226]
Baohan Xu, Yanwei Fu, Yu-Gang Jiang, Boyang Li, and Leonid Sigal. 2018. Heterogeneous knowledge transfer in video emotion recognition, attribution and summarization. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 9, 2 (2018), 255--270.
[227]
Che-Hua Yeh, Yuan-Chen Ho, Brian A. Barsky, and Ming Ouhyoung. 2010. Personalized photograph ranking and selection system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 211--220.
[228]
Suet-Peng Yong, Jeremiah D. Deng, and Martin K. Purvis. 2013. Wildlife video key-frame extraction based on novelty detection in semantic context. Multimedia Tools Appl. 62, 2 (2013), 359--376.
[229]
Sejong Yoon. 2017. TCNJ-CS@MediaEval 2017 predicting media interestingness task. In Proceedings of the MediaEval Workshop.
[230]
Sejong Yoon and Vladimir Pavlovic. 2014. Sentiment flow for video interestingness prediction. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Human Centered Event Understanding from Multimedia. ACM, 29--34.
[231]
Hui Yu, Mingjing Li, Hong-Jiang Zhang, and Jufu Feng. 2002. Color texture moments for content-based image retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Vol. 3. IEEE, 929--932.
[232]
Honghai Yu and Stefan Winkler. 2013. Image complexity and spatial information. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX’13). IEEE, 12--17.
[233]
Nick Zangwill. 2003. Aesthetic judgment. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (fall 2007 ed.), E. N. Zalta (Ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aesthetic-judgment/.
[234]
Gloria Zen, Paloma de Juan, Yale Song, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2016. Mouse activity as an indicator of interestingness in video. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 47--54.
[235]
Bin Zhao, Li Fei-Fei, and Eric P. Xing. 2011. Online detection of unusual events in videos via dynamic sparse coding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 3313--3320.
[236]
Qi Zhao and Christof Koch. 2013. Learning saliency-based visual attention: A review. Signal Process. 93, 6 (2013), 1401--1407.
[237]
Sicheng Zhao, Yue Gao, Xiaolei Jiang, Hongxun Yao, Tat-Seng Chua, and Xiaoshuai Sun. 2014. Exploring principles-of-art features for image emotion recognition. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 47--56.
[238]
Sicheng Zhao, Hongxun Yao, Yue Gao, Rongrong Ji, Wenlong Xie, Xiaolei Jiang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2016. Predicting personalized emotion perceptions of social images. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Multimedia. 1385--1394.
[239]
Bolei Zhou, Agata Lapedriza, Jianxiong Xiao, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2014. Learning deep features for scene recognition using places database. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. MIT Press, 487--495.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Anomaly and Interestingness Detection in Timed Hierarchical Business ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management10.1109/TEM.2022.318241371(12619-12634)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)Adaptive Multi-Modal Ensemble Network for Video Memorability PredictionApplied Sciences10.3390/app1217859912:17(8599)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Measuring the Binary Interestingness of Images: A Unified Prediction Framework Combining Discriminant Correlation Analysis and Multiple Kernel Learning2021 4th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications10.1145/3510487.3510512(171-183)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Computing Surveys
ACM Computing Surveys  Volume 52, Issue 2
March 2020
770 pages
ISSN:0360-0300
EISSN:1557-7341
DOI:10.1145/3320149
  • Editor:
  • Sartaj Sahni
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 March 2019
Accepted: 01 December 2018
Revised: 01 October 2018
Received: 01 January 2018
Published in CSUR Volume 52, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Interestingness
  2. aesthetic value
  3. affective value and emotions
  4. complexity
  5. coping potential
  6. creativity
  7. humour
  8. memorability
  9. novelty
  10. saliency
  11. social interestingness
  12. urban perception
  13. visual composition and stylistic attributes

Qualifiers

  • Survey
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • UEFISCDI

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)77
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Anomaly and Interestingness Detection in Timed Hierarchical Business ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management10.1109/TEM.2022.318241371(12619-12634)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)Adaptive Multi-Modal Ensemble Network for Video Memorability PredictionApplied Sciences10.3390/app1217859912:17(8599)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Measuring the Binary Interestingness of Images: A Unified Prediction Framework Combining Discriminant Correlation Analysis and Multiple Kernel Learning2021 4th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications10.1145/3510487.3510512(171-183)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2022
  • (2022)A large scale study of reader interactions with images on WikipediaEPJ Data Science10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00312-811:1Online publication date: 3-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Unsupervised Online Learning for Robotic Interestingness With Visual MemoryIEEE Transactions on Robotics10.1109/TRO.2021.312997238:4(2446-2461)Online publication date: Aug-2022
  • (2022)Robotic Interestingness via Human-Informed Few-Shot Object Detection2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS47612.2022.9981461(1756-1763)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Graph Interpretation, Summarization and Visualization Techniques: A Review and Open Research IssuesMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-021-11582-982:6(8729-8771)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Learning Low-Rank Sparse Representations With Robust Relationship Inference for Image Memorability PredictionIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2020.300948523(2259-2272)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Visual Interestingness Prediction: A Benchmark Framework and Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Computer Vision10.1007/s11263-021-01443-1129:5(1526-1550)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2021
  • (2021)Exploring Deep Fusion Ensembling for Automatic Visual Interestingness PredictionHuman Perception of Visual Information10.1007/978-3-030-81465-6_2(33-58)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media