Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3511047.3536410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Following the Trail of Fake News Spreaders in Social Media: A Deep Learning Model

Published: 04 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Even though the Internet and social media are usually safe and enjoyable, communication through social media also bears risks. For more than ten years, there have been concerns regarding the manipulation of public opinion through the social Web. In particular, misinformation spreading has proven effective in influencing people, their beliefs and behaviors, from swaying opinions on elections to having direct consequences on health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most techniques in the literature focus on identifying the individual pieces of misinformation or fake news based on a set of stylistic, content-derived features, user profiles or sharing statistics. Recently, those methods have been extended to identify spreaders. However, they are not enough to effectively detect either fake content or the users spreading it. In this context, this paper presents an initial proof of concept of a deep learning model for identifying fake news spreaders in social media, focusing not only on the characteristics of the shared content but also on user interactions and the resulting content propagation tree structures. Although preliminary, an experimental evaluation over COVID-related data showed promising results, significantly outperforming other alternatives in the literature.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (umap_spreaders_yt.mp4)
Presentation video for: ?Following the trail of fake news spreaders in social media: A deep learning model? In this paper, we present an initial proof of concept of a deep learning model for identifying fake news spreaders in social media. Our model includes not only features derived from the shared content, but also the content propagation trees and user community interactions. To support our proposal, we conducted a preliminary evaluation over a COVID-19 misinformation data collection. Results showed that the proposed model can effectively identify fake news spreaders when compared to traditional and state-of-the-art baselines.

References

[1]
Davide Chicco and Giuseppe Jurman. 2020. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC genomics 21, 1 (2020), 1–13.
[2]
Thomas Davidson, Debasmita Bhattacharya, and Ingmar Weber. 2019. Racial bias in hate speech and abusive language detection datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.12516(2019).
[3]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805(2018).
[4]
Bilal Ghanem, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, and Paolo Rosso. 2020. FacTweet: profiling fake news twitter accounts. In International Conference on Statistical Language and Speech Processing. Springer, 35–45.
[5]
Anastasia Giachanou, Bilal Ghanem, Esteban A Ríssola, Paolo Rosso, Fabio Crestani, and Daniel Oberski. 2022. The impact of psycholinguistic patterns in discriminating between fake news spreaders and fact checkers. Data & Knowledge Engineering 138 (2022), 101960.
[6]
Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 855–864.
[7]
Bohan Jiang, Mansooreh Karami, Lu Cheng, Tyler Black, and Huan Liu. 2021. Mechanisms and Attributes of Echo Chambers in Social Media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05401(2021).
[8]
Mansooreh Karami, Tahora H Nazer, and Huan Liu. 2021. Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Social Media through Psychological and Motivational Factors. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. 225–230.
[9]
Jisu Kim, Jihwan Aum, SangEun Lee, Yeonju Jang, Eunil Park, and Daejin Choi. 2021. FibVID: Comprehensive fake news diffusion dataset during the COVID-19 period. Telematics and Informatics 64 (2021), 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101688
[10]
Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net.
[11]
Yang Liu and Yi-Fang Wu. 2018. Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 32.
[12]
Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Zhongyu Wei, Yueming Lu, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2015. Detect rumors using time series of social context information on microblogging websites. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. 1751–1754.
[13]
Jing Ma, Wei Gao, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2017. Detect Rumors in Microblog Posts Using Propagation Structure via Kernel Learning. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, 708–717. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1066
[14]
Federico Monti, Fabrizio Frasca, Davide Eynard, Damon Mannion, and Michael M Bronstein. 2019. Fake news detection on social media using geometric deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06673(2019).
[15]
Yair Neuman and Yochai Cohen. 2014. A vectorial semantics approach to personality assessment. Scientific reports 4, 1 (2014), 1–6.
[16]
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). 1532–1543.
[17]
Francesco Pierri, Carlo Piccardi, and Stefano Ceri. 2020. A multi-layer approach to disinformation detection in US and Italian news spreading on Twitter. EPJ Data Science 9, 1 (2020), 35.
[18]
Bhavtosh Rath, Aadesh Salecha, and Jaideep Srivastava. 2020. Detecting fake news spreaders in social networks using inductive representation learning. In 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 182–189.
[19]
Lorenzo Rosasco, Ernesto De Vito, Andrea Caponnetto, Michele Piana, and Alessandro Verri. 2004. Are loss functions all the same?Neural computation 16, 5 (2004), 1063–1076.
[20]
Giuseppe Sansonetti, Fabio Gasparetti, Giuseppe D’aniello, and Alessandro Micarelli. 2020. Unreliable users detection in social media: Deep learning techniques for automatic detection. IEEE Access 8(2020), 213154–213167.
[21]
Karishma Sharma, Feng Qian, He Jiang, Natali Ruchansky, Ming Zhang, and Yan Liu. 2019. Combating fake news: A survey on identification and mitigation techniques. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 10, 3(2019), 1–42.
[22]
Shakshi Sharma and Rajesh Sharma. 2021. Identifying possible rumor spreaders on twitter: A weak supervised learning approach. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1–8.
[23]
Anu Shrestha and Francesca Spezzano. 2021. Characterizing and predicting fake news spreaders in social networks. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics (2021), 1–14.
[24]
Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter 19, 1 (2017), 22–36.
[25]
Kai Shu, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2019. Beyond news contents: The role of social context for fake news detection. In Proceedings of the twelfth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. 312–320.
[26]
Jiliang Tang, Yi Chang, and Huan Liu. 2014. Mining social media with social theories: a survey. ACM Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter 15, 2 (2014), 20–29.
[27]
Bao Tran Truong, Oliver Melbourne Allen, and Filippo Menczer. 2022. News Sharing Networks Expose Information Polluters on Social Media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00094(2022).
[28]
Jingzhao Zhang, Tianxing He, Suvrit Sra, and Ali Jadbabaie. 2020. Why Gradient Clipping Accelerates Training: A Theoretical Justification for Adaptivity. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=BJgnXpVYwS

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Understanding the Contribution of Recommendation Algorithms on Misinformation Recommendation and Misinformation Dissemination on Social NetworksACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/361608817:4(1-26)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2022
409 pages
ISBN:9781450392327
DOI:10.1145/3511047
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 July 2022

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Fake News
  2. Fake News Spreaders
  3. Social Media
  4. User Profiling

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

UMAP '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Understanding the Contribution of Recommendation Algorithms on Misinformation Recommendation and Misinformation Dissemination on Social NetworksACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/361608817:4(1-26)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media