Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3485447.3512268acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Screenshots, Symbols, and Personal Thoughts: The Role of Instagram for Social Activism

Published: 25 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we highlight the use of Instagram for social activism, taking 2019 Hong Kong protests as a case study. Instagram focuses on image content and provides users with few features to share or repost, limiting information propagation. Nevertheless, users who are politically active offline also share their activism on Instagram. We first evaluate the effect of protests on social media activity for protesters and non-protesters over two significant protests. Protesters’ exposure to protest-related posts is much higher than non-protesters, and their network activity follows the protest schedule. They are also much more active on posts related to the protest that they participate in than the other protest. We then analyze the images posted by the users. Users predominantly use symbols related to protests and share personal thoughts on its primary actors. Users primarily share content to raise their network’s awareness, and the content choice is directly affected by Instagram’s intrinsic interaction modalities.

References

[1]
Nova Ahmed, Zareen Tasnim, and Jasmine Jones. 2019. Digital Silence and Liberating Stories: During a Student-Driven Movement. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, alt02.
[2]
Martin R Albrecht, Jorge Blasco, Rikke Bjerg Jensen, and Lenka Mareková. 2021. Collective Information Security in Large-Scale Urban Protests: the Case of Hong Kong. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.14869(2021).
[3]
Bloomberg.com. 2019. A Brief History of the Protests. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/hong-kong-protests-timeline/ Accessed:2010-09.
[4]
Yarimar Bonilla and Jonathan Rosa. 2015. #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist 42, 1 (2015), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12112
[5]
Enrique Bonsón, David Perea, and Michaela Bednárová. 2019. Twitter as a tool for citizen engagement: An empirical study of the Andalusian municipalities. Government information quarterly 36, 3 (2019), 480–489.
[6]
Enrique Bonsón and Melinda Ratkai. 2013. A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Information Review(2013).
[7]
Felix Brünker, Fabian Deitelhoff, and Milad Mirbabaie. 2019. Collective Identity Formation on Instagram–Investigating the Social Movement Fridays for Future.
[8]
Hsia-Ching Chang. 2010. A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: Diffusion of innovation theory. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47, 1 (2010), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701295
[9]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
[10]
Victor P. Cornet, Natalie K. Hall, Francesco Cafaro, and Erin L. Brady. 2017. How Image-Based Social Media Websites Support Social Movements. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2473–2479.
[11]
Rachel L Einwohner and Elle Rochford. 2019. After the March: Using Instagram to perform and sustain the Women’s March. In Sociological Forum, Vol. 34.
[12]
Ruben Enikolopov, Alexey Makarin, and Maria Petrova. 2017. Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Available at SSRN 2696236(2017).
[13]
Sheena Erete and Jennifer O Burrell. 2017. Empowered participation: How citizens use technology in local governance. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2307–2319.
[14]
Korina Giaxoglou. 2018. # JeSuisCharlie? Hashtags as narrative resources in contexts of ecstatic sharing. Discourse, context & media 22 (2018), 13–20.
[15]
Andrea Hamm, Yuya Shibuya, Stefan Ullrich, and Teresa Cerratto Cerratto Pargman. 2021. What Makes Civic Tech Initiatives To Last Over Time? Dissecting Two Global Cases. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17.
[16]
Ehsan Ul Haq, Tristan Braud, Young D Kwon, and Pan Hui. 2020. A survey on computational politics. IEEE Access 8(2020), 197379–197406.
[17]
Tad Hirsch and John Henry. 2005. TXTmob: text messaging for protest swarms. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1455–1458.
[18]
Yuheng Hu, Lydia Manikonda, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2014. What we instagram: A first analysis of instagram photo content and user types. In Eighth International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
[19]
Christoph Kastenholz. 2021. Council Post: Gen Z And The Rise Of Social Commerce. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2021/05/17/gen-z-and-the-rise-of-social-commerce/?sh=14dab2d5251d
[20]
Avril Keating and Gabriella Melis. 2017. Social media and youth political engagement: Preaching to the converted or providing a new voice for youth?The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, 4(2017), 877–894.
[21]
Yong Ming Kow, Bonnie Nardi, and Wai Kuen Cheng. 2020. Be Water: Technologies in the Leaderless Anti-ELAB Movement in Hong Kong. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[22]
Jennifer M Larson, Jonathan Nagler, Jonathan Ronen, and Joshua A Tucker. 2019. Social networks and protest participation: Evidence from 130 million Twitter users. American Journal of Political Science 63, 3 (2019), 690–705.
[23]
Carmen Lee and Dennis Chau. 2018. Language as pride, love, and hate: Archiving emotions through multilingual Instagram hashtags. Discourse, Context & Media 22 (2018), 21–29.
[24]
Francis L. F. Lee, Samson Yuen, Gary Tang, and Edmund W. Cheng. 2019. Hong Kong’s Summer of Uprising: From Anti-Extradition to Anti-Authoritarian Protests. China Review 19, 4 (2019), 1–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26838911
[25]
Yu-Hao Lee and Gary Hsieh. 2013. Does Slacktivism Hurt Activism? The Effects of Moral Balancing and Consistency in Online Activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 811–820.
[26]
Hanlin Li, Disha Bora, Sagar Salvi, and Erin Brady. 2018. Slacktivists or activists?: Identity work in the virtual disability march. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 225.
[27]
Tawseef Majeed and Ali Abushbak. 2020. The Role of Social Media in Mobilizing Crowd Protest–A Case Study of Palestinian Anger Against Israel’s Military Measures at Al-Aqsa Compound on Instagram. 40 (06 2020), 511–526.
[28]
David Matley. 2018. “Let’s see how many of you mother fuckers unfollow me for this”: The pragmatic function of the hashtag# sorrynotsorry in non-apologetic Instagram posts. Journal of Pragmatics 133 (2018), 66–78.
[29]
Sathappan Muthiah, Bert Huang, Jaime Arredondo, David Mares, Lise Getoor, Graham Katz, and Naren Ramakrishnan. 2015. Planned protest modeling in news and social media. In Twenty-Seventh IAAI Conference.
[30]
NewsAsia. 2019. Hong Kong protests: Key dates as peaceful rallies against extradition Bill turn to violent clashes. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/hong-kong-protest-timeline-extradition-bill-china-11676634
[31]
Yuki Ogawa, Kakuko Miyata, Hitoshi Yamamoto, and Ken’ichi Ikeda. 2013. Association Between Selective Exposure and Attitude on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 03(WI-IAT ’13). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2013.164
[32]
Sameer Patil and Apu Kapadia. 2012. Are You Exposed?: Conveying Information Exposure. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion(CSCW ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141575 event-place: Seattle, Washington, USA.
[33]
Hao Peng, Ceren Budak, and Daniel M Romero. 2019. Event-Driven Analysis of Crowd Dynamics in the Black Lives Matter Online Social Movement. In The World Wide Web Conference. ACM, 3137–3143.
[34]
Thomas Poell and JoséVan Dijck. 2015. Social media and activist communication. 527–537.
[35]
Haodi Qi, Hanyu Jiang, Wende Bu, Chengzi Zhang, and Kyong Jin Shim. 2019. Tracking Political Events in Social Media: A Case Study of Hong Kong Protests. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 6192–6194.
[36]
Naren Ramakrishnan, Patrick Butler, Sathappan Muthiah, Nathan Self, Rupinder Khandpur, Parang Saraf, Wei Wang, Jose Cadena, Anil Vullikanti, Gizem Korkmaz, 2014. ’Beating the news’ with EMBERS: forecasting civil unrest using open source indicators. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1799–1808.
[37]
Suhas Ranganath, Fred Morstatter, Xia Hu, Jiliang Tang, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2016. Predicting online protest participation of social media users. In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[38]
M. Rovisco. 2016. A new‘Europe from below’? Cosmopolitan citizenship, digital media and the indignados social movement. Comparative European Politics 14 (2016), 435–457.
[39]
SCMP. 2018. What social media platforms dominate Hong Kong?https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/community/article/2142652/what-social-media-platforms-run-hong-kong-and-what-are
[40]
Noam Segev, Noam Avigdor, and Eytan Avigdor. 2018. Measuring Influence on Instagram: A Network-Oblivious Approach. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1009–1012. event-place: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
[41]
Kjerstin Thorson, Kelley Cotter, Mel Medeiros, and Chankyung Pak. 2021. Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society 24, 2 (2021), 183–200.
[42]
Martino Trevisan, Luca Vassio, Idilio Drago, Marco Mellia, Fabricio Murai, Flavio Figueiredo, Ana Paula Couto da Silva, and Jussara M Almeida. 2019. Towards Understanding Political Interactions on Instagram. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.11719(2019).
[43]
Min-Hsuan Tsai, Charu Aggarwal, and Thomas Huang. 2014. Ranking in heterogeneous social media. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 613–622.
[44]
Oren Tsur and Ari Rappoport. 2012. What’s in a Hashtag?: Content Based Prediction of the Spread of Ideas in Microblogging Communities. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining(WSDM ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 643–652. event-place: Seattle, Washington, USA.
[45]
Zeynep Tufekci and Christopher Wilson. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of communication 62, 2 (2012), 363–379.
[46]
Ehsan ul Haq, Tristan Braud, Young D Kwon, and Pan Hui. 2020. Enemy at the Gate: Evolution of Twitter User’s Polarization During National Crisis. In 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 212–216.
[47]
Volker Wulf, Konstantin Aal, Ibrahim Abu Kteish, Meryem Atam, Kai Schubert, Markus Rohde, George P Yerousis, and David Randall. 2013. Fighting against the wall: social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
[48]
Volker Wulf, Kaoru Misaki, Meryem Atam, David Randall, and Markus Rohde. 2013. ’On the ground’in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the tunisian revolution. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 1409–1418.
[49]
Jian Xiao and Isabel Fangyi Lu. 2021. Art as intervention: Protests on urban transformation in China and Australia. Journal of Urban Affairs(2021), 1–20.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)#BlackatCMO: Challenging charter schools through youth Instagram counterstoriesEducation, Citizenship and Social Justice10.1177/17461979231206941Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
  • (2022)#JusticeforGeorgeFloyd: How Instagram facilitated the 2020 Black Lives Matter protestsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.027786417:12(e0277864)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2022
  • (2022)Exploring Mental Health Communications among Instagram CoachesProceedings of the 2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068611(218-225)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2022

Index Terms

  1. Screenshots, Symbols, and Personal Thoughts: The Role of Instagram for Social Activism
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022
        April 2022
        3764 pages
        ISBN:9781450390965
        DOI:10.1145/3485447
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 25 April 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Instagram
        2. Online Social Network
        3. Protest
        4. Social Activism

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        WWW '22
        Sponsor:
        WWW '22: The ACM Web Conference 2022
        April 25 - 29, 2022
        Virtual Event, Lyon, France

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)306
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
        Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2023)#BlackatCMO: Challenging charter schools through youth Instagram counterstoriesEducation, Citizenship and Social Justice10.1177/17461979231206941Online publication date: 4-Dec-2023
        • (2022)#JusticeforGeorgeFloyd: How Instagram facilitated the 2020 Black Lives Matter protestsPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.027786417:12(e0277864)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2022
        • (2022)Exploring Mental Health Communications among Instagram CoachesProceedings of the 2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068611(218-225)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2022

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media