Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

n-Gage: Predicting in-class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the Wild

Published: 04 September 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The study of student engagement has attracted growing interests to address problems such as low academic performance, disaffection, and high dropout rates. Existing approaches to measuring student engagement typically rely on survey-based instruments. While effective, those approaches are time-consuming and labour-intensive. Meanwhile, both the response rate and quality of the survey are usually poor. As an alternative, in this paper, we investigate whether we can infer and predict engagement at multiple dimensions, just using sensors. We hypothesize that multidimensional student engagement level can be translated into physiological responses and activity changes during the class, and also be affected by the environmental changes. Therefore, we aim to explore the following questions: Can we measure the multiple dimensions of high school student's learning engagement including emotional, behavioural and cognitive engagement with sensing data in the wild? Can we derive the activity, physiological, and environmental factors contributing to the different dimensions of student learning engagement? If yes, which sensors are the most useful in differentiating each dimension of the engagement? Then, we conduct an in-situ study in a high school from 23 students and 6 teachers in 144 classes over 11 courses for 4 weeks. We present the n-Gage, a student engagement sensing system using a combination of sensors from wearables and environments to automatically detect student in-class multidimensional learning engagement. Extensive experiment results show that n-Gage can accurately predict multidimensional student engagement in real-world scenarios with an average mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.788 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.975 using all the sensors. We also show a set of interesting findings of how different factors (e.g., combinations of sensors, school subjects, CO2 level) affect each dimension of the student learning engagement.

Supplementary Material

gao (gao.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, n-Gage: Predicting in-class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the Wild

References

[1]
Karan Ahuja Dohyun Kim, Franceska Xhakaj, Virag Varga, Anne Xie, Stanley Zhang, Jay Eric Townsend, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Yuvraj Agarwal. 2019. EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 71.
[2]
Nutan D Ahuja, Amit K Agarwal, Ninad M Mahajan, Naresh H Mehta, and Hatim N Kapadia. 2003. GSR and HRV: Its Application in Clinical Diagnosis. In 16th IEEE Symposium Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, 279--283.
[3]
John L Andreassi. 2010. Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response. Psychology Press.
[4]
Bradley M Appelhans and Linda J Luecken. 2006. Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Regulated Emotional Responding. Review of general psychology 10, 3 (2006), 229--240.
[5]
James J Appleton, Sandra L Christenson, Dongjin Kim, and Amy L Reschly. 2006. Measuring Cognitive and Psychological Engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of school psychology 44, 5 (2006), 427--445.
[6]
Kimberly E Arnold, Brandon Karcher, Casey V Wright, and James McKay. 2017. Student Empowerment, Awareness, and Self-regulation Through a Quantified-self Student Tool. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference. 526--527.
[7]
Jorn Bakker, Mykola Pechenizkiy, and Natalia Sidorova. 2011. What's Your Current Stress Level? Detection of Stress Patterns from GSR Sensor Data. In 2011 IEEE 11th international conference on data mining workshops. IEEE, 573--580.
[8]
Jacob Benesty, Jingdong Chen, Yiteng Huang, and Israel Cohen. 2009. Pearson Correlation Coefficient. In Noise reduction in speech processing. Springer, 1--4.
[9]
Chris Berka, Daniel J Levendowski, Michelle N Lumicao, Alan Yau, Gene Davis, Vladimir T Zivkovic, Richard E Olmstead, Patrice D Tremoulet, and Patrick L Craven. 2007. EEG Correlates of Task Engagement and Mental Workload in Vigilance, Learning, and Memory Tasks. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 78, 5 (2007), B231--B244.
[10]
Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam. 2009. Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education) 21, 1 (2009), 5.
[11]
Nathaniel Blanchard, Robert Bixler, Tera Joyce, and Sidney D'Mello. 2014. Automated Physiological-based Detection of Mind Wandering During Learning. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 55--60.
[12]
Wolfram Boucsein. 2012. Electrodermal Activity: Springer Science & Business Media. Broek, EL vd, Schut, MH, Westerink, JHDM, Herk, J. v., & Tuinenbreijer, K (2012).
[13]
Patrick Buckley and Elaine Doyle. 2016. Gamification and student motivation. Interactive learning environments 24, 6 (2016), 1162--1175.
[14]
John T Cacioppo, Louis G Tassinary, and Gary Berntson. 2007. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.
[15]
A John Camm, Marek Malik, J Thomas Bigger, Günter Breithardt, Sergio Cerutti, Richard J Cohen, Philippe Coumel, Ernest L Fallen, Harold L Kennedy, RE Kleiger, et al. 1996. Heart Rate Variability: Standards of Measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. (1996).
[16]
Filipe Canento, Ana Fred, Hugo Silva, Hugo Gamboa, and André Lourenco. 2011. Multimodal Biosignal Sensor Data Handling for Emotion Recognition. In SENSORS, 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 647--650.
[17]
Steven Cantrell and Thomas J Kane. 2013. Ensuring Fair and Reliable Measures of Effective Teaching: Culminating Findings from the MET Project's Three-year Study. MET Project Research Paper (2013).
[18]
Tianfeng Chai and Roland R Draxler. 2014. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) or Mean Absolute Error (MAE)?-Arguments Against Avoiding RMSE in the Literature. Geoscientific model development 7, 3 (2014), 1247--1250.
[19]
Kwang-Ho Choi, Junbeom Kim, O Sang Kwon, Min Ji Kim, Yeon Hee Ryu, and Ji-Eun Park. 2017. Is Heart Rate Variability (HRV) an Adequate Tool for Evaluating Human Emotions?-A Focus on the Use of the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Psychiatry research 251 (2017), 192--196.
[20]
James Patrick Connell, Margaret Beale Spencer, and J Lawrence Aber. 1994. Educational Risk and Resilience in African-American Youth: Context, Self, Action, and Outcomes in School. Child development 65, 2 (1994), 493--506.
[21]
Lyn Corno and Ellen B Mandinach. 1983. The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation. Educational psychologist 18, 2 (1983), 88--108.
[22]
National Research Council et al. 2003. Engaging Schools: Fostering High School Students' Motivation to Learn. National Academies Press.
[23]
Hugo D Critchley. 2002. Electrodermal Responses: What Happens in the Brain. The Neuroscientist 8, 2 (2002), 132--142.
[24]
Marguerite Cronk. 2012. Using Gamification to Increase Student Engagement and Participation in Class Discussion. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 311--315.
[25]
Richard J De Dear and Gail S Brager. 2002. Thermal Comfort in Naturally Ventilated Buildings: Revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and buildings 34, 6 (2002), 549--561.
[26]
Shohreh Deldari, Jonathan Liono, Flora D Salim, and Daniel V Smith. 2019. Inferring Work Routines and Behavior Deviations with Life-logging Sensor Data. (2019).
[27]
Elena Di Lascio, Shkurta Gashi, and Silvia Santini. 2018. Unobtrusive Assessment of Students' Emotional Engagement During Lectures Using Electrodermal Activity Sensors. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 103.
[28]
Jane Elith, John R Leathwick, and Trevor Hastie. 2008. A Working Guide to Boosted Regression Trees. Journal of Animal Ecology 77, 4 (2008), 802--813.
[29]
Rebecca Eynon. 2015. The Quantified Self for Learning: Critical Questions for Education.
[30]
Asma Ahmad Farhan, Krishna Pattipati, Bing Wang, and Peter Luh. 2015. Predicting Individual Thermal Comfort Using Machine Learning Algorithms. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, 708--713.
[31]
Jeremy D Finn. 1989. Withdrawing from School. Review of educational research 59, 2 (1989), 117--142.
[32]
Jeremy D Finn, Gina M Pannozzo, and Kristin E Voelkl. 1995. Disruptive and Inattentive-withdrawn Behavior and Achievement Among Fourth Graders. The Elementary School Journal 95, 5 (1995), 421--434.
[33]
Jeremy D Finn and Donald A Rock. 1997. Academic Success Among Students at Risk for School Failure. Journal of applied psychology 82, 2 (1997), 221.
[34]
Jennifer A Fredricks, Phyllis C Blumenfeld, and Alison H Paris. 2004. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of educational research 74, 1 (2004), 59--109.
[35]
Jennifer A Fredricks and Wendy McColskey. 2012. The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer, 763--782.
[36]
Jerome Friedman, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Vol. 1. Springer series in statistics New York.
[37]
Kathryn A Fuller, Nilushi S Karunaratne, Som Naidu, Betty Exintaris, Jennifer L Short, Michael D Wolcott, Scott Singleton, and Paul J White. 2018. Development of a self-report Instrument for Measuring In-class Student Engagement Reveals that Pretending to Engage is a Significant Unrecognized Problem. PloS one 13, 10 (2018), e0205828.
[38]
Nan Gao, Wei Shao, Mohammad Saiedur Rahaman, Jun Zhai, Klaus David, and Flora D Salim. 2020. Transfer Learning for Thermal Comfort Prediction in Multiple Cities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.14382 (2020).
[39]
Nan Gao, Wei Shao, and Flora D Salim. 2019. Predicting Personality Traits From Physical Activity Intensity. Computer 52, 7 (2019), 47--56.
[40]
Maurizio Garbarino, Matteo Lai, Dan Bender, Rosalind W Picard, and Simone Tognetti. 2014. Empatica E3---A wearable Wireless Multi-sensor Device for Real-time Computerized Biofeedback and Data Acquisition. In 2014 4th International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare-Transforming Healthcare Through Innovations in Mobile and Wireless Technologies (MOBIHEALTH). IEEE, 39--42.
[41]
Shkurta Gashi, Elena Di Lascio, and Silvia Santini. 2019. Using Unobtrusive Wearable Sensors to Measure the Physiological Synchrony Between Presenters and Audience Members. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 1 (2019), 13.
[42]
Alberto Greco, Gaetano Valenza, Antonio Lanata, Enzo Pasquale Scilingo, and Luca Citi. 2015. cvxEDA: A Convex Optimization Approach to Electrodermal Activity Processing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 63, 4 (2015), 797--804.
[43]
James E Groccia. 2018. What is student engagement? New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2018, 154 (2018), 11--20.
[44]
John Hattie and Helen Timperley. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Review of educational research 77, 1 (2007), 81--112.
[45]
Ulla Haverinen-Shaughnessy, DJ Moschandreas, and RJ Shaughnessy. 2011. Association Between Substandard Classroom Ventilation Rates and Students' Academic Achievement. Indoor air 21, 2 (2011), 121--131.
[46]
Katherine A Herborn, James L Graves, Paul Jerem, Neil P Evans, Ruedi Nager, Dominic J McCafferty, and Dorothy EF McKeegan. 2015. Skin Temperature Reveals the Intensity of Acute Stress. Physiology & behavior 152 (2015), 225--230.
[47]
Javier Hernandez, Ivan Riobo, Agata Rozga, Gregory D Abowd, and Rosalind W Picard. 2014. Using Electrodermal Activity to Recognize Ease of Engagement in Children During Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 307--317.
[48]
Stephen Hutt, Kristina Krasich, Caitlin Mills, Nigel Bosch, Shelby White, James R Brockmole, and Sidney K D'Mello. 2019. Automated Gaze-based Mind Wandering Detection During Computerized Learning in Classrooms. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 29, 4 (2019), 821--867.
[49]
Sinh Huynh, Seungmin Kim, JeongGil Ko, Rajesh Krishna Balan, and Youngki Lee. 2018. EngageMon: Multi-Modal Engagement Sensing for Mobile Games. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 13.
[50]
Han Jiang, Matthew Iandoli, Steven Van Dessel, Shichao Liu, and Jacob Whitehill. 2019. Measuring Students' Thermal Comfort and Its Impact on Learning. Educational Data Mining (2019).
[51]
Kane. 2020. What are Safe Levels of CO and CO2 in Rooms? https://www.kane.co.uk/knowledge-centre/what-are-safe-levels-of-co-and-co2-in-rooms Accessed 2020-07-08.
[52]
Guolin Ke, Qi Meng, Thomas Finley, Taifeng Wang, Wei Chen, Weidong Ma, Qiwei Ye, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2017. Lightgbm: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3146--3154.
[53]
Zachary D King, Judith Moskowitz, Begum Egilmez, Shibo Zhang, Lida Zhang, Michael Bass, John Rogers, Roozbeh Ghaffari, Laurie Wakschlag, and Nabil Alshurafa. 2019. micro-Stress EMA: A Passive Sensing Framework for Detecting in-the-wild Stress in Pregnant Mothers. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 1--22.
[54]
Mikkel B Kjærgaard, Omid Ardakanian, Salvatore Carlucci, Bing Dong, Steven K Firth, Nan Gao, Gesche Margarethe Huebner, Ardeshir Mahdavi, Mohammad Saiedur Rahaman, Flora D Salim, et al. 2020. Current Practices and Infrastructure for Open Data based Research on Occupant-centric Design and Operation of Buildings. Building and Environment (2020), 106848.
[55]
Celine Latulipe, Erin A Carroll, and Danielle Lottridge. 2011. Love, Hate, Arousal and Engagement: Exploring Audience Responses to Performing Arts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1845--1854.
[56]
Antonio Luque-Casado, Mikel Zabala, Esther Morales, Manuel Mateo-March, and Daniel Sanabria. 2013. Cognitive Performance and Heart Rate Variability: the Influence of Fitness Level. PloS one 8, 2 (2013), e56935.
[57]
Neil Malhotra. 2008. Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 72, 5 (2008), 914--934.
[58]
Helen M Marks. 2000. Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High school years. American educational research journal 37, 1 (2000), 153--184.
[59]
Jonathan Martin and Amada Torres. 2016. What is Student Engagement and Why is it Important. Retrieved May 4 (2016), 2018.
[60]
Karen S McNeal, Jacob M Spry, Ritayan Mitra, and Jamie L Tipton. 2014. Measuring Student Engagement, Knowledge, and Perceptions of Climate Change in an Introductory Environmental Geology Course. Journal of Geoscience Education 62, 4 (2014), 655--667.
[61]
Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, and Ying Wang. 2011. A Comparison of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Indices in Distinguishing Single-Task Driving and Driving Under Secondary Cognitive Workload. Proceedings of the 6th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: driving assessment 2011 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1451
[62]
Wendy Berry Mendes. 2009. Assessing Autonomic Nervous System Activity. Methods in social neuroscience (2009), 118--147.
[63]
Hamed Monkaresi, Nigel Bosch, Rafael A Calvo, and Sidney K D'Mello. 2016. Automated Detection of Engagement Using Video-based Estimation of Facial Expressions and Heart Rate. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 8, 1 (2016), 15--28.
[64]
KA Moore and L Lippman. 2005. Conceptualizing and Measuring Indicators of positive Development: What do Children Need to Flourish.
[65]
Mehrab Bin Morshed, Koustuv Saha, Richard Li, Sidney K D'Mello, Munmun De Choudhury, Gregory D Abowd, and Thomas Plötz. 2019. Prediction of Mood Instability with Passive Sensing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 75.
[66]
Andreas C Müller, Sarah Guido, et al. 2016. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: A Guide for data scientists. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
[67]
H Nagendra, Vinod Kumar, and Shaktidev Mukherjee. 2015. Cognitive Behavior Evaluation Based on Physiological Parameters Among Young Healthy Subjects with Yoga as Intervention. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine 2015 (2015).
[68]
Peter Nickel and Friedhelm Nachreiner. 2003. Sensitivity and Diagnosticity of the 0.1-Hz component of Heart Rate Variability as an Indicator of Mental Workload. Human factors 45, 4 (2003), 575--590.
[69]
World Health Organization et al. 2007. Housing, Energy, and Thermal Comfort. A review of 10 (2007).
[70]
Manoranjan Pal and Premananda Bharati. 2019. Applications of Regression Techniques. Springer.
[71]
Richard V Palumbo, Marisa E Marraccini, Lisa L Weyandt, Oliver Wilder-Smith, Heather A McGee, Siwei Liu, and Matthew S Goodwin. 2017. Interpersonal Autonomic Physiology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review 21, 2 (2017), 99--141.
[72]
Wargocki Pawel, Alí Porras-Salazar José, and William P. Bahnfleth. 2017. Quantitative Relationships Between Classroom CO2 Concentration and Learning in Elementary Schools. 8th AIVC Conference "Ventilating healthy low-energy buildings" (2017).
[73]
Richard Pflanzer and W McMullen. 2013. Galvanic Skin Response and the Polygraph. BIOPAC Systems, Inc. Retrieved 5 (2013).
[74]
Paul R Pintrich and Elisabeth V De Groot. 1990. Motivational and Self-regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of educational psychology 82, 1 (1990), 33.
[75]
John P Pollak, Phil Adams, and Geri Gay. 2011. PAM: A Photographic Affect Meter for Frequent, in Situ Measurement of Affect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 725--734.
[76]
Mohammad Saiedur Rahaman, Jonathan Liono, Yongli Ren, Jeffrey Chan, Shaw Kudo, Tim Rawling, and Flora D Salim. 2020. An Ambient-Physical System to Infer Concentration in Open-plan Workplace. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2020).
[77]
Verónica Rivera-Pelayo, Valentin Zacharias, Lars Müller, and Simone Braun. 2012. Applying Quantified Self Approaches to Support Reflective Learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. 111--114.
[78]
Amin Sadri, Yongli Ren, and Flora D Salim. 2017. Information Gain-based Metric for Recognizing Transitions in Human Activities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 38 (2017), 92--109.
[79]
Marco Sarchiapone, Carla Gramaglia, Miriam Iosue, Vladimir Carli, Laura Mandelli, Alessandro Serretti, Debora Marangon, and Patrizia Zeppegno. 2018. The Association Between Electrodermal Activity (EDA), Depression and Suicidal Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. BMC psychiatry 18, 1 (2018), 22.
[80]
Usha Satish, Mark J Mendell, Krishnamurthy Shekhar, Toshifumi Hotchi, Douglas Sullivan, Siegfried Streufert, and William J Fisk. 2012. Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-moderate CO2 Cncentrations on Human Decision-making Performance. Environmental health perspectives 120, 12 (2012), 1671--1677.
[81]
George AF Seber and Alan J Lee. 2012. Linear Regression Analysis. Vol. 329. John Wiley & Sons.
[82]
Pavel Senin. 2008. Dynamic Time Warping Algorithm Review. Information and Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, USA 855, 1-23 (2008), 40.
[83]
Fred Shaffer and JP Ginsberg. 2017. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Frontiers in public health 5 (2017), 258.
[84]
Wei Shao, Arian Prabowo, Sichen Zhao, Siyu Tan, Piotr Koniusz, Jeffrey Chan, Xinhong Hei, Bradley Feest, and Flora D Salim. 2019. Flight Delay Prediction using Airport Situational Awareness Map. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 432--435.
[85]
David J Shernoff, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Barbara Schneider, and Elisa Steele Shernoff. 2014. Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory. In Applications of flow in human development and education. Springer, 475--494.
[86]
Ellen Skinner, Carrie Furrer, Gwen Marchand, and Thomas Kindermann. 2008. Engagement and Disaffection in the Classroom: Part of a Larger Motivational Dynamic? Journal of educational psychology 100, 4 (2008), 765.
[87]
Ellen A Skinner, Thomas A Kindermann, and Carrie J Furrer. 2009. A Motivational Perspective on Engagement and Disaffection: Conceptualization and Assessment of Children's Behavioral and Emotional Participation in Academic Activities in the Classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement 69, 3 (2009), 493--525.
[88]
Deborah Stipek. 2002. Good Instruction is Motivating. In Development of achievement motivation. Elsevier, 309--332.
[89]
Kimberly D Tanner. 2013. Structure Matters: Twenty-one Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity. CBE---Life Sciences Education 12, 3 (2013), 322--331.
[90]
Paul van Gent, Haneen Farah, Nicole van Nes, and Bart van Arem. 2019. HeartPy: A Novel Heart Rate Algorithm for the Analysis of Noisy Signals. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 66 (2019), 368--378.
[91]
Jorina von Zimmermann, Staci Vicary, Matthias Sperling, Guido Orgs, and Daniel C Richardson. 2018. The Choreography of Group Affiliation. Topics in Cognitive Science 10, 1 (2018), 80--94.
[92]
Chen Wang and Pablo Cesar. 2015. Physiological Measurement on Students' Engagement in a Distributed Learning Environment. In PhyCS. 149--156.
[93]
Rui Wang, Fanglin Chen, Zhenyu Chen, Tianxing Li, Gabriella Harari, Stefanie Tignor, Xia Zhou, Dror Ben-Zeev, and Andrew T Campbell. 2014. StudentLife: Assessing Mental Health, Academic Performance and Behavioral Trends of College Students Using Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 3--14.
[94]
Weichen Wang, Gabriella M Harari, Rui Wang, Sandrine R Müller, Shayan Mirjafari, Kizito Masaba, and Andrew T Campbell. 2018. Sensing Behavioral Change over Time: Using Within-person Variability Features from Mobile Sensing to Predict Personality Traits. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 141.
[95]
Jamie A Ward, Daniel Richardson, Guido Orgs, Kelly Hunter, and Antonia Hamilton. 2018. Sensing Interpersonal Synchrony Between Actors and Autistic Children in Theatre Using Wrist-worn Accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 148--155.
[96]
Trevor S Wiens, Brenda C Dale, Mark S Boyce, and G Peter Kershaw. 2008. Three Way K-fold Cross-validation of Resource Selection Functions. Ecological Modelling 212, 3-4 (2008), 244--255.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A magnetometer-based method for in-situ syncing of wearable inertial measurement unitsFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2024.13853926Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Research on the Mechanism of Dynamic Monitoring of Undergraduate Students’ Learning Situation and Adaptive Adjustment of Teaching Mode--Based on the Perspective of Educational Evaluation ReformApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns-2024-27469:1Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Physiological Responses of Students Over Different CoursesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676620(104-110)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. n-Gage: Predicting in-class Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement in the Wild

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 4, Issue 3
      September 2020
      1061 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3422862
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 04 September 2020
      Published in IMWUT Volume 4, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Electrodermal Activity
      2. Engagement Prediction
      3. Students
      4. Wearable

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)282
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)38
      Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)A magnetometer-based method for in-situ syncing of wearable inertial measurement unitsFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2024.13853926Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Research on the Mechanism of Dynamic Monitoring of Undergraduate Students’ Learning Situation and Adaptive Adjustment of Teaching Mode--Based on the Perspective of Educational Evaluation ReformApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns-2024-27469:1Online publication date: 4-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Understanding Physiological Responses of Students Over Different CoursesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3675095.3676620(104-110)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
      • (2024)ClassID: Enabling Student Behavior Attribution from Ambient Classroom Sensing SystemsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36595868:2(1-28)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
      • (2024)An E-learning System Model to Enhance User Experience with Content Recommendation2024 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon)10.1109/MERCon63886.2024.10688835(1-6)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
      • (2024)ERUDITE: Human-in-the-Loop IoT for an Adaptive Personalized Learning SystemIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2023.334346211:8(14532-14550)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
      • (2024)A Systematic Review of Human Activity Recognition Based on Mobile Devices: Overview, Progress and TrendsIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2024.335759126:2(890-929)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2024
      • (2024)Industry 5.0 use cases development frameworkInternational Journal of Production Research10.1080/00207543.2024.230750562:17(6064-6089)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2024
      • (2023)MDNN: Predicting Student Engagement via Gaze Direction and Facial Expression in Collaborative LearningComputer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences10.32604/cmes.2023.023234136:1(381-401)Online publication date: 2023
      • (2023)Human-computer interaction for virtual-real fusionJournal of Image and Graphics10.11834/jig.23002028:6(1513-1542)Online publication date: 2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media