research-article

Isolated, untrusted people in society and charismatic person using opinion dynamics

Authors:

Akira IshiiAuthors Info & Claims

WI '19 Companion: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence - Companion Volume

Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/3358695.3360921

Published: 14 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Consider the problem of socially isolated people who are not trusted by the people around them. This can be not only in the real world, but also in human relations on SNS. Using a new theory of opinion dynamics that can handle both trust and distrust among people, we perform simulations related to isolated person. We found that a charismatic popular person could be saved by having a relationship with an isolated person. However, on the other hand, the charismatic population is weakened.

References

[1]

Guillaume Deffuant, David Neau, Frédéric. Amblard, and Gérard Weisbuch. Mixing Beliefs among Interacting Agents. Advances in Complex Systems, 3:87-98, 2000. 15.

[2]

Gérard Weisbuch, Guillaume Deffuant, Frédéric Amblard and Jean-Pierre Nadal, “Meet, Discuss and Segregate!” Complexity, 7(3):55-63, 2002.

[3]

Hegselmann R and U Krause, ”Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis, and Simulation” Journal of Artificial Society and Social Simulation 5 (2002)

[4]

Claudio Castellano, Santo Fortunato and Vittorio Loreto, ”Statistical physics of social dynamics”, Reviews of Modern Physics 81 (2009) 591/646

[5]

Sîrbu A., Loreto V., Servedio V.D.P., Tria F. (2017) Opinion Dynamics: Models, Extensions and External Effects. In: Loreto V. (eds) Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Under- standing Complex Systems. Springer, Cham, 42 page

[6]

A Ishii and Y Kawahata,“Opinion Dynamics Theory for Analysis of Consensus Formation and Division of Opinion on the Internet ”, Proceedings of The 22nd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolu- tionary Systems (IES2018), 71-76; arXiv:1812.11845 [physics.soc-ph]

[7]

Ishii A. (2019) Opinion Dynamics Theory Considering Trust and Suspicion in Human Relations. In: Morais D., Carreras A., de Almeida A., Vetschera R. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation: Behavior, Models, and Support. GDN 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 351. Springer, Cham

[8]

Akira Ishii and Yasuko Kawahata, “Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of trust and distrust and media effects”, The 33rd Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 33 (2019) Volume JSAI2019 2F3-OS-5a-05

[9]

French J R P (1956) A formal theory of social power., Psychological Review 63. pp. 181-194.

[10]

Harary F (1959)“ A criterion for unanimity in French ’s theory of social power ”. In Cartwright D (Ed.), Studies in Social Power. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor.

[11]

Abelson, R P (1964),“ Mathematical models of the distribution of attitudes under controversy”. In Frederiksen, N and Gulliksen H (Eds.), Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

[12]

De Groot M H (1974) Reaching a consensus. J. Amer.Statist. Assoc. 69. pp. 118 - 121.

[13]

Lehrer K (1975) Social consensus and rational ag- noiology. Synthese 31. pp. 141 - 160.

[14]

Chatterjee S (1975) Reaching a consensus: Some limit theorems. Proc. Int. Statist. Inst. pp.159 -164.

[15]

Tanimoto K, H Kita and A. Mitukuni, “Opinion Choice Model in Public Meeting by Using Evolutionary Game Theory” Infrasturcture Planning Review Vol.18no.1 (2001) 89ー95

[16]

Sîrbu A., Loreto V., Servedio V.D.P., Tria F. (2017) Opinion Dynamics: Models, Extensions and External Effects. In: Loreto V. (eds) Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Under- standing Complex Systems. Springer, Cham

[17]

Galam, Physica A 238, 66 (1997).

[18]

Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11,1157 (2000)

[19]

Sznajd-Weron, M. Tabiszewski, and A. M. Timpanaro, Europhys. Lett. 96, 48002 (2011).

[20]

Galam S, ”Application of statistical physics to politics” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations 274, 1999, Pages 132-139

[21]

Galam S, ”Real space renormalization group and to- talitarian paradox of majority rule voting” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 285, Issues 1-2, 15 September 2000, Pages 66-76

[22]

Galam S, “Are referendums a mechanism to turn our prejudices into rational choices? An unfortunate answer from sociophysics ” Chapter 19 of The Rout- ledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy edited by Laurence Morel and Matt Qvortrup, (Taylor & Francis, London, 2017)

[23]

Galam, S, ”The Trump phenomenon: An explanation from sociophysics”, Int. J.Mod. Phys.B31 (2017) 1742015

[24]

Wander Jager and Frédéric Amblard, ”Uniformity, Bipolarization and Pluriformity Captured as Generic Stylized Behavior with an Agent-Based Simulation Model of Attitude Change”, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 10 (2004) 295-303

Digital Library

[25]

Wander Jager and Frédéric Amblard, ”Multiple attitude dynamics in large populations” presented in the Agent 2005 Conference on Generative Social Pro- cesses, Models and Mechanisms, October13-15, 2005 at The University of Chicago.

[26]

Evaguenii Kurmyshev, Héctor A. Juárez, Ricardo A. González-Silva, ”Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: Concord against partila antagonism” Physica A 390 (2011) 2945-2955

[27]

A Ishii and Y Kawahata, “Phase Transition like behavior in consensus building using new opinion dynamics theory including both trust and distrust into human relationships” to be published

[28]

Yasuko Kawahata and Akira Ishii, "Consensus formation Online using Sociophysics method", arXiv:1907.07946, 2019; GDN2019(19th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation in 2019 a Joint GDN-EWG/BOR meeting) Proceedings

[29]

A Ishii and Y Kawahata, "New Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of both trust and distrust", ABCSS2019 in Web Intelligence 2019

[30]

E Kurmyshev, H A Juarez and R A Gonzalez-Silvia, “Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: Concord against partial antagonism” Physica A 390 (2011) 2945-2955

Cited By

Ishii AKawahata YOkano N(2023)Significant Role of Trust and Distrust in Social SimulationThe Psychology of Trust10.5772/intechopen.101538Online publication date: 18-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101538
Fujii M(2022)Comparison of Consensus Building Processes by Different Reach Patterns on Opinion Dynamics2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020776(4126-4132)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020776
Okano NYamamoto HNishikawa MIshii A(2021)Simulation of Intragroup Alignment Using a New Model of Opinion DynamicsIntelligent Systems and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-82193-7_30(453-463)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82193-7_30
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

New opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of both trust and distrust
WI '19 Companion: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence - Companion Volume

New opinion dynamics theory is presented where both trust and distrust are included in interpersonal relationship. Using this theory, we do not obtain consensus building if half of the human relationship are distrust. We also try to measure opinion ...
Distrust and trust in B2C e-commerce: do they differ?
ICEC '06: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Electronic commerce: The new e-commerce: innovations for conquering current barriers, obstacles and limitations to conducting successful business on the internet

Researchers have not studied e-commerce <u>distrust</u> as much as e-commerce <u>trust</u>. This study examines whether trust and distrust are distinct concepts. If trust and distrust are the same, lack of distrust research matters little. But if they ...
Trust and distrust on the web

We examine the content of trustful and distrustful user experience reports on the web.Distrust is mostly an effect of graphical and structural design issues of a website.Trust is based on social factors such as reviews or recommendations by friends. The ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

WI '19 Companion: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence - Companion Volume

October 2019

326 pages

ISBN:9781450369886

DOI:10.1145/3358695

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

WI '19

WI '19: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence

October 14 - 17, 2019

Thessaloniki, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
101
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ishii AKawahata YOkano N(2023)Significant Role of Trust and Distrust in Social SimulationThe Psychology of Trust10.5772/intechopen.101538Online publication date: 18-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.101538
Fujii M(2022)Comparison of Consensus Building Processes by Different Reach Patterns on Opinion Dynamics2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020776(4126-4132)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020776
Okano NYamamoto HNishikawa MIshii A(2021)Simulation of Intragroup Alignment Using a New Model of Opinion DynamicsIntelligent Systems and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-82193-7_30(453-463)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82193-7_30
Ishii AOkano N(2020)Social simulation of a divided society using opinion dynamics2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WIIAT50758.2020.00100(660-667)Online publication date: Dec-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIAT50758.2020.00100
Ishii AYomura IOkano N(2020)Opinion Dynamics Including both Trust and Distrust in Human Relation for Various Network Structure2020 International Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI)10.1109/TAAI51410.2020.00032(131-135)Online publication date: Dec-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI51410.2020.00032
Okano NOhira YIshii A(2020)Two-Component Opinion Dynamics Theory of Official Stance and Real Opinion Including Self-InteractionIntelligent Decision Technologies10.1007/978-981-15-5925-9_39(461-470)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5925-9_39
Ishii AOkano N(2020)Sociophysics Approach of Simulation of Mass Media Effects in Society Using New Opinion DynamicsIntelligent Systems and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_2(13-28)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_2
Ishii AOkano N(2020)Two Dimensional Opinion Dynamics of Real Opinion and Official StanceProceedings of NetSci-X 2020: Sixth International Winter School and Conference on Network Science10.1007/978-3-030-38965-9_10(139-153)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38965-9_10
Okano NIshii A(2019)Sociophysics Approach of Simulation of Charismatic Person and Distrusted People in Society Using Opinion DynamicsProceedings of the 23rd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems10.1007/978-3-030-37442-6_22(238-252)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37442-6_22

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten