Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3360901.3364432acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Contextual Graph Attention for Answering Logical Queries over Incomplete Knowledge Graphs

Published: 23 September 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Recently, several studies have explored methods for using KG embedding to answer logical queries. These approaches either treat embedding learning and query answering as two separated learning tasks, or fail to deal with the variability of contributions from different query paths. We proposed to leverage a graph attention mechanism to handle the unequal contribution of different query paths. However, commonly used graph attention assumes that the center node embedding is provided, which is unavailable in this task since the center node is to be predicted. To solve this problem we propose a multi-head attention-based end-to-end logical query answering model, called Contextual Graph Attention model (CGA), which uses an initial neighborhood aggregation layer to generate the center embedding, and the whole model is trained jointly on the original KG structure as well as the sampled query-answer pairs. We also introduce two new datasets, DB18 and WikiGeo19, which are rather large in size compared to the existing datasets and contain many more relation types, and use them to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. Our result shows that the proposed CGA with fewer learnable parameters consistently outperforms the baseline models on both datasets as well as Bio dataset.

    References

    [1]
    Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2016. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 (2016).
    [2]
    Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In ICLR 2015.
    [3]
    Jonathan Berant, Andrew Chou, Roy Frostig, and Percy Liang. 2013. Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. In EMNLP. 1533--1544.
    [4]
    Antoine Bordes, Nicolas Usunier, Alberto Garcia-Duran, Jason Weston, and Oksana Yakhnenko. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2787--2795.
    [5]
    Will Hamilton, Payal Bajaj, Marinka Zitnik, Dan Jurafsky, and Jure Leskovec. 2018. Embedding logical queries on knowledge graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2030--2041.
    [6]
    William L Hamilton, Rex Ying, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Representation learning on graphs: Methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05584 (2017).
    [7]
    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770--778.
    [8]
    Krzysztof Janowicz, Frank van Harmelen, James A Hendler, and Pascal Hitzler. 2015. Why the Data Train Needs Semantic Rails. AI Magazine, Vol. 36, 1 (2015), 5--14.
    [9]
    Guoliang Ji, Shizhu He, Liheng Xu, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2015. Knowledge graph embedding via dynamic mapping matrix. In ACL, Vol. 1. 687--696.
    [10]
    Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR 2017.
    [11]
    Chen Liang, Jonathan Berant, Quoc Le, Kenneth D Forbus, and Ni Lao. 2017. Neural Symbolic Machines: Learning Semantic Parsers on Freebase with Weak Supervision. In ACL, Vol. 1. 23--33.
    [12]
    Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu, and Xuan Zhu. 2015. Learning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion. In AAAI, Vol. 15. 2181--2187.
    [13]
    Gengchen Mai, Krzysztof Janowicz, and Bo Yan. 2018. Support and Centrality: Learning Weights for Knowledge Graph Embedding Models. In EKAW . Springer, 212--227.
    [14]
    Gengchen Mai, Bo Yan, Krzysztof Janowicz, and Rui Zhu. 2019. Relaxing Unanswerable Geographic Questions Using A Spatially Explicit Knowledge Graph Embedding Model. In Proceedings of 22nd AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science .
    [15]
    Maximilian Nickel, Kevin Murphy, Volker Tresp, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. 2016a. A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 104, 1 (2016), 11--33.
    [16]
    Maximilian Nickel, Lorenzo Rosasco, Tomaso A Poggio, et almbox. 2016b. Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphs. In AAAI. 1955--1961.
    [17]
    Maximilian Nickel, Volker Tresp, and Hans-Peter Kriegel. 2012. Factorizing yago: scalable machine learning for linked data. In WWW. ACM, 271--280.
    [18]
    Michael Schlichtkrull, Thomas N Kipf, Peter Bloem, Rianne Van Den Berg, Ivan Titov, and Max Welling. 2018. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In European Semantic Web Conference . Springer, 593--607.
    [19]
    Richard Socher, Danqi Chen, Christopher D Manning, and Andrew Ng. 2013. Reasoning with neural tensor networks for knowledge base completion. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 926--934.
    [20]
    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 5998--6008.
    [21]
    Petar Velivc ković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph attention networks. In ICLR 2018 .
    [22]
    Meng Wang, Ruijie Wang, Jun Liu, Yihe Chen, Lei Zhang, and Guilin Qi. 2018. Towards Empty Answers in SPARQL: Approximating Querying with RDF Embedding. In International Semantic Web Conference. Springer, 513--529.
    [23]
    Quan Wang, Zhendong Mao, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. 2017. Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 29, 12 (2017), 2724--2743.
    [24]
    Jiacheng Xu, Kan Chen, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2016. Knowledge graph representation with jointly structural and textual encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.08661 (2016).
    [25]
    Bishan Yang, Wen-tau Yih, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, and Li Deng. 2015. Embedding entities and relations for learning and inference in knowledge bases. In ICLR .
    [26]
    Manzil Zaheer, Satwik Kottur, Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Barnabas Poczos, Ruslan R Salakhutdinov, and Alexander J Smola. 2017. Deep sets. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3391--3401.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)On the Opportunities and Challenges of Foundation Models for GeoAI (Vision Paper)ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/365307010:2(1-46)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2022) Symbolic and subsymbolic GeoAI : Geospatial knowledge graphs and spatially explicit machine learning Transactions in GIS10.1111/tgis.1301226:8(3118-3124)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2022
    • (2022)A review of location encoding for GeoAI: methods and applicationsInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science10.1080/13658816.2021.200460236:4(639-673)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Contextual Graph Attention for Answering Logical Queries over Incomplete Knowledge Graphs

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        K-CAP '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture
        September 2019
        281 pages
        ISBN:9781450370080
        DOI:10.1145/3360901
        • General Chairs:
        • Mayank Kejriwal,
        • Pedro Szekely,
        • Program Chair:
        • Raphaël Troncy
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 23 September 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. knowledge graph embedding
        2. logical query answering
        3. multi-head attention model

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        K-CAP '19
        Sponsor:
        K-CAP '19: Knowledge Capture Conference
        November 19 - 21, 2019
        CA, Marina Del Rey, USA

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 198 submissions, 28%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)90
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
        Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)On the Opportunities and Challenges of Foundation Models for GeoAI (Vision Paper)ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems10.1145/365307010:2(1-46)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
        • (2022) Symbolic and subsymbolic GeoAI : Geospatial knowledge graphs and spatially explicit machine learning Transactions in GIS10.1111/tgis.1301226:8(3118-3124)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2022
        • (2022)A review of location encoding for GeoAI: methods and applicationsInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science10.1080/13658816.2021.200460236:4(639-673)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2022
        • (2022)Narrative Cartography with Knowledge GraphsJournal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis10.1007/s41651-021-00097-46:1Online publication date: 2-Feb-2022
        • (2022)HyperQuaternionE: A hyperbolic embedding model for qualitative spatial and temporal reasoningGeoInformatica10.1007/s10707-022-00469-y27:2(159-197)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2022
        • (2022)Deep Learning Algorithm for Procedure and Network Inference for Genomic DataInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Engineering10.1007/978-981-16-8542-2_40(493-503)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2022
        • (2020) SE‐KGE : A location‐aware Knowledge Graph Embedding model for Geographic Question Answering and Spatial Semantic Lifting Transactions in GIS10.1111/tgis.1262924:3(623-655)Online publication date: 30-May-2020

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Get Access

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media