Value Creation Framework Based on Designable Evaluation Network
Pages 20 - 25
Abstract
Social innovation is an attempt to solve various social problems. It requires the creation of new value in a local community. However, a concrete method for creating new value in a local community is yet to be established. Therefore, in our study, we aim to construct a framework for creating new value in the local community by designing a social support system of the local community. To construct such a framework, we propose a designable evaluation network (DEN), which is a social network that expresses the evaluation relationship between people/artifacts and people/artifacts in a local community as a network structure. Moreover, the evaluation relationship in a DEN is formed through a designable evaluation model, which is a mathematical model with designability. It is possible to construct a framework by designing a social support system on a computer using a DEN and conducting operations to create new value for a local community.
References
[1]
Adams, D. and Hess, M. 2010. Social innovation and why it has policy significance. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 21, 2, 139--155. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1177/103530461002100209
[2]
Van der Have, R. P. and Rubalcaba, L. 2016. Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45, 9, 1923--1935. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010
[3]
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., and Miller, D. T. 2008. Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6, 4, 34--43.
[4]
Mulgan, G. 2006. The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1, 2, 145--162.
[5]
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., and Mulgan, G. 2010. The open book of social innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
[6]
Cajaiba-Santana, G. 2014. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 82, 42--51. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
[7]
Inuzuka, N., Takeuchi, S., and Matsushima, H. 2011. Pattern mining on ego-centric networks of friendship networks. In International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, 89--97. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23866-6_10
[8]
Maulana, A., Saito, K., Ikeda, T., Yuze, H., Watanabe, T., Okubo, S., and Muto, N. 2016. Characterizing similarity structure of spatial networks based on degree mixing patterns. In 2016 IEEE 30th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 9--16. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2016.116
[9]
Liu, B., Zhou, Q., Ding, R. X., Palomares, I., and Herrera, F. 2019. Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. Eur. J. of Oper. Res., 275, 2, 737--754. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.075
[10]
Ripley, R. M., Tom A. B. S., Boda, Z., Voros, A., and Preciado, P. 2020. Manual for RSiena (version Apr 29, 2020).
[11]
Zou, Q. and Liu, D. 2017. An evaluation model of academic performance of electronic information science and technology based on complex network theory, In 7th International Conference on Management, Education, Information and Control, 553--557. DOI= https://doi.org/10.2991/meici-17.2017.107
[12]
Ishida, Y. and Kuraya, S. 2018. Fake news and its credibility evaluation by dynamic relational networks: A bottom up approach. Procedia Comput. Sci., 126, 2228--2237. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.226
[13]
Lombardi, M., Lopolito, A., Andriano, A. M., Prosperi, M., Stasi, A. and Iannuzzi, E. 2020. Network impact of social innovation initiatives in marginalised rural communities. Soc. Netw, 63, 11--20. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.04.001
[14]
Freeman, L. C. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw, 1, 3, 215--239. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
[15]
Dekker, A. 2005. Conceptual distance in social network analysis. Journal of Social Structure, 6, 3.
[16]
Brandes, U. 2008. On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation. Soc. Netw., 30, 2, 136--145. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.11.001
[17]
Barabâsi, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., and Vicsek, T. 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A, 311, 3-4, 590--614. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
[18]
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthelemy, M., and Stanley, H. E. 2000. Classes of small-world networks. PNAS, 97, 21, 11149--11152. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200327197
[19]
Kurosu, M., Hashizume, A., and Ueno, Y. 2018. User experience evaluation by ERM: Experience recollection method. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 138--147. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91238-7_12
[20]
Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., and Lehner, K. 2000. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 201--208. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332432
[21]
Karapanos, E., Martens, J. B., and Hassenzahl, M. 2012. Reconstructing experiences with iScale. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud, 70, 11, 849--865. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.06.004
[22]
Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Karapanos, E., and Sinnelä, A. 2011. UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interact. Comput., 23, 5, 473--483. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.06.005
[23]
Hakan, K. and Seval, F. 2011. CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability and validity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592--599. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146
[24]
Stufflebeam, D. L. 2007. CIPP evaluation model checklist.
[25]
Moody, D. L. 2003. The method evaluation model: A theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. ECIS 2003 Proceedings, 79.
[26]
Borlund, P. 2003. The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research, 8, 3, 152.
[27]
Boukhari, A., Oumlil, R., and Achaba, A. 2020. Reviewing two decades of value creation in tourism: An attempt to develop a conceptual framework. Téoros. Revue de Recherche en Tourisme, 39, 1.
[28]
Williams, M., Biggemann, S., and Tóth, Z. 2020. Value creation in art galleries: A service logic analysis. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 28, 1, 47--56. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.08.002
[29]
Lehtinen, J., Peltokorpi, A., and Artto, K. 2019. Megaprojects as organizational platforms and technology platforms for value creation. Int. J. Project Manage., 37, 1, 43--58. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.10.001
[30]
Sadovska, V., Ekelund Axelson, L., and Mark-Herbert, C. 2020. Reviewing value creation in agriculture---A conceptual analysis and a new framework. Sustainability, 12, 12, 5021. DOI= https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125021
[31]
Elia, G., Polimeno, G., Solazzo, G., and Passiante, G. 2020. A multi-dimension framework for value creation through big data. Industrial Marketing Management. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.015
[32]
Ishida, Y. 2004. Immunity-based systems: A design perspective. Springer Science & Business Media.
[33]
Tokumitsu, M., Asai, F., Kusakabe, M., Ogura, S., Aoki, S., Takada, T., Wakabayashi, M., and Ishida, Y. 2017. A prototype of an integrated telemetry receiving system with volunteers: Designs of a simple receiver, a protocol, and an intelligent information processing. Procedia Comput. Sci., 112, 2445--2454. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.176
[34]
Newman, M. E. 2004. Analysis of weighted networks. Phys. Rev. E, 70, 5, 056131. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131
[35]
Kaur, G. and Ratnoo, S. 2019. Adaptive genetic algorithm for feature weighting in multi-criteria recommender systems. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 27, 1.
[36]
Sanchez-Vilas, F., Ismoilov, J., Sanchez, E. and Lama, M. 2011. Applying multicriteria algorithms to restaurant recommendation. In 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 87--91. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIAT.2011.124
[37]
Clemen, R. T. 1996. Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
[38]
Dodgson, J. S., Spackman, M., Pearman, A. and Phillips, L. D. 2009. Multi-criteria analysis: A manual.
[39]
Panchendrarajan, R., Murugaiah, B., Prakhash, S., Ahamed, M. N., Ranathunga, S., and Pemasiri, A. 2016. Cheap food or friendly staff? Weighting hierarchical aspects in the restaurant domain. In 2016 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference, 24--29. DOI= https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCon.2016.7480110
[40]
Zhong, Y. Y. S., Busser, J., and Baloglu, S. 2017. A model of memorable tourism experience: The effects on satisfaction, affective commitment, and storytelling. Tourism Analysis, 22, 2, 201--217. DOI= https://doi.org/10.3727/108354217X14888192562366
Index Terms
- Value Creation Framework Based on Designable Evaluation Network
Recommendations
What’s in it for me? A mixed-methods study on teachers’ value creation in an inter-institutional community on open educational resources in higher education
AbstractThe affordances of Open Educational Resources (OER) have resulted in various initiatives around the world, but most of them cease to exist once the initial project funding stops. Communities might be a means to create sustainable practices, yet, ...
Research on network-course learning effect evaluation model based on three-layer Bayesian network
IITA'09: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intelligent information technology applicationEvaluation of network-course learning effect has the characteristic with fuzziness and uncertainty. In the paper, network-course learning effect evaluation method based on three-layer Bayesian network is presented. Firstly, evaluation indexes for ...
Research on Network-Course Learning Effect Evaluation Model Based on Three-layer Bayesian Network
IITA '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application - Volume 01Evaluation of network-course learning effect has the characteristic with fuzziness and uncertainty. In the paper, network-course learning effect evaluation method based on three-layer Bayesian network is presented. Firstly, evaluation indexes for ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2020
93 pages
ISBN:9781450375276
DOI:10.1145/3429523
Copyright © 2020 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 09 November 2020
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
CCIOT 2020
CCIOT 2020: 2020 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Internet of Things
September 22 - 24, 2020
Okinawa, Japan
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 56Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)12
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in