research-article

Tangible Interaction for Children’s Creative Learning: A Review

Authors:

Thomas Weber, and

Heinrich HussmannAuthors Info & Claims

C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition

June 2021

Article No.: 14, Pages 1 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465262

Published: 22 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Creativity is an important part of children’s education. Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs) provide new possibilities for creative learning. In this review, we gave an overview of recent studies that supported children’s creative learning using TUIs. Results showed that TUIs had many advantages, such as they (1) were novice-friendly, (2) supported children’s cognitive process and development, (3) promoted their initiatives, (4) enabled them to think outside the box, and (5) encouraged communication and collaboration in an authentic context. Meanwhile, we summarized previous work’s three main limitations: First, most of the studies did not have a long-term experimental verification with sufficient sample size and objective evaluation; Second, some TUI designs lacked a balance of abstractness, openness, richness, and complexity; Finally, the use of TUIs had little consideration of the teacher’s role. Therefore, further research should focus more on the trans-disciplinary nature of TUIs for creative learning and leverage collaboration between human-computer interaction researchers and school teachers.

References

[1]

Diana Africano, Sara Berg, Kent Lindbergh, Peter Lundholm, Fredrik Nilbrink, and Anna Persson. 2004. Designing tangible interfaces for children’s collaboration. In Extended abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria, April 24 - 29, 2004, Elizabeth Dykstra-Erickson and Manfred Tscheligi (Eds.). ACM, 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.985945

Digital Library

[2]

Inna Alesina and Ellen Lupton. 2010. Exploring materials: Creative design for everyday objects. Princeton Architectural Press.

[3]

Martha W Alibali and Mitchell J Nathan. 2007. Teachers’ gestures as a means of scaffolding students’ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. Video research in the learning sciences(2007), 349–365.

[4]

Abdullah Aljughaiman and Elizabeth Mowrer-Reynolds. 2005. Teachers’ Conceptions of Creativity and Creative Students. The Journal of Creative Behavior 39, 1 (2005), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.x

[5]

Alissa Nicole Antle. 2007. The CTI framework: informing the design of tangible systems for children. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction 2007, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, February 15-17, 2007, Brygg Ullmer and Albrecht Schmidt (Eds.). ACM, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227010

Digital Library

[6]

Janelle Arita, Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo, Sharon Lynn Chu, and Francis K. H. Quek. 2015. The role of materiality in tangibles for young children’s digital art drawings. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’15, Medford, MA, USA, June 21-25, 2015, Marina Umaschi Bers and Glenda Revelle (Eds.). ACM, 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771907

Digital Library

[7]

Saskia Bakker, Elise van den Hoven, and Alissa Nicole Antle. 2011. MoSo tangibles: evaluating embodied learning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction 2011, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, January 22-26, 2011, Mark D. Gross, Nuno Jardim Nunes, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Stephen A. Brewster, and Ian Oakley(Eds.). ACM, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935720

Digital Library

[8]

Mark Batey and Adrian Furnham. 2006. Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 132, 4(2006), 355–429. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.132.4.355-430 18341234.

[9]

G.E. Baykal, I. Veryeri Alaca, A.E. Yantaç, and T. Göksun. 2018. A review on complementary natures of tangible user interfaces (TUIs) and early spatial learning. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 16 (June 2018), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.01.003

[10]

Danielle Begnaud, Merijke Coenraad, Naishi Jain, Dhruvi Patel, and Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2020. ”It’s Just Too Much”: Exploring Children’s Views of Boredom and Strategies to Manage Feelings of Boredom. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (London, United Kingdom) (IDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394414

Digital Library

[11]

Ilene R. Berson, Karen Murcia, Michael J. Berson, Victoria Damjanovic, and Virginia McSporran. 2019. Tangible Digital Play in Australian and U.S. Preschools. Kappa Delta Pi Record 55, 2 (2019), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2019.1580986

[12]

Riccardo Berta, Francesco Bellotti, Erik van der Spek, and Thomas Winkler. 2017. A Tangible Serious Game Approach to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 571–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-50-4_32

[13]

Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman. 2010. The creativity crisis.

[14]

W. S. Burleson, D. B. Harlow, K. J. Nilsen, K. Perlin, N. Freed, C. N. Jensen, B. Lahey, P. Lu, and K. Muldner. 2018. Active Learning Environments with Robotic Tangibles: Children’s Physical and Virtual Spatial Programming Experiences. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 11, 1 (2018), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2724031

[15]

Martin Cápay and Nika Klimová. 2019. Engage Your Students via Physical Computing!. In IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2019, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, April 8-11, 2019, Alaa K. Ashmawy and Sebastian Schreiter (Eds.). IEEE, 1216–1223. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725101

[16]

Alejandro Catalá, Cristina Sylla, Mariët Theune, Eva Brooks, and Janet C. Read. 2018. Rethinking children’s co-creation processes beyond the design of TUIs. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2018, Trondheim, Norway, June 19-22, 2018, Michail N. Giannakos, Letizia Jaccheri, and Monica Divitini (Eds.). ACM, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3205870

Digital Library

[17]

Raymond B. Cattell. 1971. Abilities : their structure, growth, and action [by] Raymond B. Cattell. Houghton Mifflin Boston. xxii, 583 p. pages.

[18]

Karin Knorr Cetina. 2009. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.

[19]

Karin Knorr Cetina, Theodore R Schatzki, and Eike Von Savigny. 2005. The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.

[20]

K. Chappell, L. Hetherington, H. Ruck Keene, H. Wren, A. Alexopoulos, O. Ben-Horin, K. Nikolopoulos, J. Robberstad, S. Sotiriou, and F.X. Bogner. 2019. Dialogue and materiality/embodiment in science|arts creative pedagogy: Their role and manifestation. Thinking Skills and Creativity 31 (2019), 296 – 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.008

[21]

Chunhan Chen, Yihan Tang, Tianyi Xie, and Stefania Druga. 2019. The Humming Box: AI-Powered Tangible Music Toy for Children. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341215.3356990

Digital Library

[22]

Erin Cherry and Celine Latulipe. 2014. Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 4, Article 21 (June 2014), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617588

Digital Library

[23]

Lee Chia-Hsun, Ma Yu-Pin, and Jeng Taysheng. 2003. A Spatially-Aware Tangible Interface for Computer-Aided Design. In CHI ’03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI EA ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 960–961. https://doi.org/10.1145/765891.766094

Digital Library

[24]

Jean Ho Chu, Paul Clifton, Daniel Harley, Jordanne Pavao, and Ali Mazalek. 2015. Mapping Place: Supporting Cultural Learning through a Lukasa-Inspired Tangible Tabletop Museum Exhibit. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680559

Digital Library

[25]

Sanne Cools, Peter Conradie, Maria-Cristina Ciocci, and Jelle Saldien. 2018. The Diorama Project : development of a tangible medium to foster STEAM education using storytelling and electronics. In Citizen, territory and technologies : smart learning contexts and practices (Aveiro, Portugal), Óscar Mealha, Monica Divitini, and Matthias Rehm (Eds.), Vol. 80. Springer, 169–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61322-2_17

[26]

José Luis Cortina, Claudia Zúñiga, and Jana Višňovská. 2015. An Alternative Starting Point for Fraction Instruction.International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning (2015).

[27]

Paul T Costa and Robert R McCrae. 1985. The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FL.

[28]

Mats Daniels and Amie Hauer. 2007. Balancing scaffolding and complexity in open ended group projects (OEGPs). In 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports. F2G–1–F2G–2. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2007.4418091

[29]

Elena C. Daschmann, Thomas Goetz, and Robert H. Stupnisky. 2014. Exploring the antecedents of boredom: Do teachers know why students are bored?Teaching and Teacher Education 39 (2014), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.009

[30]

Jack Davenport, Mark Lochrie, and John Law. 2017. Supporting Creative Confidence in a Musical Composition Workshop: Sound of Colour. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (CHI PLAY ’17 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3131307

Digital Library

[31]

Filipa Martins de Abreu and Álvaro Barbosa. 2017. Creative Engagement: Multimodal Digital Games in Children’s Learning Environment in Macau S.A.R. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Arts (Macau, China) (ARTECH2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106548.3106599

Digital Library

[32]

Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2015. Creating Unique Technology for Everyone. In Proceedings of the ASEAN CHI Symposium’15 (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (ASEAN CHI Symposium’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2776888.2780363

Digital Library

[33]

Rebecca A. Dodds, Steven M. Smith, and Thomas B. Ward. 2002. The Use of Environmental Clues During Incubation. Creativity Research Journal 14, 3-4 (2002), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_1

[34]

Jerry Alan Fails, Allison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Gene Chipman, Sante Simms, and Wayne Churaman. 2005. Child’s Play: A Comparison of Desktop and Physical Interactive Environments. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boulder, Colorado) (IDC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109547

Digital Library

[35]

Morten Fjeld, Martin Bichsel, and Matthias Rauterberg. 1998. BUILD-IT: An intuitive design tool based on direct object manipulation. In Gesture and Sign Language in Human-Computer Interaction, Ipke Wachsmuth and Martin Fröhlich (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0053008

[36]

Friedrich Fröbel. 1826. On the Education of Man (Die Menschenerziehung). Keilhau/Leipzig: Wienbrach.

[37]

Robert M Gagne and Leslie J Briggs. 1974. Principles of instructional design.Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

[38]

Michail N. Giannakos and Letizia Jaccheri. 2018. From players to makers: An empirical examination of factors that affect creative game development. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 18 (2018), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.002

[39]

Becca Rose Glowacki. 2017. Bear Abouts: Sharing Stories across the Physical and Digital. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 683–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3091980

Digital Library

[40]

David Goading. 1992. Putting agency back into experiment. (1992).

[41]

Carina S. González-González, María D. Guzmán-Franco, and Alfonso Infante-Moro. 2019. Tangible Technologies for Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 11, 10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102910

[42]

Joy Paul Guilford. 1950. Creativity.American psychologist 5, 9 (1950), 444.

[43]

Erica Rosenfeld Halverson and Kimberly Sheridan. 2014. The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review 84, 4 (12 2014), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063

[44]

Jiffer Harriman, Michael Theodore, and Mark Gross. 2015. The Kitsch-Instrument: Hackable Robotic Music. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680593

Digital Library

[45]

Amie Hauer and Mats Daniels. 2008. A Learning Theory Perspective on Running Open Ended Group Projects (OEGPs). In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education - Volume 78(Wollongong, NSW, Australia) (ACE ’08). Australian Computer Society, Inc., AUS, 85–91.

[46]

Elisabeth Heimdal and Tanja Rosenqvist. 2012. Three roles for textiles as tangible working materials in co-designprocesses. CoDesign 8, 2-3 (2012), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672579

[47]

Julie Henry and Bruno Dumas. 2018. Perceptions of computer science among children after a hands-on activity: A pilot study. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). 1811–1817. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363454

[48]

Cindy E Hmelo-Silver and Howard S Barrows. 2006. Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary journal of problem-based learning 1, 1 (2006), 4. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1004

[49]

Margaret Honey and David E Kanter. 2013. Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. Routledge.

[50]

Eva Hornecker. 2008. “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. In 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2008.4660193

[51]

Eva Hornecker. 2011. The Role of Physicality in Tangible and Embodied Interactions. Interactions 18, 2 (March 2011), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/1925820.1925826

Digital Library

[52]

Gesu India, Geetha Ramakrishna, Jyoti Bisht, and Manohar Swaminathan. 2019. Computational Thinking as Play: Experiences of Children Who Are Blind or Low Vision in India. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3354608

Digital Library

[53]

Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715

Digital Library

[54]

Qiao Jin, Danli Wang, and Fang Sun. 2018. TanCreator: A Tangible Tool for Children to Create Augmented Reality Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers (Singapore, Singapore) (UbiComp ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267305.3267603

Digital Library

[55]

David H Jonassen. 1997. Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational technology research and development 45, 1(1997), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613

[56]

Kaiju Kangas, Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, and Kai Hakkarainen. 2013. Design expert’s participation in elementary students’ collaborative design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23, 2(2013), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9172-6

[57]

Anastasios Karakostas, George Palaigeorgiou, and Yiannis Kompatsiaris. 2017. WeMake: A Framework for Letting Students Create Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Environments for Their Own STEAM Learning. In Internet Science, Ioannis Kompatsiaris, Jonathan Cave, Anna Satsiou, Georg Carle, Antonella Passani, Efstratios Kontopoulos, Sotiris Diplaris, and Donald McMillan (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_1

Digital Library

[58]

James C. Kaufman and Ronald A. Beghetto. 2009. Beyond Big and Little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology 13, 1 (2009), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688

[59]

Ioannis Kazanidis, George Palaigeorgiou, and Christos Bazinas. 2018. Dynamic interactive number lines for fraction learning in a mixed reality environment. In 2018 South-Eastern European Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Society Media Conference (SEEDA_CECNSM). IEEE, Kastoria, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/SEEDA-CECNSM.2018.8544927

[60]

Ioannis Kazanidis, George Palaigeorgiou, and Christos Bazinas. 2018. Dynamic interactive number lines for fraction learning in a mixed reality environment. In 2018 South-Eastern European Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Society Media Conference (SEEDA_CECNSM). IEEE, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/SEEDA-CECNSM.2018.8544927

[61]

Majeed Kazemitabaar, Jason McPeak, Alexander Jiao, Liang He, Thomas Outing, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2017. MakerWear: A Tangible Approach to Interactive Wearable Creation for Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025887

Digital Library

[62]

John M Keller. 1987. Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development 10, 3 (1987), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780

[63]

Mi Jeong Kim and Mary Lou Maher. 2008. The impact of tangible user interfaces on spatial cognition during collaborative design. Design Studies 29, 3 (2008), 222–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.006

[64]

Richard Kimbell and Kay Stables. 2007. Researching design learning: Issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Vol. 34. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5115-9

[65]

Paul A. Kirschner, John Sweller, and Richard E. Clark. 2006. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist 41, 2 (2006), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

[66]

Varsha Koushik, Darren Guinness, and Shaun K. Kane. 2019. StoryBlocks: A Tangible Programming Game To Create Accessible Audio Stories. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300722

Digital Library

[67]

Manya Krishnaswamy, Bori Lee, Chirag Murthy, Hannah Rosenfeld, and Austin S. Lee. 2017. Iyagi: An Immersive Storytelling Tool for Healthy Bedtime Routine. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Yokohama, Japan) (TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025076

Digital Library

[68]

Aleksander Krzywinski and Weiqin Chen. 2015. Hi Robot: Evaluating RoboTale. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (Madeira, Portugal) (ITS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2823507

Digital Library

[69]

D Midian Kurland and Roy D Pea. 1985. Children’s mental models of recursive LOGO programs. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1, 2 (1985), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.2190/JV9Y-5PD0-MX22-9J4Y

[70]

Reed W Larson and Maryse H Richards. 1991. Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American journal of education 99, 4 (1991), 418–443. https://doi.org/10.1086/443992

[71]

Celine Latulipe. 2013. The Value of Research in Creativity and the Arts. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (Sydney, Australia) (C&C ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2485921

Digital Library

[72]

Mathieu Le Goc, Allen Zhao, Ye Wang, Griffin Dietz, Rob Semmens, and Sean Follmer. 2020. Investigating Active Tangibles and Augmented Reality for Creativity Support in Remote Collaboration. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28960-7_12

[73]

Kian Teck Lee. 2016. Use of Tangible Learning in Stem Education. In SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications (Macau) (SA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2999508.3008582

Digital Library

[74]

Arthur Lefford, Herbert G Birch, and George Green. 1974. The perceptual and cognitive bases for finger localization and selective finger movement in preschool children. Child Development (1974), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127953

[75]

Nicole Leggett. 2017. Early childhood creativity: challenging educators in their role to intentionally develop creative thinking in children. Early Childhood Education Journal 45, 6 (2017), 845–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0836-4

[76]

Markus Löchtefeld, Frederik Wiehr, and Sven Gehring. 2017. Analysing the Effect of Tangibile User Interfaces on Spatial Memory. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI-2017), October 16-17, Brighton, United Kingdom. ACM, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131277.3132172

Digital Library

[77]

Anna Loparev, Lauren Westendorf, Margaret Flemings, Jennifer Cho, Romie Littrell, Anja Scholze, and Orit Shaer. 2017. BacPack: Exploring the Role of Tangibles in a Museum Exhibit for Bio-Design. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Yokohama, Japan) (TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025000

Digital Library

[78]

Rani Lueder and Valerie J Berg Rice. 2007. Ergonomics for Children: Designing products and places for toddler to teens. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203609163

[79]

Mary Lou Maher, John Gero, Lina Lee, Rongrong Yu, and Tim Clausner. 2016. Measuring the Effect of Tangible Interaction on Design Cognition. In Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience, Dylan D. Schmorrow and Cali M. Fidopiastis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39955-3_33

Digital Library

[80]

Mary Lou Maher, Lina Lee, John S. Gero, Rongrong Yu, and Timothy Clausner. 2017. Characterizing Tangible Interaction During a Creative Combination Task. In Design Computing and Cognition ’16, John. S Gero (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0_3

[81]

Paul Marshall. 2007. Do Tangible Interfaces Enhance Learning?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) (TEI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227004

Digital Library

[82]

Sarah Matthews, Stephen Viller, and Marie A. Boden. 2020. ”... And We Are the Creators!” Technologies as Creative Material. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374980

Digital Library

[83]

Sarnoff Mednick. 1962. The associative basis of the creative process.Psychological review 69, 3 (1962), 220. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850

[84]

Alexandros Merkouris and Konstantinos Chorianopoulos. 2015. Introducing Computer Programming to Children through Robotic and Wearable Devices. In Proceedings of the Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (London, United Kingdom) (WiPSCE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818314.2818342

Digital Library

[85]

Maria Montessori. 1912. The Montessori Method. New York: Frederick Stokes Co.

[86]

Michael D. Mumford. 2003. Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going? Taking Stock in Creativity Research. Creativity Research Journal 15, 2-3 (2003), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403

[87]

Tatiana de Cassia Nakano and Solange Muglia Wechsler. 2018. Creativity and innovation: Skills for the 21st Century. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) 35, 3 (2018), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752018000300002

[88]

Tom Neutens and Francis wyffels. 2016. Teacher Professional Development through a Physical Computing Workshop. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (Münster, Germany) (WiPSCE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 108–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/2978249.2978270

Digital Library

[89]

Nora S Newcombe, David H Uttal, and Megan Sauter. 2013. Spatial development.(2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199958450.013.0020

[90]

Eslam Nofal, Georgia Panagiotidou, Rabee M. Reffat, Hendrik Hameeuw, Vanessa Boschloos, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2020. Situated Tangible Gamification of Heritage for Supporting Collaborative Learning of Young Museum Visitors. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 1, Article 3 (Feb. 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3350427

Digital Library

[91]

Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press.

[92]

Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books.

[93]

Hyunjoo Oh, Sherry Hsi, Michael Eisenberg, and Mark D. Gross. 2018. Paper Mechatronics: Present and Future. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202761

Digital Library

[94]

Johanna Okerlund, Evan Segreto, Casey Grote, Lauren Westendorf, Anja Scholze, Romie Littrell, and Orit Shaer. 2016. SynFlo: A Tangible Museum Exhibit for Exploring Bio-Design. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839488

Digital Library

[95]

Claire O’Malley and Danae Stanton Fraser. 2004. Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190328 A NESTA Futurelab Research report - report 12.

[96]

George Palaigeorgiou and Christos Pouloulis. 2018. Orchestrating tangible music interfaces for in-classroom music learning through a fairy tale: The case of ImproviSchool. Education and Information Technologies 23, 1 (2018), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9608-z

Digital Library

[97]

Weiguo Pang. 2015. Promoting creativity in the classroom: A generative view.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9, 2 (2015), 122. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000009

[98]

Alisha Panjwani. 2017. Constructing Meaning: Designing Powerful Story-Making Explorations for Children to Express with Tangible Computational Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Stanford, California, USA) (IDC ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079723

Digital Library

[99]

Mildred B Parten. 1932. Social participation among pre-school children.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 27, 3(1932), 243. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074524

[100]

Jean Piaget. 1997. The moral judgement of the child. Simon and Schuster.

[101]

Kati Pitkänen, Megumi Iwata, and Jari Laru. 2019. Supporting Fab Lab Facilitators to Develop Pedagogical Practices to Improve Learning in Digital Fabrication Activities. In Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference (Oulu, Finland) (FabLearn Europe ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335061

Digital Library

[102]

Mareen Przybylla and Ralf Romeike. 2017. The Nature of Physical Computing in Schools: Findings from Three Years of Practical Experience. In Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland) (Koli Calling ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141880.3141889

Digital Library

[103]

Mitchel Resnick and Brian Silverman. 2005. Some Reflections on Designing Construction Kits for Kids. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boulder, Colorado) (IDC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556

Digital Library

[104]

Chris Rogers and Merredith Portsmore. 2004. Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education: innovations and research 5, 3 (2004).

[105]

Wolff-Michael Roth. 1996. Art and Artifact of Children’s Designing: A Situated Cognition Perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences 5, 2 (1996), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_2

[106]

Mark A Runco. 1999. Tension, adaptability, and creativity. Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (1999), 165–194.

[107]

Kimiko Ryokai, Stefan Marti, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2004. I/O Brush: Drawing with Everyday Objects as Ink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985731

Digital Library

[108]

Alpay Sabuncuoglu. 2020. Tangible Music Programming Blocks for Visually Impaired Children. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374939

Digital Library

[109]

Alpay Sabuncuoğlu, Merve Erkaya, Oğuz Turan Buruk, and Tilbe Göksun. 2018. Code Notes: Designing a Low-Cost Tangible Coding Tool for/with Children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 644–649. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210791

Digital Library

[110]

Gavriel Salomon, Tamar Globerson, and Eva Guterman. 1989. The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a Reading Partner.Journal of educational psychology 81, 4 (1989), 620. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.620

[111]

Theodosios Sapounidis, Stavros Demetriadis, and Ioannis Stamelos. 2015. Evaluating Children Performance with Graphical and Tangible Robot Programming Tools. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 19, 1 (Jan. 2015), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0774-3

Digital Library

[112]

Julie Sarama and Douglas H Clements. 2009. “Concrete” computer manipulatives in mathematics education. Child Development Perspectives 3, 3 (2009), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00095.x

[113]

Mahender Reddy Sarsani. 2008. Do High and Low Creative Children Differ in Their Cognition and Motivation?Creativity Research Journal 20, 2 (2008), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059861

[114]

Robert Keith Sawyer, Vera John-Steiner, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Seana Moran, David Henry Feldman, Howard Gardner, Robert J Sternberg, Jeanne Nakamura, 2003. Creativity and development. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.001.0001

[115]

Lori Scarlatos. 2002. An application of tangible interfaces in collaborative learning environments. (01 2002), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/1242073.1242141

Digital Library

[116]

Sue Sentance, Jane Waite, Steve Hodges, Emily MacLeod, and Lucy Yeomans. 2017. ”Creating Cool Stuff”: Pupils’ Experience of the BBC Micro:Bit. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Seattle, Washington, USA) (SIGCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017749

Digital Library

[117]

Ben Shneiderman. 2007. Creativity Support Tools: Accelerating Discovery and Innovation. Commun. ACM 50, 12 (Dec. 2007), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689

Digital Library

[118]

Arash Soleimani, Keith Evan Green, Danielle Herro, and Ian D. Walker. 2016. A Tangible, Story-Construction Process Employing Spatial, Computational-Thinking. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children(Manchester, United Kingdom) (IDC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930703

Digital Library

[119]

Keyur Sorathia and Rocco Servidio. 2012. Learning and experience: teaching tangible interaction & edutainment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 64 (2012), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.031

[120]

Kurt Squire. 2007. Open-ended video games: A model for developing learning for the interactive age. MacArthur Foundation Digital Media and Learning Initiative.

[121]

Robert J Sternberg and Wendy Melissa Williams. 1996. How to develop student creativity. ASCD.

[122]

Amanda Strawhacker and Marina U Bers. 2015. “I want my robot to look for food”: Comparing Kindergartner’s programming comprehension using tangible, graphic, and hybrid user interfaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 25, 3(2015), 293–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9287-7

[123]

Amanda Strawhacker, Clarissa Verish, Orit Shaer, and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2020. Designing with Genes in Early Childhood: An exploratory user study of the tangible CRISPEE technology. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 26 (2020), 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100212

Digital Library

[124]

Amanda Sullivan and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2018. Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28, 2(2018), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0

[125]

Paula Te. 2015. TADCAD: A Tangible and Gestural 3D Modeling & Printing Platform for Building Creativity. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boston, Massachusetts) (IDC ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 406–409. https://doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771865

Digital Library

[126]

Amal Tidjani, Eileen Cho, and Priscilla Lee. 2016. MuSme: A Tangible Skin Suit for Music Creation. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 743–748. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2872960

Digital Library

[127]

E. PAUL TORRANCE. 1972. Can We Teach Children To Think Creatively?*. The Journal of Creative Behavior 6, 2 (1972), 114–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00923.x

[128]

Iliana Triantafyllidou, Athina-Maria Chatzitsakiroglou, Stergiani Georgiadou, and George Palaigeorgiou. 2018. FingerTrips on Tangible Augmented 3D Maps for Learning History. In Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning, Michael E. Auer and Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_46

[129]

Guy Tsafnat, Paul Glasziou, Miew Keen Choong, Adam Dunn, Filippo Galgani, and Enrico Coiera. 2014. Systematic review automation technologies. Systematic reviews 3, 1 (2014), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-74

[130]

Klaus K. Urban. 1991. On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal 4, 2 (1991), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534384

[131]

Lisbeth Uribe and Amy Eguchi. 2015. 4th Graders creating robots with sensors. In 2015 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference. 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2015.7119904

[132]

Andrea Valente and Emanuela Marchetti. 2015. Make and Play: Card Games as Tangible and Playable Knowledge Representation Boundary Objects. In 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.31

Digital Library

[133]

Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen, Linda de Valk, and Tilde Bekker. 2016. Tangible Play Objects: Influence of Different Combinations of Feedback Modalities. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839492

Digital Library

[134]

Richard Voase. 2002. Rediscovering the imagination: investigating active and passive visitor experience in the 21st century. International Journal of Tourism Research 4, 5 (2002), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.390 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jtr.390

[135]

LEV SEMENOVICH VYGOTSKY. 2004. Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 42, 1(2004), 7–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210

[136]

Torben Wallbaum, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. Towards a Tangible Storytelling Kit for Exploring Emotions with Children. In Proceedings of the on Thematic Workshops of ACM Multimedia 2017 (Mountain View, California, USA) (Thematic Workshops ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126686.3126702

Digital Library

[137]

Torben Wallbaum, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. Towards a Tangible Storytelling Kit for Exploring Emotions with Children. In Proceedings of the on Thematic Workshops of ACM Multimedia 2017 (Mountain View, California, USA) (Thematic Workshops ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126686.3126702

Digital Library

[138]

Mark Weiser. 1999. The Computer for the 21st Century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 3, 3 (July 1999), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/329124.329126

Digital Library

[139]

Peta Wyeth and Helen C. Purchase. 2002. Tangible Programming Elements for Young Children. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) (CHI EA ’02). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 774–775. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506591

Digital Library

[140]

Diana Xu. 2005. Tangible User Interface for Children - An Overview. In in Proceedings of the SIXTH Conference in the Department of Computing. 579–584.

[141]

Chulin Yang and Stephen Jia Wang. 2016. Sandtime: A Tangible Interaction Featured Gaming Installation to Encourage Social Interaction Among Children. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. Springer, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_16

[142]

Varpu Yrjönsuuri, Kaiju Kangas, Kai Hakkarainen, and Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen. 2019. The roles of material prototyping in collaborative design process at an elementary school. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal 24, 2(2019), 141–162. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2585

[143]

Victor Zappi and Andrew P McPherson. 2014. Dimensionality and Appropriation in Digital Musical Instrument Design. In NIME, Vol. 14. 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1.1.1089.4497

[144]

Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-Inspired Manipulatives. CHI 2005: Technology, Safety, Community: Conference Proceedings - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093

Digital Library

Cited By

Ghazali AMohamad Ashari ZHardman JAbu Yazid A(2024)DEVELOPMENT AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE E-SKY MODULE BASED ON PBL IN THE TEACHING AND FACILITATION PROCESS OF EARLY SCIENCEJournal of Baltic Science Education10.33225/jbse/24.23.22123:2(221-239)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.221
Çipiloğlu Yıldız ZDoğan S(2024)Algo-AR: Development of an Augmented Reality-Supported Tangible Programming Tool to Improve Algorithmic Thinking SkillsBilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi10.17671/gazibtd.139878117:2(59-69)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.1398781
Guneysu AReis HKuoppamäki SSylla C(2024)Enhancing Autism Therapy through Smart Tangible-Based Digital Storytelling: Co-Design of Activities and Feasibility StudyProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659371(665-669)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3659371
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

A Meta-Analysis of Tangible Learning Studies from the TEI Conference
TEI '22: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Tangible learning has received increasing attention. However, in the recent decade, it has no comprehensive overview. This study aimed to fill the gap and reviewed 92 publications from all the TEI conference proceedings (2007–2021). We analysed previous ...
Read More
Comparing Tangible and Multi-touch Interaction for Interactive Data Visualization Tasks
TEI '16: Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction

Interactive visualization plays a key role in the analysis of large datasets. It can help users to explore data, investigate hypotheses and find patterns. The easier and more tangible the interaction, the more likely it is to enhance understanding. This ...
Read More
Novel interaction techniques using touch-sensitive tangibles in tabletop environments
ITS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces

In this work, we propose techniques for interaction that use a touch-sensitive tangible to assist 3D manipulation in tabletop applications. The objective of this research is to investigate the effectiveness and user satisfaction with this combination ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition

June 2021

581 pages

ISBN:9781450383769

DOI:10.1145/3450741

General Chairs:
Corina Sas
Lancaster University, UK
,
Neil Maiden
City, University of London, UK

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Elite Network of Bavaria

Conference

C&C '21

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

C&C '21: Creativity and Cognition

June 22 - 23, 2021

Virtual Event, Italy

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
615
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)249
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ghazali AMohamad Ashari ZHardman JAbu Yazid A(2024)DEVELOPMENT AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE E-SKY MODULE BASED ON PBL IN THE TEACHING AND FACILITATION PROCESS OF EARLY SCIENCEJournal of Baltic Science Education10.33225/jbse/24.23.22123:2(221-239)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.221
Çipiloğlu Yıldız ZDoğan S(2024)Algo-AR: Development of an Augmented Reality-Supported Tangible Programming Tool to Improve Algorithmic Thinking SkillsBilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi10.17671/gazibtd.139878117:2(59-69)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.1398781
Guneysu AReis HKuoppamäki SSylla C(2024)Enhancing Autism Therapy through Smart Tangible-Based Digital Storytelling: Co-Design of Activities and Feasibility StudyProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659371(665-669)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3659371
Hunt CSun KTseng KBalasubramaniyam PDruin AHuynh ALeithinger DYip J(2024)Making a Metaphor Sandwich: Analyzing Children's use of Metaphor During Tabletop Telepresence Robot Supported Participatory DesignProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3656272(173-188)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3656272
Currin FHourcade J(2024)Creating Personas of Parents of Young Children Based on Balancing PrioritiesProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655790(105-118)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3628516.3655790
Hofer LCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)Opportunity Spaces for Children ́s Informal Learning in Public EnvironmentsProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3634897(1-5)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3623509.3634897
Delgado Rodriguez SChatterjee PDao Phuong AAlt FMarky K(2024)Do You Need to Touch? Exploring Correlations between Personal Attributes and Preferences for Tangible Privacy MechanismsProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642863(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642863
Carbajal MBaranauskas M(2024)Enactive Interaction in Support of Creative Learning: A Systematic Literature ReviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2353425(1-26)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2353425
Sun YLin L(2024)Designing a Tangible Interactive Learning System for Children’s Art Education: A Multi-Sensory Design ApproachHCI International 2024 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-61953-3_25(225-234)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61953-3_25
Melniczuk AVrapi E(2023)Exploring Feedback Modality Designs to Improve Young Children's Collaborative ActionsProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3577190.3614140(271-281)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3577190.3614140
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents