Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Characterizing the Usage Intensity of Public Cloud

Published: 29 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This article uses precise and novel data on country-level Cloud IaaS and PaaS revenue to measure the intensive margin of technology diffusion across countries and within countries over time. We horse race diffusion models and find that cloud diffusion exhibits both Log-Log and Logistic Growth patterns. We use cross validation on nearly 100 features to determine what correlates with cross-country differences. We find that increases in features impacting Gross Domestic Product, Internet Connectivity, and Human Capital are associated with increases in intensity of cloud adoption. We finally compare the relative impacts of these variables using a random coefficients model. Although correlative, our algorithmic research design motivates data-driven hypothesis generation and further causal work regarding how policymakers can encourage more cloud computing adoption and technology adoption more broadly.

References

[1]
Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. 1845. Mathematical researches into the law of population growth increase. Nouveaux Memoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles 18 (1845), 1–42.
[2]
R. U. Ayres. 1989. Technological Transformations and Long Waves. Ph.D. Dissertation. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. http://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-89-001.pdf.
[3]
Heiko Bauke. 2007. Parameter estimation for power-law distributions by maximum likelihood methods. European Physical Journal B 58, 2 (Aug. 2007), Article 2, 6 pages.
[4]
Alexandre Belloni and Victor Chernozhukov. 2013. Least squares after model selection in high-dimensional sparse models. Bernoulli 19, 2 (2013), 521–547.
[5]
Jess Benhabib and Mark Spiegel. 2005. Human capital and technology diffusion. In Handbook of Economic Growth,Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf (Eds.). Vol. 1, Part A. Elsevier, 935–966. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:grochp:1-13.
[6]
Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla, and M. E. J. Newman. 2009. Power law distribution in empirical data. Society for Industrial and Applied Math 51, 4 (Nov. 2009), Article 5, 43 pages.
[7]
Diego Comin and Bart Hobijn. 2010. An exploration of technology diffusion. American Economic Review 100, 5 (2010), 2031–59.
[8]
Diego A. Comin and Marti Mestieri Ferrer. 2013. If Technology Has Arrived Everywhere, Why Has Income Diverged?Working Paper 19010. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[9]
Amazon’s Quarterly Revenue Filing. 2017. Securities and Exchange Commission Filings. Technical Report. Amazon. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=97664&p=irol-sec&control_selectgroup=Annual20Filings.
[10]
Garrett Fitzmaurice, Marie Davidian, Geert Verbeke, and Geert Molenberghs (Eds.). 2009. Longitudinal Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 309–362. www.stat.ncsu.edu/people/davidian/courses/st732/notes/chap9.pdf
[11]
Gartner Forecast. 2017. Gartner Says WW Public Cloud Services Market to Grow 18 Percent in 2017. Technical Report. Gartner. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3616417.
[12]
World Economic Forum. 2017–2018. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Technical Report. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018.
[13]
John Fox and Sanford Weisberg. 2010. An R Companion to Applied Regression (2nd ed.). SAGE, Washington DC, Appendix. http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/appendix/Appendix-Nonlinear-Regression.pdf.
[14]
Jordan Novet. 2017. Amazon’s cloud growth might be slowing, but it’s still way ahead of everybody else. CNBC. Retrieved September 27, 2017 from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/28/aws-still-rules-the-cloud-despite-growth-slump.html.
[15]
Sungho Park and Sachin Gupta. 2009. Simulated maximum likelihood estimator for the random coefficient logit model using aggregate data. Journal of Marketing Research 46, 4 (2009), 531–542. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20618914.
[16]
W. Craig Riddell and Xueda Song. 2017. The role of education in technology use and adoption: Evidence from the Canadian workplace and employee survey. ILR Review 70, 5 (2017), 1219–1253.
[17]
Jonathan Skinner and Douglas Staiger. 2005. Technology Adoption from Hybrid Corn to Beta Blockers. Working Paper 11251. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[18]
Tanner Sorensen and Shravan Vashisht. 2016. Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan. Quantitative Methods for Psychology 12, 3 (June 2016), 1–30.
[19]
Jeff Tayman and David A. Swanson. 1999. On the validity of MAPE as a measure of population forecast accuracy. Population Research and Policy Review 18, 4 (Aug. 1994), 299–322.
[20]
Shuang Wang, Jacob LaRiviere, and Aadharsh Kannan. 2019. Spatial competition and missing data: An application to cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 NBER Technology Workshop.
[21]
F. Welch. 1970. Education in production. Journal of Political Economy 78, 1 (1970), 35–59. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:78:y:1970:i:1:p:35-59.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A 2-Phase Strategy for Intelligent Cloud OperationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.331221811(96841-96853)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2022)TRAP: task-resource adaptive pairing for efficient scheduling in fog computingCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-022-03641-z25:6(4257-4273)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing the Usage Intensity of Public Cloud

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
    ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation  Volume 9, Issue 3
    September 2021
    181 pages
    ISSN:2167-8375
    EISSN:2167-8383
    DOI:10.1145/3468852
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 May 2021
    Accepted: 01 December 2020
    Revised: 01 April 2020
    Received: 01 October 2018
    Published in TEAC Volume 9, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Cloud computing
    2. technology diffusion

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)A 2-Phase Strategy for Intelligent Cloud OperationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.331221811(96841-96853)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2022)TRAP: task-resource adaptive pairing for efficient scheduling in fog computingCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-022-03641-z25:6(4257-4273)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media