Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3397481.3450657acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Critiquing for Music Exploration in Conversational Recommender Systems

Published: 14 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Dialogue-based conversational recommender systems allow users to give language-based feedback on the recommended item, which has great potential for supporting users to explore the space of recommendations through conversation. In this work, we consider incorporating critiquing techniques into conversational systems to facilitate users’ exploration of music recommendations. Thus, we have developed a music chatbot with three system variants, which are respectively featured with three different critiquing techniques, i.e., user-initiated critiquing (UC), progressive system-suggested critiquing (Progressive SC), and cascading system-suggested critiquing (Cascading SC). We conducted a between-subject study (N=107) to compare these three types of systems with regards to music exploration in terms of user perception and user interaction. Results show that both UC and SC are useful for music exploration, while users perceive higher diversity of recommendations with the system that offers Cascading SC and perceive more serendipitous with the system that offers Progressive SC. In addition, we find that the critiquing techniques significantly moderate the relationships between some interaction metrics (e.g., number of listened songs, number of dialogue turns) and users’ perceived helpfulness and serendipity during music exploration.

References

[1]
Ivana Andjelkovic, Denis Parra, and John O’Donovan. 2016. Moodplay: Interactive Mood-based Music Discovery and Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) (UMAP ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930280
[2]
Ivana Andjelkovic, Denis Parra, and John O’Donovan. 2019. Moodplay: Interactive music recommendation based on Artists’ mood similarity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 121 (2019), 142–159.
[3]
Wanling Cai and Li Chen. 2020. Predicting User Intents and Satisfaction with Dialogue-Based Conversational Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Genoa, Italy) (UMAP ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3394856
[4]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2006. Evaluating Critiquing-based Recommender Agents. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1 (Boston, Massachusetts) (AAAI’06). AAAI Press, 157–162. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1597538.1597564
[5]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2007. Preference-based organization interfaces: aiding user critiques in recommender systems. In International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, 77–86.
[6]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2010. Eye-Tracking Study of User Behavior in Recommender Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization(Big Island, HI) (UMAP’10). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_35
[7]
Li Chen and Pearl Pu. 2012. Critiquing-based Recommenders: Survey and Emerging Trends. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1-2 (April 2012), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9108-6
[8]
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods 41, 4 (2009), 1149–1160.
[9]
Neil Hurley and Mi Zhang. 2011. Novelty and Diversity in Top-N Recommendation – Analysis and Evaluation. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10, 4, Article 14 (March 2011), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1944339.1944341
[10]
Mohit Jain, Pratyush Kumar, Ramachandra Kota, and Shwetak N. Patel. 2018. Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196735
[11]
Dietmar Jannach, Ahtsham Manzoor, Wanling Cai, and Li Chen. 2020. A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00646(2020).
[12]
Yucheng Jin, Wanling Cai, Li Chen, Nyi Nyi Htun, and Katrien Verbert. 2019. MusicBot: Evaluating Critiquing-Based Music Recommenders with Conversational Interaction. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 951–960. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3357923
[13]
Mohsen Kamalzadeh, Christoph Kralj, Torsten Möller, and Michael Sedlmair. 2016. TagFlip: active mobile music discovery with social tags. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 19–30.
[14]
Marius Kaminskas and Derek Bridge. 2016. Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: a survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 7, 1(2016), 1–42.
[15]
Jie Kang, Kyle Condiff, Shuo Chang, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren Terveen, and F. Maxwell Harper. 2017. Understanding How People Use Natural Language to Ask for Recommendations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Como, Italy) (RecSys ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1145/3109859.3109873
[16]
Jaya Kumar and Nava Tintarev. 2018. Using Visualizations to Encourage Blind-Spot Exploration. In Recsys workshop on Interfaces and Decision Making in Recommender Systems.
[17]
Wolfgang Lenhard and Alexandra Lenhard. 2014. Hypothesis Tests for Comparing Correlations. Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2954.1367
[18]
Mark Levy and Klaas Bosteels. 2010. Music recommendation and the long tail. In 1st Workshop On Music Recommendation And Discovery, ACM RecSys (Barcelona, Spain) (WOMRAD).
[19]
Chang Li, Haoyun Feng, and Maarten de Rijke. 2020. Cascading Hybrid Bandits: Online Learning to Rank for Relevance and Diversity. In Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Virtual Event, Brazil) (RecSys ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3412245
[20]
Yu Liang and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2019. Personalized Recommendations for Music Genre Exploration. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Larnaca, Cyprus) (UMAP ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1145/3320435.3320455
[21]
Christian Matt, Alexander Benlian, Thomas Hess, and Christian Weiß. 2014. Escaping from the Filter Bubble? The Effects of Novelty and Serendipity on Users’ Evaluations of Online Recommendations. In Thirty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems.
[22]
Eyal Peer, Laura Brandimarte, Sonam Samat, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2017. Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70 (2017), 153–163.
[23]
Zhenhui Peng, Yunhwan Kwon, Jiaan Lu, Ziming Wu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2019. Design and Evaluation of Service Robot’s Proactivity in Decision-Making Support Process. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300328
[24]
James Reilly, Kevin McCarthy, Lorraine McGinty, 2004. Incremental critiquing. In Proc. of SGAI’04. Springer, 101–114.
[25]
Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira, and Paul B. Kantor. 2015. Recommender Systems Handbook(2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag.
[26]
Tobias Schnabel, Paul N. Bennett, Susan T. Dumais, and Thorsten Joachims. 2016. Using Shortlists to Support Decision Making and Improve Recommender System Performance. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW ’16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 987–997. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883012
[27]
Tobias Schnabel, Paul N. Bennett, Susan T. Dumais, and Thorsten Joachims. 2018. Short-Term Satisfaction and Long-Term Coverage: Understanding How Users Tolerate Algorithmic Exploration. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Marina Del Rey, CA, USA) (WSDM ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159700
[28]
Hideo Shimazu. 2001. ExpertClerk: Navigating Shoppers’ Buying Process with the Combination of Asking and Proposing. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2 (Seattle, WA, USA) (IJCAI’01). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1443–1448. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1642194.1642287
[29]
Taavi T. Taijala, Martijn C. Willemsen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2018. MovieExplorer: Building an Interactive Exploration Tool from Ratings and Latent Taste Spaces. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (Pau, France) (SAC ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167281
[30]
Maria Taramigkou, Efthimios Bothos, Konstantinos Christidis, Dimitris Apostolou, and Gregoris Mentzas. 2013. Escape the Bubble: Guided Exploration of Music Preferences for Serendipity and Novelty. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Hong Kong, China) (RecSys ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1145/2507157.2507223
[31]
Cynthia A. Thompson, Mehmet H. Göker, and Pat Langley. 2004. A Personalized System for Conversational Recommendations. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21, 1 (March 2004), 393–428. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1622467.1622479
[32]
Nava Tintarev, Shahin Rostami, and Barry Smyth. 2018. Knowing the unknown: visualising consumption blind-spots in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 1396–1399.
[33]
Saúl Vargas and Pablo Castells. 2013. Exploiting the Diversity of User Preferences for Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Open Research Areas in Information Retrieval (Lisbon, Portugal) (OAIR ’13). LE CENTRE DE HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES D’INFORMATIQUE DOCUMENTAIRE, Paris, France, France, 129–136. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2491748.2491776
[34]
Katrien Verbert, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Erik Duval. 2013. Visualizing Recommendations to Support Exploration, Transparency and Controllability. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Santa Monica, California, USA) (IUI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1145/2449396.2449442
[35]
Rebecca M Warner. 2012. Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Sage Publications.
[36]
Pontus Wärnestål. 2005. User evaluation of a conversational recommender system. In Proceedings of the 4th IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems. 32–39.
[37]
Wen Wu, Li Chen, and Yu Zhao. 2018. Personalizing recommendation diversity based on user personality. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 3 (01 Aug 2018), 237–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-018-9205-x
[38]
Longqi Yang, Michael Sobolev, Christina Tsangouri, and Deborah Estrin. 2018. Understanding User Interactions with Podcast Recommendations Delivered via Voice. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) (RecSys ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 190–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240389
[39]
Jiyong Zhang and Pearl Pu. 2006. A comparative study of compound critique generation in conversational recommender systems. In International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. Springer, 234–243.
[40]
Mi Zhang and Neil Hurley. 2009. Novel Item Recommendation by User Profile Partitioning. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01(WI-IAT ’09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2009.85
[41]
Yuan Cao Zhang, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Daniele Quercia, and Tamas Jambor. 2012. Auralist: Introducing Serendipity into Music Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Seattle, Washington, USA) (WSDM ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2124295.2124300
[42]
Cai-Nicolas Ziegler, Sean M. McNee, Joseph A. Konstan, and Georg Lausen. 2005. Improving Recommendation Lists Through Topic Diversification. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (Chiba, Japan) (WWW ’05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1060745.1060754

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)CRS-Que: A User-centric Evaluation Framework for Conversational Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36315342:1(1-34)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Design of Generative AI in Supporting Music-based Reminiscence for Older AdultsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642800(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Investigating meta-intents: user interaction preferences in conversational recommender systemsUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-024-09411-3Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Critiquing for Music Exploration in Conversational Recommender Systems
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IUI '21: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
        April 2021
        618 pages
        ISBN:9781450380171
        DOI:10.1145/3397481
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 14 April 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. conversational interaction
        2. conversational recommender systems
        3. critiquing
        4. music exploration

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Funding Sources

        • Hong Kong Baptist University Interdisciplinary Research Clusters Matching Scheme (IRCMS)

        Conference

        IUI '21
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

        Upcoming Conference

        IUI '25

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)85
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
        Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)CRS-Que: A User-centric Evaluation Framework for Conversational Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36315342:1(1-34)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
        • (2024)Exploring the Design of Generative AI in Supporting Music-based Reminiscence for Older AdultsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642800(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Investigating meta-intents: user interaction preferences in conversational recommender systemsUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-024-09411-3Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
        • (2023)“Listen to Music, Listen to Yourself”: Design of a Conversational Agent to Support Self-Awareness While Listening to MusicProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581427(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
        • (2023)Ontology-Based Conversational Recommender System for Smartphone Domain2023 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT)10.1109/ICoICT58202.2023.10262611(52-56)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2023
        • (2022)Exploring the longitudinal effects of nudging on users’ music genre exploration behavior and listening preferencesProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3523227.3546772(3-13)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
        • (2022)Impacts of Personal Characteristics on User Trust in Conversational Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517471(1-14)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
        • (2022)Task-Oriented User Evaluation on Critiquing-Based Recommendation ChatbotsIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems10.1109/THMS.2021.313167452:3(354-366)Online publication date: Jun-2022
        • (2022)Promoting Music Exploration through Personalized Nudging in a Genre Exploration RecommenderInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2022.210806039:7(1495-1518)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2022
        • (2022)Conversational recommendationAI Magazine10.1002/aaai.1205943:2(151-163)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2022

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media