Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Characterizing Disinformation Risk to Open Data in the Post-Truth Era

Published: 03 June 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Curated, labeled, high-quality data is a valuable commodity for tasks such as business analytics and machine learning. Open data is a common source of such data—for example, retail analytics draws on open demographic data, and weather forecast systems draw on open atmospheric and ocean data. Open data is released openly by governments to achieve various objectives, such as transparency, informing citizen engagement, or supporting private enterprise. Critical examination of ongoing social changes, including the post-truth phenomenon, suggests the quality, integrity, and authenticity of open data may be at risk. We introduce this risk through various lenses, describe some of the types of risk we expect using a threat model approach, identify approaches to mitigate each risk, and present real-world examples of cases where the risk has already caused harm. As an initial assessment of awareness of this disinformation risk, we compare our analysis to perspectives captured during open data stakeholder consultations in Canada.

References

[1]
BBC News. 2016. Toronto ‘guerrilla’ archivists to help preserve US climate data. BBC News (December 15, 2016).
[2]
Nikita Biryukov. 2017. Many Public Documents Still Missing from White House Website. Retrieved March 2, 2018 from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/many-public-documents-still-missing-white-house-website-n723916.
[3]
Alieda Blandford, Dominique Taylor, and Michael Smit. 2015. Examining the role of information in the civic engagement of youth. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 1--9.
[4]
Ian L. Boyd. 2016. Take the long view. Nature News 540, 7634 (Dec. 2016), 520.
[5]
Canadian Press. 2015. A brief look at the history of the ferry service between Nova Scotia and Maine. Canadian Press (2015).
[6]
Daniel Castro and Travis Korte. 2015. Open Data in the G8: A Review of Progress on the Open Data Charter. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from http://www.datainnovation.org/2015/03/open-data-in-the-g8.
[7]
CBC News. 2014. Experimental Lakes Area Research Station Officially Saved. Retrieved March 15, 2018 from http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/experimental-lakes-area-research-station-officially-saved-1.2594161.
[8]
Jørgen Grønnegaard Christensen. 1999. Bureaucratic Autonomy as a Political Asset. Department of Political Science, Aarhus University.
[9]
Adrienne Colborne and Michael Smit. 2017. Identifying and mitigating risks to the quality of open data in the post-truth era. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data’17). 2588--2594.
[10]
K. Cooper, W. Funnell, and J. Lee. 2012. Public Sector Accounting and Accountability in Australia. University of New South Wales Press.
[11]
Tim Davies. 2010. Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform: A Look at Open Government Data Use from data.gov.uk. Edited version of Master’s dissertation available from http://practicalparticipation.co.uk/odi/report/. University of Oxford.
[12]
Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2000. In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Communication Review 4, 1 (2000), 129--164. arXiv:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10714420009359466.
[13]
Theo Douglas. 2017. State, Local Officials Question Open Data Directives Under Trump. Retrieved April 24, 2018 from http://www.govtech.com/data/State-Local-Officials-Question-Open-Data-Directives-Under-Trump.html.
[14]
Navroz K. Dubash, Marc Fleurbaey, and Sivan Kartha. 2014. Political implications of data presentation. Science 345, 6192 (2014), 36--37.
[15]
Ottmar Edenhofer and Jan Minx. 2014. Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values. Science 345, 6192 (2014), 37--38.
[16]
Sikiru A. Fadairo, Rosemary Williams, and Evelyn Maggio. 2015. Accountability, transparency and citizen engagement in government financial reporting. Journal of Government Financial Management (Alexandria) 64, 1 (2015), 40--45. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/docview/1711620148/abstract/489982A48C3A4A3FPQ/39.
[17]
M. Flinders. 2017. The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State. Taylor 8 Francis.
[18]
Felipe Gonzalez-Zapata and Richard Heeks. 2015. The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Government Information Quarterly 32, 4 (Oct. 2015), 441--452.
[19]
Andrew Graham. 2006. The Legitimacy, Powers, Accountability and Oversight of Public Administration in a Democratic State. Paper prepared for the Building Democracy in Ukraine Project, Queens University. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from http://post.queensu.ca/∼grahama/publications/BASISOFPUBLICADMIN.pdf.
[20]
David Graham. 2017. Why Did FEMA Remove Stats About Puerto Rico’s Recovery? Retrieved November 2, 2017 from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/10/why-did-fema-remove-stats-about-puerto-ricos-recovery/542343/.
[21]
Tavia Grant. 2013. Canadian income data ‘is garbage’ without census, experts say. Globe and Mail. October 4, 2013. Retrieve May 18, 2020 from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/without-census-data-on-canadian-income-garbage-experts/article14701515/.
[22]
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Gregory Porumbescu, Boram Hong, and Tobin Im. 2013. The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review 73, 4 (2013), 575--586.
[23]
Michael Gross. 2017. The Dangers of a Post-Truth World. Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982216315159.
[24]
Joel Gurin. 2014. Open governments, open data: A new lever for transparency, citizen engagement, and economic growth. SAIS Review of International Affairs 34, 1 (June 2014), 71--82.
[25]
Brian Clark Howard. 2014. Data Deleted from UN Climate Report Highlight Controversies. National Geographic News. Retrieve May 18, 2020 from https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/07/140703-ipcc-climate-report-deleted-data-global-warming-science/.
[26]
Thorhildur Jetzek, Michel Avital, and Niels Bjorn-Andersen. 2014. Data-driven innovation through open government data. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research (Curicó) 9, 2 (May 2014), 100--120. http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.dal.ca/docview/1535033791/abstract/489982A48C3A4A3FPQ/96.
[27]
Jenna Johnson. 2017. FEMA Removes—Then Restores—Statistics About Drinking Water Access and Electricity in Puerto Rico from Website. Washington Post (October 2017). Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/10/05/fema-removes-statistics-about-drinking-water-access-and-electricity-in-puerto-rico-from-website/.
[28]
Rob Kitchin. 2014. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. Sage.
[29]
Loren Kohnfelder and Praerit Garg. 1999. The threats to our products. Microsoft Interface (1999).
[30]
Richard Kreitner. 2016. Post-truth and its consequences: What a 25-year-old essay tells us about the current moment. The Nation (November 30, 2016). Retrieved May 18, 2020 rom http://www.thenation.com/article/post-truth-and-its-consequences-what-a-25-year-old-essay-tells-us-about-the-current-moment/.
[31]
Doug Laney. 2001. 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity, and variety. In Application Delivery Strategies. Vol. 949. META Group Inc. (now Gartner).
[32]
Lianjiang Li. 2004. Political trust in rural China. Modern China 30, 2 (2004), 228--258.
[33]
D-Lib Magazine. 2011. The dataverse network®: An open-source application for sharing, discovering and preserving data. D-Lib Magazine 17, 1--2 (2011).
[34]
Tracie Mauriello. 2017. Government Watchdogs Criticize Trump’s Removal of Open Data Sets. Retrieved March 2, 2018 from http://www.govtech.com/data/Government-Watchdogs-Criticize-Trumps-Removal-of-Open-Data-Sets.html.
[35]
Nature. 2012. Death of evidence [Editorial]. Nature 487 (July 2012), 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/487271b.
[36]
Andreas I. Nicolaou and D. Harrison McKnight. 2006. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research 17, 4 (2006), 332--351.
[37]
Kieron O’Hara. 2012. Transparency, open data and trust in government: Shaping the infosphere. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference. ACM, New York, NY, 223--232. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2380747
[38]
Diane Orihel and David Schindler. 2014. Experimental Lakes Area is saved, but it’s a bittersweet victory for science. Globe and Mail (April 1, 2014). Retrieved March 15, 2018 from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/experimental-lakes-area-is-saved-but-its-a-bittersweet-victory-for-science/article17753956/
[39]
Andy Pitman and Lisa Alexander. 2014. No, the Bureau of Meteorology is not fiddling its weather data. The Conversation (August 31, 2014). Retrieved May 18, 2020 from http://theconversation.com/no-the-bureau-of-meteorology-is-not-fiddling-its-weather-data-31009.
[40]
Thomas C. Redman. 1998. The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise. Communications of the ACM 41, 2 (1998), 79--82.
[41]
Chantel Ridsdale, James Rothwell, Michael Smit, Hossam Ali Hassan, Michael Bliemel, Dean Irvine, Daniel Kelly, Stan Matwin, and Brad Wuetherick. 2015. Strategies and Best Practices for Data Literacy Education: Knowledge Synthesis Report. Technical Report. Dalhousie University. http://hdl.handle.net/10222/64578
[42]
Eleanor Ross. 2015. Why Open Data Doesn’t Mean Open Government. Retrieved March 7, 2018 from http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/2015/dec/02/china-russia-open-data-open-government
[43]
Monica Scannapieco, Antonino Virgillito, Carlo Marchetti, Massimo Mecella, and Roberto Baldoni. 2004. The DaQuinCIS architecture: A platform for exchanging and improving data quality in cooperative information systems. Information Systems 29, 7 (2004), 551--582.
[44]
Nataliya Shevchenko, Timothy A Chick, Paige O’Riordan, Thomas Patrick Scanlon, and Carol Woody. 2018. Threat Modeling: A Summary of Available Methods. Technical Report. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
[45]
Adam Shostack. 2008. Experiences threat modeling at Microsoft. In Proceedings of the Modeling Security Workshop.
[46]
Statistics Canada. 2017. Guide to the Census of Population, 2016. Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 98-304-X2016001. Ottawa, Canada. Version updated January 2018.
[47]
Erik Stokstad. 2008. Canada’s experimental lakes. Science 322, 5906 (2008), 1316--1319.
[48]
Jaime A. Teixeira Da Silva and Judit Dobránszki. 2015. Potential dangers with open access data files in the expanding open data movement. Publishing Research Quarterly (New York) 31, 4 (Dec. 2015), 298--305.
[49]
Paul G. Thomas. 2017. What happened to the promise of ‘open government’? Winnipeg Free Press (May 12, 2017). Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/analysis/what-happened-to-the-promise-of-open-government-422070513.html.
[50]
Toronto Star. 2017. Daniel Dale’s trump fact checks. Toronto Star (October 5, 2017).
[51]
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2015. Open Government Action Plan Consultation Data [Data Set]. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/74aa0e1a-8e13-4ddb-a31e-129c253a09b3.
[52]
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2017. Open Government Consultation Data: Canada’s Third Biennial Plan to the Open Government Partnership (2016-18) [Data Set]. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/8ef41d2e-9309-486a-9f9f-bfd11945a959.
[53]
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2018. Open Government Consultation Data: 2017-18. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/23ecac3f-2bcc-44fd-af82-cd405991cce2.
[54]
Catherine Tully. 2018. Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia Review Report 18-11. Retrieved May 18, 2020 from https://oipc.novascotia.ca/sites/default/files/reports/18-11%20Review%20Report%20%2817%20Dec%202018%29_0.pdf.
[55]
Jamie L. Vernon. 2017. Science in the post-truth era. American Scientist 105, 1 (Feb. 2017), 2. http://ezproxy.library.dal.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true8db=eih8AN=1203082318site=ehost-live
[56]
David G. Victor, Reyer Gerlagh, and Giovanni Baiocchi. 2014. Getting serious about categorizing countries. Science 345, 6192 (2014), 34--36.
[57]
Yair Wand and Richard Y. Wang. 1996. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM 39, 11 (Nov. 1996), 86--95.
[58]
Richard Y. Wang and Diane M. Strong. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12, 4 (1996), 5--33.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Parenting Pain Away: Development and usability testing of an educational website about infant procedural pain managementPaediatric and Neonatal Pain10.1002/pne2.12096Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
  • (2021)Mobile Application User Experience Checklist: A Tool to Assess Attention to Core UX PrinciplesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.187636137:13(1283-1290)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Data and Information Quality
Journal of Data and Information Quality  Volume 12, Issue 3
On the Horizon and Regular Articles
September 2020
104 pages
ISSN:1936-1955
EISSN:1936-1963
DOI:10.1145/3404101
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 June 2020
Accepted: 01 April 2019
Revised: 01 April 2019
Received: 01 June 2018
Published in JDIQ Volume 12, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Open data
  2. data quality assurance
  3. fake news
  4. post-truth
  5. risk identification
  6. risk mitigation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • MEOPAR NCE

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)44
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Parenting Pain Away: Development and usability testing of an educational website about infant procedural pain managementPaediatric and Neonatal Pain10.1002/pne2.12096Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
  • (2021)Mobile Application User Experience Checklist: A Tool to Assess Attention to Core UX PrinciplesInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.187636137:13(1283-1290)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media