Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic Resistance

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Algorithms in online platforms interact with users' identities in different ways. However, little is known about how users understand the interplay between identity and algorithmic processes on these platforms, and if and how such understandings shape their behavior on these platforms in return. Through semi-structured interviews with 15 US-based TikTok users, we detail users' algorithmic folk theories of the For You Page algorithm in relation to two inter-connected identity types: person and social identity. Participants identified potential harms that can accompany algorithms' tailoring content to their person identities. Further, they believed the algorithm actively suppresses content related to marginalized social identities based on race and ethnicity, body size and physical appearance, ability status, class status, LGBTQ identity, and political and social justice group affiliation. We propose a new algorithmic folk theory of social feeds-The Identity Strainer Theory-to describe when users believe an algorithm filters out and suppresses certain social identities. In developing this theory, we introduce the concept of algorithmic privilege as held by users positioned to benefit from algorithms on the basis of their identities. We further propose the concept of algorithmic representational harm to refer to the harm users experience when they lack algorithmic privilege and are subjected to algorithmic symbolic annihilation. Additionally, we describe how participants changed their behaviors to shape their algorithmic identities to align with how they understood themselves, as well as to resist the suppression of marginalized social identities and lack of algorithmic privilege via individual actions, collective actions, and altering their performances. We theorize our findings to detail the ways the platform's algorithm and its users co-produce knowledge of identity on the platform. We argue the relationship between users' algorithmic folk theories and identity are consequential for social media platforms, as it impacts users' experiences, behaviors, sense of belonging, and perceived ability to be seen, heard, and feel valued by others as mediated through algorithmic systems.

References

[1]
[n.d.]. About TikTok | TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/about?lang=en
[2]
[n.d.]. Community Guidelines. https://www.tiktok.com/community-guidelines?lang=en
[3]
[n.d.]. How TikTok recommends videos #ForYou - Newsroom | TikTok. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/how-tiktok-recommends-videos-for-you/
[4]
[n.d.]. TikTok ban: The US is 'looking at' banning Chinese social media apps, Pompeo says - CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/07/tech/us-tiktok-ban/index.html
[5]
[n.d.]. TikTok to launch Transparency Center for moderation and data practices - Newsroom | TikTok. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/tiktok-to-launch-transparency-center-for-moderation-and-data-practices
[6]
D. Abrams and M.A. Hogg. 2006. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Taylor Francis. https://books.google.com/books?id=50OV4gqcFA0C
[7]
Julia Alexander. 2019. LGBTQ YouTubers are suing YouTube over alleged discrimination. https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/14/20805283/lgbtq-youtuber-lawsuit-discrimination-alleged-video-recommendations-demonetization
[8]
Oscar Alvarado and Annika Waern. 2018. Towards Algorithmic Experience: Initial Efforts for Social Media Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173860
[9]
Nazanin Andalibi and Patricia Garcia. 2021. Sense making and Coping After Pregnancy Loss: The Seeking and Disruption of Emotional Validation Online. Proceedings of the ACM Human Computer Interaction Vol. 5 (April 2021), 31. Issue No. CSCW1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449201
[10]
Paul Baker and Amanda Potts. 2013. 'Why do white people have thin lips?' Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms.Critical Discourse Studies10, 2 (May 2013), 187--204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320 Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320.
[11]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019.Race after technology: abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Polity, Medford, MA.
[12]
Sam Biddle, Paulo Victor Ribeiro, and Tatiana Dias. 2020. Invisible Censorship: TikTok Told Moderators to Suppress Posts by "Ugly" People and the Poor to Attract New Users. https://theintercept.com/2020/03/16/tiktok-app-moderators-users-discrimination/ Library Catalog: The Intercept.
[13]
Elena Botella. 2019. TikTok Admits It Suppressed Videos by Disabled, Queer, and Fat Creators. https://slate.com/technology/2019/12/tiktok-disabled-users-videos-suppressed.html Library Catalog: slate.com.
[14]
Engin Bozdag. 2013. Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology 15, 3 (Sept. 2013), 209--227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013--9321--6
[15]
André Brock. 2009. "Who do you think you are?": Race, Representation, and Cultural Rhetorics in Online Spaces. Poroi 6, 1 (July 2009), 15--35. https://doi.org/10.13008/2151--2957.1013
[16]
Melissa Brown, Rashawn Ray, Ed Summers, and Neil Fraistat. 2017. #SayHerName: a case study of intersectional social media activism. Ethnic and Racial Studies40, 11 (Sept. 2017), 1831--1846. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334934Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334934.
[17]
Jennings Bryant and Peter Vorderer. 2013.Psychology of Entertainment. Routledge. Google-Books-ID: AVnhAQAAQBAJ.
[18]
Peter J. Burke. 1980. The Self: Measurement Requirements from an Interactionist Perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly 43, 1 (March 1980), 18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033745
[19]
Peter J. Burke and Jan E. Stets. 2009.Identity theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York. OCLC: ocn271647128.
[20]
Matthew Carrasco and Andruid Kerne. 2018. Queer Visibility: Supporting LGBT+ Selective Visibility on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1--12.https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173824
[21]
Michelle Caswell, Marika Cifor, and Mario H. Ramirez. 2016. "To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing": Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives1. The American Archivist 79, 1 (June 2016), 56--81. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360--9081.79.1.56
[22]
John Cheney-Lippold. 2011. A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control.Theory,Culture & Society28, 6 (Nov. 2011), 164--181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420
[23]
John Cheney-Lippold. 2017. We are data: algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York University Press, New York. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CSCW 2, Article 305. Publication date: October 2021. Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity on TikTok305:27
[24]
Robin R. Coleman and Emily Chivers Yochim. 2008. Symbolic Annihilation. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Wolfgang Donsbach (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, wbiecs124. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs124
[25]
Kimberle Crenshaw. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review43, 6 (July 1991), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
[26]
Michael Ann Devito, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeffery T. Hancock, Megan French, and Sunny Liu. 2018. How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173694
[27]
Michael Ann Devito, Darren Gergle, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2017. "Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 3163--3174. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025659
[28]
Zak Doffman. [n.d.]. Warning-Apple Suddenly Catches TikTok Secretly Spying On Millions Of iPhoneUsers.https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2020/06/26/warning-apple-suddenly-catches-tiktok-secretly-spying-on-millions-of-iphone-users/ Library Catalog: www.forbes.com Section: Innovation.
[29]
Bryan Dosono and Bryan Semaan. 2020. Decolonizing Tactics as Collective Resilience: Identity Work of AAPI Communities on Reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 1--20.https://doi.org/10.1145/3392881
[30]
Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 2371--2382. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858494
[31]
Motahhare Eslami, Sneha R. Krishna Kumaran, Christian Sandvig, and Karrie Karahalios. 2018. Communicating Algorithmic Process in Online Behavioral Advertising. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174006
[32]
Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, KevinHamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 153--162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702556
[33]
Nancy Ettlinger. 2018. Algorithmic affordances for productive resistance.Big Data & Society5, 1 (Jan. 2018), 2053951718771399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718771399 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[34]
Ryan J. Gallagher, Elizabeth Stowell, Andrea G. Parker, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2019. Reclaiming Stigmatized Narratives: The Networked Disclosure Landscape of #MeToo. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction3, CSCW (Nov. 2019), 96:1--96:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359198
[35]
Susan A. Gelman and Cristine H. Legare. 2011. Concepts and Folk Theories. Annual Review of Anthropology 40 (2011),379--398. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41287739 Publisher: Annual Reviews.
[36]
Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of 'platforms'. New Media & Society12, 3 (May 2010), 347--364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 Publisher: SAGE Publications.
[37]
Quentin Grossetti, Cédric du Mouza, and Nicolas Travers. 2019. Community-Based Recommendations on Twitter:Avoiding the Filter Bubble. In Web Information Systems Engineering -- WISE 2019, Reynold Cheng, Nikos Mamoulis, Yizhou Sun, and Xin Huang (Eds.). Vol. 11881. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 212--227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--34223--4_14 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[38]
Mario Haim, Andreas Graefe, and Hans-Bernd Brosius. 2018. Burst of the Filter Bubble?: Effects of personalization on the diversity of Google News.Digital Journalism 6, 3 (March 2018), 330--343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
[39]
Oliver Haimson. 2018. Social Media as Social Transition Machinery.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 63:1--63:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274332
[40]
Monique M. Hennink and Bonnie N. Kaiser. 2020. Saturation in Qualitative Research. In SAGE Research Methods Foundations. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036822322
[41]
M.A. Hogg. 2006. Social Identity Theory. In Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, Peter J. Burke (Ed.). Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, 111--136. https://books.google.com/books?id=8Jzkgbq2vYwC
[42]
Nina Huntemann. 2015. No More Excuses: Using Twitter to Challenge The Symbolic Annihilation of Women in Games.Feminist Media Studies 15, 1 (Jan. 2015), 164--167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.987432
[43]
Instagram. 2020. Introducing Instagram Reels.https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/introducing-instagram-reels-announcement
[44]
Sheila Jasanoff. 2004. Afterword. InStates of Knowledge(1 ed.). Routledge, 274--282. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CSCW2, Article 305. Publication date: October 2021.
[45]
John C. Turner, Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, Margaret S. Wetherell. 1989. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.Amer. J. Sociology94, 6 (May 1989), 1514--1516. https://doi.org/10.1086/229205
[46]
Willett Kempton. 1986. Two Theories of Home Heat Control*. Cognitive Science 10, 1 (1986), 75--90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_3 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_3.
[47]
Donald Ervin Knuth. 1997. The art of computer programming(3rd ed ed.). Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
[48]
Hanlin Li, Disha Bora, Sagar Salvi, and Erin Brady. 2018. Slacktivists or Activists?: Identity Work in the Virtual Disability March. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173799
[49]
Fannie Liu, Denae Ford, Chris Parnin, and Laura Dabbish. 2017. Selfies as Social Movements: Influences on Participation and Perceived Impact on Stereotypes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction1, CSCW (Dec. 2017),72:1--72:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134707
[50]
Sorcha Avalon Mackenzie and David Nichols. 2020. Finding 'Places to Be Bad' in Social Media: The Case of TikTok. In Urban Australia and Post-Punk: Exploring Dogs in Space, David Nichols and Sophie Perillo (Eds.). Springer, Singapore, 285--298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--981--32--9702--9_22
[51]
Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13, 1 (Feb. 2011), 114--133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
[52]
George J. McCall and J. L. Simmons. 1966. Identities and Interactions. Free Press, New York, NY, US. Pages: ix, 278.
[53]
Sarah McRoberts, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Tamara Peyton, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2016. Do It for the Viewers!: Audience Engagement Behaviors of Young YouTubers. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC '16. ACM Press, Manchester, United Kingdom, 334--343. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930676
[54]
Sarah McRoberts, Haiwei Ma, Andrew Hall, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2017. Share First, Save Later: Performance of Selfthrough Snapchat Stories. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 6902--6911. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025771
[55]
Debra Merskin. 1998. Sending up Signals: A Survey of Native American1 Media Use and Representation in the Mass Media. Howard Journal of Communications 9, 4 (Oct. 1998), 333--345. https://doi.org/10.1080/106461798246943
[56]
Sadia Mir and Christina Paschyn. 2018. Qatar's Hidden Women: Symbolic Annihilation and Documentary Media Practice. Visual Communication Quarterly25, 2 (April 2018), 93--105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2018.1456932
[57]
Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press, New York.
[58]
Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA,1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392
[59]
Bahiyah Omar and Wang Dequan. 2020. Watch, Share or Create: The Influence of Personality Traits and User Motivation on TikTok Mobile Video Usage.International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies14, 04 (March 2020), 121--137.https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12429 Publisher: Universität Kassel.
[60]
Jahna Otterbacher, Jo Bates, and Paul Clough. 2017. Competent Men and Warm Women: Gender Stereotypes and Backlash in Image Search Results. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Denver Colorado USA, 6620--6631. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025727
[61]
Daphna Oyserman, Kristen Elmore, and George Smith. 2012. Self, self-concept, and identity. In Handbook of self and identity, 2nd ed. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, 69--104.
[62]
Eli Pariser. 2012.The filter bubble: how the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. OCLC:1120489057.
[63]
Sarah Perez. 2020. TikTok to open a 'Transparency Center' where outside experts can examine its moderation practices-- Tech Crunch. http://search.proquest.com/docview/2376021221?pq-origsite=summon& Place: New York, United States, New York Publisher: AOL Inc.
[64]
Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15. ACM Press,Seoul, Republic of Korea, 173--182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702174
[65]
Rashawn Ray, Melissa Brown, Neil Fraistat, and Edward Summers. 2017. Ferguson and the death of Michael Brown on Twitter: #BlackLivesMatter, #TCOT, and the evolution of collective identities. Ethnic and Racial Stud-ies40, 11 (Sept. 2017), 1797--1813. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1335422 Publisher: Routledge _eprint:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1335422.
[66]
Reuters. 2020. TikTok: China's ByteDance agrees to divest US operations after Trump threat. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/aug/01/tiktok-ban-china-bytedance-divest-microsoft Library Catalog: www.theguardian.com Section: Technology.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. CSCW2, Article 305. Publication date: October 2021. Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity on TikTok305:29
[67]
Adi Robertson. 2019. TikTok prevented disabled users' videos from showing up in feeds. https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/2/20991843/tiktok-bytedance-platform-disabled-autism-lgbt-fat-user-algorithm-reach-limit Library Catalog:www.theverge.com.
[68]
Aja Romano. 2019. A group of YouTubers is claiming the site systematically demonetizes queer content. https://www.vox.com/culture/2019/10/10/20893258/youtube-lgbtq-censorship-demonetization-nerd-city-algorithm-report
[69]
Christian Sandvig, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios, and Cédric Langbort. 2014. Auditing Algorithms : Research Methods for Detecting Discrimination on Internet Platforms.
[70]
Michael Schuman. [n.d.]. Why America Is Afraid of TikTok - The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2020/07/tiktok-ban-china-america/614725/'s=09
[71]
Donghee Shin, Bu Zhong, and Frank A. Biocca. 2020. Beyond user experience: What constitutes algorithmic experiences?International Journal of Information Management 52 (June 2020), 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102061
[72]
Ellen Simpson and Bryan Semaan. Forthcoming. For You, or For "You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTok. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction CSCW (Forthcoming), 1--33.
[73]
Anselm L. Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998.Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory(2nd ed ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[74]
Sheldon Stryker. 1980.Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co, Menlo Park, Calif.
[75]
Benjamin Toff and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2018. "I Just Google It": Folk Theories of Distributed Discovery.Journal of Communication 68, 3 (June 2018), 636--657. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy009
[76]
Gaye Tuchman. 2000. The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media. In Culture and Politics, Lane Crothers and Charles Lockhart (Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, 150--174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--349--62397--6_9
[77]
Julia Velkova and Anne Kaun. 2019. Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society(Aug. 2019), 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
[78]
Paul Venzo and Kristy Hess. 2013. "Honk Against Homophobia": Rethinking Relations Between Media and Sexual Minorities. Journal of Homosexuality 60, 11 (Nov. 2013), 1539--1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.824318
[79]
Ashley Marie Walker and Michael A. DeVito. 2020. "'More gay' fits in better": Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ+ Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376497
[80]
Shuaishuai Wang. 2020. Calculating dating goals: data gaming and algorithmic sociality on Blued, a Chinese gay dating app. Information, Communication & Society 23, 2 (Jan. 2020), 181--197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1490796Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1490796.
[81]
Yunwen Wang. 2020. Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin). Computers in Human Behavior110 (Sept. 2020), 106373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106373
[82]
Michele Willson. 2017. Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society20, 1 (Jan. 2017), 137--150.https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645
[83]
Svetlana Yarosh, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Sarah McRoberts, and Tamara Peyton. 2016. YouthTube: Youth Video Authorship on YouTube and Vine. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '16. ACM Press, San Francisco, California, USA, 1421--1435. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819961
[84]
Lei Zhang, Feng Wang, and Jiangchuan Liu. [n.d.]. Understand Instant Video Clip Sharing on Mobile Platforms:Twitter's Vine as a Case Study. ([n. d.]), 6.
[85]
Chengyan Zhu, Xiaolin Xu, Wei Zhang, Jianmin Chen, and Richard Evans. 2019. How Health Communication viaTik Tok Makes a Difference: A Content Analysis of Tik Tok Accounts Run by Chinese Provincial Health Committees.International journal of environmental research and public health 17, 1 (2019), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010192 Place: Switzerland Publisher: MDPI AG.
[86]
Frederik J. Zuiderveen Borgesius, Damian Trilling, Judith Möller, Balázs Bodó, Claes H. de Vreese, and Natali Helberger. 2016. Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review 5, 1 (March 2016). https://doi.org/10.14763/2016.1.401
[87]
Diana Zulli and David James Zulli. 2020. Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform.New Media & Society(Dec. 2020), 1461444820983603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603 Publisher: SAGE Publications.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)TikTok en campañas políticas: estudio de caso de las elecciones regionales en Colombia, 2023Palabra Clave10.5294/pacla.2024.27.2.127:2(1-37)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
  • (2024)Emociones políticas y narrativas prototípicas: TikTok en las campañas políticas, estudio de casoRevista Latina de Comunicación Social10.4185/rlcs-2024-2234(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
  • (2024)A Machine Walks into an Exhibit: A Technical Analysis of Art CurationArts10.3390/arts1305013813:5(138)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic Resistance

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW2
      October 2021
      5376 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3493286
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 October 2021
      Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Honorable Mention

      Author Tags

      1. algorithm
      2. algorithmic identity
      3. algorithmic privilege
      4. algorithmic representational harm
      5. algorithmic resistance
      6. algorithmic symbolic annihilation
      7. co-production
      8. folk theories
      9. identity
      10. identity strainer theory
      11. marginalization
      12. marginalized identity
      13. social media

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2,658
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)377
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)TikTok en campañas políticas: estudio de caso de las elecciones regionales en Colombia, 2023Palabra Clave10.5294/pacla.2024.27.2.127:2(1-37)Online publication date: 14-May-2024
      • (2024)Emociones políticas y narrativas prototípicas: TikTok en las campañas políticas, estudio de casoRevista Latina de Comunicación Social10.4185/rlcs-2024-2234(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
      • (2024)A Machine Walks into an Exhibit: A Technical Analysis of Art CurationArts10.3390/arts1305013813:5(138)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Factors Influencing the Career Advancement of Malaysian Women Homepreneurs on the TikTok PlatformInformation Management and Business Review10.22610/imbr.v16i3S(I)a.418716:3S(I)a(991-998)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Mediated Sexual and Romantic Learning on TikTok: The Dating Wrapped TrendSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124127925510:3Online publication date: 17-Sep-2024
      • (2024)Women in STEM on TikTok: Advancing Visibility and Voice Through STEM Identity ExpressionSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124127467510:3Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
      • (2024)“Tell Me You Have ADHD Without Telling Me You Have ADHD”: Neurodivergent Identity Performance on TikTokSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124126926010:3Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
      • (2024)“There’s Always a Way to Get Around the Guidelines”: Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Content Moderation on TikTokSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124125437110:2Online publication date: 17-May-2024
      • (2024) “You Could Hear a Hair Pin Drop”: Queer Utopianism and Informal Knowledge Production in the Gaylor Closeting Conspiracy Theory Social Media + Society10.1177/2056305124124279710:2Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Bridging awareness and resistance: Using algorithmic knowledge against controversial contentBig Data & Society10.1177/2053951724129604611:4Online publication date: 10-Nov-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media