Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3501712.3535285acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Young Children’s Perceptions of Coding and Implications

Published: 27 June 2022 Publication History

Abstract

To inform the design of personally meaningful computational learning experiences for young people, it is necessary to investigate children’s perceptions of coding, such that new learning experience designs can better leverage their funds of knowledge. We conducted focus groups with 20 young children in two coding workshops to learn their perceptions of coding. The young participants mainly form their perceptions of coding based on past coding- and computer-related experiences and typically associate coding with controlling the computer, creating projects, expressing ideas, playing video games, and the language for communicating with the computer. Importantly, young children might not know the right strategies to debug code but try practices like restarting the device and deleting the whole code. Based on the findings, we highlight the pedagogical implications to design productive computational learning experiences for young people.

References

[1]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[2]
Deborah A Fields, Yasmin B Kafai, Tomoko Nakajima, and Joanna Goode. 2017. Teaching Practices for Making E-Textiles in High School Computing Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education(FabLearn ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141798.3141804
[3]
Rita Francese, Carmine Gravino, Michele Risi, Giuseppe Scanniello, and Genoveffa Tortora. 2015. Using Project-Based-Learning in a mobile application development course-An experience report. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 31 (2015), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2015.10.019
[4]
Gayithri Jayathirtha and Yasmin B Kafai. 2020. Interactive Stitch Sampler: A Synthesis of a Decade of Research on Using Electronic Textiles to Answer the Who, Where, How, and What for K–12 Computer Science Education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 20, 4 (oct 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3418299
[5]
Xiaosong Li and Christine Prasad. 2005. Effectively teaching coding standards in programming. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology education (SIGITE ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Newark, New Jersey, USA, 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1145/1095714.1095770
[6]
James Lockwood and Aidan Mooney. 2018. Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it fit?International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools 2, 1(2018), 1–58.
[7]
Caitlin K Martin, Nichole Pinkard, Sheena Erete, and Jim Sandherr. 2016. Connections at the family level: Supporting parents and caring adults to engage youth in learning about computers and technology. In Moving Students of Color from Consumers to Producers of Technology. IGI Global, 220–244. https://doi.org/0.4018/978-1-5225-2005-4.ch011
[8]
Pekka Mertala. 2019. Young children’s conceptions of computers, code, and the Internet. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 19 (2019), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.11.003
[9]
Luis C Moll, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice 31, 2 (mar 1992), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
[10]
Michael T. Rücker and Niels Pinkwart. 2016. Review and Discussion of Children’s Conceptions of Computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 2 (2016), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9592-2
[11]
Ronny Scherer, Fazilat Siddiq, and Bárbara Sánchez Viveros. 2020. A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions. Computers in Human Behavior 109, 0318 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106349
[12]
Robert Sheehan. 2003. Children’s perception of computer programming as an aid to designing programming environments. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Preston, UK, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/953536.953548
[13]
Mike Van Duuren, Barbara Dossett, and Dawn Robinson. 1998. Gauging Children’s Understanding of Artificially Intelligent Objects: A Presentation of ”Counterfactuals”. International Journal of Behavioral Development 22, 4(1998), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502598384207
[14]
Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational Thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (2006), 33–35.
[15]
Junnan Yu and Ricarose Roque. 2018. A Survey of Computational Kits for Young Children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18). ACM, Trondheim, Norway, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202738
[16]
Junnan Yu and Ricarose Roque. 2019. A review of computational toys and kits for young children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 21 (2019), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.04.001

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Study of Coding Learning Amongst Children: Motivation and Learning Performance2023 6th International Conference on Engineering Technology and its Applications (IICETA)10.1109/IICETA57613.2023.10351439(39-44)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '22: Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
June 2022
718 pages
ISBN:9781450391979
DOI:10.1145/3501712
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 June 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Design Implications
  2. Focus Groups
  3. Perceptions of Coding
  4. Young Children

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IDC '22
Sponsor:
IDC '22: Interaction Design and Children
June 27 - 30, 2022
Braga, Portugal

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)A Study of Coding Learning Amongst Children: Motivation and Learning Performance2023 6th International Conference on Engineering Technology and its Applications (IICETA)10.1109/IICETA57613.2023.10351439(39-44)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media