Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Exploring Feelings of Student Community across a Geographically Distributed University

Published: 22 April 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Options for students to learn and connect with each other have diversified in recent years, with online resources and campuses playing an increasing role. Flexibility and comfort are becoming a priority as students choose when, where and how to pursue learning goals. Nonetheless, students want to feel sense of community with their peers and instructors; institutional bonds are in turn associated with enhanced learning. In this paper, we explore the feelings of community among students studying at a geographically distributed university. We seek to understand how the students understand community, the levels of community they feel and how their campus location may affect these feelings. In this paper, we present findings from both a survey and an interview study and consider the implications for tools that might promote community.

References

[1]
Albert Bandura. 2000. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current directions in psychological science, Vol. 9, 3 (2000), 75--78.
[2]
Albert Bandura, WH Freeman, and Richard Lightsey. 1999. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
[3]
Matt Bower, Jacqueline Kenney, Barney Dalgarno, and Gregor E Kennedy. 2013. Blended synchronous learning: Patterns and principles for simultaneously engaging co-located and distributed learners. In ASCILITE-Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 92--102.
[4]
John M Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 1996. Developing the Blacksburg electronic village. Commun. ACM, Vol. 39, 12 (1996), 69--74.
[5]
John M Carroll and Mary Beth Rosson. 2013. Wild at home: The neighborhood as a living laboratory for HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 20, 3 (2013), 1--28.
[6]
John M Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, and Jingying Zhou. 2005. Collective efficacy as a measure of community. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1--10.
[7]
PewResearch Center. 2015. Social media usage: 2005--2015. Retrieved June, Vol. 20 (2015), 2016.
[8]
Hamish Coates. 2005. Leveraging LMSs to enhance campus-based student engagement. Educause Quarterly, Vol. 28, 1 (2005), 66--68.
[9]
Sebastian Dennerlein, Robert Gutounig, Eva Goldgruber, and Stefan Schweiger. 2016. Web 2.0 Messaging Tools for Knowledge Management? Exploring the Potentials of Slack. In European Conference on Knowledge Management. Academic Conferences International Limited, 225.
[10]
Roc'io Fernández-Ballesteros, Juan D'iez-Nicolás, Gian Vittorio Caprara, Claudio Barbaranelli, and Albert Bandura. 2002. Determinants and structural relation of personal efficacy to collective efficacy. Applied Psychology, Vol. 51, 1 (2002), 107--125.
[11]
Ido Guy, Michal Jacovi, Adam Perer, Inbal Ronen, and Erel Uziel. 2010. Same places, same things, same people? Mining user similarity on social media. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 41--50.
[12]
Jonna Häkkilä, Petri Hannula, Elina Luiro, Emilia Launne, Sanni Mustonen, Toni Westerlund, and Ashley Colley. 2019. Visiting a virtual graveyard: designing virtual reality cultural heritage experiences. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 1--4.
[13]
Kay Harman. 2002. Merging divergent campus cultures into coherent educational communities: Challenges for higher education leaders. Higher Education, Vol. 44, 1 (2002), 91--114.
[14]
Randolph Hester. 1993. Sacred structures and everyday life: A return to Manteo, North Carolina. Dwelling, seeing, and designing (1993), 271--297.
[15]
Jean L Hill. 1996. Psychological sense of community: Suggestions for future research. Journal of community psychology, Vol. 24, 4 (1996), 431--438.
[16]
Jeff Hoyt and Scott Howell. 2012. Why students choose the branch campus of a large university. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, Vol. 60, 2 (2012), 110--116.
[17]
Robert E Kraut and Paul Resnick. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Mit Press.
[18]
Wilfred WF Lau. 2017. Effects of social media usage and social media multitasking on the academic performance of university students. Computers in human behavior, Vol. 68 (2017), 286--291.
[19]
Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.
[20]
Chi-Sing Li and Beverly Irby. 2008. An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, Vol. 42, 2 (2008).
[21]
Cindy H Liu, Courtney Stevens, Sylvia HM Wong, Miwa Yasui, and Justin A Chen. 2019. The prevalence and predictors of mental health diagnoses and suicide among US college students: Implications for addressing disparities in service use. Depression and anxiety, Vol. 36, 1 (2019), 8--17.
[22]
Julia M Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Louise Barkhuus, Kaisa Väänänen, and Quentin Jones. 2016. Supporting opportunities for context-aware social matching: An experience sampling study. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2430--2441.
[23]
Julia M Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, and Quentin Jones. 2015. Making social matching context-aware: Design concepts and open challenges. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 545--554.
[24]
Hilary McLellan. 1992. Virtual reality: A selected bibliography. Vol. 6. Educational Technology.
[25]
David W McMillan. 1996. Sense of community. Journal of community psychology, Vol. 24, 4 (1996), 315--325.
[26]
Scott Nicholson. 2002. Socialization in the ?virtual hallway": instant messaging in the asynchronous web-based distance education classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 5, 4 (2002), 363--372.
[27]
Karen Owens. 2010. Community college transfer students' adjustment to a four-year institution: A qualitative analysis. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, Vol. 22, 1 (2010), 87--128.
[28]
Susanna Paasovaara, Ekaterina Olshannikova, Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Aris Malapaschas, and Thomas Olsson. 2016. Next2You: a proximity-based social application aiming to encourage interaction between nearby people. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 81--90.
[29]
N Andrew Peterson, Paul W Speer, and David W McMillan. 2008. Validation of a brief sense of community scale: Confirmation of the principal theory of sense of community. Journal of community psychology, Vol. 36, 1 (2008), 61--73.
[30]
LeAnn G Putney and Suzanne H Broughton. 2011. Developing collective classroom efficacy: The teacher's role as community organizer. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 62, 1 (2011), 93--105.
[31]
Daniele Quercia and Licia Capra. 2009. FriendSensing: recommending friends using mobile phones. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems. 273--276.
[32]
Yuqing Ren, Robert Kraut, and Sara Kiesler. 2007. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization studies, Vol. 28, 3 (2007), 377--408.
[33]
William S Robinson. 1951. The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, Vol. 16, 6 (1951), 812--818.
[34]
Peter Sammartino. 1964. Multiple-campus colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 35, 9 (1964), 503--506.
[35]
Irina Shklovski, Robert Kraut, and Jonathon Cummings. 2008. Keeping in touch by technology: maintaining friendships after a residential move. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 807--816.
[36]
Tara S Singer and Aaron W Hughey. 2002. The role of the alumni association in student life. New directions for student services, Vol. 2002, 100 (2002), 51--68.
[37]
David Snadden, Joanna Bates, et almbox. 2005. Expanding undergraduate medical education in British Columbia: a distributed campus model. Cmaj, Vol. 173, 6 (2005), 589--590.
[38]
Na Sun. 2017. Enhancing visibility of distance learners to promote community. In companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. ACM, 101--105.
[39]
Na Sun and Mary Beth Rosson. 2017. Finding the community in online education: It's in the instructors' eyes. Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
[40]
Na Sun, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2018. Where is Community Among Online Learners?: Identity, Efficacy and Personal Ties. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 292.
[41]
Na Sun, Xiying Wang, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2019. How do distance learners connect? Shared identity, focused work and future possibilities. In 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2019. Association for Computing Machinery.
[42]
Loren Terveen and David W McDonald. 2005. Social matching: A framework and research agenda. ACM transactions on computer-human interaction (TOCHI), Vol. 12, 3 (2005), 401--434.
[43]
Florian Znaniecki. 1934. The method of sociology. Farrar & Rinehart.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Adaptive, Sociable and Ready for Anything: Undergraduate Students Are Resilient When Faced with Technological ChangeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536898:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Computer-Based Self-Assessment as a Customised Tool for the Strategic Implementation of an Updated Circular Teaching ModelLanguage Education During the Pandemic10.1007/978-3-031-35855-5_3(61-83)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Feelings of Student Community across a Geographically Distributed University

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
      CSCW
      April 2021
      5016 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3460939
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 April 2021
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. community
      2. education
      3. student
      4. system design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Pennsylvania State University, College of Information Sciences & Technology

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Adaptive, Sociable and Ready for Anything: Undergraduate Students Are Resilient When Faced with Technological ChangeProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36536898:CSCW1(1-32)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2023)Computer-Based Self-Assessment as a Customised Tool for the Strategic Implementation of an Updated Circular Teaching ModelLanguage Education During the Pandemic10.1007/978-3-031-35855-5_3(61-83)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2023

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media